We saw various news weasels ask: Is Iowa too white for the country’s first presidential caucus? Do you ever hear them ask if Detroit is too black for civilization?

Horrifying news: Ron Paul was going to appear on the Political Cesspool in 2006! We’ve called out the National Guard and will meet this threat to liberty with steel eyes and frosted mullets.

Followers of Ron Paul are being called “non-cons.” I have to admit, it’s a catchy rhyme.

The old Ron Paul newsletters are fun to read. Our second-place winner in the New Hampshire primary (but first-place winner among young voters) was like a blogger before there were blogs. Some excerpts:

More excerpts and timeless advice from the newsletters:

Do your very best to keep your family away from inner cities.

I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming.

Washington, with its racist government, racist radio, racist ministers, racist universities, and racist attitudes, is the black New Jerusalem.

To be white in Washington is to experience a culture that is anti-white and proud of it.

I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in [Washington] are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.

Our country is being destroyed by a group of actual and potential terrorists – and they can be identified by the color of their skin.

Order was only restored in Los Angeles [after the riots] when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks.

Opinion polls consistently show that only 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions…

Middle-class blacks and black political activists hold opinions not markedly different from the Crips and the Bloods.

Constitutionally and from the standpoint of our natural rights, we should be able to discriminate in renting or otherwise using our property – sexually, racially, religiously, ethnically, or just because we don’t like the person’s face.

Blacks have black schools, clubs, and neighborhoods. The same is true of Hispanics. It is human nature that like attracts likes. But whites are not allowed to express this same human impulse. Except in a de facto sense, there can be no white schools, white clubs, or white neighborhoods. The political system demands white integration, while allowing black segregation.

Blacks have “civil rights,” quotas, mandated hiring preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black TV shows, black TV anchors, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.

The black leadership indoctrinates its followers with phony history and phony theory to bolster its claims of victimology.

Even [MLK's] ballyhooed “non-violence” was a tactic. He wanted to take power like Castro did.

…our rotten liberal culture, which admonishes whites faced with raging blacks to lie back and think of England.

“Black is Beautiful” is permissible, but “White is Beautiful” is “the slogan of bigots.” Oh?

The ACT-UP slogan is “Silence = Death.” But shouldn’t it be “SODOMY = Death”?

If you think that’s shocking, just wait until you read this:

“The race question,” said Adolf Hitler, “not only furnishes the key to world history but also to human culture as a whole. There is absolutely no other revolution but a racial revolution…”

To the enlightened and civilized, all of that sounded like gobbledygook. According to sophisticated books, the term “race” had little if any scientific status. There was no evidence that any “race” was superior to another. We were all part of “mankind,” though divided somewhat arbitrarily into “nation-states.” Our rational destiny was some sort of Parliament of Man.

Only it turns out that Hitler was, politically viewed, very nearly right. Race, or more antiseptically “ethnicity,” emerges as the critical factor in twentieth-century political behavior, with religion – another atavistic category, from the enlightened standpoint – running a close second. And, often, race and religion are intertwined, reinforcing one another.

These reflections are prompted by the deteriorating situation in South Africa, where race is the determinant, and by the fatuous things being said about South Africa in so many quarters…

You could argue that the present government in Pretoria is in fact, by most accepted criteria, the best on the continent of Africa. Blacks in large numbers are willingly emigrating to South Africa. No Berlin Wall keeps people from leaving South Africa if they want to do so. But, because of the factor of race, it is South Africa – not Uganda, not Mozambique – that is denounced by Mr. Reagan and even the Pope. Any tyranny, any caste system – even Cambodia’s or North Korea’s – is apparently more acceptable to our moral custodians than the South African racially based system.

So, that’s the way it is. In India, in Latin America, in Asia, race or “ethnicity” is the determining political category. Hitler seems to have won his debased argument…

[R]ace governs all.

The only problem is that this quote didn’t come from Ron Paul. James Edwards writes that it came from an editorial in the September 6, 1985, edition of National Review, “which was the voice of American conservatism in the 1980s. The editorial was published with the full approval of William F. Buckley; it’s very likely he wrote it himself.”

Could we get all the people denouncing Ron Paul as a racist to do the same to Buckley?

Ron Paul says repeatedly that he didn’t personally write the newsletters he published, but no one believes that he didn’t at least approve what was written, since it went out with his signature. Others are saying that there are only a few paragraphs that are offensive to leftists (not true), and he should be excused for overlooking them. Of course, his fellow congressmen pass bills that are thousands of pages long and don’t read a single word of them. But while leftists like to use the right-wing stuff in their scare campaigns, Paul’s economic proposals are what really scare them, because they know that he has a good chance of succeeding. A Jew York Times editorial gets right to the point: “Ron Paul long ago disqualified himself for the presidency by peddling claptrap proposals like abolishing the Federal Reserve, returning to the gold standard, cutting a third of the federal budget and all foreign aid and opposing the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” That last part is thrown in only to saddle racism to the rest of it. The message: Only a racist would want to take away a Jew’s livelihood!

John C. Calhoun, the last of our founding fathers, wrote the following in his monumental Disquisition on Government:

[I]t is a great and dangerous error to suppose that all people are equally entitled to liberty. It is a reward to be earned, not a blessing to be gratuitously lavished on all alike…not a boon to be bestowed on a people too ignorant, degraded and vicious, to be capable either of appreciating or of enjoying it… Liberty, then, when forced on a people unfit for it, would, instead of a blessing, be a curse; as it would, in its reaction, lead directly to anarchy,—the greatest of all curses…

These great and dangerous errors have their origin in the prevalent opinion that all men are born free and equal;—than which nothing can be more unfounded and false. It rests upon the assumption of a fact, which is contrary to universal observation, in whatever light it may be regarded. It is, indeed, difficult to explain how an opinion so destitute of all sound reason, ever could have been so extensively entertained, unless we regard it as being confounded with another, which has some semblance of truth;—but which, when properly understood, is not less false and dangerous. I refer to the assertion, that all men are equal in the state of nature; meaning, by a state of nature, a state of individuality, supposed to have existed prior to the social and political state; and in which men lived apart and independent of each other. If such a state ever did exist, all men would have been, indeed, free and equal in it; that is, free to do as they pleased, and exempt from the authority or control of others—as, by supposition, it existed anterior to society and government. But such a state is purely hypothetical. It never did, nor can exist; as it is inconsistent with the preservation and perpetuation of the race. It is, therefore, a great misnomer to call it the state of nature. Instead of being the natural state of man, it is, of all conceivable states, the most opposed to his nature—most repugnant to his feelings, and most incompatible with his wants. His natural state is, the social and political—the one for which his Creator made him, and the only one in which he can preserve and protect his race.

This goes straight to the heart of why libertarianism doesn’t work, and it is Ron Paul’s biggest problem. Dr. Paul gets a grade of F from NumbersUSA because his libertarianism gets in the way of preserving and protecting his race. The irony is that libertarians appeal to liberty. As Father Calhoun said, liberty becomes a curse when it is bestowed on a people unfit for it. This is straight out of the Bible.

“For three things the earth is perturbed, yes, for four it cannot bear up: For a servant when he reigns…” ~ Proverbs 30:21-22

A Servant When He Reigneth, by Rudyard Kipling:

Three things make earth unquiet
And four she cannot brook,
The godly Agur counted them
And put them in a book –
Those Four Tremendous Curses
With which mankind is cursed;
But a Servant when He Reigneth
Old Agur entered first.

An Handmaid that is Mistress
We need not call upon.
A Fool when he is full of Meat
Will fall asleep anon.
An Odious Woman Married
May bear a babe and mend;
But a Servant when He Reigneth
Is Confusion to the end.

His feet are swift to tumult,
His hands are slow to toil,
His ears are deaf to reason,
His lips are loud in broil.
He knows no use for power
Except to show his might.
He gives no heed to judgment
Unless it proves him right.

Because he served a master
Before his Kingship came,
And hid in all disaster
Behind his master’s name,
So, when his Folly opens
The unnecessary hells,
A Servant when He Reigneth
Throws the blame on someone else.

His vows are lightly spoken,
His faith is hard to bind,
His trust is easy broken,
He fears his fellow-kind.
The nearest mob will move him
To break the pledge he gave –
Oh, a Servant when he Reigneth
Is more than ever slave!

On his January 9 show, Rush Limbaugh made these “racist” but true remarks:

“I believe that whatever drives Obama and his party is the pursuit of money without having to work for it… If you look at the way the Obamas live, with Michelle and her separate vacations and not being concerned about how much it costs to take separate airplanes – an opportunity to live high on the hog without having it cost them a dime. They justify it by saying, well we deserve this, we’re owed this because of whatever happened to our ancestors.”

‎”Organized envy usually crystallizes into egalitarian norms whose origin is found not in custom but in government. This is a kind of uniformity from above: egalitarianism through coercion, either ideological, economic or social. These three facets are complementary, and Marxist-Leninist doctrine proclaims a utopia based on this triple equalization: that all think alike (ideological), that all belong to this one class only (economic), and that all share a similar patrimony (ethnic). Ideological egalitarianism requires a supreme definitory urging, an education, the means of communication to the masses that are centralized and directed, and an implacable censure for whatever is not the official ideology. This in short is cultural dictatorship, the ultimate weapon of egalitarianism. The envious find within this system a firm protection against originality, against free intellectual exchange, and against noetic superiority. Power alone is allowed to think; the rest can only be simple reformulators or applicators shaped by the same mold. To distinguish oneself is to fall into heterodoxy. For this reason, any thinker worthy of the name has been labeled within Marxism as ‘deviationist.’ Even within democracies there are certain dogmas that allow the labeling of those who disagree as ‘maladjusted.’ The envy of the intellectually mediocre establishes a canon so that it may denounce and condemn the independent thinker. The unity of the envious imposes an ‘orthodoxy’ that not only frees them from the effort to create and makes it easy to overlook the absence of creativity, but forces those who were formerly privileged and envied to an agreement, so that they may come to a pronouncement like the following: ‘Do not envy me; I am not different. I am equal to you, I believe your catechism to be true, and I condemn to moral exile all those that are not members of this club.’ In this manner, ‘the privileged’ have apologized for being outstanding and have promised to change their ways. This ruse neutralizes the envy of the establishment and allows free access to the communication media and to the budgets. ‘Either the syndicate of orthodoxy or the ghetto’ constitutes the dilemma that summarizes the tactic of the most refined manifestation of collective envy.” ~ Gonzalo Fernandez de la Mora, Egalitarian Envy, p. 97

“Men remain feeling guilty, for a false sense of guilt has no cure save the truth, and this is not forthcoming. Since the citizens are now guilt-ridden because of their education and political indoctrination, they are more amenable to robbery, and even murder. If the white man feels guilty towards the Negro, he is less capable of defending himself against the Negroes who turn into a revolutionary rabble, bent on theft and murder. The state finds it easier to rob men when men feel guilty for what they are and have, and the state drones on and on about the needs of the poor of the nation and of the world.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, The Politics of Guilt and Pity, p. 46

You can see that diversity is always a means to an end, namely uniformity and then control. The more you hear a person talk about the need for diversity, the more you can be certain that the goal is to end it.

Consider the drive for “unity” in Europe. European kleptocrats thought that the introduction of the euro and the erasing of borders would overturn God’s design for nations divided along lines of religion and ethnicity. Ten years after the pomp that heralded “a new era in Europe,” Europeans are wondering when they will awake from the nightmare.

The European Union was built on the myth that we are one people with one common destiny – an “ever closer union,” in the words of the 1957 Treaty of Rome that founded what was then called the European Economic Community. We are now discovering that regional and national differences are not dissolving and that Europeans think and act very differently from one another. The British view of the state’s role is very different from the French view. The Greek or Italian concept of law is very different from that of Sweden or Denmark. Latvians have a very different view of Russia from Germans. What an Irishman is prepared to pay in taxes is very different from what a Dane or Belgian will allow…

[W]e have succeeded in building a European Union without Europeans.

They have exploited very real similarities that exist among Europeans in order to erase the differences, thereby giving them maximum control. They have also exploited envy, which is the fuel for their fire. It’s classical Marxism, and as de la Mora writes, its aim is ideological, economic, and ethnic uniformity. But it’s not working.

The faggot who writes the article is asked by one of his students, “What is a European?”

I found myself stuttering and stammering as I searched for an answer. I waffled for a bit about European values – freedom, democracy, human rights, the rule of law – but didn’t convince myself, let alone the class.

“European fundamental values are sacred,” Jan Peter Balkenende, then Dutch prime minister, said in 2004. When it came to actually defining those values, however, he was fuzzier, admitting, “We have been discussing the idea of Europe for the last 1,200 years, but we cannot grasp what it means.”

These are the same propositionalists who have run America into the ground since the time of Lincoln. They are nameless, faceless, and fatherless; wheels in a cog of false patriotism, squirrels in a cage of self-loathing. Is anything more pitiful than the man who doesn’t know his own identity? Yet this is the state of most white men alive today, which is why our race is dying. But it was not always so. The Dutch Prime Minister might not know how to define Europe, but our European ancestors suffered no confusion about their own identity, in part because they never considered the patria to be an “idea.” Like flesh and blood, it was real, and it was cherished because it belonged to them. Remember the ancient Greek aphorism? “Know thyself.” It was inscribed on the temple of Apollo at Delphi. How to get there has been the foremost question on the minds of white men for our entire history. John Calvin explained on page one of his magnum opus the paradox that without knowledge of self there is no knowledge of God, and without knowledge of God there is no knowledge of self, and that one can never attain to a true self-knowledge until he has first been known of God. This fundamental truth is suppressed by reprobates, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson in his poem, Gnothi Seauton.

The law, the gospel, and the Providence,
Heaven, Hell, the Judgement, and the stores
Immeasurable of Truth and Good,
All these thou must find
Within thy single mind,
Or never find.

“Every group regarding itself as emancipated is convinced that its predecessors were fearful of reality. It looks upon euphemisms and all the veils of decency with which things were previously draped as obstructions which it, with superior wisdom and praiseworthy courage, will now strip away. Imagination and indirection it identifies with obscurantism; the mediate is an enemy to freedom. One can see this in even a brief lapse of time; how the man of today looks with derision upon the prohibitions of the 1890′s and supposes that the violation of them has been without penalty!” ~ Richard M. Weaver

Propositionalists like to write inane things like “American values are clearly and succinctly defined in the Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution,” which implies that Americans had no values prior to those documents being written, or that the sum total of our “values” (gad, I hate that word) are to be found on a few sheets of paper under glass in Washington City. They like to pretend that the universe sprang into being during the Enlightenment, which is another way of saying that the Mind is God, and all light and life emanate from it like shit from a goose’s sphincter. They don’t know themselves because they hate God.

In Europe, as in the West at large, they know that to forge a new, artificial unity they must shatter the old, organic unity, which was pluriform rather than uniform. To do this, lip service must be paid to diversity, even though its existence is contrary to the proposed new uniformity.

The EU prides itself on its differences, even as it tries to legislate them out of existence. Its motto is “united in diversity,” and few places on Earth have such a glorious mishmash of cultures, languages, landscapes, and peoples coexisting in such a small area. Diversity doesn’t equal tolerance, however, and the existence of differences doesn’t mean acceptance of them – a fact that has come glaringly to the fore as Europe has slipped deeper into crisis and relationships have strained among its members…

At the Congress of Europe in 1948, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill famously said, “We hope to see a Europe where men of every country will think of being a European as of belonging to their native land, and…wherever they go in this wide domain…will truly feel, ‘Here I am at home.’”

Some hope… Instead of borders being erased – the aim of the agreement Western European countries signed in Schengen, Luxembourg, in 1985 – they seem to be coming back into fashion.

We Kinists can easily see the problem here. We know that we are bound to Europe and to our European people, even if not joined to them under the same government. It is because we have a balanced racial awareness that we seek the good of our own kind but abstain from centralizing authority. It is our fear of God that compels us to love our neighbor according to God’s own law and order. But all who hate God love death.

Notice also the lament that the new “Generation E” continues to identify with “nation-states” rather than “Europe.” In both cases, the reference is to geopolitical bodies, governments, rather than distinct ethnic brothers and sisters who are bound in covenant, not to mention the mystic chords of memory. Like deracinated, Alienist preachers, the one-worlders refuse to accept that blood means anything. They insist that we must pledge our allegiance to an “idea,” when in fact we are merely the subjects of the kleptocrats, not citizens in any real sense of the word. Therefore, they will not hear of devotion to a people and patriotism in a real patria. Instead, they see only an obsolete loyalty to a “nation-state.”

As Chris Patten, former European commissioner for external affairs, has said, “The nation is alive and well – more potent than ever in some respects… It is the largest unit, perhaps, to which people will willingly accord emotional allegiance.” In fact, even the nation-state is too much for many Europeans. Europe has 16 more countries today than it had in 1988, thanks to the shattering of artificial states – the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia. In Belgium, a country smaller than Maryland, there is such a vicious division between Flanders and Wallonia that until December there had been no government for well over 500 days – a world record.

Obviously, the EU is every bit as artificial and will be as short-lived as the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia. The American Empire will join them on the dung heap of history.

It was believed that by giving all Europeans a common currency, the people would develop a common identity, which would allow the kleptocrats to achieve their real goal: convincing Europe’s sons and daughters to offer up their lives in “defense” of “Europe,” meaning the machinations of the European government. This has met with success in America, where the rulers freely tax from sea to shining sea and use the money to enrich themselves and prop up Israel, and the good-ole-boys fly the flag of the accursed empire from their pickup trucks and sign up to become fodder for Israel. Europe wants in on the act. After all, the same bankers are behind both enterprises.

But the structure of the New World Order is collapsing.

The European Union has constructed common institutions, laws, and even a currency. It has created all the symbols of a nation-state, including a burgundy passport that places “European Union” above one’s own nationality, and a flag, even if it is only voluntarily waved at the Ryder Cup golf championships. It even has an anthem: Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy,” though it doesn’t have lyrics and most Europeans don’t know it is their anthem. What it lacks is a people who share a common culture, language, or narrative – or at the very least are able to identify with the political construct that has been created in their name.

The European government can’t be voted out, and one state doesn’t trust another state to protect its best interests.

The EU has responded to this wave of euroskepticism by asking for more powers to govern states’ political and economic affairs…

Yeah, we know all about that. Hint: The empire doesn’t release power once it has been taken, and the excuse for taking it is always the same: security.

Rather than bringing the European Union closer to its citizens, the currency has widened the gap between rulers and ruled. Instead of ushering in a new era of prosperity, the euro has condemned millions of Europeans to decades of penury. And far from bringing together the peoples of Europe, it is on the verge of tearing them apart.

We two have paddled in the stream,
from morning sun till dine;
But seas between us broad have roared
since auld lang syne.

The difference between the Old West and the New West is that the Old Westerners loved themselves and their culture and wanted their heritage to continue. As Jared Taylor writes, “White Americans believed race was a fundamental aspect of individual and group identity. They believed people of different races differed in temperament, ability, and the kind of societies they built. They wanted America to be peopled by Europeans, and thought only people of European stock could maintain the civilization they valued. They therefore considered immigration of non-whites a threat to whites and to their civilization. It was common to regard the presence of non-whites as a burden, and to argue that if they could not be removed from the country they should be separated from whites socially and politically. Whites were strongly opposed to miscegenation, which they called ‘amalgamation.’” We will not survive unless we return to this self-love and common sense, and above all, gratitude to God for His gifts.

If you want to see a fine example of a nation that loves itself, rent Russian Ark from Netflix: one film, one single take, one continuous shot, 2000 actors, 300 years of Russian history, and a milestone in the history of cinema.

At the end of the film the camera moves towards a door, and as it opens we see that outside is a wild, raging sea, and the narrator understands, movingly, that the museum – and I think Russia herself – is actually an ark, eternally tossed about in turbulent waters. This is a wonderful metaphor, as it captures the sense of Russia having a God-given destiny to preserve Christianity and Western culture against any storms which may rage against it.

Although the film goes out of its way to avoid politics, politics is in a sense unavoidable, as everything you see is an utter repudiation of cultural relativism. To try and pretend as you see such beauty that notions of aesthetics are relative, and that what we are shown is not intrinsically superior to anything produced by modern degenerate Western culture, simply seems absurd. Because leftism revels in ugliness, perversion, and distortion, the film works as a powerful rebuke without ever having to say so.

Sadly, I do not think Britain (or probably America) could have had the cultural confidence to produce such a film. There is not a minority to be seen (apart from a few Persian diplomats) and there is no cultural cringe or sense of awkwardness about the fact that they are unabashedly celebrating themselves. This fact, along with the beauty of the women in the costumes (as I said to my friend, they are beautiful but never “hot” or “sexy”) and the civilised nature of the dancing and music means that I have to fight back tears as I watch the film and think about that which we have lost and are told to despise…

Eric Voegelin describes civilization as an island in the midst of an ocean of barbarism. In other words, civilization is not something which, along with its freedoms, is simply to be enjoyed like a consumer item, but is an uncertain, besieged enterprise whose existence must always be defended. Yet it is as a consumer item or a collection of consumer items that American writers, particularly “conservatives,” commonly talk about America now. This is especially the case when they defend mass non-Western immigration on the basis that the immigrants are not coming here to change America, but simply to “enjoy its freedoms.”

Also, don’t miss this wonderful Catalonian cultural celebration, which happened to set a world record. It is simply unthinkable that Americans could produce anything of the kind. You know it, I know it, and the American people know it, as Bob Dole used to say. There are no organic American myths and heroes because “America” long ago ceased to be a nation. Now we’re a multinational corporation run by Jewish bankers. Our “heroes” are produced by the media: soldiers who make the world safe for Israel, niggerball players, and actors and singers who allow us to escape into Jew-fantasy because reality is so horrible.

Our people have turned into vampires who prowl the recesses of the night because the Day will turn them to dust. The Catalans in this video unashamedly celebrate what Sinn Fein calls “We Ourselves” and what others have called FUBU (For Us, By Us). The Catalans survive. Spain will not hold them. To them the kingdom of heaven.

“The only freedom which can last is a freedom embodied somewhere, rooted in a history, located in space, sanctioned by genealogy, and blessed by a religious establishment. The only equality which abstract rights, insisted upon outside the context of politics, are likely to provide is the equality of universal slavery. It is a lesson which Western man is only now beginning to learn.” ~ Mel Bradford

Sam Dickson: The Idea and the Ideal of the Ethnostate.

Johann Fichte expressed the unity of language and nation in his Thirteenth Address to the German Nation in 1806:

The first, original, and truly natural boundaries of states are beyond doubt their internal boundaries. Those who speak the same language are joined to each other by a multitude of invisible bonds by nature herself, long before any human art begins; they understand each other and have the power of continuing to make themselves understood more and more clearly; they belong together and are by nature one and an inseparable whole.

Only when each people, left to itself, develops and forms itself in accordance with its own peculiar quality, and only when in every people each individual develops himself in accordance with that common quality, as well as in accordance with his own peculiar quality – then, and then only, does the manifestation of divinity appear in its true mirror as it ought to be; and only a man who either entirely lacks the notion of the rule of law and divine order, or else is an obdurate enemy thereto, could take upon himself to want to interfere with that law, which is the highest law in the spiritual world!

Let’s revisit the Kipling poem above about the nature of the slave. Has there ever been a better verse than this to describe the Negro?

His feet are swift to tumult,
His hands are slow to toil,
His ears are deaf to reason,
His lips are loud in broil.
He knows no use for power
Except to show his might.
He gives no heed to judgment
Unless it proves him right.

A 13-year-old white girl in Ocala, Florida, has been beaten unconscious by seven “teens” by the names of Zantavia, Ladricka, Javaris, Alphonso, Bria, Lamiracle, and Jebria.

“[I]t was her first day riding the school bus and none of the children would allow her to sit down… One 14-year-old girl said she punched the victim in the head 10 to 15 times because the girl allegedly called her a name.” A racial slur. This is the first lesson in Nigger Social Relations 101; the natural response to hearing unsettling words, for any reason at all, is to beat the life out of someone.

This was the second attack on the same bus in the last year, and last time the school persecuted the white victims and labeled it “a fight between two groups,” as though both the black attackers and the white defenders are equally culpable.

Rapes? Murders? Assaults? That’s all well and good for our precious little girls, but let’s not even think about segregation. That’s crazy talk, and racist too.

Just ask Barry Buckland, whose 14-year-old daughter was used as a spitting post and punching bag by three Negroes on a Portland transit bus. This man is so perfectly trained that he tells a reporter: “People have taken a grain of sand [the assault of my little girl] and tried to turn it into a 200-pound boulder [race-driven violence].” The girl herself, well-trained by her father, who is probably a deacon in some insane hate-church, has said that she doesn’t believe it was a racial altercation. But just read how it all started: “Karley made it clear that she didn’t appreciate the girls’ loud, distasteful remarks about a boy riding with her. They, in turn, didn’t like that she had the mettle to stand up for her friend. So, the thugs advanced.” This is a perfect description of what we’ve all seen a million times: boisterous, ill-mannered niggers who use their fists when “dissed,” which includes any request, however polite, for them to act civilized. The newspaper and all involved are doing their best to say “No hate crime here, folks! Move along now.” But if the tables were turned, and whites had assaulted a black passenger, it would be the biggest news story of the month. Barry Buckland – the name of this coward should live in infamy. He sacrificed his own child to the gods of political correctness, and all he got for it was a lousy t-shirt.

He who says he is in the light, and hates his daughter, is in darkness until now. He who loves his daughter abides in the light, and there is no cause for stumbling in him. But he who hates his daughter is in darkness and walks in darkness, and does not know where he is going, because the darkness has blinded his eyes. (paraphrase of 1 John 2:9-11)

A white man tries to reason with three Democrats using, you know, words, and naturally, fisticuffs ensue.

I was hoping for a broken nose.

“If you’re white your life is cheap, and all our people do is sleep.” Listen to the excellent song, 19 Years, about Gavin Hopley, a teenager who was chased, robbed, and beaten to death by a Muslim gang in Oldham, Lancashire, England. The song is sung by Lee Haggan.

“If the anti-Christian Christians of the new Christless churches would stop looking for the mythical, moderate blacks whom they can worship and adore and face reality, they would see that every humane, charitable impulse on this earth emanates from white people. It’s quite simple, Mr. Negro-worshipping Liberal. When the white remnant disappears so will charity.” ~ CWNY

“If the white race disappears, absorbed into a Babylonian, mixed race, mercy will disappear from the face of the earth. An old Christian hymn warns the sinner to ‘Look down, look down, that lonesome road before you travel on.’ The halfway house Christians need to look down the negro-worshipping road and see where it ends. It ends in a hellish, nightmare world of lost souls.” ~ CWNY

A Flint, Michigan homeowner is fed up with living near black people, who she calls “niggas.” It’s good that she didn’t succumb to Hate© by using two different letters in that word. “I put that sign up there because I’m disappointed in my people,” said the woman. “I did it to wake my people up.” Well, there will be no waking of anyone, says the NAACP (Niggers Arguing And Constantly Protesting), if hate-terms are going to be used. One commenter writes: “Let me get this straight. We have an organization that still uses an out-dated racial term in its very own name [Colored], commenting on someone else’s use of a commonly used derogatory racial term on her very own home.” Yes, you got it straight. While homes are being robbed, vandalized, and burned, and neighborhoods are war zones, the high-yellers who run the NAACP are fretting over words. They would make perfect white Christians.

Notice, as James Edwards observes, that if a white person had done this, it would have been a matter for the Department of Justice. When a black person does it, it’s just ho-hum.

Some white people are not so much cowards like Barry Buckland as just plain stupid. In this category, you would have trouble topping the story of this 26-year-old psychologist who hiked across Kenya with 75 other women and a portable pole on which she played the slut for throngs of likely rapists. I’m sure her father wishes he were dead. What has happened to our once-noble race and our once-lovely women?

An old-fashioned Christmas riot at the Mall of America. Something needs to be done about those unruly Swedes.

Another reason why lunch counters were segregated.

Another at-risk youth.

Dear State: Please, kill these people immediately.

Our greatest president, Thomas Jefferson, had the right idea about crime and punishment. This bill, introduced in 1778, would clear up many of the problems we have today. Some excerpts:

Whosoever shall be guilty of Rape, Polygamy, or Sodomy with man or woman shall be punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman, by cutting thro’ the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch diameter at the least.

Whosoever committeth Robbery shall be condemned to hard labor four years in the public works, and shall make double reparation to the persons injured.

And just for good measure, to put the holy rollers out of business:

All attempts to delude the people, or to abuse their understanding by exercise of the pretended arts of witchcraft, conjuration, inchantment, or sorcery or by pretended prophecies, shall be punished by ducking and whipping at the discretion of a jury, not exceeding 15 stripes.

In the same bill, Jefferson proposed amendments that would prevent free Negroes from entering Virginia of their own accord or remaining there for more than one year after they were emancipated. He proposed that any white woman who was pregnant with a mulatto child be forced to leave the state immediately after the birth and take her spurious brood with her. Failure to comply meant that she and the child were to be declared “out of the protection of the laws”; in other words, eligible for lynching.

Now, this is the cup the White Men drink
When they go to right a wrong,
And that is the cup of the old world’s hate –
Cruel and strained and strong.
We have drunk that cup – and a bitter, bitter cup
And tossed the dregs away.
But well for the world when the White Men drink
To the dawn of the White Man’s day!

A New York Times article leads off with this sentence: “Social behavior among primates – including humans – has a substantial genetic basis, a team of scientists has concluded from a new survey of social structure across the primate family tree.” It’s not necessary to buy into the evolutionary premise to recognize that genes have a lot to do with behavior (Rushton and Jensen have discovered that nature is 80% and nurture is 20%), which is the very thing that social scientists are employed to deny when it comes to racial disparities in schools and elsewhere. These Oxford scientists are challenging the idea that “social structure is shaped by environment,” that “complex societies evolve step by step from simple ones,” and “the so-called social brain hypothesis,” that “intelligence and brain volume increase with group size because individuals must manage more social relationships.” Here’s a good message for the school integrators: “Being rooted in genetics, social structure is hard to change, and a species has to operate with whatever social structure it inherits.” And another: “Primate species [tend] to have the same social structure as their close relatives, regardless of how and where they live.” Speaking of Worldstarhiphop videos: “With chimps, territorially based bands also exchange daughters to avoid incest but continue to fight with one another to the death because the males cannot recognize their kinship with relatives in neighboring bands.”

One hundred years ago, Detroit was 100% white, and it was magnificent. Now it’s 82% black and a hellhole. Race matters. But Detroit is not even the worst-run city in America. That dishonor goes to Miami. And the worst places on earth have something in common.

“Liberia was founded and colonised by black Americans to demonstrate what slave stock could achieve. They certainly showed us.”

Haiti two years later. These people have come to the conclusion that Haiti is still Haitian.

“In a century, the Belgian Congo was lifted from cannibalism to skyscrapers and automobiles. In half a century, it has returned to the jungle.”

Microsoft has patented a new “avoid diversity” feature on GPS devices.

How art thou racist? Let me count the ways.

Our galaxy is racist.

Water is racist:

Anyone who criticizes Attorney General Eric Holder is a racist. That “conversation” with the “cowards” must not be going very well.

A fugly mulatto explains in Psychology Today that whites who claim to be “colorblind” (i.e., every Alienist you know) are racists. She writes:

As a person of color, I like who I am, and I don’t want any aspect of that to be unseen or invisible. The need for colorblindness implies there is something shameful about the way God made me and the culture I was born into that we shouldn’t talk about. Thus, colorblindness has helped make race into a taboo topic that polite people cannot openly discuss. And if you can’t talk about it, you can’t understand it, much less fix the racial problems that plague our society.

You know how to “fix” the “problems,” don’t you? Ka-ching! $$$$. Viva Las Vegas!

But imagine if a white person wrote:

As a white person with a proud European heritage, I like who I am, and I don’t want any aspect of that to be unseen or invisible. The need for snowblindness implies there is something shameful about the way God made me and the culture I was born into that we shouldn’t talk about.

You know exactly what would happen. This is not at all what Attorney General Eric Holder expects a white person to say when he calls for a “conversation on race” with the white “cowards.” He expects grovelling followed by open wallets.

And you know what’s really bad? Colorblind messages create stress in minorities, causing them to be stupider.

Notice that the psychologist is a mulatto but belongs to the Delaware Valley Association of Black Psychologists, the Association of Black Psychologists, and African Americans in Behavioral Therapy. I wonder if there’s any such thing as the Delaware Valley Association of White Psychologists, the Association of White Psychologists, or White Americans in Behavioral Therapy.

RC Sproul’s magazine interviews a black pastor and tosses him a loaded question on slavery, straight down the middle. The answer reveals a lot about the unorthodox nature of black Christianity. The criterion for blacks to accept Christianity, a denomination, or a particular church is whether the institution of slavery is denounced as sinful. Since the Bible does not do this, it means that black Christians have an impaired understanding of the faith from the starting gate. Millions of whites have been enslaved throughout history, and viewing slavery as “sinful” has never been the determining factor for whether they convert to the faith. But if any church declares that slavery is not a sin, because the Bible does not call it a sin, no blacks will join – at least not these days. The intended point of this interview of Anthony Carter is that more blacks will join Reformed churches if Reformed churches will be more enthusiastic about repenting of the “sins” of their slaveowning fathers and working to integrate even the family.

Most of us like comfort. We like to be around people with whom we are comfortable and have much in common. This is particularly true when it comes to those places that mean the most to us – home and church. Thus, not only are our churches not integrated, but even more rarely are our families integrated.

Still, this lack of integration is not something with which we should be comfortable.

Carter reads things into the Bible that are simply not there and elevates them to matters of sanctification.

It is difficult to not celebrate culture, class, and ethnicity. Yet, this is what we are called to do.

Are we also called to split infinitives? He says that blacks can overlook the “racist” past of Reformed churches in the same way that early Christians accepted instruction from the changed Saul of Tarsus, once a murderer of the saints.

How can I, a black man, embrace the theology of men who owned slaves? I can joyfully embrace it because I realize that I am embracing the theology of the Bible and not necessarily the frail, fallible men who teach it. I can embrace the theology because it allows me to point out the sins of such teachers and yet the grace that is greater than that sin.

How could the early Christians embrace the theology of the Apostle Paul when, as Saul of Tarsus, he pursued, persecuted, and even consented to many of their deaths?

Translation: Slaveowners were like murderers. This reveals almost no comprehension of the Scriptures whatsoever, and Sproul and his gang of wiggers play into it for the sake of popularity.

‎”From the biblical perspective, therefore, slavery is not itself intrinsically evil; the failure to live as free men, the dependency or incompetence of a slave mind is, however, regarded as an inferior way. The believer cannot revolt against his situation, but he cannot become a slave in good conscience, voluntarily, for any form of slavery is an infringement upon Christ’s total rights over him (1 Cor. 7:22,23).” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, The Politics of Guilt and Pity, p. 24

Read Nathanael Strickland’s very good article on this interview, called On Being White and Reformed. N.S. is correct that a white pastor who wrote a positive, non-grovelling book for white people would simply be excommunicated. If he were to be interviewed, the questions would be hostile and misrepresentative, not the patronizing, fluttering softballs pitched to Anthony Carter. While Carter can talk of race and ethnicity to his heart’s content, the white author in our thought experiment would be challenged to prove that race and ethnicity exist as meaningful categories.

Further, both the interviewer and Anthony Carter have no issue with leaping to assign collective guilt to Southern whites for owning slaves and practicing “racism.” But if the interviewer had invoked the fact that 3% of the U.S. population, black males aged 13-35, commit more violent crime than all other groups combined, along with the collective implications of that fact, I would imagine that there would have been quite a different reaction.

As Nathanael observes, if “the vision of the Scriptures is clear” that families must be integrated, it means that those who oppose what the Scriptures “clearly” teach are in sin, and church discipline is needed. This is the Negro’s “vision of the Scriptures,” and it is contrary to what our righteous forefathers believed. The Negro’s “vision of the Scriptures” means the end of the freedoms of speech, contract, and association, and it replaces them with envy and theft of property. Call this what you will, but please, don’t call it Christianity.

Even Ron Paul knows that the Civil Rights Act abolished private property.

Adi Schlebusch explains that Paul’s rebuke of Peter in Galatians 2 pertained to soteriology, not to natural social order. Many race-mixers now twist the Apostle’s words to condemn racial segregation, but this commits violence upon the text, and no one can appeal to John Calvin in support of it.

John Piper “assumes that if whites deal with other races in any way other than suicidal groveling then they are indubitably transgressing the sixth commandment.” Read part 2 of Nil’s review of Bloodlines. No historical considerations like abolitionist or communist agitation are allowed in Piper’s survey of the South and its collective decisions; it’s all chalked up to bigotry on the part of whites. Piper reveals that he understands very little and is merely posturing for political points, “even though he has at other times provided book-length responses to scholars on important biblical and theological issues.” He writes that Christian support for segregation was ubiquitous yet sinful. (What else in history could be said to have ubiquitous Christian support that was sinful?) He slanders his parents by writing that “the whole structure of the relationship” with the Piper family’s black maid “was demeaning,” without mentioning a single instance in which the maid was maligned, injured, scorned, or victimized. You’re just supposed to take his word for it, apparently.

All this rhetoric communicates the novel notion that social or hierarchical inequality is equivalent to the denial of an inferior’s humanity – inequality is exactly how the “structure” is “demeaning.” As argued by Tribal Theocrat, this is perfectly egalitarian, and it utterly contradicts [Piper's] own arguments elsewhere that gender complementarity is not inherently demeaning. His obvious contradiction in this area, in addition to his implicit defamation of his parents, is profoundly disturbing…

Righteous men should reject his teachings and love their race.

Ken Ham, the Australian, race-mixing, Abe Lincoln lookalike, has a new video called “What is the Only Answer to Racism?” Answer: Agreeing with Ken Ham. “Boldly dealing with a topic that many in the church have not addressed” is a very funny line. As a friend of ours writes, it sure does take a lot of moral courage to go out on a limb and agree with MTV and Hollywood. Such bravery! Such derring-do! Another friend wonders if Ken will claim martyr status by treading the thorny topics of good nutrition and exercise, or perhaps reducing electric bills. The prophet Daniel was a wimp in comparison. Ham’s video is the same old song and dance. “Darwinian evolution is inherently racist,” he says, and by defining racism so broadly as to include support of the natural, historic order, he bears false witness against his fellow Christians who agree with Christian doctrines that long predated Darwinism. This takes us to Ken Ham’s other bonafide, which is that our godly forefathers were wrong, and if only they had understood “the Bible’s account of the true history of man,” they would not have been racists. Oh, if only we could agree with Ken, how holy we would be. If you ever hear a Kinist say that men of our time have chanced upon some new revelation that was hidden to our fathers, or some modern proof that our fathers were collectively mistaken, be sure to take my pulse.

“Is it possible God actually calls some Blacks to fall in love with Whites, and vice-versa? If that is true, then we should celebrate. Yes, celebrate! Let’s rejoice over the beautiful children born to interracial marriages and do everything possible to make them fully accepted. Let’s recognize the contributions intermarriage can make toward breaking down prejudice. And though we may not necessarily promote interracial marriages, let’s take the lead in defending, protecting, and supporting them in our churches… The entertainment industry has attempted to keep pace with the increasing number of intermarrying Americans. Television shows such as General Hospital and L.A. Law and major Hollywood releases like Jungle Fever, Mississippi Masala, The Joy Luck Club, and The Bodyguard have all highlighted interracial romances. This is one area where the media may be morally ahead of the church… American churches can become havens of safety and support for interracial couples… More creative heterogeneous churches may emerge, becoming places that feel like home to interracial families… We should rejoice over the barrier-shattering potential each Christian interracial marriage brings to our churches.” ~ Bilious Billy Graham, from a Christianity Today article, March 1994

Shield my eyes!

Franken-Ken also likes to deny the existence of the “curse of Ham,” which is a rhetorical trick. The curse was applied to Ham’s son, Canaan. Men have wondered about this for a very long time. It could have been because Canaan was a guilty party. It could be that Ham was not cursed directly because God had already blessed Ham (Gen. 9:1). It could be because God intended to punish Ham without debasing his entire line. It could be because there was no greater curse to which Ham could have been subjected than to see his youngest son cursed. But there is no doubt that Ham was cursed as a result of his actions, and for Ken Ham to pretend otherwise is the height of foolishness. In the same manner, the ground was cursed on Adam’s account, even though Eve committed the sin, because Adam was the responsible agent. Everyone knows the history of the race of Ham, and everyone knows that the bond of slavery has fallen upon that race primarily. According to Matthew Henry, the “fulfilment of this prophecy…contains almost a history of the world.”

“The modern church’s view of heaven is disgusting, teaching in essence that we will be un-sexed, un-raced, un-familied, and un-married aberrations when we reach the pinnacle of human existence and the joy of man’s desiring. This view is satanic in its denial of our humanity and in its death-wish to be removed from our worldly ties, better befitting eastern paganism than biblical Christianity… Given the fact that nations and tribes are composed of families (Gen. 10:5, 20, 31-32), it follows that all these corporate groupings will also exist in heaven. Scripture affirms a tenet belonging to the kinist side of the continental divide, by implication affirming the entire kinist outlook.”

Church as sex therapy, with a Negro anthem.

This clown, Russell Moore, accuses his childhood Sunday school teacher of being a “white supremacist” for telling him, after he put a coin in his mouth, “That’s filthy! Why, you don’t know if a colored man might have held that.” But he’s just getting started! He also says that her comment was “subversive of the gospel,” “dehumanizing of African-Americans,” and she was an advocate of “a twisted form of Darwinism.” She probably also wanted to kill six million Jews.

Oh nose! Judge Roy Moore of Ten Commandments fame is tied to…brace yourself…EXTREMISTS! Meaning Michael Peroutka, who is “affiliated” with the League of the South and has appeared on the James Edwards show. As the SPLC knows very well, there is nothing more “extreme” than the Ten Commandments, but opposing “racism” scores many more donation dollars for the Hate Headquarters.

John Hagee’s bouncers are busy, and I’m not talking about when he gets on the treadmill. Remember when the gospel used to be preached in churches?

Holy-rollers praying for war to smite the enemies of anti-Christ Israel.

We were right on 9/11. We were right from the beginning of the Iraq War. Back then, even paleoconservatives were saying that we must support our president and support our troops, and damn the torpedoes. Almost every Christian in the country was cheering for war, waving flags, and singing Yankee hymns of genocide.

Oh, how the “Christians” cheered. They wrote countless articles trying to convince the public that World War W satisfied Just War Theory. We warned that it could be like another Vietnam, and when Baghdad was easily taken, they laughed at us. It’s all going to be for nothing, we said. At the end of this exercise in folly, we said the empire would have nothing to show for it but two mountains: one of dead bodies and another of debt. At the close of 2011, the final convoy of American troops left Iraq. Obama claims that they leave behind “a sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq.” But this is wishful thinking. The truth is that nothing has changed, and the president is too afraid to break the news to the public that their sons were slain in vain and their money has been utterly wasted.

This is a very interesting documentary by Byron Jost, the late producer of A Line in the Sand. One especially interesting part of it recounts a time when Bishop Fulton Sheen was beating Jew Milton Berle in TV ratings, and there were mass conversions to Catholicism as a result. It’s difficult to believe now that such a time existed in America. Sheen railed against Jew Sigmund Freud and the attempt by his cult of Jew psychoanalysts to redefine the soul. The classical Greek understanding of the tripartite soul was of a rider on a horse. Reason is the rider, passion is the horse, and will is the bridle. Christians understood that will (ethos), reason (logos), and passion (pathos) were inadequate substitutions for Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Jews placed the psychoanalyst in the position of high priest of the new religion that professed to condemn the Christian ways of the past as mental illness. To Jews, Christianity is just a synonym for anti-Semitism. Their goal was transvaluation, to change vice to virtue and virtue to thought crime. Freud identified himself with Hannibal, making war against Rome (the Christian West), and this is interesting because the Christian West is truly the New Israel, and Carthage was a Canaanite colony that began as a refuge for exiles from Palestine. Procopius of Caesarea, a fifth-century historian, recorded that in his time there was near Tangiers a column bearing this inscription: “We are they who fled before the face of Joshua, the robber, the son of Nun.” Carthage is now a heap of ruins in the suburbs of Tunis, and we pray that all the works of the Jews will meet the same destiny.

Secondly, Jew-Boasian anthropology pushed the idea that race is not important, that nurture is everthing and nature is nothing. Jew-antropology has been even more significant than Jew-psychology, because even “conservative” Christians have now been indoctrinated to agree that race is meaningless. Boas’s disciple, Margaret Mead, taught that Christianity is sexually repressive, and that Christian society imposes morality, and if we can throw off the shackles of Christian society, which seeks to repress us, we will live in freedom, like the ubiquitous gang-rapists that she allegedly witnessed in Samoa.

The Frankfurt School is the third prong of Jewish subversion that has given us the reigning climate of political correctness. The philosophy of the Frankfurt School was that Gentiles project their own lust for power on the Jew, accusing the Jew of oppression when they themselves seek the same power to oppress. Even positive feelings for parents, nation, and race on the part of the Christian were viewed by the Jew as sublimations of hostility. You see, the Christians are only saying that they have love, but really they are filled with hate; this was the ideal stance for the Jew to take against the Christian. The Jews knew that since patriotism is based on the Fifth Commandment, undermining the family would be the best way to undermine the nation. Hence, Jews have formed huge “entertainment” industries based on portraying the father of the nuclear family as a buffoon and every kind of deviant social bonding as a “family.” The Frankfurt School’s beef with Nazi Germany, from which they evacuated to New York, was not that six million Jews were in the process of being killed; those stories were invented after the war. It was because the Nazis were self-consciously exclusionary and gave the Marxist Jew no possible foothold in German society. The ethnic warfare that Jews have waged against the West ever since is designed to prevent another Christian ethnonationalist government from arising. Their greatest fear is a race of men who band together to say, “Our God is not your god; our nation is not your nation; our family is not your family.” Thus, they are driven to attack God, nation, and family by every means possible. But of course, their god, nation, and family are sacred.

Today, your lying preacher has accepted the Jew-lie that the majority must be indifferent to its own eclipse, because there is no majority, and our unity is founded on ideology. He didn’t learn this from Jesus Christ. He learned it from the wretched Jew. Vast numbers of white Christians today welcome the demise of their own race, which has been gifted by God and has blessed all peoples. All the world marvels and follows the Beast. “Who is like the beast?” they ask. “Who is able to make war with him?” As Dr. Sanchez states in the video, white men and women find that by turning queer or feminist, they leave their former weak estate, having zero moral authority, and join respected minority classes who are able to wield significant political influence. This is the triumph of the Jew, and it is made sweeter by their success in casting opposition to their program as deranged and even criminal. Scroll up and read the de la Mora quote again, about how the very system of Marxism is designed to punish “deviationist” and “maladjusted” thought by blocking access to funds and media until the offenders repent of their particularity and agree to join in the parade of collective envy.

“The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity… It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray… Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen… All the boys and girls will learn from an early age to be what is called ‘co-operative,’ i.e., to do exactly what everybody is doing. Initiative will be discouraged in these children, and insubordination, without being punished, will be scientifically trained out of them.” ~ Bertrand Russell

At about the 50:00 mark in this sermon, R.J. Rushdoony explains that the Enlightenment philosophy of the social scientists is a rejection of history and a rejection of culture.

After all, what difference does it make whether the white man in America has produced a great culture and the Negro has produced nothing?… So when you take all of these away from the white man and from the Negro, what’s the difference between them [according to the social scientist]? Just a little color… The Negro and the white man in the United States – strip both of them of everything, and what’s the difference between them?… Well, what is the Negro if he is not his past and his intelligence and his achievements? And what is the white man if he is not exactly what he has produced here in this country? And if you take away from us everything that our past has given us, our physical inheritance, our abilities, who are we then? I am no longer myself if you deny to me everything that my inheritance has given me, everything that my work has given me, everything that my thinking has given me.

Clearly, Rushdoony was not like the pansy preachers of today who tell us that faith is all that matters, and everything else is negotiable. What does it mean to be pro-life if you kill me and my people by taking from us what makes us who we are? Rush goes on to say that the Enlightenment man believes that by changing institutions, human nature will be born again. For example, they believe that if the institution of marriage is changed, as sex faggots and race faggots have done, biology itself can be conquered. No longer will white girls long to be with white men, but their affections will be learned from Benetton ads, and their children will be as dysfunctional as what they see in the Jew-movies. Such is the dream of genocide in the dark mind of the anti-Christ.

But as the Roman poet Horace said, “Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret. [Though you drive Nature out with a pitchfork, she will still find her way back.]”

The good chaps at Empty Tomb Books recently bought ad space on WorldJewDaily, which amazingly was accepted. Why was this amazing? Well, take a look at the ad.

Have you ever in your life witnessed such anti-Semitism? It’s pretty much like a Holocaust, and it’s all Joseph Farah’s fault. I can almost feel the heat from the crematory ovens, or maybe it’s just the laptop toasting my nether regions. At any rate, it took three days for the ad to be pulled. WND didn’t want to be guilty of giving Judeochristianity a bad name, but frankly, I feel that three days of Jew-hatred is inexcusable.

Dances with Jews.

Anything for a buck.

Mel Gibson apologizes. This is so heartfelt that you might need a hanky.

Beautiful images from Teheran. Jews want nothing more than to destroy what you see in this video, and one can only hope that the destroyer is destroyed in the process.

“A Christian is not free to believe and promote a lie about any person or nation.”

And you thought Jews were clever in making up Holohoax history. Now they’ve taken the incident of the Epic Beard Man, who keeps the amberlamps in business, and have rewritten it for Spicy Spickerson.

Jews built a fence to keep Palestinians away, are now building a fence to keep Egyptians away, and will next build a fence to keep Jordanians away. But Mexicans just want to live the American Dream.

Bring the whole fam-damily! (There’s a disclaimer at the end to avoid to tarbrush of racism, because even the threat of hell is not as terrifying to the white man.)

Keep aliens illegal!

Look at the doll in the opening of this video. A friend who has some regular contact with Mexicans hears from them that black and brown gangs have essentially been given permission by the government to exist and wreak havoc, while white nationalist groups are hunted down for “racism.”

“The beginning of the Jewish attack on the South… The Civil Rights Movement was revenge for the Leo Frank case.”

As a child during the fashionable 1970s, I read many Archie comics, including Al Hartley’s Spire Comics, which were Christian-themed. I enjoyed reading them, but wow, some of them were awful.

Aren’t the clothes supposed to fall off dispensationalists? And how about that theology? “God’s love at the cross was for his enemies.” At least Calvinists can wash their hands of blame for these comics.

Even though comic books in the 1970s were mighty-white, the message of miscegenation, cloaked in the gospel, was there already.

The dispies were never bashful about their Jewish Supremacism.

Here it is again, in a comic about Corrie Ten Boom.

Corrie is sent to a “death camp” herself, but the bumbling Germans, HEY LOOK! WHAT’S THAT OVER THERE?

In spite of the born-again cheese logs, the Spire comics were pretty good for kids. Even the regular Archie comics, though created by a Jew who was a national commissioner of the ADL, never had to suffer “diversity.” They were all about being white, featuring a love triangle of colored people: blonde, brunette, and redhead. Thanks to strong character development, Archie at one time rivaled Marvel and DC comics in popularity. Now, the dog has returned to its vomit, and Archie is being produced by the Tolerant and Relevant. About a year ago, Archie had jungle fever.

To step it up a notch, the latest issue features a faggot, interracial marriage.

In the next issue, Archie himself will be raped by a coach in the shower at Penn State.

Lead us, Evolution, lead us
Up the future’s endless stair;
Chop us, change us, prod us, weed us,
For stagnation is despair:
Groping, guessing, yet progressing,
Lead us nobody knows where.
C.S. Lewis

The world’s first “chimeric” monkeys have been created with genetic material from not two but six parents. There is the requisite griping about “enormous ethical concerns,” because many of these frankenmonkeys “die of severe and unrelated malformations caused by the genetic modifications,” but all will be well if we can turn these macaques into voters and church communicants, and down the road maybe even give them some culturally-sensitive SAT exam questions. Progress demands it. We, your friendly editorial staff at SWB, propose a new term: “Chimerican.” This is a word for those who are derived from two or more genetically distinct sources, find phony religion from impastors, and base their citizenship on propositional Nothingness.

Blacks are always belly-aching about how their kids can’t understand exam questions written by whites because of the “cultural” divide. Some school administrators in Norcross, Georgia, attempted to do something about this by writing questions that blacks will understand, so that they can learn more in school. (You know that blacks wrote the questions because racism is never mentioned in the article.) Alas, there was snapping of necks and wagging of index fingers in Mudville when welfare matriarchs discovered that their children were being asked how many oranges were picked by slaves and how many beatings per day Frederick Douglass received.

In the Washington, DC, area, black “students” are suspended and expelled two to five times as often as whites. The Washington Post blames this on poverty first of all, right after a few paragraphs in which they admit that the same thing is happening in extremely wealthy suburbs like Fairfax and Alexandria, and in “school districts across the country.” It’s sad when liberals can’t stick to the script, even after they’ve been rehearsing it for decades. Other scapegoats suggested for the cause of this problem: racism and “unconscious bias,” single-parent homes, cultural insensitivity, zero-tolerance policies which disproportionately affect blacks because they naturally join gangs, lack of “positive-behavior initiatives,” lack of parental trust in the “system,” teacher training, “unequal access to highly effective teachers and differences in school leadership styles.” But don’t worry! The “experts” are hard at work on a solution: “many school leaders said they are increasingly focused on the problem and grappling with ways to close the gap.” This would be the same gap that has never even been narrowed. Every excuse in the book is offered to avoid telling the truth, which is that this story is about race. Vast sums of money are spent to employ people whose job is to lie.

The neo-American mentality in 1.25 minutes – ready, go.

Nearly 14% of college graduates from the classes of 2006 through 2010 can’t find full-time work, and only 55.3% of people ages 16 to 29 have jobs. This spells doom for their future careers since 70% of pay increases for the average person come during the first ten years in the workforce, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research. When compounded for the remaining years of employment, they stand to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars. Meanwhile, everyone is expecting a rebound in the economy, but I just don’t see it. Pay and productivity are stagnant while inflation climbs, and there’s nothing on the horizon like the personal computer boom of the 1980s to do wonders for productivity. Add to this the problem of debt that can never be repaid, and there’s probably no way to avoid the collapse of the dollar, which is why gold is priced so high. We’re on the eve of a revolution.

After looking at Ron Paul’s investment portfolio, a financial analyst says that he has “never seen such an extreme bet on economic catastrophe.”

A friend of ours on the left coast writes:

I have loved Apple Computers for decades. I have built my career and work on these machines. But in the end it is just another PC company with the usual multiculty agenda. I had a very disturbing problem at the UVillage store in Seattle a few days ago. While I was waiting for my wife to get some help with her new iPhone, I looked at the software for sale. An Apple sales guy came over and asked me if I needed some help and I said no. But then I added a question. I said, you know it would be nice, if my son could look at this software and see a positive role model for him. Your software has: (1) two blacks (a literacy program); (2) two blacks and a mexican and (3) the Diego program, with one black, one asian and three mexicans. I observed that when all this multicultural stuff started 50 years ago, the argument was that each child needs an appropriate role model, and so minorities should have appropriate role models. Well, fair enough. But now, little European-American (White) boys like mine (who was standing there) have no role models at all, and it would be nice if there were appropriate and positive role models for little boys like mine. (And dare I say it, like the little Steve Jobs.) Then, an obese White woman shoved aggressively towards my son and I and said, “You’re a freak, you’re a fucking freak.” I said, are you objecting to the idea of positive role models for little White boys? She said very loudly: “You’re a god-damned fucking freak!” And stomped away. I turned back to the Apple guy and said, well, too many people really hate little white children. And I added, Apple should still be considerate about positive role models for all kinds of children, not just minorities. The Apple guy looked at me and at my son, and pointing at a game software package, said here is one that looks like your son. It was a game with a yellow dinosaur with red polka dots on it. I asked him if he really thought that it looked like my boy, and he leaned towards me and said: “I will not say another word to you, I refuse to help you find anything.” And he walked away. This is simple bigotry and illegal discrimination on the basis of race and national origin. Apple Computer should be ashamed of itself. And poor old Steve Jobs is probably rolling over in his grave, because he wanted to bring computers to everyone, and yet today the corporation he built hates little White boys.

North Dakota appears to have the best protection for “racists” who are being punished for practicing free speech: “Makes it a discriminatory practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire a person; to discharge an employee; or to treat a person or employee adversely or unequally with respect to application, hiring, training, apprenticeship, tenure, promotion, upgrading, compensation, layoff, or a term, privilege, or condition of employment, because of participation in lawful activity off the employer’s premises during nonworking hours which is not in direct conflict with the essential business-related interests of the employer.”

Winston Smith’s top ten most hateful events of 2011.

Darkness seeking to overpower Light?

This Ohio State linebacker was repeatedly called a “cracker” by black University of Florida players. “I’ve never seen more people swing at our players and call us racial slurs. I’ve never been called a ‘cracker’ more in my life than I have today.” Notice that no one cares about this kind of racial slur. Even the writer of the article warns that he’s “not trying to make light of the situation,” which is exactly what he does. But if the tables were turned, there would be no end to the whining, and it would only end by the school of the guilty white man paying a substantial bribe to a black advocacy group.

Never have so few done so little and been praised for so much by so many as the Tuskegee Airmen. You’ve heard that you should never go in with a Sicilian when death is on the line, but verily I say to you, never expect a history lesson when racism is on the line. George Lucas is saying that he tried to make the movie with an all-black cast. He probably doesn’t like to mention the fact that Star Wars was made with an all-white cast.

Et tu, Buckwheat?

A slice of Norwegian heaven, which looks just like the old “racist” America. We live in dark times indeed when beauty and peace and chastity seem like fantasies. Thank the Lord for His gifts.

Here’s a very interesting artifact, a letter from Rushdoony to Van Til in which some myths about George Washington, atheism, and citizenship are refuted.

Finally, two great men died recently, Francis Nigel Lee and Louis Andrews. They will be sorely missed. Pray that you can be one-tenth as effective as these men during the course of your life. It goes by so fast.