Holiness Versus Assholiness
December 13, 2011 
75 Comments
RC Sproul Jr is back with more of his genocidal tomfoolery. He’s the court jester of the holocaust. “Is it a sin to marry outside one’s race?” he asks himself. It’s not even possible, he replies, because marriage is for humans. Alienists can only obfuscate, because the alternative is to meet Kinists point for point, and this they are incapable of doing. His paragraph on worldliness is a response to our recurrent observation that race-mixers in the Church disagree with their own godly fathers and agree with a unanimous contingent of Christ-haters on this issue and none other. He rationalizes this ahistorical relationship by saying that his atheist, non-racist, non-sexist, non-homophobic bedfellows “retain the remnants of the image of God,” and so “we should expect to agree with them from time to time.” This is true if the question is whether daylight savings time contributes to productivity. But our godly Christian ancestors, through their words and actions, proved that they were adamantly opposed to the consensus on race that prevails today. This is merely the prima facie evidence against the case that Sproul and other Race-Mixers-for-Jesus are trying to make, but it’s an important point, because one will search in vain to find another example in which so many Christians have so dramatically reversed opinion and have adopted practices that are not to be found in history except among freaks. As CWNY has written, “The late John Paul II once asked, with obvious perplexity, why the people with the correct views on racial equality and democracy had the wrong views on abortion. But it was John Paul II who was being inconsistent, not the liberals.” RC Jr. is equally ignorant and equally the servant of anti-Christs.
A key component to his obfuscation is to toss the blame on Kinists for conforming to the world since Charles Darwin’s theories hinged on racial superiority. How many times do we need to say it? Christians thought like Kinists long before Darwin was born. And we’re not Darwinists by a long shot. This is a guilt by association tactic that doesn’t stand up to a moderate breeze. And how does RC distance himself from “supremacism”? By denying that genes have any impact whatsoever on culture!
It is true enough that some cultures are better than others. What makes one culture superior, however, isn’t genetics, but the impact of the Christian faith. Low levels of melanin didn’t build Europe, the gospel did. Matching levels of melanin in turn won’t make a godly marriage. The gospel will. Away with legalism that adds to God’s perfect law.
He skips from one logical fallacy to another. Why didn’t he write “low levels of melanin didn’t build Japan”? It’s just foolishness from start to finish. Worst of all, it robs God of the gratitude owed to Him for the tremendous genetic gifts with which He has endowed our race, gifts that have blessed the whole world. It’s true that similarity in marriage does not necessarily correlate to godliness, but without question it contributes to harmony and fertility, just as dissimilarity in marriage most certainly alienates spouses and exacerbates ungodliness which ripples far beyond the realm of the immediate family.
The National Institutes of Health has found that whites with black partners “have significantly more depressive symptoms and less relationship satisfaction…” Not to mention that a white woman married to a black man is 12 times more likely to be murdered than if she were married to a white man. Choose life!
It’s anything but godly to diminish obedience to the Fifth Commandment by calling it “legalism.”
“The instinctive impulse to symbolically link together all appearances, until the living (not bare intellectual) idea of unity is reached, the inexhaustible richness of phantasy, the bold, fearless flight of thought, the metaphysical vein, the intensity, the incomparable recognition of personality, the unselfishness, the holy earnestness, the leaning towards reclusion, the untirable assiduity, the scientific achievements, the mystical contemplation, but also the long-windedness, the disposition to look at the dark side of things, the tastelessness, the characterlessness, the frequency of unclear thinking, that goes hand in hand with childish fabrications, the willingness to esteem highly the alien, and to underestimate own superb values etc.: all this can also be found in the Indo-Aryan, and in consequence we see ourselves as in a magnifying mirror. That will help us, to know ourselves, and to clearly separate the real own characteristics from those obtruded on, forced onto and funnelled into us.” ~ Houston Stewart Chamberlain
“The way to love anything is to realize it might be lost.” ~ G.K. Chesterton
Nil Desperandum has written an excellent response to Sproul at Faith & Heritage. You’re highly encouraged to read it. Just as Athanasians made creedal confession against Arianism, and as the Reformers made creedal confession against Rome, Kinists are making creedal confession against Alienism and the resurgence of Gnosticism. This is because, as Nil writes, “it is our zeitgeist.” We would not expect Christians in ages past to be faced with the same challenges we face, but it would be “disastrously naïve and foolish,” not to mention suicidal, to ignore the peculiar threats of the modern world simply because they were not faced to a similar extreme by our fathers. This dearth of wisdom in our corner of the contemporary Church is partly due to an obsessive reliance on precedent, which is ironic because we Kinists are the ones who are typically accused of living in the past. But it’s even worse than that. Nil writes:
The main problem with Sproul, Jr.’s usage of Scripture here can properly be called biblicism, or a worship of the Bible. It manifests itself usually by rote prooftexting and an absence of regenerate wisdom; and it is characterized by an unduly lax or harsh understanding of God’s law, fueled either by the request for impossibly specific Bible verses or by appeal to inapplicable passages with a can’t-you-see-the-obvious mentality. Against this biblicism, I contend that opposition to miscegenation should hardly require any biblical text (just like patriotism): it is grounded in racial realism, which is itself grounded in a healthy understanding of natural revelation. Though Scriptures may be provided on this issue, and though God’s Word serves as a wonderful and illuminating guiderail in leading our minds on the path of godliness, we are not confined to a knowledge only of supernatural revelation. God has revealed Himself both in His Word and in His world.
Nature has been called the 67th book of the Bible, not because science speaks with authority equal to Scripture but simply because God has ordained that we are not to learn everything there is to know about life from the Bible alone. The Bible itself refers to this fact in many places, such as 1 Cor. 11:14, which asks, “Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory?” God is the creator and sustainer of nature, as Job came to understand. The first chapter of Romans tells us that the reprobate are without excuse because, from the foundation of the world, God’s invisible attributes have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made. Nature is therefore a holy witness. We understand natural functions and natural affections not strictly because we learned them from Bible verses but because God revealed them to us in nature and confirmed them in His Word. In Proverbs, the sluggard is told to go to the ant, to consider her ways and be wise. And guess what. In nature, kind pairs with kind. The birds do not seek an unnatural unity with “birdkind”; the species are divided, and without such divisions we would not be able to experience the rich diversity of nature, as God intends.
As a friend of ours puts it, if qualitatively distinguishing between races is a sin then it is also sinful to “value racial diversity” in itself, since by definition there can be no diversity without qualitative differences.
The root of the word kindness is the word kind, which is the same as the word kin. We are to bestow kindness primarily on our kin, as it says in 1 Timothy 5:8. The word king also comes from kin, which is why Deut. 17:15 tells us that the king must be a kinsman. In both cases, the West has rejected the faith. The problem in this case is not “legalism,” as Sproul calls it, but simple disobedience. To the Alienist, kin is merely skin, and skin is entirely irrelevant to the human condition.
The interracial adoption craze is fueled by the Alienist idea that faith is all that matters, that there is no qualitative difference between filial blood and strange blood as long as all parties involved are Christians. It is connected to the false contemporary understanding of Galatians 3:28, which is contrary to the historical Christian understanding. The idea is that if we can capture children young enough that their minds are blank slates and pump the right kind of knowledge into them, we can make them just like us, and God’s purposes for the world can go hang themselves. This is Gnosticism on stilts. Ironically, as a friend of ours observes, those who condemn Southern slavery as “man-stealing” are delighted by the international adoption racket, even after they are shown that many of the children are stolen from their parents or sold by their governments to Americans. Christians even participate in the abduction, convincing desperate parents that their children will be better off without them. A small army of gospeltards flew into Haiti after the earthquake with this as their evangelical mission. As our friend asks when he sees lovely, large families like the Sprouls demote their own children to co-heirs with black boys and Chinese girls: “Is love-making, conception, diet, health, breast milk, biology, genes, etc. worthless? Meaningless?” Don’t forget that the placenta goes two ways. Fetal cells are not attacked by the mother’s body, and they stay in her body, helping her to fight infection for 50 years. Marvelous are Your works, and my soul knows it well.
Listen to Christian Gray respond to Sproul and discuss the disease of allophilia.
Our prayers are with Denise Sproul in her battle against leukemia, and with the entire Sproul family. Do not go gentle into that good night.
John Piper on “why pastors should bless interracial marriage.” It’s interesting that he acknowledges prohibition of miscegenation in the Old Testament because it drew people away from God, but now he mocks the idea that this can still happen among Christians since in 1 Cor. 7:39, a Christian woman is told that “she is at liberty to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord.” This means that she is to marry only according to the will of the Lord. Otherwise, it would encompass same-sex Christian marriage or incest marriage. Even when he considers examples such as these to be beyond the pale, the Alienist still finds it impossible to condemn, under any circumstances, the marriage of an old man to a young girl, for instance. The father of the girl has no say in the matter, the Alienist believes, because if the two are believers, this is all that matters. One can only wonder what alternate universe Piper inhabits. He gives himself a pat on the back for “magnificently overcoming what the world regards as insuperable issues.” What? Piper stands to lose nothing for his “brave” stand against racism. He is in lockstep with the world. Why isn’t he brave enough to admit it?
Read Nil Desperandum’s critique of Piper’s new book, Bloodlines. Even though Piper promises to define his terms in a book about race, he “fails to do what every anti-racist in history has failed to do: provide a definition of racism, explain why it is sinful, and identify how many (or some) people are guilty of it. If any of those three criteria are not achieved then the lamentations of institutional racism are vacuous.” Piper writes that his pastoral staff spent months trying to define the word “racism,” but in the end they simply cribbed the PCA’s inadequate definition. How could any word take months to define, especially if it is so obviously contrary to Scripture? Piper “admires King’s ‘historic Christian vision,’ and he even takes seriously King’s and Ralph Abernathy’s showmanship in kneeling down in prayer while rebelling against the police (pp. 24, 25). He mourns the murder of James Byrd but fails to mention the deluge of black-on-white rapes that are destroying our women – over ten daily and 35,000 annually.” Piper is an effeminate showman in the same vein as the hucksters he admires, not a minister of the gospel.
The always-brilliant Ehud Would expounds on the dangers of the neo-Christian rejection of race and kinship. “The liberal White denial of race is one of the greatest impediments to real peace amongst the races.” This, of course, is the exact opposite of what is believed by Piper, who wishes that the very word “race” did not exist. Ehud shows that antique Christians were nothing like what passes for a Christian in the popular imagination today, and this made them more circumspect in their interactions with strangers. They were not willing to gloss over important differences, even for the sake of the gospel, because to do so would place their own precious children at risk as well as the stability of their civilization. This was the experience of United Christian Missions to Africa in 1899:
The sterility and unprogressiveness of negro civilizations, negro states, are as much due to the paralyzing death grip of Islam as to nature’s foreclosure of his intellectual powers when she mortgages the growth of his brain after puberty… Africa is home to the most man-like apes and the most ape-like men… The Negro has an animal-look…skin as rancid as a goat’s…and inherent mental inferiority… The negro is unmoral…an overgrown child… His animal spirits are irrepressible and the mothers do all the parenting… Anarchy is the dominant chord of the Hamite… The lost churches of Abyssinia… Africa was a land of death shades… Darkness covered the earth and gross darkness her peoples… Ethiopic Christianity shows the utmost amount of superstition that can overwhelm a church without killing it… [A]cceptance of this view [that they are truly Christians] strains our view of Christianity and the Church almost to breaking… [W]hatever extravagant ritualism…and fatal divorce between ethics and religion disfigures oriental Christianity reveals itself most hideously in Abyssinia… Negro theology, when eliminated of superstition, retains little religion.
This reminds me of the clip from this game show. A Polynesian man is honest enough to divulge his revulsion to how the average black person thinks and behaves, and he is denounced as idiotic, stupid, offensive, etc. But not a single one of his name-calling interlocutors attempts to prove that what he says is false, because people tend not to attempt the impossible. It ends with eye-rolling platitudes from a black man.
The missionaries quoted above were doing the work of the gospel in Africa, but like Albert Schweitzer after them, they knew that it would serve the black man least of all to pretend that he was something he is not.
Negroes did not even have a word in their native tongue for “promise,” “bond,” “oath,” “dedication,” “contract,” or “covenant.” Ehud writes: “Black Africans, unlike Europeans or Asians, have no ruins of past civilization, no archeological, written, nor even oral history of which to speak.” They could barely harness fire. This may not be the mark of Cain or the curse of Canaan, but it is certainly the sign of a race set apart from the world. In the words of Isaiah, they are “a nation scattered and peeled…a people terrible from their beginning onward.” Christians today, in their abortive attempt at compassion for the stranger, make war on their own sons and daughters. “Plainly put, the cost of denying the reality of race is carnage and death.”
Seven of the ten worst countries in the world are in Sub-Saharan Africa. Another is Haiti, which is an extension of Africa. The other two countries are current warzones. The top thirteen best-performing states are all overwhelmingly white.
Lying 501(c)3 impastors like Piper and Sproul have much in common with Judas, who stooped to betrayal for a small bag of coins. They are rewarded with respect and fat salaries for a time, but at the cost of dispossessing their own people. They are traitors.
Ehud shows that a willful blindness has set in among scientists as well as theologians. There is a war underway against biology and all of God’s created order.
[T]he next time someone tells you that “science has proven that race doesn’t exist” [remember that] when the greatest living expert on genetics said otherwise, he was immediately shunned by all of the government-sponsored think tanks and stripped of his funding. The law of political correctness dictates that science is not allowed to draw such conclusions…
As the American Society of Transplantation attests, the transfusion of blood, bone marrow, and organs is possible heterogeneously (cross-race) only through “the development of drugs that suppress the immune system.” This immunosuppression generally destroys a patient’s immune system for good.
R.C. Sproul Jr. might want to read Ehud’s article and amend his marriage-is-for-humans theory, if children matter at all to him.
Moreover, it is the Scripture which gives us one of the most clearly expressed refutations of the a-racial/anti-racial view, in that the text everywhere presupposes the legitimate, lawful, and ontological reality of races and ethnic groups. Specific terms are used redundantly throughout, such as Gentiles and nations (Heb. goyim/Grk. ethnos), which mean, just as the Greek hints, “ethnicities.” Similarly, the term peoples (Grk. genos) is the root of “genes,” “genetics,” “genealogy,” etc., and is generally translated by linguists forthrightly as “races.” There are even many words used in Scripture which denote taxonomical, lineal, and legal exclusion from a race: for instance, the term which appears as “other peoples” (Grk. allogenes) is the composite of two Greek words, allos (“other”) and genos (“races”). And the term rendered “illegitimate” or “bastard” (Heb. mamzer/Grk. nothos) in Deuteronomy 23:2 is candidly understood by linguists to mean “mixed-race, mongrel,” as is proved by its translation in Zechariah 9:6, which says “a mongrel race shall dwell in Ashdod.” These are not controversial matters to language experts, only to modern theologians who desperately seek to obfuscate the plain meaning of the text in favor of an egalitarian sociology. Wherever the text speaks in these overtly ethnic categories (which is virtually everywhere), moderns are compelled by the spirit of our liberal age, perhaps unwittingly, to spiritualize all said references. Even the word which is often rendered as “pagan” (Heb. zuwr) in the Old Testament of our English Bibles literally means “alien or foreign.” Any religious connotation assumed when one sees the word “pagan” in those texts is but an anachronistic eisegetical (misinterpretive) imposition made by translators. It is patently a racial or tribal term.
As we’ve said, the Alienist heresy is basically rehashed Gnosticism. Race must be destroyed so that purposely-rootless individuals may prepare for their transition to ghosthood. Families are useful vehicles for the gospel, because families raise a new crop of individuals, but nations are no longer to be baptized as nations, unless by accident. This is the new twist on the old Gnostic idea that the body is evil but the soul is divine and immortal. As Petr commented here recently, on the third century Petelian tablet the “soul” declares:
I am a child of Earth and of Starry Heaven;
But my race is of Heaven.
Or as Larry Norman sang to the dispie-sensational Jesus Freaks of the 1970s: “This world is not my home. I’m just passing through.”
Milton Friedman on why society is and must be based on families and extended families rather than individuals.
“A concept of individualism, the one that prevails, is relatively modern, coming into its own with the French Revolution and its aftermath. Instead of identifying a man as a member of a group, family, clan, or nation, in terms of his faith and culture, identification became purely personal. ‘I am myself. Nobody can define me. I am unique.’ That’s the mentality.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony (7:24)
See here and here for the latest feeble attempt of Bojangles Marinov to redefine the family. He asserts, contrary to all that is identifiably Christian for thousands of years, that allegiance that extends beyond father, mother, sister, and brother is “pagan” because Christianity only looks forward, never behind. Alienists are so eager to deny that blood and soil have any significance whatsoever that they make themselves look increasingly ridiculous.
You’ll be amazed by what militant amillennialist Michael Horton says here, beginning at 6:20. Horton is an outspoken advocate of the New Gnosticism. He denies that we should make “the moral law as expressed in the Ten Commandments” the law of the land, either as the Church or as individuals. He says we have no right to laws based on the law of Moses, because they were given only to ancient Israel. We’re only allowed to have laws based on conscience, he says, because anything more would be coercive. He even claims that Jesus “revoked” Mosaic legislation by fulfilling it and then “kicking it away.” This is the “radical two kingdoms” wackiness which Rev. Bret McAtee nicely summarizes here:
Simply put:
1. Life is divided into two realms, the common realm (Creation) and the Church realm (Redemption). In the common realm Jesus rules through Natural law, and arguments for and against issues with pagans must be based on Natural law alone. No Bible usage allowed. In the Church realm, Jesus rules through His revealed special revelation (Scripture), and every issue must be decided upon with warrant from God’s word.
2. The Church cannot and must not speak to issues that exist in the common realm. The Church must only speak to the redemptive realm and to individual personal morality that does not coincide with the public square. This means that ministers have no business praying at Town Meetings, writing Letters to the Editor about public square issues, or officiating at common realm events. Ministers as ministers belong to the Church and must not speak beyond the Church as ministers.
3. The Old Testament Moral law applies to believers in their personal private lives, and though it might apply to the common realm, the Church cannot do the applying. That is left to the believer alone to do.
4. No case law at all and no general equity at all from the case law applies today. So, from a Natural law view we might say incest is wrong, when arguing on policy in the common realm, but we cannot say it is wrong from a general equity Biblical case law view.
5. R2K denies that there is or ought to exist such a thing as Christian culture. R2K denies that there is such a thing as Christian education, Christian economics, Christian history, Christian jurisprudence, Christian art, Christian music, Christian politics, or Christian family, because “Christian” is a term reserved for the redemptive realm, and all these exist in the common realm. In point of fact, R2K denies any and all ideas of Christendom.
6. R2K advocates individual Christian involvement in common realm affairs, but it refuses to give a “thus saith the Lord” declaration on any of that involvement. So in practical terms, this means that one set of Christians could start a Christian Marxist club, and another set of Christians could form a Christian Limited Government club, and both sets of Christians would be equally honored in the Church, because the Church does not get involved in these common realm issues. Indeed, it is even possible that members of both clubs would be members of the same Church.
7. R2K advises to obey Caesar in every situation and policy UNLESS Caesar decrees that the redemptive realm must be shut down and worship must cease. Only then can the Church tell Caesar to take a hike. If Caesar mandates homosexual marriage, as one example, then Christians must support Caesar in this and only work against such policy within the confines of what Caesar determines to be law.
And they can oppose it in their personal lives (see point 3), but the R2K “church” will never back them up if they, for example, try to oust fags as youth leaders in various civic organizations (see point 6). The upshot is that Christian individuals must be totally isolated from their communities; the church is to be their only community, and their insane R2K pastor the only leader. Head for the hills before they start mixing the Kool-Aid.
The Top Ten Reasons Why I am Not a Baptist.
An amusing baptist slant on history in which the red dots (true Christians) are choked out in the non-baptist stream:
Here’s a Free Will Baptist church that voted against miscegenation and then promptly apologized for it. The church had resolved that “parties of such marriages will not be received as members, nor will they be used in worship services and other church functions, with the exception being funerals.” The vote was made necessary when a mudshark brought her buck from Zimbabwe to the service and invited him to sing. She quickly discovered that even Arminians know more than she about the Bible.
“But is not race-mixing Satan’s supreme triumph? If he can kill the white race then he can eradicate the past, the Christian past of the European people. Without that past there is no future for poor, unaccommodated mankind. It’s of no consequence to Satan if a theoretical Christ, fashioned to please the liberals and the colored races, exists in the Christian churches. All that concerns Satan is the non-abstract Christ, the Christ of the antique Europeans…” ~ CWNY
As Pat Buchanan writes in his latest book, “When the faith dies, the culture dies, the civilization dies, the people die.”
“The liberals and the halfway house Christians are fond of telling people like me, who write about the moral gulf between old Europe and modern Europe, that every sin known to man existed in old Europe just as it does now. And that is true; but we must make two distinctions. First, the antique Europeans did not deny that they were sinners. When they committed adultery they called it sin; when a woman killed her child, she was called a murderess. And the second distinction is like unto the first. When a man or woman sinned they were not supported by their peers; they were shunned. For instance, in antique Europe if a man was addicted to sodomy he had no support system. He knew if he couldn’t control his sinful desires then he must confine them to secret places where the outcast men dwelt. And repentance was possible, because if a man persisted in his sin he knew he lost the fellowship of his fellow men, just as Scrooge cast himself into greed-forged isolation by his illicit love of money. The sinner could be reclaimed, because there was a world beckoning to him in which people believed there was a such a thing as sin. Not so today… Today a sinner is lauded and told he is virtuous. He has a support system for his sin. Miscegenation becomes ‘striking a blow against prejudice,’ infanticide becomes ‘a woman’s choice,’ sexual promiscuity becomes ‘free love,’ and institutionalized blasphemy becomes ‘liberalism.’” ~ CWNY
Alienists only have a few examples to offer from the Bible to justify miscegenation, all of which we roundly dispute: Moses/Zipporah, Salmon/Rahab, Boaz/Ruth, and a few others on the periphery. They say that these were godly men whose mixed marriages were blessed, and therefore Irishmen are perfectly suited to marry equatorials. But isn’t it fascinating that they never use examples of godly men who had more than one wife to justify polygamy? Isn’t it curious that they never use examples of godly slaveowners like Philemon to justify slavery? Apparently, biblicism, like the American Express card, has its limits.
Our foul-mouthed Rosa Parks. She was arrested after this incident and will remain in jail until January. Her child is in state custody. Meanwhile… An 18-year-old white boy in London is chased to his home by a gang of blacks who slash his throat and leave him bleeding at his front door until he dies. Meanwhile… A gang of Somalian Muslim girls, screaming “kill the white slag,” repeatedly kick a white girl in the head as she lay motionless on the ground. The blacks walk free without being charged. The judge reasons that they could not have been drunk because their religion does not allow it. All the white sheeple who rushed to apologize profusely for the belligerence of our Rosa have nothing to say about these attacks, and not a word of apology or grief is heard from the fabled “black community,” lauded in story and song. All that the sheeple can do is lock their doors and hide.
The last gasp of “multiculturalism.”
The reign of terror is ending. More and more white people are pissed off and are growing courageous.
“Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society.” ~ Aristotle
“There will always be an England.” ~ H.V. Morton
According to this CNN poll, whites give Obama negatives by an almost 2-to-1 ratio, while non-whites give him positives by a more than 2-to-1 ratio. One of these days, whites will realize that only they can determine their own future.
It’s a myth that North American Indians used fish to fertilize their corn. If anything, Squanto learned how to fertilize by observing Europeans. And while Squanto’s assistance to the Pilgrims was undoubtedly appreciated, his tribe had just been wiped out by a plague, making his advice about how to live off the land and paint with all the colors of the wind a bit less crucial than white people like to believe every time Thanksgiving rolls around. They believe myths about the “noble savage” because it serves their purposes.
Speaking of the noble savage, it’s interesting that Herman Cain took the opposite approach to marketing that corporations take. No respectable company dares to place white people in the foreground of marketing photos. The white man is always in the background, usually accompanied by a white woman, while black women and Asian women and beings of indiscernible patrilineage are at the center of the photo, depicted as the masters of industry, with their arms folded confidently across their chests. The message is clearly that a few white men are still allowed to keep their jobs only as long as they are willing to contribute to the hijacking of their civilization and economy. And God help the poor antiquarian who dares to suggest that women make the world’s worst executives. Even women hate to work for women. Corporate marketing is a different world on the other side of the looking glass; it tends to invert reality. Herman Cain bought stock images for his website that reveal his goals, just as other corporations boldly depict their non-white goals. For Herman, white women are front and center.
Here’s another example of reality inverted. In an article about one of the safest colleges in the country (because it is located in an overwhelmingly white area), the accompanying image is naturally a grinning black man.
If you’re Doug Phillips, the homunculus of patriarchy, you can place yourself in the back layer of a photo and still make it focused on you. Narcissists know how to do things like this.
Ultrasound is racist. Even unborn white children despise jungle noise.
Fiat has declared war on the white race, on beauty, and on good taste. The Jews are no longer even trying to be subtle. In reality, of course, three black men would run as fast as they could from three pregnant women.
The reason why lunch counters were segregated.
Now we read that 60% of black girls under the age of 18 have been sexually abused by black men. Explain to me again why our “racist” Christian forefathers were wrong for believing that slavery is the best state of existence for the black man. Three percent of the population is responsible for more violence than the rest of the country combined. They are a staggering 5,000% more violent than whites. This is so lopsided that not even profession of faith can make up for it. “The least Christian White neighborhood is still a many times more moral place than the most Christian Black neighborhood.” Liberia is the most “theonomic” country in the world, and it’s a hellhole.
Fifty-one years after independence from Belgium, Congo women are being raped at 26 times the rate previously reported by the United Nations. Four women every five minutes.
Black people did invent Bluetooth technology though.
The White House has released an official proclamation called “The President’s Agenda and the African American Community” that details how we have all gone deep into debt to give free money to black people, which we are to take as wonderful news. It would be horrible racism and evil wickedness to suggest that anything should be done for white people, or even that white people should keep their money for their own children. Explain to me again how slavery was eradicated.
THANK God for pluck – unknown to slaves –
The self ne’er of its Self bereft,
Who, when the right arm’s shattered, waves
The good flag with the left.
Clearly, the system is to blame here.
The poor families of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom will not yet be able to close the saddest chapter of their lives, as our incomparable “justice” system assured them. New trials have been granted to the murderers. It’s stunning to think of how much money will be spent on the scum. Every day that they breathe air is an offense to humanity.
The prosecution prepares its case:
Polk County, Florida, School Board Chairmulatto Kay Fields, who appears to be one of the ugliest hybrids that ever grew from a zygote, is forcing two young white siblings to attend separate schools because racial “diversity is just as important as family” unity.
It’s HATE to insinuate that black men look alike. This boy was expelled from school for his unspeakable hatred. When asked for specifics, the superintendent replied, “It’s not what he said but how he said it.” Yeah, we get that a lot from those who don’t have a clue about how to prove us wrong.
You won’t find the word “equality” in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, or the Federalist Papers. When Jefferson wrote in the Declaration that all men are created equal, he was making a very important and timely distinction between inherited and natural aristocracy. Obviously, the slaveowners who ratified his words did not intend that they should be interpreted as they have, with every person who breathes having equal capacities and rights. Of the French revolutionaries who idolized equality and gave birth to the new American religion, Edmund Burke wrote:
Nothing can be conceived more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician. It comes nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man. It is like that of the principle of evil himself, incorporeal, pure, unmixed, dephlegmated, defecated evil.
(Don’t miss the poem of the wolf and the lamb at that link.)
It’s a Wonderful Race. “Meet witch doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga.”
Check your region for mighty-whiteness. And please, be aware that we can’t all be perfect.
Proof that all races are equal:
Families in Russia with three or more children are now being given free land.
Ed Young, the “life coach” of this seeker church, is ultra-relevant and stars in rap skits like a wigger. But churches like this have to continually tantalize the audience to keep them interested in the “gospel,” so of course they’ve learned to cash in on sex sermons. This one shows all the places where a married couple can have sex every day. If Polycarp had known about this he might not have been burned at the stake.
Is every person in the world your neighbor? Heretic Tim Keller says heterosexuality doesn’t send you to heaven, so homosexuality can’t send you to hell. He says it’s “misleading” to call homosexuality sinful. Something tells me that he and Ted Haggard keep in touch.
Get a free copy of Greg Bahnsen’s By This Standard.
The KJV: When 400 years old you are, look as good you will not.
Hope for the Luddites of the 21st century!
For housewives of the 21st century who prefer animate rather than mechanical domestic servants, there may be a choice other than the robot… The RAND panel mentioned that by the year 2020 it may be possible to breed intelligent species of animals, such as apes, that will be capable of performing manual labor. During the 21st century, those houses that don’t have a robot in the broom closet could have a live-in ape to do the cleaning and gardening chores. Also, the use of well-trained apes as family chauffeurs might decrease the number of automobile accidents.
The twelve days of homeschool.
In Texas, white kids are being forced in school to recite the Mexican national anthem and pledge allegiance to the Mexican flag. It’s all part of the conquest of Aztlan. It’s funny that the Mexican salute looks similar to the Nazi salute. In Europe, an arm motion of that kind can get you arrested. Even dogs can get in trouble in Germany. An animal shelter trained this dog to stop raising his leg so high, but the answer to the problem was to put him in a sombrero. I like how the author of the article makes a special point of calling him a “crossbreed.” And this one calls him a “mongrel.” No, journalists, the word is “Mexican.”
Don’t just keep the aliens out of your country. Keep them out of your groceries too.
At first glance, the picture below looks like a before/after shot. But not so fast.
The line going down the center is the southern border of the empire, and Mexico is to the left.
Aren’t borders hateful, seeing as how all people are equal? In fact, all human beings are Americans in embryo, since America is merely an idea, a dream, a proposition, not a real land inhabited by a real nation.
“I think it was Robert Frost who said good fences make for good neighbors. The white separatist is the man who has the courage and the honesty to say he believes in fences and thereby creates the only genuine basis for good neighbors.” ~ Michael Hoffman’s White Separatism FAQ
It’s helpful to see pictures like this to contrast them with the lies of anti-Christs. Jew Albert Einstein called ethnic nationalism “the measles of mankind.” But of course, when the security of Jews is at stake, borders are good things.
Be sure to visit our friends at Empty Tomb Books, and order your copy of the new edition of Judaism’s Strange Gods. It’s a mini-masterpiece. To whet your whistle:
When Jesus said that Jerusalem was the “killer of the prophets” (Luke 13:34-35), He was indicating the propensity of that city when it is denuded of God, and when man’s pride and ego – as symbolized by Judaism – comes to the ascendant. Under these conditions, the so-called “Holy Land” is nothing of the kind. It becomes, rather, a God-forsaken sandbox where the spiritual heirs of the Pharisees further multiply their transgressions…
The weird cult of “Judeo-Christianity” is an oxymoron found on the lips of many Christians including even conservative ones. This abominable “Judeo-Christianity” contrivance is of a piece with the cloning of human and animal genes or any of the other alchemical mixtures of two mutually contradictory substances which we have witnessed these last few decades in the modern cauldron. The near-universal approbation and currency exerted by this cockamamie term exposes at one glance the level of abysmal historical ignorance which obtains today. The Church Fathers knew of no “Judeo-Christian” tradition, since Judaism did not exist before Christ. Before Him, there was the faith of the Israelites as it gradually decayed and was subverted by corrupt teachings such as were transmitted by the Pharisees and the Sadducees…
Judaism is Talmudism, not Old Testament, and those who revere the Old Testament teachings outside the prism of Talmud are its hereditary enemies. A counterfeit cannot be said to be the heir to a genuine article. Judaism, whether qualified as ancient or not, is totally alien to the only Biblical religion on earth today, Christianity…
The psychiatry of Sigmund Freud was premised on his diagnosis of many Judaics who were raised under Talmudic auspices. He then applied what he learned from their Talmudic-inspired dementia to his diagnosis of gentiles, who had no such background. As a result, non-Judaics were saddled with all sorts of bizarre penis-envy and incestuous oedipal complexes, as well as other mental sicknesses that were not part of their heritage. Weird concepts and strange imaginings never before encountered in mainstream psychological literature were suddenly being applied to all mankind. Overnight we were convinced of our own perversity, but a perversity we did not possess until the “scientist” Freud determined that we were burdened with these intrinsically Talmudic orientations. The fact is, Talmudists become insane as a result of trying to obey the Talmud (even though Hollywood propaganda has often associated such “hang-ups” with “Puritan” and “Christian” repression)…
The faith of Western Civilization, Christianity, has been supplanted by a new state religion, which is Judaism, presented in the palatable guise of Orwellian “Holocaust” Newspeak of which the figure of six million dead “Jews” is fixed, sacred dogma which in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Canada it is a crime punishable by imprisonment to doubt or contest… Christians are not to obey or partake in any idolatry or false witness. The Six Million, if it is a wild exaggeration, would constitute a lie that has been made sacred and to which we in the West are expected to bow and bend our knee. There is a Biblical warning along these lines, about “not giving heed to Jewish fables…” (Titus 1:14).
UPDATE: Mickey Henry has given the readers 15% off on Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded if ordered before January 1. Use this coupon code at checkout: SWB-JSG.
Get this book too, and it will change your life. Use the coupon code F&H-PGP at checkout for an additional 15% off. These are perfect Christmas presents.
But now, for equal time, let us meditate upon the wisdom of the Talmud.
Not burying cut fingernails causes miscarriages. (BT Moed Katan 18a)
Adam had sexual relations with all of the animals in the Garden of Eden. (BT Yebamoth 63a)
After seven years, hyenas turn into bats. After even longer periods, they turn into thorns and demons. (BT Baba Kamma 16a)
That’s about all I can take.
“The Golgotha of modern mankind is Auschwitz. The cross, the Roman gallows, was replaced by the gas chambers… In Auschwitz, the Jewish people was the High Priest and the sacrificial lamb in one.” ~ Rabbi Ignaz Maybaum, The Face of God After Auschwitz, 1965
You might be surprised to know that the Nazis were very critical of this board game. But this shouldn’t stop you from drop-shipping it to your local Chabad House as a Christmas gift. What better time of the year to be generous? I’m dreaming of a blight business.
This article is about how Jews are in anguish because they can’t get the great Arthur Butz fired, which is what they want to do to everyone who disagrees with them. The first two sentences are amusing, though.
Students don’t have too many nice things to say about Arthur R. Butz. He is a professor of electrical engineering at Northwestern University, and according to his students, he is boring, his handwriting is too small to make out on the board and he leaves all the real teaching to the teaching assistants.
Anyone who has been to a major university knows that this is an accurate description of every professor.
This is why Ron Paul is under a media blackout. The other contenders show him what is required to be elected president. Mr. Paul was, of course, banned from this debate by the Jews because he is an “extremist.”
“The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected.” ~ G.K. Chesterton
This is obviously a Ron Paul voter:
The SPLC is all that stands between Granny Warriors obsessed with Ron Paul and the Fourth Reich! Hate is on the rise! Send in your donations today! Human Events asks:
Is the SPLC, by its own criteria, the real hate group? It still carries weight in plenty of circles here in America, and so when it categorizes an organization as a hate group, many people of good conscience are influenced by that designation, one which is quite stigmatizing and destructive, as evidenced by the recent events involving [Focus on the Family] and [American Family Association] mentioned above. Yet it is the leaders of the SPLC who are either irresponsibly attacking other fine organizations, or worse still, knowingly defaming them.
Who then deserves the title of “hate group,” Focus on the Family or the Southern Poverty Law Center? Who has been guilty of demonizing others and spreading hurtful, inaccurate information? Whose actions and words have been hateful? The record speaks for itself.
Perhaps Human Events has learned from its own overreaction. The magazine unfairly fired Kevin Lamb following a mere phone call from Porky Beirich of the SPLC, who called him a “supremacist” or some other meaningless term.
Meanwhile, the ADL is hot on the trail of anti-Semitism. Dogs and vodka don’t stand a chance.
Questions that a friend of ours would like to see put to Newt Gingrich at the next Republican-Jewish affair:
- When are Jews finally going to break the silence and begin talking about the Holocaust?
- When is Israel finally going to get the amount of foreign aid it deserves?
- Is the present level of assistance to our only ally in the Middle East enough and, if it is not, in your opinion how much more can Americans give to ensure the stability, vitality and security of those who have made the desert blossom like the rose?
- What will you do as President legally to quell the tidal wave of anti-semitic speech and Holocaust-denial that is inflicting so much anguish on Holocaust survivors and other members of “the community”?
“Instead of friends, I see in Washington only mortal enemies. Instead of loving the old flag of the stars and stripes, I see in it only the symbol of murder, plunder, oppression, and shame.” ~ Rose O’Neal Greenhow
If you own guns or have more than seven days of food in your house, the empire suspects you to be a terrorist.
Though it oversimiplifies, this page about returning to the Middle Ages is very good.
“A recent incident on a railroad train justly illustrates the result of women’s ‘rights.’ A solitary female entered a car where every seat was occupied, and the conductor closed the door upon her and departed. She looked in vain for a seat, and at last appealed to an elderly man near her to know if he would not ‘surrender his seat to a lady.’ He, it seems, was somewhat a humorist, and answered: ‘I will surrender it cheerfully, Madam, as I always do, but will beg leave first to ask a civil question. Are you an advocate of the modern theory of women’s rights?’ Bridling up with intense energy, she replied, ‘Yes, sir, emphatically; I let you know that it is my glory to be devoted to that noble cause.’ ‘Very well, Madam,’ said he, ‘then the case is altered: You may stand up like the rest of us men, until you can get a seat for yourself.’ This was exact poetic justice; and it foreshadows precisely the fate of their unnatural pretensions. Men will treat them as they treat each other; it will be ‘every man for himself, and the devil take the hindmost’… And the society which will emerge from this experiment will present woman in the position which she has always held among savages, that of domestic drudge to the stronger animal… She will reappear from this ill-starred competition defeated and despised, tolerated only to satiate the passion, to amuse the idleness, to do the drudgery, and to receive the curses and blows of her barbarized masters.” ~ Robert Lewis Dabney
It’s the slow, sloppy slide into androgyny; life as the Negro has always known it, both before and after he heard the gospel.
An excellent quote from B.B. Warfield:
To Paul, the human race is made up of families, and every several organism – the church included – is composed of families, united together by this or that bond. The relation of the sexes in the family follow it therefore into the church. To the feminist movement the human race is made up of individuals; a woman is just another individual by the side of the man, and it can see no reason for any differences in dealing with the two. And, indeed, if we can ignore the great fundamental natural difference of sex and destroy the great fundamental social unit of the family in the interest of individualism, there does not seem any reason why we should not wipe out the differences established by Paul between the sexes in the church – except, of course, the authority of Paul.
As Bret McAtee observes, this Jacobin worldview carries over from a gynocracy to the destruction of cultures and ethnicities. It pretends “that just as women and men are undifferentiated cogs, so it is the case that men of different nationalities are likewise merely undifferentiated cogs that can be swapped in and out of the Statist created cultural machine of the New World Order.”
“Romantic love thrives on frustration. It likes to feel sorry for itself. And the essence of romantic love is that there be insuperable problems, star-crossed lovers, and that it go from frustration to frustration. And romantic love dies when it can get the one it loves.” ~ Dr. R.J. Rushdoony
Movies these days, and I guess most stories, are either explosions and car chases for men or romance for women. And the romance never moves beyond the excitement of the chase. Families as families are never honored, because that would be boring. As a consequence, young people are taught to be shallow and to thrive on frustration, as Rushdoony said. They never see even fictional accounts of life as it is meant to be lived.
If this is “unhate,” I’ll take a triple hate on the rocks, please.
The sons of Japheth continue seeking new worlds to explore. Dear God in heaven, I love white people.
Thanks to James Edwards for linking to our previous piece. James is well on his way to a Bob Costas level of broadcasting expertise. I only wish that his rewards were commensurate with his talent.
“It’s not just for money alone that one spends a lifetime building up a business, Mr. Jorkin… It’s to preserve a way of life that one knew and loved. No, I can’t see my way to selling out to the new vested interests, Mr. Jorkin. I’ll have to be loyal to the old ways and die out with them if needs must.” ~ Ebenezer Scrooge
Have a very merry Christmas and a happy new year. It’s a tradition at our house, when we tuck the children into bed on Christmas Eve, to don the kerchief and cap, light a few candles, and read Ed Sebesta’s holiday classic, No Plantation Christmas.
Regarding Hortons mention just under the Marriage 100 Years From Now poster above, I listened to that particular recording of him & posted this on the Revs thread where the link was posted. I like to create quotes that I think would be said from certain people, places, or things & in an amusing way post those quotes. What Horton said brought something in particular to mind as I was listening:
I’m listening…he just said that nation states can have constitutions ordered from the natural moral law written on the conscience.
“If that’s the case then depending upon my mood the law is subject to change.” – by order of The State
-tkbk-
Thank you so much for mentioning my little online bookstore, Empty Tomb Books! As a thank you to readers of Spirit/Water/Blood, I’d like to offer 15% off on “Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded” if you order before January 1st. Just use this coupon code at checkout: SWB-JSG
“(Marinov) asserts, contrary to all that is identifiably Christian for thousands of years, that allegiance that extends beyond father, mother, sister, and brother is “pagan” because Christianity only looks forward, never behind.”
To begin with, it is very naive to lump all “pagan” things together. For starters, there is this basic differentiation between “Dionysian” and “Apollonian” forms of heathen thought that Nietzsche made famous.
There are indeed pagan cults and religions around the world that are all about conserving order and worshipping ancestral traditions and rituals. But that is just one side of the coin. Because there is also “underground”, Dionysian forms of pagan thought that manifest themselves in CHAOS CULTS. The antinomian counterpart of legalism.
The grand old man of anti-familism himself (Gary North), has written a book about how chaos cults have inspired modern revolutionary thought. Whereas Apollonian heathen worship social order, the Dionysian ones relish in overthrowing it.
And it’s a psychological archetype that is universal. The classic Chinese equivalent of Apollonian worship of hierarchy and orderliness, for example, is Confucianism and its cult of filial duties. But Chinese history has also seen many bloody uprisings made by occult sects that had gotten rid of “familist” prejudices – judge for yourself:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?p=1061794&highlight=trigrams#post1061794
“Thus began many uprisings that were incited by doomsday-preaching and messianic sects; the Yellow Turbans in 184, the Faqing Maitreya rebellion in 515, the Manichaean rebellion of Fang La in 1120, the White Lotus in 1351, the Eight Trigrams in 1813, etc. The message of these movements was pretty similar. They combined Taoism and folk-Buddhism and often emphasized Maitreya, the future Buddha whose soon-to-happen coming in its brightness and liberation would be realized in the destruction of the “old world.” The believers, the chosen elite, would have to further the realization of the prophecy while awaiting the salvation.
All possible ties would have to be cut off, the family ties included. According to the chronicle of Wei dynasty (from the year 515), “fathers, sons and brothers no longer know each other.” In China, morality is essentially based on the respect for family duties: if these are abandoned, everything is permitted. A sect becomes the new replacement-family that completely subjugates the individual.
The rest of the mankind will go to Hell in hereafter – and will suffer a violent end in this world. Occasionally (like in the year 402), the magistrates are chopped into pieces and if their wives and children refuse to eat them, the same thing will happen to them. In the year 1120 the massacre seems to have involved millions of people. All values are turned upside down. In the year 1130 a proclamation was given that “by killing people, the dharma (Buddhist law) will be realized”; murder is a merciful deed, for it releases the soul; theft promotes equality; suicide is enviable happiness; the more horrendous the suicide is, the greater the reward will be; according to one 19th century text, “the death committed with slow dismemberment guarantees an entry to Heaven in a crimson cape.””
Now here was a pagan adept that had truly abandoned familist sentiments (following the Buddhist doctrine that since the world is a mere illusion, its empty forms need to be abolished):
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?p=1062440&highlight=maher#post1062440
“Demiéville also refers to the ninth-century Chinese monk Yi-hiuan, who urged his hearers to “Kill everything you encounter, internally as well as externally! Kill the Buddha! Kill your father and mother! Kill your closest friends!””
Even such heathen who were not specifically committed to Dionysian excesses were not as such lovers of Apollonian order as superficial classicist historians might lead us to think. I seem to recall that Rushdoony wrote in his “One and the Many” that Julius Ceasar was some sort of initiate in Bacchanalian mysteries, and this was somehow connected to his violent overthrow of traditional Roman ways.
Even Sparta, the epitome of Fascist order in the classical world, went through a “Reconstruction” of its own more than two hundred years before Christ:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabis#Ruler_of_Sparta
“Nabis was committed to the reformist program of Cleomenes III and took it to extreme lengths, exiling the wealthy and dividing up their estates.[4] He freed many slaves and made them citizens, but left the institution of helotry in place as part of the Lycurgan system which he was claiming to restore.[5] The increased citizen body, however, meant that Nabis had more citizen troops for his army, which also included numerous mercenaries. Polybius, who was deeply hostile to Nabis’ revolutionary program, described his supporters as “a crowd of murderers, burglars, cutpurses and highwaymen” (ἀνδροφόνοι καὶ παρασχίσται, λωποδύται, τοιχωρύχοι).[6]
Nabis executed the last descendants of the two Spartan royal dynasties; and the ancient sources, especially Polybius and Livy, depict him as a bloodthirsty ruler who held power through armed force and shocking brutality. Polybius (13.6-7) claims that he would frequently exile the leading citizens of conquered communities and marry their wives to the brigands and freed slaves under his command. Polybius (13.6) in an account that either demonstrates the extent of Nabis’s tyranny or Polybius’s bias, tells how wealthy landowners were often summoned into his presence and forced to pay him large sums of money – those who refused were tortured, supposedly through use of a machine that resembled an Iron Maiden,[7] known as the Apega of Nabis, made after his own wife Queen Apega.”
See also:
http://www.archive.org/stream/ancientcityastu03coulgoog#page/n472/mode/2up
Wasn’t Way Cool Jr. defrocked a while back for ecclesiastical abuse? Is he still with the CREC romper room, or am I behind the times?
In the parallel universe he inhabits, what did the gospel do to build Europe in the ages prior to the evangelism of Europe? The gospel did not turn back the Canaanite hordes of Hannibal nor the Eastern hordes of Xerxes just to name two; the eternal plan of God keeping Europe for the gospel did. And the instrument in each of those cases was the white people who loved their lands and their people, unlike the poseurs and charlatans of today.
How can one spend three decades in ministry and quote only part, or just not understand, what 1 Timothy 5:8 actually says?
http://vimeo.com/32974486
Piper’s greatest fear: That someone is thinking too much about family.
Actually the armies of Hannibal were largely Celts whom he had recruited from today’s northern Italy. Only his cavalry was essentially North African, and Roman historians in fact considered as one of signs of Hannibal’s genius that he managed to maintain such a good discipline among such a multicultural crew:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?p=795191&highlight=guizot#post795191
“However, the delights of victory and of pillage at last brought into full play the Cisalpine Gauls’ natural hatred of Rome. After Ticinus and Trebia, Hannibal had no more zealous and devoted troops. At the battle of Lake Trasimene he lost 1500 men, nearly all Gauls; at that of Cannae he had 30,000 of them, forming two-thirds of his army; and at the moment of action they cast away their tunics and chequered cloaks (similar to the plaids of the Gaels or Scottish Highlanders) and fought naked from the belt upwards, according to their custom when they meant to conquer or die. Of 5500 men that the victory of Cannae cost Hannibal, 4000 were Gauls.”
We could say that Greco-Roman pagans did not yet have any clear “European” identity. They saw themselves as the golden mean between northern (“Scythian”) and Oriental barbarism.
For exaple, see what emperor Julian the Apostate, the last great champion of classic paganism, thought about the peoples of Western Europe:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?p=395891&highlight=galileans#post395891
“For lawgivers have succeeded in adding but little by their discipline to the natural characters and aptitudes of men. Accordingly the Scythians would not receive Anacharsis 28 among them when he |349 was inspired by a religious frenzy, and with very few exceptions you will not find that any men of the Western nations 29 have any great inclination for philosophy or geometry or studies of that sort, although the Roman Empire has now so long been paramount. But those who are unusually talented delight only in debate and the art of rhetoric, and do not adopt any other study; so strong, it seems, is the force of nature.”
29. 1 He means the Gauls and Iberians, since the Germans at that time were distinguished only in warfare.”
God almighty, Piper looks old and ghoulish. . .twisted–like Mr. Burns from The Simpsons.
You can’t hide it, folks. What you are on the inside will manifest on the outside, unless you’re a complete sociopath. If you’re at odds with reality, it’s going to manifest somehow. That usually means it’s going to break you.
Who still supports this creep?
There have always been both mercenaries and infighting among European peoples. Self interest and blindness are rampant among our people and always have been. Much like today. The Carthaginians were descendants of the Canaanites. The Punic Wars were an extension of the ages old struggle between God and Satan. Europe was saved from the horrors of Canaanite domination, whether or not any of the actors were conscious of it.
“Hannibal, the grace of Baal as his name ran in his own tongue.” – G.K. Chesterton
“Spaniards girt in gold and the brown Numidians on their unbridled desert horses wheeling and darting like hawks, and whole mobs of deserters and mercenaries and miscellaneous peoples; and the Grace of Baal went before them.” Chesterton, from The Everlasting Man, Chapter 7.
“And in its last stand of Latin fury
By Carthage yet ungored,
Roaring in language loud with fight
That unto devils she would not render
The tattered flag of human nature,
Rome fought with a broken sword.
Therefore great Baal has sent me
As war’s very wizardry,
For the last free fortress of heathen men
Still keeps its humanity.
For although the world grows old, grows old
And Hell is loosed by my father’s art;
Before Rome is wrecked upon the plain
Some humanity may yet remain
For the Galilean to reclaim
And Baal shall know fear in his heart.”
http://www.vulgatamagazine.org/dave19.html
I didn’t know that!
They might have been saved for a few years, but the entire atmosphere of rome was corrupted by the bankers and the Caesars. They were simply continuing the age old tradition of elites and bankers trying to destroy everything white. The Peloponnesian war was probably the starting point in terms of modern europe where the bankers in Athens fought against the Spartans who did not have bankers.
The first introduction that israel had to Baal worship was introduced by a rival aten priest class in the exodus account that followed Israel out of egypt. In 18th dynasty Egypt you had a power takeover by a priesthood and a king (Akhenaten, the father of king tut) who were the social Marxists par excellence of the ancient world. They not only attempted to switch the religion to monotheistic sun worship, but they also tried to completely change the architecture, the culture, and the racial makeup of Egypt. It took about forty to fifty years for them to get tossed out of Egypt which is about the time frame that we are talking about. They had human sacrifice in the wilderness and wielded essentially total power over Israel. This was so much the case that the primary tabernacle was not the true tabernacle, but the tabernacle of the enemy god molech.
2 But God turned away and delivered them up to serve the host of heaven; as it is written in the book of the prophets, ‘IT WAS NOT TO ME THAT YOU OFFERED VICTIMS AND SACRIFICES FORTY YEARS IN THE WILDERNESS, WAS IT, O HOUSE OF ISRAEL? 43 YOU ALSO TOOK ALONG THE TABERNACLE OF MOLOCH AND THE STAR OF THE GOD ROMPHA, THE IMAGES WHICH YOU MADE TO WORSHIP. I ALSO WILL REMOVE YOU BEYOND BABYLON.’ (Acts 7)
The interesting thing is that Steven will use this account of the deceiving of Israel to associate the chief priests with the deceivers. He will then go on to blame them for the murder of all of the prophets in Israel (which is the trait of the whore of Babylon, a nod to the ancient Babylonian scribal/priest class who formed the banking class due to their monopoly of literacy) and in his dialogue he obviously denounces the idea of the temple of Solomon as unnecessary which is sacrilege to the NWO. The history of the kings of Israel is essentially one long list of men compromising with the enemy with only a few exceptions. The kings of Israel beginning with Solomon were corrupted by their whoring with foreign gods and thus turned their hearts away from the God of Israel and Israel. They frequently embraced the false foreign gods and invited the foreign priest and scribal classes in which literally left the prophets and a few of the uncompromising people as the only people in Israel to oppose them. In revelation, you have the whore of Babylon and you have the beast as the two primary enemies of god’s people. The title of the beast is a nod towards the ancient ruling classes who used chimerical symbols to represent themselves from the sphinx to Bel’s dragon. In the NT times, this is a fairly obvious reference to the Ceasars who indeed ended up turning upon the Whore of Babylon.
At any rate, that is just about as good a summary of the ancient problems that plague us and still do to this day. A good deal of the infighting among Europeans (probably about 90% or so actually) is caused by elite power grabbing. A certain amount of tribal migration around Europe was natural with certain outrages yes, but the ages of the great empires and modern wars that cost so many lives were artificial attempts to grab power, not natural expressions of the peoples of europe. This includes the various campaigns in the British Isles from ceasar through to the conflicts during and after 1066, this includes the hundred year war, this includes the thirty years war, the American Revolution, this includes the war of 1812, this includes WWI and WWII and quite a few others that were not as large scale. All of these were fought over little more than power and the control of resources. It is a joke to think that any of this actually helped anyone; rather it harmed Europe and held it back for a thousand years.
It also isn’t that hard to see that the elites hold power in so many institutions. Simply look up how many popes were connected to European royalty after about 1300 or so. You will find that the vast majority were members of royalty (along with the majority of cardinals and bishops). The pope of martin Luther’s time, Leo X, was a medici. Pope Alexander VI’s children were regarded as royalty and he is an ancestor of modern royalty. In the modern times, you then have the introduction of the hardcore bankers and social manipulators in the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers. As always, the monarchs and elites are in full agreement with the social and financial manipulation that the non aristocratic groups engage in. The last monarch to oppose this scheme was the Kaiser who got deposed by the bankers, the tsar, the American presidency and the king of England all of whom were in league with one another.
G.K. Chesterton was not immune to fratricidal sentiments himself. He was one of those Englishmen who firmly believed that the First World War was a holy crusade against German evil (sometimes he even explicitly labeled Germany as the cradle of Reformation and thus evil).
This, for example, is what G.K. wrote in the preface of a book of his late brother Cecil who had fallen in 1918:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/24062/24062-h/24062-h.htm
“But things even deeper than patriotism impelled him against Prussianism. His enemy was the barbarian when he enslaves, as something more hellish even than the barbarian when he slays. His was the spiritual instinct by which Prussian order was worse than Prussian anarchy; and nothing was so inhuman as an inhuman humanitarianism. If you had asked him for what he fought and died amid the wasted fields of France and Flanders, he might very probably have answered that it was to save the world from German social reforms.”
“How many times do we need to say it? Christians thought like Kinists long before Darwin was born. And we’re not Darwinists by a long shot.”
A gentle criticism: if you really want to avoid this charge of Darwinian materialism, perhaps you should not keep comparing Blacks to monkeys (like with that image of ape orchestra).
If blacks were subhuman they would not seek after God. They are not apes, but they do live like apes, and their way of life works contrary to a Christian order. To suggest otherwise would be a lie. We don’t take the approach of shaming them into better behavior, as Rev. James Manning does. Our criticisms are not directed to blacks at all. They are entirely aimed at the white people who are foolish enough to copulate with them and grant them the vote.
You may be interested in the latest monthly newsletter (Vol 18 Issue 12) from Ken Ham’s Answers in Genesis. On the back page is the usual article denouncing racism and proclaiming again Ham’s “one blood” doctrine. But 2 pages over from that is a Christmas greeting with an AIG staff photo: over a hundred people and you will look long and hard trying to spot a “minority” in the photo. It’s a sea of white faces. He’s outdone Doug Phillips! What a hypocrite. I have more blacks working for me in my company of 15 than he does and I’m a mean ol’ kinist.
Joshua is hot on the trail. There is growing within the body of the West a cancer of those seeking world domination. The Luciferian cult is quite real.
As for GK Chesterton, just because he may be wrong about one thing doesn’t make him wrong about everything. I perceive him and others like him as tragic figures, great minds trapped by the Romanist deception. Nevertheless, he was in a sense right about German social reforms. That same mischief afflicted the US. The Union armies were full of escapees from the failed revolutions of 1848, many of them Germans. That doesn’t mean we should hate all Germans, nor does it mean that the World Wars were black and white. But Prussianism, Bismarckianism, Lincolnism, etc. all spring out of the same cesspool mentioned by Joshua. And behind all of it stands that old serpent and his hordes of deserters and mercenaries and miscellaneous peoples.
Thanks a lot for letting us know, Murdock. Hopefully we can get our hands on that picture. I’m glad you mentioned Little Napoleon Phillips. He has perfected the art of living in a city that is maybe one-third white, hiring only whites (except for maybe a black janitor), and denouncing “racism.” The funniest moment of his career was when he hosted a History of the World conference, had only white speakers, and discussed only white history. Now that’s what I call education! I think the only way he keeps from being fined by the EEOC is by having too few employees to be on their radar.
He and Ken Ham are birds of a feather. They’re both pushing interracial adoption so that they can soothe their white guilt and be around diversities that they can craft in the white image. They’re narcissists with messiah complexes. I pity the families when the adoptees reach their teenage years. It’s hard enough to deal with hormones and rebellion among our own kind without adding foreign genes to the mix.
I wonder how many non-whites work at Ham’s Creation Science museum in Kentucky.
I’ve been to the Creation Museum three times and don’t recall seeing any coloreds, except of course for the Adam and Eve in the faux-Garden.
Now that’s funny! Whiteness, whiteness everywhere except for the couple in the fig leaves.
I tend to find that Christians make for more committed multiculturalists than liberals do. I suspect that this is due to the fact that so many are convinced in Christianity that ensuring racial equality is an absolute moral value to be pursued at all costs. By convincing themselves of this, they will whip themselves up into a pious frenzy which no amount of facts or arguments can bring them down. Liberals on the other hand have a rather checkered history in this regard. Modern day liberals and a lot of earlier liberals are and were fairly egalitarian; however a lot of pre 1950 liberals weren’t that egalitarian. You do see a lot of liberal male whites and jews marrying Asians in this time which accounts for the largest proportion of interracial marriages.
Piper is kind of a case in point. He is fully committed to the multicultural doctrine as he has shown by adopting interracially and I think that one of his sons is married interracially (if I recall correctly). Several of the people at AiG are married to Asians, so I tend to think that they really do believe in it.
As far as the modern day “anti-racists” go, there are a few prominent individuals who are in interracial marriages (Rupert Murdoch and George Soros to Asian women and George W. Bush’s son to a Hispanic woman), however that whole group tends to use the middlemen as internationalist breeding stock, so I wouldn’t make too much of that. Basically, if you combine a NWO moron with an asian, you get a NWO moron who looks asian and thus could be used to subvert asian countries. In other words, a simple business decision.
I’m glad to hear that Caradoc doesn’t insist that we hate all Germans. It’s odd however to learn that Lincolnism can be associated BOTH with Prussianism AND the 1848 revolutionists. Now that’s a dialectic I would like to see unpacked.
BTW, Prussia (i.e. the court of Brandenburg) was Reformed since the early 1600′s, and most of the kings and kaisers appear to have been pious, Ludwig the Great being the notable exception.
We should learn to appreciate BOTH Chesterton’s typically British “let’s just muddle through somehow” ethos, AND the pietist/Reformed Prussian model of discipline, finding your place and being content and hard-working in it, and social reforms. When I was young, I preferred Chesterton’s vision. The older I get, the more I prefer the Prussian. However, one can see that both models have worked in forming and fashioning a great people.
As I’ve mentioned to some here before, when Ham and crew came out with One Blood, AIG consisted solely of whites. As afar as I know, that’s stayed pretty consistent.
When the One Blood came out, it did cause a few minor grumblings among some of the creationists with advanced degrees, because they felt the proofs One Blood gave were weak and misleading. However, since Ham is now the Don in the world of creation ministries, they dared not speak out publicly, lest they lose their jobs with AIG or ICR. Not only that, but one of Ham’s biggest persuaders on the topic of race was Jonathan Sarfati, who is a messianic joo of some variety.
Now that Ham has produced numerous videos and books on the subject, I’m afraid that even if he became a Kinist, he’d never admit it publicly because the cost for him to retract the damage he’s done would bankrupt AIG. But, one has to wonder what goes on in his head, since all 5 of his kids are married to whites, all of AIG’s speakers are white, and most of AIG’s staff is white – yet he promotes other Christians to steal foreigners and marry outside their race. Quite the hypocrite Ken is.
Oops, that would be Friedrich the Great (in my last post).
The house of hohenzollern is not one of the bad groups insofar as I know. Frederick the great was involved with the masons and was also a good friend of voltaire which likely explains why he wasn’t particularly pious. He was a man of the enlightenment and so he was fairly tolerant of a number of different views in prussia, however he preferred the jewish merchant presence to be kept to the polish border regions away from the cities. Kaiser Wilhelm II said that the masons and the jews started WWI (why, he almost sounds like a conspiracy theorist
). Bismark himself was a proponent of a nationalist lutheran protestant state albeit of a socialist variety.
What Caradoc is driving at I think is that a substantial portion of the northern generals were either prussian or influenced by prussian techniques of war via westpoint. A substantial portion of the northern army was also made up of recent german immigrants. These relitively new forces conflicted with the established southern english/scottish forces that had been in the south for ages. That’s not to diss all germans for that fact (because they were the most anti establishment group in the 20th century), however it is a historical fact.
To clarify: The conflict between the German/Prussian model and the Anglo-Celtic model is not racial, at least in my mind. I also interpreted Chesterton’s statement in that light. Bismarck’s policy of “Blood and Iron” and Lincoln’s Republican policy of internal improvements, tariffs, and favoured industries were very similar. It is proto-fascism. It is not a racial problem so much as a governmental/philosophical problem. Prussia instituted compulsory schooling; Prussia developed the kindergarten, Prussia instituted social security before anyone else had heard of it. I believe Bismarck’s idea may have been pragmatic – give them some of what they wanted and stave off full blown Communist revolt. But one should not make deals with the devil and expect to come out ahead. The initial compulsory government schools in the US were built on the Prussian model. They were intended both here and there to weaken family and local ties and strengthen loyalty to a central state, i.e Unionism versus localism/States Rights. Wasn’t Bismarck’s whole goal the unifying of Germany under a strong central government? Even if the Germans had the intentions of the angels in heaven, the fact is that they built and unleashed the social machinery of hell. This is what the South hated, and this is what good Englishmen hated. The machinery was first put in place in Prussia that is now being used against ALL Europeans. I hold no animus toward the German people as such; but I hate Prussianism much as I hate red republicanism and Yankee sanctimony. I hate National Socialism as well as International Socialism. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Sometimes there are more than two sides in a conflict. Read Pawns in the Game.
Yes, a substantial number of the Yankee generals were of German descent, and had come from the failed 1848 revolutions.
Every man who saw the race problem is not an ally. Cecil Rhodes was very much a proponent of white rule, and he was a devil.
“Kaiser Wilhelm II said that the masons and the jews started WWI (why, he almost sounds like a conspiracy theorist).”
The Kaiser was not himself innocent in the fratricidal mess of the WWI either, not by a long shot. He especially eagerly anticipated struggle against Russia, seeing it as a sacred race-war of Teutons against the Slavic enemy. Like Hitler, he had no problem starting a war against the French and Slavs, but he would have wanted to avoid conflict with Britain.
“Every man who saw the race problem is not an ally. Cecil Rhodes was very much a proponent of white rule, and he was a devil.”
Quite true. G.K. Chesterton liked to mock Rhodes and his imperialist dreams as Oriental and un-English:
http://www.online-literature.com/chesterton/2598/
“It was an Oriental (Disraeli) who gave to Queen Victoria the crown of an Empress in addition to that of a Queen. He did not understand that the title of King is higher than that of Emperor. For in the East titles are meant to be vast and wild; to be extravagant poems: the Brother of the Sun and Moon, the Caliph who lives for ever. But a King of England (at least in the days of real kings) did not bear a merely poetical title; but rather a religious one. He belonged to his people and not merely they to him. He was not merely a conqueror, but a father- yes, even when he was a bad father.
But this sort of solid sanctity always goes with local affections and limits: and the Cecil Rhodes Imperialism set up not the King, but the Sultan; with all the typically Eastern ideas of the magic of money, of luxury without uproar; of prostrate provinces and a chosen race. Indeed Cecil Rhodes illustrated almost every quality essential to the Sultan, from the love of diamonds to the scorn of woman.”
I agree with you on that matter. Adolf Hitler is perhaps the icon of this where the national socialist regime had a lot of evil and tyrannical elements within it. One only needs to think of the SS wearing black all the time and using logos like death’s head. The SS was also conscious of this fact as reflected in their marching song about singing the devil’s song as they fight the reds and destroy for germany.
I fully appreciate the complexities of WWI and the “powder keg” nature of europe at the time which was caused by all parties. However, I think that it should be pointed out that the kaiser did attempt to stop the war with his letter to the tsar and the king of england to no effect.
Effeminate John Piper seeks to further diminish the family.
http://www.desiringgod.org/blog/posts/have-we-over-elevated-the-family
When press’d by loads of church affairs
I seek to sport and dally,
The sweetest solace of my cares
Is in the lap of Sally…
She’s black you tell me — grant she be–
Must colour always tally?
Black is love’s proper hue for me
And white’s the hue for Sally…
What though she by the glands secretes;
Must I stand shil-I shall-I?
Tuck’d up between a pair of sheets
There’s no perfume like Sally…
You call her slave–and pray were slaves
Made only for the galley?
Try for yourselves, ye witless knaves–
Take each to bed your Sally…
(A poem written by Thomas Jefferson’s political opponents, though, I think it applies equally to Piper.)
Excellent commentary on Prussianism being forced upon the US. Something that many modern day writers on the immigration question fail to remember (see Vdare) is that the Know-Nothing movement was not just directed against Irish Catholics, but in the South (which lacked the anti-Catholic element) it was directed at mostly Protestant Germans (especially in Texas). The first ideologies started to appear in the US after the heavy German immigration began, and I dont think it can now be questioned that by the Civil War they had changed the face of the country – for the worse. That of course does not mean that I too dislike Germans, but it is downright false to see some German descended Americans acting as if the German immigration was totally seamless.
Here’s an example of Chesterton’s combination of anti-Protestant and anti-German attitudes:
http://www.chesterton.org/wordpress/2011/07/just-added-to-the-2011-chesterton-conference-line-up-gkc-himself/
“The internationalists in Chesterton’s time were pathetically trying to pacify two empires that were growing into monsters. The first of these was Nazi Germany (which according to Chesterton was nothing more than a continuation of the Prussian empire), the second was the Soviet Union. The rest of Europe and America watched in a sort of daze as these two beasts devoured Poland.
Chesterton blasts both the Liberals, who are enthusiastic towards a universal Communism, “their enthusiasm being tinged with euthanasia,” and the Conservatives, who are “old men bullying young men by roaring in a raucous voice that all foreigners are fools.” The hatred of Poland, he says, was, in essence, the hatred of Christianity.
…
The growth of Protestantism in Germany led to a strange and steady distancing from the universal Church of Christendom and an embrace of Old Testament ideas, particularly the ancient story of the Covenant with Israel. Thus the Germans grew more and more into the mood of seeing their religion as a mystical religion of Race. Inflamed by the rhetoric of Hitler, they began to see themselves as the new Chosen People, an irony Chesterton sums up as “The Judaism of Hitler.””
Except for religion, family was perhaps the target of the most poisonous attacks of early Communist writers. Even before Reds became dogmatic opponents of colonialism (Marx still thought it might serve a progressive purpose), nationalism and racialism – before all this, they first attacked the dignity of the family, referring contemptuously to “patriarchalism” as a reactionary mentality.
(We might argue that the very first attack on the family was directly connected to the Fall – when the serpent seduced Eve and led her to rise against the authority of Adam.)
Marxism promoted the idea that family was NOT the original living-system of human beings – that it only arose out afterwards (along with the sense of private property) from communal, matriarchal, promiscuous chaos:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=75097&page=6
“But not long after he set his ideas out, a British scholar, John Ferguson McLennan, published Primitive Marriage (1865). In it he posited that humanity in its most ancient condition lived in promiscuous hordes, from which it gradually transitioned to an order based on “kinship through females only.”
…
Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, Rochester lawyer Lewis Henry Morgan was attempting to generalize from the matrilineal Iroquois of upstate New York that society based on descent through women must have been at some point universal. … Morgan’s final synthesis of his own ideas about prehistory, Ancient Society, (1878) came to the attention to Karl Marx in his last days. After Marx died, Engels picked up Marx’s notes on Morgan and adding to them his own divergent ideas wrote The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State (1884).
…
Engels took from Morgan the idea that the “family” is not a primordial human reality but a phenomenon that emerged out of an earlier more communal set of arrangements. This notion appeals to some anthropologists who would like to deconstruct the apparent centrality of families in various non-Western societies.”
Marxism thus had a direct connection to radical feminism (matriarchy being the “natural” condition of mankind, and patriarchy being just a recent innovation). Some fine company Christian family-bashers are in.
After reading the screeds by Chesterton and Belloc, I come to the conclusion that popish anti-Prussianism is nought but thinly-veiled anti-Calvinism.
In his 1919 book “Irish Impressions,” Chesterton actually compared the Ulster Protestants to Prussia:
http://www.archive.org/stream/irishimpressions00ches#page/204/mode/2up
“The men of Belfast offer that city as something supreme, unique and unrivalled; and they are very nearly right. There is nothing exactly like it in the industrialism of this country; but for all that, the fight against its religion of arrogance has been fought out elsewhere and on a larger field. There is another centre and citadel from which this theory, of strength in a self-hypnotised superiority, has despised Christendom. There has been a rival city to Belfast; and its name was Berlin.
Historians of all religions and no religion may yet come to regard it as a historical fact, I fancy, that the Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century (at least in the form it actually took) was a barbaric breakdown, like that Prussianism which was the ultimate product of the Protestantism.”
Admin, you’ve outdone yourself with this most excellent column. But then I think that about every one you write.
On “the German Question”, me thinks that even some great men have sometimes mistakenly identified everything that comes out of Germany as being German (or Prussian). I hate to think what a similarly outside vision of America might look like.
I appreciate the site. I truly do. I’ve commented here before, and I think this ministry is vital. I must say, however, that you’ve taken a cheap shot at Baptists. Of course, it’s a simple matter to set forth a whole host of Baptist heretics (proponents of the “Trail of Blood” theory, Arminians, Dispenstationalists, etc.). Their sins have indeed been great, especially in the 20th century. Do you suppose, however, that the Baptist is incapable of trotting out a whole host of Presbyterian heretics? One might even argue that, because of their greater social status, learning, and theological influence (certainly over the course of the last century), these latter heretics have done greater theological harm to the Church of Christ. Regardless, there is clearly a fallacy in your presentation, i.e., guilt by association. The vast majority of Baptists of the 19th century (and before) were every bit as clear on race as their Presbyterian peers. They were also Calvinistic and covenantal. As to the referred article “Top Ten Reasons I’m Not A Baptist,” there is a great deal of muddled thinking, and almost as many sophisms as there are points. Though I have no intention of taking up the entire debate between Reformed Baptists and Presbyterians,to cite but one example of terrible theology in the “Ten Reasons,” let us examine point 7: “I didn’t wait for my children to ask me into their hearts before I named them and made them a part of my family. Why should I expect God to wait for His covenant seed to ask Jesus into their hearts before He names them in Baptism and makes them part of the family of God?” Construe this assertion as you will,it is undeniably baptismal regeneration. To be made part of the “family of God” is to be united to Christ. It is to benefit from all the graces that Christ’s redemption purchased, including perseverance and glorification. You as as Kinist, of all people, should understand what it means to be part of the “family of God.” Will Christ throw off some of his children? The “good and necessary consequence” of point 7 is baptismal regeneration. Once again, this is undeniable. And although such might be the Gospel-denying position of the Douglas Wilsons and Steve Wilkins’s, it is certainly not the Reformed, evangelical understanding. There is no essential difference in this position from that of the Arminian Baptist who latches on to a “decision” made at a Billy Graham crusade or to that of the Catholic who points to his baptism. They are all equally sacramental, supposing that God communicates the grace of salvation through man’s activity. One last thing, it’s just as easy to bash Kinists by misrepresenting their positions or by associating them with heretics as it is to misrepresent Baptists by doing the same thing. That may make for good rhetoric, but it certainly doesn’t advance truth.
Your comment took me by surprise, because I didn’t recall anything that would be taken as a cheap shot against baptists. Just so you know where I stand personally, I think baptists are some of the friendliest and most helpful Christians I know. If someone in the neighborhood is in distress, it’s a safe bet that a baptist or group of baptists will be the first to render aid. Their independence is also a safeguard against the racial insanity of our time. It’s no surprise that John Weaver is a baptist or that the Free Will Baptist church mentioned above voted as they did. Congregational churches tend to be less susceptible to semitical correctness. Baptists are important allies that we have among our people.
BUT, so you also know where I stand personally, Jesus warned His disciples against forbidding little children from coming to Him, because they belong to Him. They are His not from the age of 6, or even from birth, but from the womb.
“From birth I was cast on you; from my mother’s womb you have been my God.” Psalm 22:10
This is just as it was during the old covenant when babies were circumcised and children were allowed to partake of the Passover. No one accused their parents of “circumcisional regeneration.” They were born into the covenant and therefore could not be refused its sign.
I don’t think baptists are heretics; I understand the reasons you have for believing as you do. But the vast majority of Christians throughout history have believed what I just wrote to be true: Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Anglicans, Assyrians, Lutherans, Presbyterians, Methodists, etc. Then you have a relatively young and tiny sliver (historically) of baptists in their various forms (Southern Baptists, Charismatics, Anabaptists, Brethren, non-denominationals, etc.) who say that all the rest are wrong to baptize infants, and believers need to be rebaptized if they were once baptized as infants. Respectfully, I call this lunacy, and I’m very glad that the baptists I know are inconsistent with their own theology and do not treat their children as little pagans.
I realize that you’re making a distinction between Reformed Baptists and Arminian Baptists, and it’s worthwhile to distinguish between the two. But the “five points of Calvinism” are not the sum total of Reformed theology. Taken as a whole, I fail to see how the word “Baptist” can follow the word “Reformed.”
Thank you sir once again for a splendiferous SWB! We truly appreciate the time and effort you take (in the midst of a super-busy life!) to do this for our people. I am GRATEFUL!
Interestingly enough, I was listening to a panel-discussion a few days ago on the Federal Vision controversy and got a vague idea that some of the effort fueling the movement arises from the influence of racial-egalitarianism over modern Reformed theology.
Could there be any truth to this, or is the FV fueled solely by a reaction against the atomization of the church-goer?
Merry Christmas to all you guys.
Aye. . .Merry Christmas!
Regarding the issue of genetic differences in IQ, surely you are aware that Jews and Northeast Asians (Japanese, Koreans, Chinese) have higher average scores than white Gentiles.
In any event, if genes are all important then there is no reason to regulate adoptive parents. Let mentally ill people adopt, homosexuals adopt, potheads adopt, illiterate people adopt, etc. The environment will have no bearing on how the child turns out. Of course, you don’t believe that one bit.
What are you carrying on about? Who ever said that IQ means everything, and who here has denied that whites may not have the highest IQ in the world? The people who believe that “genes are all important,” like Jews, could correctly be called supremacists, but that’s not us. It would behoove you to do some reading before posting silly comments.
Here is a classic post from Irish Savant of “worse is better” fame.
“Mad Judge Disease”
http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/search/label/mad%20judge%20disease
Enjoy.
The poster spewing garbage names itself after the site of the greatest airline fiasco of all time.
Apropos.
While it might be true that north eastern Asians have the same or slightly higher IQ than white people, this is flawed for several reasons. To begin, not all white countries have the same intelligence. Germans for example on average are going to have a higher IQ than some of the southern Slavic countries. Most northern European countries have an IQ around or in excess of 100. When examining the Asian countries, it might be fine to say that the Japanese average 109-110, however does that hold up for the Malay group (Malaysia, Philippines), the mongoloid group, or the Amerindians (who are also Asiatic)? On average, I know that the Amerindian average will be less, but I also suspect that the Malay average will not be as high as the north East Asian average.
At any rate, even if that was all true, then so what? What difference do a couple of IQ points here and there make to the nationalist cause? If this is the case, then can we expect a bunch of Asians and white people to flood Africa or South America because they have an IQ between 65 and 80? No, you can’t argue for national policy simply based upon IQ.
Besides, while East Asians have some good inventions that I do not wish to detract from (such as gunpowder and paper); the vast majority of sciences have been developed by white countries ranging from ancient Persia, to Greece, to the modern European countries. This alone should tell us that Europeans at least have a higher than average rate of highly intelligent people. Europeans have also developed many fine artistic forms such as art, music, and architecture. While there have been quite a few successful jewish scientists, their artistic forms are rather lacking.
Right, the Alienist thinks that he can discredit ethnonationalism by showing that other races might have a higher IQ than whites. And if this turns out to be true, it means that we can’t legitimately fight for our own survival? It’s amazing that some people think this makes sense. Talk about a supremacist mindset. If we’re not the smartest people in the world, we must not be a people! And again, they think nothing of allowing a double standard; it’s perfectly acceptable for every other race in the world to protect their own interests, regardless of IQ or anything else.
I would argue that the Jews are very “artistic,” but their “art” is the product of deviant, anti-Christian minds. Again, it shows that IQ isn’t everything.
When people discuss the issue of differing gifts among the races (I mean: gifts given to entire racial groups), they always do so in a degrading way that saps the dignity from the people-in-question.
For a small scale illustration of what I mean: Alvin Plantinga may have a higher IQ than C.S. Lewis, but I’d go fishing with Lewis any day over Plantinga!
There’s a spiritual cleverness to Lewis that Plantinga is missing, despite his higher IQ.
Of course, Lewis would come back from the grave and haunt me if I were to claim that he was superior to Plantinga. Lewis (more so than other writers) always took pains to emphasize how important a human being is.
When we see our fellow man, says Lewis, we’re seeing the image of God on Earth.
Likewise, (by extension) we should treat entire races with the same amount of dignity.
Just because Lewis doesn’t have as high an IQ as Plantinga, doesn’t mean that he doesn’t have his own dignity, purpose and unique “fit” into God’s meta-narrative.
I don’t love my people (and think they’re superior to all others) because of this or that “superior” character trait that they may possess… I love them because they’re *my* people!
And glory of all glories, we have a God who relates to man in exactly the same way.
Discussing an entire racial group solely in terms of this or that character trait, is a mistake that many pagan white nationalists make, as well as the alienist (like our friend here) when they construct their caricatures of our position.
In both cases, the dignity of the racial class under discussion is trampled. (It would be like reducing Lewis and Plantinga to mere IQ and making a judgement about which is superior based on the resulting observation.)
I couldn’t agree more, Shotgun. And I don’t think I’ll ever be able to grasp the Alienist caricature that we only love our race because we think it is superior to all others. No man feels this way about his children. Why would any man feel this way about his nation or his race? We love them because they are our own. The family is familiar, by definition. Of course, there is a kind of distinctly anti-Kinist person who loves his country because his country is the strongest militarily in the world. Sadly, this kind of person fills Christian churches.
See Chesterton’s complaint about Kipling (alas, for we do love Kipling). Chesterton called himself a Little Englander, and Kipling loved the expanse of the British empire, which was soon to collapse.
“He admires England, but he does not love her; for we admire things with reasons, but love them without reason. He admires England because she is strong, not because she is English.”
I don’t think this was an entirely fair criticism, but in our time it definitely rings true when every war proposed on behalf of Jews is heralded like it was the second coming of Christ. This is a supremacist mindset, and the irony of it is that they accuse us Kinists of the very thing they are guilty of doing.
“I would argue that the Jews are very “artistic,” but their “art” is the product of deviant, anti-Christian minds.”
Jewishness “artsyness” is a quite lately-developed trait, unknown in the pre-emancipation times when Talmudic rabbis ruled. Secular Jew Israel Shahak explains:
http://members.tripod.com/alabasters_archive/jewish_history_2.html
“It is important to note that all the supposedly “Jewish characteristics”—by which I mean the traits which vulgar so-called intellectuals in the West attribute to “the Jews”—are modern characteristics, quite unknown during most of Jewish history, and appeared only when the totalitarian Jewish community began to lose its power. Take, for example, the famous Jewish sense of humor. Not only is humor very rare in Hebrew literature before the 19th century (and is only found during few periods, in countries where the Jewish upper class was relatively free from the rabbinical yoke, such as Italy between the 14th and 17th centuries or Muslim Spain) but humor and jokes are strictly forbidden by the Jewish religion—except, significantly, jokes against other religions. Satire against rabbis and leaders of the community was never internalized by Judaism, not even to a small extent, as it was in Latin Christianity. There were no Jewish comedies, just as there were no comedies in Sparta, and for a similar reason.8 Or take the love of learning. Except for a purely religious learning, which was itself in a debased and degenerate state, the Jews of Europe (and to a somewhat lesser extent also of the Arab countries) were dominated, before about 1780, by a supreme contempt and hate for all learning (excluding the Talmud and Jewish mysticism). Large parts of the Old Testament, all nonliturgical Hebrew poetry, most books on Jewish philosophy were not read and their very names were often anathematized. Study of all languages was strictly forbidden, as was the study of mathematics and science. Geography,9 history—even Jewish history—were completely unknown. The critical sense, which is supposedly so characteristic of Jews, was totally absent, and nothing was so forbidden, feared and therefore persecuted as the most modest innovation or the most innocent criticism.
It was a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism and ignorance, a world in which the preface to the first work on geography in Hebrew (published in 1803 in Russia) could complain that very many great rabbis were denying the existence of the American continent and saying that it is “impossible.”"
I would argue that even though egalitarian propagandists have brazenly denied the importance of hereditarian causes, we should not rush to the other extreme and deny the likewise very real importance of environmental and cultural causes.
Environmental factors can explain, to mention just one example, why the Slavs have been so culturally backward compared to other branches of Indo-European family. For Slavic peoples were the last Aryans to establish contact with the Levantine culture-sphere, from which higher culture flowed westwards and northwards.
The first Indo-European people that were in intimate contact with Mediterranean-Mesopotamian cultures was, of course, the Greeks. They (and the Etruscans) then transmitted this influence to the Latin tribes of Italy.
The Celts also had some contact with the Mediterranean through Spain and southern France – by the time Julius Caesar conquered Gaul, they were (at least to some extent) using Greek letters in civil transactions.
The Germanic tribes would be the next ones to be gradually drawn into the sphere of Mediterranean culture (the “runes” were just a clumsy imitation of Latin alphabet).
And thus the last Indo-Europeans to have these vital cultural contacts were the Slavic tribes that had been living in inpenetrable inland areas. Russia especially was before the days of Peter the Great (about 1700 AD) almost more Asiatic than European country.
New’s years greetings for 2012 anno Domini to all at Spirit Water Blood.
This year New Year’s Day falls on the Sunday within the Octave of the Nativity of our Lord. The Introit is Psalm 92:1 “The Lord hath reigned. He is clothed with beauty; the Lord is clothed with strength and hath girded Himself with might.”
In the mind and prayer of the Church, the eternal Word and Second Person of the Holy Trinity, by Whom and for Whom all that exists as creation was spoken into being, has by his flesh taking “girded Himself with might.”
The powers of hell tremble, oganize and go forth. And the post Christian, most modern nations that once comprised the Christendom from the Atlantic to the Urals make nothing of it.
For its entire history as a Christendom the nations of Europe were subject to the great pincers of militant Islam funded by Babylonian Jewry that took the nations of the Christian East and put to the sword those indigenous Christian peoples of the Roman Empire.
These had converted as nations to the holy faith after the Edict of Milan – an imperial edict of toleration for the formerly proscribed faith (the Church and observances)- persecuted for over 300 years throughout the empire.
The armies of Islam out of Arabia invaded the Christian nations of the East and they invaded the Christian nations of the West -but in the West, they were driven out after a war that lasted hundreds of years.
The Christian nations of Europe fought the Reconquista in the West and the Crusades in the East. They fought for the Christendom and the right of the baptised nations to form a Christendom. They fought for the right of their monarchs, councils, parliaments to legislate upon the basis of Apostolic law and those of the ancient common law of their people as baptised by the Church – such as the freedom of the highways and byeways of their land.
They believed in their right to Christendom as opposed to the political will of the Judaic imperium for multicultural political entities subsisting under Talmudic law or Sharia or Masonic agenda or whatever.
For its entire history, the Christendom was the Church militant in the full sense of that word.
The beautiful city of Aigues-Mortes was built by Saint Louis IX, Confessor and King of France at the mouth of the Rhone to serve as the point of embarcation for the wars of Christendom in the East – the Crusades.
One day while conversing informally with King Henry III of England, St Louis reminesced about their past adventures – especially the disaster of Mansura. He remarked: “If I have been able to do something in the service of our Lord Jesus Christ, I have been greatly rewarded for it! He gave me the grace to endure all my misfortunes with patience and such a benefit alone is worth more than all the world.”
He wrote to his children while on Crusade and these letters are in the national archive of France. To his daughter Isabel of France (Queen of Navarre), he wrote: “Dear daughter, humbly obey your husband and obey your father and mother in the things that are according to God. You must gladly give to each of them what is rightly due to him or her because of the love you owe them: but you must do this even more for the love of Our Lord who has ordained it. But in things that are contrary to the law of God, you must obey no one.”
His most famous remark was to the ambassador of the emir of Tunis “To see the emir baptised into the holy faith, I would joyfully spend the rest of my life in Saracen chains” – the chains that had been imposed upon all nations of the once Christian East and upon the Christian nations of Spain and Portugal.
St Louis, King of France pray for the people of those lands once of France in North America now sunk into idolatry, slavery and darkness worse than the chains of Islam imposed upon the Christian East.
Friends – la plus belle aventure du monde, c’est la notre. The most beautiful adventure in the world is ours.
Aye, Happy New Year!
Aye x 2…
It’s been a very eventful few days for me.
For those of us new to the world of S/W/B and to “Kinism” … how do the more-experienced feel like we’ve done, on the whole, this year?
I feel like Satan’s about to give up! (We’ve been pounding our faces against his fists for so long, that I’m sure he’s had all he can take!)
Shotgun said:
For those of us new to the world of S/W/B and to “Kinism” … how do the more-experienced feel like we’ve done, on the whole, this year?
I feel like Satan’s about to give up! (We’ve been pounding our faces against his fists for so long, that I’m sure he’s had all he can take!)
————
This was a genuine LOL.
This was a genuine sigh.
The conflict whereof Shotgun speaks will last for the entire age of this world/time. And in the latter times it will have a climax in which the Woman crowned with the victory wreath of twelve stars (the Arc of the Covenant) stands forth in the heavens.
The conversion of the European race in its nations to Christ and the rule of law based upon the Evangel (however imperfect) was what chained the Beast empires. Now the chain is removed.
Nothing is so irresistible, it is said, as an idea whose time has come. It could be said that Hess, Marx, Engels and their fellow Satanists seemed relatively powerless a little over 130 years ago. But they were promoting an ‘idea whose time had come’ – the dialectical materialism which was to blend with the era of apostasy.
The 19th century was to see the rise of Marx, prophet of the Anti-Christ, acclaimed by his followers as “the man who will drag down this God from His heaven.” There was a widespread collapse of faith and morals in the Catholic states where throne and altar were overthown by the Masonic revolutions that established the republics.
But in the gathering darkness there were also flashes of light and portents of great events to come. Our Lady came to the Rue du Bac in Paris (1830) to speak with St Catherine Laboure. She came to La Salette in 1846 and to Lourdes in 1858. She came to Pontmain in 1871.
All four appearances were in France where the infernal enemy had thrown down the guantlet in the dying years of the 18th century – the Revolution inaugurated in 1879, the Revolution that is now culminating in its global Communist phase.
France where our Lord himself appeared 100 years before the Revolution and revealed His Sacred Heart. The heirs of David (the French monarchy) He said had a choice. They could have France consecrated to the Sacred Heart and our Lord himself would lead them to victory in the battles that would come. Or they could neglect His desire and our Lord would fight with them the long defeat. They chose the latter.
So when the guantlet was throne down in 1789, France could not accept it on the behalf of Heaven because the heirs of David had declined the wishes of the Sacred Heart.
But the Blessed Virgin accepted for the time of the hour of the power of darkness that was going to fall.
This would be the time when the world would be chastised for sins against the Creator and the natural order, for sins, blasphemies, outrages and indifference to the Redeemer of the world, the sins of denial and contempt of the Holy Spirit sent upon the Church to glorify Christ. And the republics legislated for the four sins crying to heaven for vengeance which became institutionalized as law.
It is now a hate crime in Europe to spell Christ (as in Jesus Christ) with a capital C. So they have not only uncrowned Him but hated Him.
In this time,our time, our Lady said that men would no longer be able to perceive what was for their good, no longer know why they were created and lack the faith to rejoice in the Gospel of Redemption.
The darkness would be profound.
The richest soil, wrote Plutarch uncultivated produces the rankest weeds. The Christian civilization of the West, this Christendom, was indeed that rich soil. Uncultivated by the Divine grace of previous centuries, it would soon produce the rankest weeds – cruelty and atrocities on a scale that would defy the imagination.
And the end is not yet.
There is going to be a direct confrontation between the Woman (Gen 3:15) and the infernal serpent. Our Lady has foretold it because it has been confided to her. Our Lord must chastize the world for its sins; the Church and the holy Father having much to suffer, that all things might be restored before the close of the age.
To restore all things in Christ to the glory of God the Father is the cause of the hour. This can only occur through the powerhouse of graces flowing from the infinite merit of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in union with the Immaculate Heart of Mary – the Blessed Virgin Mother of God and our mother in the order of grace.
Yeah, that Mormonism is crazy stuff.
Yes, “Mormonism is crazy stuff” and in spite of this, how many of our Evangelical brethren will vote for this heretic Mitt Romney for president in the coming election? How many Evangelical Leaders will endorse him?
The feeble narrative for the presidential election will be: “Better a Mormon Republican than a “Communist” Democrat” I choose none of the above.
It has been a month! I can’t take it any more.
I never heard of Christian Kinism until just recently. How far do you take your beliefs in personal interactions? For example, can Kinists have friends of other races or eat food from other cultures?
Valerie,
I know other (more experienced) Kinists will likely weigh in on this, but I’ll add my two-cents anyway:
As I grow in my Kinism, I’m seeing it more and more as an issue of Biblical nationalism.
To illustrate what I mean by that, consider this (somewhat vulgar) analogy:
We can be good Americans, and still enjoy French, Chinese or Mexican food. We can have pen-pals from France or China (or Mexico, if anyone there knows how to write…) We can even visit each other.
In the same way, when Nations are organized along racial / ethnic lines (as I would argue God intends), we’ll still be able to enjoy other cultures and peoples.
As for being close personal friends with someone of another race (or “nationality” in the true sense of the term), that presupposes a society like we live in today, where different races hold hands and sing “Lean on Me.”
The truth is, people, even in America, largely self-segregate. (Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, just released a new book “White Identity” in which he thoroughly covers the statistical data that proves this.) It’s especially true in our neighborhoods and churches, but self-segregation is occurring everywhere (from prisons to government school lunchrooms — quite to the chagrin of the liberal elite.)
Still, even in this situation (where a Godly nationalism is suppressed in favor of a Satanic “propositional” nationalism)…people remain largely segregated into various ethnic enclaves, with some interaction (much of it enforced by law) between them.
As a Kinist, I’d just like these habits formally recognized by law instead of being suppressed.
That would be a great first-step towards finally getting our own ethnic-nation-state.
rabbis seem to be as unreliable as catholic priests on sexual abuse
January 15, 2012
Did rabbi downplay incest rape?
Telem Yahav, Ynet, Jan 14 2012
The State Prosecutor’s Office has filed an indictment this week against two brothers who molested their younger sister, Yedioth Ahronoth reported Friday. The abuse continued for years after a rabbi advised the parents against involving to the police, saying that such incidents “happen in many families.” The girl,14, was only 10 years old when her older brothers began sexually assaulting her. The eldest brother, 20, used to rape his sister regularly, while the younger of the two, 19, touched her inappropriately. When the parents discovered the horrifying abuse they consulted their rabbi, who advised them to deal with the issue at home. The parents claimed the rabbi told them they shouldn’t “make a big deal of it” because it is a common occurrence. The family kept the episodes secret for two years; meanwhile, the abuse continued. The case was uncovered when the minor told her psychologist about what her siblings had done. The therapist then informed the police. The older brother has been charged with rape, indecent acts and sodomy, while the younger one has been charged with indecent acts and attempted rape. The defendants’ attorneys, Yehuda Fried and Tal Gabay, said:
The accusations filed by the prosecution don’t reflect the truth. In any case, our clients chose many years ago to pursue a path of rehabilitation and treatment, and we believe that the court will choose this path as well.
Leave a Comment » | Uncategorized | Permalink
Posted by niqnaq
——————————————————————————–
Valerie: Kinists certainly can have friends of other races and eat foods of other cultures.
Kinism is the understanding that ethnicity and race are extensions of family. My first priority is the well-being of my family, but that doesn’t mean that I can’t have goodwill and friendship toward other families.
At the same time, families should respect the boundaries of one another. I may invite the Jones family to my house for supper, but the Joneses should not presume they have the right to come for a free meal any time they please.
Kinism follows the biblical guideline of Acts 17:26-27, i.e., respecting the proper boundaries among peoples encourages them to “seek after God,” which in turn promotes harmony among them.
Kinists are split though, on how closely we can associate with Democrats.
Some say no… others say **** no.
“Alienists are so eager to deny that blood and soil have any significance whatsoever that they make themselves look increasingly ridiculous.”
Bo Marinov is at it again; in the name of opposing materialistic determinism, he commits the childish error of just running to the opposite extreme, instead of emplying a proper sense of moderation. He seemingly tries to deny the importance of genetic heritage altogether (although like a weasel, he does not dare to commit himself completely on this questionable position by stating that genes do not matter at ALL).
http://americanvision.org/5540/the-fallacy-of-materialistic-determinism/
“The crudest and most primitive (“primitive” as in “savage, uncivilized”) form of materialism, of course, is racism. It has existed in different forms among the savage tribes, mainly those who have adopted thoroughly animistic view of the world and nature. The idea that their own tribe is exceptional because it came from a specific ancestor – ironically, very often an animal ancestor – was common among many Native American tribes. The Indian caste system was based on the materialistic assumptions that man was determined by his genes. Even in the modern world, and even among those today who claim to be “Christians,” this philosophical materialism of racism can sometimes find favorable soil. The belief that genes produce culture, or ethics, or art, or anything else, has had and still has a hold on the mind of the fallen man.”
You people must have gotten under Marinov’s skin, since he flails (indirectly) at you like this. He provides a classic example of false dichotomy: if you do not buy into semi-Gnostic hyper-spiritualism, you are a materialist!
Good find, Petr. Yes, various Kinists have definitely gotten under his skin. It might even be fair to say that Marinov is hounded by Kinism everywhere he goes.
Of course, he misrepresents Kinism, because that’s always easier than being honest. Kinists believe that every gift comes from God, including genes. As you wisely observe, Alienists like Marinov have such a violent reaction against Kinism that they go to the extreme of denying that genes have any role whatsoever to play in culture, ethics, art, intelligence, etc. They believe what our Christian ancestors did NOT believe, which is pretty much the definition of a cult.
How can Marinov claim that affinity for nation and tribe are ungodly when God ordained the nation of Israel and specified its division into tribes? Aside from Galatians 3:28, do these Babelists ever read the Bible?
Good question, Luther. I know they make a special exception for Israel, and quickly add that God used to love nationalism but no longer, since Jesus died to turn all men brown.
I believe modern Babelist Christians are partly inspired by craven desire to FLATTER their potential flocks of new converts; they may sincerely feel that they could not perform missionary work in, say, Africa, if they saw its inhabitants in some way inferior to themselves. They feel that they would be somehow unloving and insincere if they acknowledged the limitations of Black race while offering the Gospel to them.
Moreover, they may be afraid that false religions like Islam will be able to “outbid” them among third-worlders by labeling Christianity as “White man’s religion” (I have seen them often visibly anxious to refute this claim).
Consciously or unconsciously, they seem to believe that we need to FLATTER non-Whites in order to be able to convert them. And this whole flattery-mentality is one of the main pillars of modernist democratic society – I have written about this elsewhere:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=5397&highlight=flattery
“Christianity is a religion very much against flattery. The Bible is full of warnings against it, and all the great preachers have started, not by flattering their audience but by condemning it, saying that they are lost sinners, ungrateful rebels against God, that they have been blind to higher truths of life and that they will end up in Hell if they continue on their present course.
On the other hand, it is typical for pagan New Age cults to start their “pitch” by claiming that the individual they are addressing possesses some hidden qualities that should be brought forth – that even the whole mankind might be a deity that is unaware of itself. They promise him a glorious future, and if there’s any fault they address it is the ignorance of his own hidden godhood that prevents him to fully realize his grand destiny.
Michael A. Hoffman describes in his classic book Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare (pp. 4-5) how the denial of Original Sin (which implies that fallen mankind can never be perfected into quasi-godhood) has been the basic dogma of anti-Christian Enlightenment movement and totalitarian ideologies that have followed it:
“What separates the traditional people of the past from the modern variety, is their attitude towards human nature. Modern ideologues decree that the trouble within the society derives from the traditional view of man as a fallen creature; hopelessly defective. The modernists resolve to improve the world by exalting man and announcing his essential goodness.”
…
“Flattery, The First Principle of Mind Control
Why does he then revere them? Because they flatter him. This is the first secret of mass mind control and can be observed as the foundation stone of virtually every false religion, party, cult, philosophy system and training. How can modern man free himself when he is told that he is already a demi-god, that the problem lies only in finding a pure enough economic or political system worthy of his high-minded brilliance?”
I read Marinov to prep for my punching-bag workouts.
(And if I start getting tired, I pull up a Schwertley article.)
Eye of the tiger, Shotgun!
That is so true, Petr. Flattery very often masquerades as evangelism. I think this is because whites don’t believe that the news of the gospel will be accepted by non-whites unless the deal is sweetened by freebies. This is what “racial reconciliation” is all about in the churches. It never focuses on how whites have been wronged, or even on how both sides have been wronged. Its focus is always on non-whites, and it’s always about “correcting the injustices of the past,” which always boils down to money. Reparations without end.
In old times, the products of flattery-and-bribery missionary methods were known as “Rice Christians” (although the term has also been used maliciously by Western secularists to slander ALL missionary enterprises indiscriminately):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_christians
The Jesuits once got into big trouble with their own fellow RCs for their overly smooth ways of attracting converts in China:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Rites_controversy
“Besides the Jesuits, other religious orders such as the Dominicans, Franciscans, and Augustinians started missionary work in China during the 17th century, often coming from the Spanish colony of the Philippines. Contrary to the Jesuits, they refused any adaptation to local customs and wished to apply in China the same tabula rasa principle they had applied in other places,[11] and were horrified by the practices of the Jesuits.[12]”
And yet I believe that missionaries around the world should show some amount of respect to local cultures, without becoming ecumenical-syncretistic panderers. One would have to find the golden mean.
I decided not to lose my grip on dreams of the past, and give American Vision another shot.
I posted a response to Marinov’s recent article on family.
Like so many times, it was deleted within thirty minutes (it happens too fast!)
Contemporary Christians are real manly-men, right? I’m done with them. I did my time and took my chances.