North claims the Presbyterian Church USA went liberal as a result of the conservatives’ refusal to support abolitionism.

See, Petr, I’ve been telling you for months not to take him so seriously. I guess you are starting to see why.

After all, North was familiar with the classic work of Fustel de Coulanges (often cited by Rushdoony) that described in detail how ancient Greco-Roman peoples began to literally worship their own forefathers as gods (Manes, Lares, Penates):

http://www.archive.org/details/ancientcityastu03coulgoog

Coulanges provided North plenty of ammunition for his claim that an un-Christian family is at least as big a threat to the faith as an un-Christian state.

(Already once in church history this pagan worship of dead people managed to seriously seduce Christians into false paths; for the cult of the saints arose in post-Constantinian era as a functional successor to the cult of Manes and Lares, the saints becoming tutelary local deities in their stead.)

http://www.americanfundamentalists.com/cast/north_g.html

“Furthermore, there is that other great, intolerable evil of the New England Puritans: the Puritans took land away from the “native Americans.” You know, the Indians. (Liberals have adopted the phrase “native Americans” in recent years. They never, ever say “American natives,” since this is only one step away from “American savages,” which is precisely what most of those demon-worshipping, Negro slave-holding, frequently land-polluting people were…. This was one of the great sins in American life, they say: “the stealing of Indian lands”…. That a million savages had a legitimate legal claim on the whole of North America north of Mexico is the unstated assumption of such critics. They never ask the question: From whom did the Indians of early colonial America get the land? They also never ask the even more pertinent question: Was the advent of the European in North America a righteous historical judgment of God against the Indians? On the contrary, our three authors [Noll, Hatch, Marsden] ridicule the Puritans for having suggested that the Indians were the moral and covenantal equivalent of the Canaanites (p. 33). In fact, if ever a continent of covenant-breakers deserved this attribution, the “native Americans” did. (ibid)”

http://lewrockwell.com/north/north1040.html

“The present-oriented nations in the south of Europe, plus Ireland, ran up huge debts, while the bankers in the north bought the IOUs. Bankers pretended that the temporal perspective of the North – future-oriented – also governed the time perspective of the South: “Let’s party! It’s sunshine forever around here.”

They have known for approximately 500 years that, with the brief exceptions of a handful of northern Italian city-states in the 14th through 16th centuries, the southern outlook was fundamentally different from the north. It was analogous to the time perspectives dividing Canada and the United States from the nations south of the Rio Grande. The operational phrase in the South was “stiff the gringos!” Gringo investors have never caught on.”

Listen carefully…

Can you hear it?

That’s the sound of satire whizzing over your head.

Back in serious mode:
This blog is by far the BEST collection of racialist writings I have ever encountered in any medium. This article will be an excellent tool for me to use in the fight against ignorance, and I sincerely thank the author. Best wishes to all involved in the production of this website.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/05/confessions-of-a-former-racist/#comments

Gary North’s anti-Kinism is not motivated by leftist collectivism (which he has fought against his whole life) but by libertarian individualism – the opposites meet each other!

http://www.cfnews.org/rand.htm

“Ayn Rand, Author of Atlas Shrugged,
says Parenthood is a horror,
and “the worship of the family is racism.”"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4JWE7mp8nI&feature=player_embedded