The Time of the Assassins
November 11, 2011 
62 Comments
Pat Buchanan, who is becoming the successor to Sam Francis, courageously allowed James Edwards to interview him for a third time, and both men knew that the diversity would hit the fan the next day.
Abe Foxman’s yarmulke is in a twist. What’s the world coming to when not even a major columnist, pundit, and bestselling author (the book rose to #4 on the NYT list) is intimidated by Menorah Man? When the ADL writes about James Edwards, they use the hate-term “white supremacist” twice in one sentence. It’s twice as bad when a white supremacist is the host of a show that is also white supremacist. And then if white supremacists are listening on the other end, it’s thrice as bad.
Buchanan went on NPR to defend his freedom to be interviewed. “I think [ADL Director Abe Foxman] has called me even worse names than he is calling this radio station,” Buchanan said. “I think there’s an awful lot of smearing being done by the Anti-Defamation League, frankly, over the years, of individuals who simply disagree maybe with U.S. policy towards Israel, and a lot of name-calling… Am I supposed to vet all the people on these shows and get the list from Abe Foxman of what shows I can go on to?”
This is a very important historical development. Anyone else, at any other time, in Buchanan’s position, would be so concerned about assuaging the distress of leftists and avoiding their tarbrush of hate that he would immediately pull the Edwards interview from his website and make the rounds in the media to apologize for being so neglectful in his associations. Instead, Buchanan fires back at these thugs. It’s hard to imagine anyone else with such a prestigious career being so gutsy, but Buchanan is both Irish and German, so say no more.
Here’s a very comedic SPLC article that calls for Buchanan to be fired from MSNBC for the crime of being interviewed by someone with non-kosher opinions, meaning James. MSNBC has completely censored promotion of the book, even though the network employs Buchanan. The SPLC claims that Buchanan has “reacted furiously” to this McCarthyism of the Left, but it’s not true. Buchanan loves it that the terrorists and censors are helping him sell books.
James Edwards is a real troublemaker, and he deserves to be proud. He is perfecting his craft, is at least as good a broadcaster as overpaid tools like Hannity, and routinely produces bigger headlines than Limbaugh. Pound for pound, he is the best.
Pat Buchanan appears on my show for a grand total of three interviews out of thousands of routine radio and television interviews over a career spanning decades.
The result is an ongoing, two-week eruption of rage…
Would they ever apply the same rules to, say, Martin Luther King? Just see what happens if one of us cites the enormous number of connections he had to the Communist Party.
Here’s a good Chronicles article that mocks the wailing lamentations over Edwardsgate.
Apparently, anyone expressing trepidation about the fact that the Census Bureau projects that by 2042 whites will, for the first time in history, no longer be a majority in the United States should be excluded from public life…
The Color of Change, on its website, states that it “exists to strengthen Black America’s political voice. Our goal is to empower our members – Black Americans and our allies – to make government more responsive to the concerns of Black Americans and to bring about positive political and social change for everyone.” In the political world Color of Change wants to create, allowing yourself to be interviewed by someone who describes himself as “pro-white” should be enough to get you fired, but wanting to “strengthen Black America’s political voice” is okay.
“We have witch-hunts now, only we call it anti-racism.” ~ Otto Scott (34:36)
“How long can you operate on the theory that the white race is on earth to take care of the black race?” ~ Otto Scott (48:58)
Buchanan deserves a lot of credit for working with those of us, like James and crew, who are more outspoken on racial matters. The only trouble is that one minute he’s praising the founding stock of the country, and the next he’s longing for the American “nation” of his youth, except for all that yucky segregation stuff that kept white girls from being raped. Thus, in his new book he writes that America was made great because it is a melting pot. This would not make America great even if there were none but white people here, and the stew certainly turns sour when other races are thrown into the pot. He seems to believe that before we were being flooded by other races, year after year, the multiracial melange “was united on a common faith, morality, history, heroes, holidays, holy days, language and literature.” This is simply not true. He also says that it’s “not the government’s job” to support and defend the Christian faith and the law of God! On the contrary, the government has no greater responsibility; it is a far greater responsibility than protecting the unborn, which is now the holy grail of conservatism. I hate to criticize Pat, because he goes as far as a “respectable” commentator and advisor to three presidents can go in defending our race. But what we need at this late hour is not Jewy nostalgia for melting pot mythology or misguided patriotism but the hard, cold truth.
Here’s a very good article in which Buchanan observes that we are no longer “one united people” but what Klemens von Metternich called Italy: “a mere geographical expression.” He correctly argues “that the America we grew up in is disintegrating, breaking apart along the fault lines of politics, race, ethnicity, culture and faith.” The only qualification we would offer is that the “America we grew up in” was already long in the process of disintegrating. With the exception of politics, Buchanan’s fault lines are the same blood and faith issues that Kinists warn are crucial to national health.
What holds us together, then?
We are not now and will not then be “descended from common ancestors.” We will consist of all the races, cultures, tribes and creeds of Earth – a multiracial, multicultural, multiethnic, multilingual stew of a nation that has never before existed, or survived. The parallels that come to mind are the Habsburg Empire that flew apart after World War I, and the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia that disintegrated after the Cold War.
No more will we all speak the same language…
As for “professing the same religion,” where 85 percent of Americans were Christians in 1990, that is down to 75 percent and plummeting…
The new secession that is coming…is not like the secession of 1861. It is a secession of the heart from one another.
Meanwhile, the lying preachers are saying that faith is all that matters, and everything else is fungible, that people are just people because they all come from Adam. They are liars, and their false religion is contrary to both Scripture and nature. Even the brains that God gave us balance unity (right hemisphere) and particularity (left hemisphere). Without the left brain you would not understand language, among many other things, and without the right brain you would not experience emotions, among many other things. People who suffer from Williams Syndrome have what is called pathological altruism, because they trust everyone and consider no one to be a stranger, and therefore have no racial awareness, but are also incapable of forming deep social connections. They are imbalanced. A sound mind balances unity and particularity, and so does a sound community. The Church is one kind of community; a nation is another; a family is another. None of these can sacrifice unity or particularity and expect to remain healthy. So when neo-Christian Alienists come to you preaching their heretical, gnostic gospel of race-mixing, mark them well, for like Satan, they come to steal, kill, and destroy. They devastate nations, races, and most importantly, trust in Jesus Christ, who is our only Hope.
Pat Buchanan writes that Lothrop Stoddard, the author of The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy and the Revolt Against Civilization, “was something of a prophet. He predicted Japan’s rise to power, its war with the United States, a second European war, the fall of the Western empires, mass immigration of peoples of color to the West, and the rise of Islam as a threat to Western civilization.” Racists get tired of always being right.
“Ethnomasochism, the taking of pleasure in the dispossession of one’s own ethnic group, is a disease of the heart… It come out of what James Burnham called an ‘ideology of Western suicide,’ a belief system that provides a morphine drip for people who have come to accept the inevitability of their departure from history.” ~ Pat Buchanan
“Did the God of the Pentateuch strengthen the people he had created when he destroyed the unity of their language and scattered them to the four corners of the earth? To hear men endlessly recite this mindless mantra, ‘Our diversity is our strength,’ when tribal, ethnic, and religious diversity is tearing nations to pieces, is to recall Orwell: Only an intellectual could make a statement like that. No ordinary man could be such a fool.” ~ Pat Buchanan
“Not a single European nation, except Muslim Albania, has a birth rate that will enable it to replace its present population. By mid-century, Western man will be down to 12% of world population. By century’s end, he will be a tiny fraction, roughly equal to the white population of Rhodesia when Robert Mugabe came to power.” ~ Pat Buchanan
“In 1920, Western [i.e., White] people were nearly one-third of mankind. Today, Western man is down to one-sixth of the world’s population, shrinking to one-eighth by 2050, and not a tenth by century’s end.”
But it doesn’t need to be this way. We can turn it around quickly. All it takes is for white people to start loving themselves again, and stop believing the lies of deicides that the world would be better off without us. Take Russia, for instance. There were more births in Moscow in August than in any month since the Soviet Union fell. They’ve come a long way since this 1929 Soviet periodical in which Jesus is being tossed out with the trash by the masters of industry.
The task of the conservative, said Russell Kirk, is “to preserve a particular people, living in a particular place during a particular time.” Except that “conservatives” and most “Christians” no longer believe that particular peoples are worth saving. Only Kinists remain the true conservatives and the true Christians.
“To make us love our country, our country ought to be lovely.” ~ Edmund Burke, Reflections, p. 172
We used to know the meaning of the word lovely. Look at the artwork on the old silver notes. No Sacajawea or César Chávez or Rosa Parks; only loveliness.
The faith in which we stand,
The laws we made and guard,
Our honour, lives, and land
Are given for reward
To murder done by night
To treason taught by day,
To folly, sloth, and spite,
And we are thrust away.
The blood our fathers spilt,
Our love, our toils, our pains
Are counted us for guilt
And only bind our chains –
Before an Empire’s eyes
The traitor claims his price.
What need of further lies?
We are the sacrifice.
~ Rudyand Kipling
Like Kipling, Charles Dickens, who Chesterton called the last of the great men, “overstrains and overstates a mood our period does not understand,” a “sense of infinite opportunity and boisterous brotherhood. And we resent his undue sense of it, because we ourselves have not even a due sense of it.”
Some Alienists here are trying to salvage John Calvin from the infamy of Kinism, quoting him as saying that racial segregation among Christians is “wicked madness.” But on closer inspection, it’s obvious that Calvin is not advocating racial and political integration at all but rather the recognition and respect for covenant members, and the rebuke of those who create inappropriate covenantal divisions. The division created by Peter was “that they [Gentiles] had the same faith of the Gospel which he had, yet did he use them as strangers, because it was taken to be a kind of defiling, to be in company with them.” Calvin is correct that Christians of all tribes are “one flock” covenantally. We belong “to the body of our Lord Jesus Christ, and [are] the very children of God.” We have the same Redeemer, and we all belong to the household of faith. The error of the Alienist is in assuming that being of one flock covenantally necessarily entails being of one flock and one family in every other respect. This would annihilate nationhood and kinship, which are great gifts of God.
The difference is that we don’t view the institutional church as the kingdom of God. The kingdom of God consists of the church, the state, homes, farms, businesses, the nation, and all of creation. Christians tend to be afflicted by defeatism and conclude that, with all else lost to us, all we have is the Church, and this is all that will remain in eternity, because we’ll fly away to heaven and live as happy ghosts. But this is not what the Bible tells us at all. The heavens and the earth and our bodies will be resurrected, because everything God created is good.
As was said in a comment on the previous post, the Alienist sinks into a kind of Manichean heresy. Manicheanism was a Gnostic cult with close ties to Buddhism. It had a resurgence of popularity among the Anabaptists, who tried to stamp out inequalities in the world and cursed us with much of the race-mixing that infects the Church today. The basic idea of the Manicheans is that the spiritual world is light and the material world is darkness, and there is a dualism that pits abstract spirituality and the mind against the flesh and all matter. This is offensive to the Christian doctrines of the Incarnation, Resurrection, Baptism, and Holy Communion. We Kinists hate abstract spiritualism more than anything; it is our calling in life to oppose it completely. We’re the Alienist’s greatest whitemare.
“The struggle of our time is to concentrate, not to dissipate; to renew our association with traditional wisdom; to re-establish a vital connection between the individual and the race. It is, in a word, a struggle against Liberalism.” ~ T.S. Eliot
“Burke, the supreme anti-liberal of Europe, cut right to the heart of the liberals’ madness when he wrote, ‘I hate abstractions.’” ~ CWNY
“A man can never be considered an abstraction from what he is. To hold that we can discount a man’s race, heritage, intelligence, religion, and moral character, and then somehow deal with the real man is a common liberal fallacy; the result is only an abstract idea of a man, not a living man… [E]quality as a philosophical and religious faith is at work. All people are equals; woman is equal to man, and man is equal to God. As a result, there must be in principle a war against differences. Not only unisex but unihuman is the goal, the bland, neutral person… There must be a time of total destruction, the ‘time of the assassins,’ and the new world can only come when the old world is forgotten. This means a period of anarchy, racial amalgamation, and universal human hermaphroditism (‘the birth of male-and-female in every individual’) and then the new world may appear.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law, Vol. 1, pp. 434, 437
Yet we have Christians today who speculate about what their raceless, anti-family, anti-national “heaven” will be like. Having suppressed their own humanity, they attempt to “fix” the eternal by draining it of life. It’s fortunate that God continues to love flesh and soil. He promises to resurrect both.
Notice the hypocrisy of the Alienists linked above. As our friend Scott observes, they like to pretend that the mixed multitude that left Egypt was absorbed into the nation of Israel, and ever after was Israel mixed. They even believe that Moses married a Negro. So how could Israelites, who lost their racial distinctiveness through alleged intermarriage, be “racists” for refusing to associate with Gentiles? These people are never logically consistent. If anything, by their own reasoning, Peter was a religious bigot, nothing more.
“The mixed multitude who were among them yielded to intense craving…” ~ Numbers 11:4
More on John Piper, who is having hot flashes over the Jim Crow era. But here’s the catch. As Tribal Theocrat writes, “Jacobins like Piper are upset that the facilities were separate, not that they were unequal.” The Supreme Court integrated schools in spite of the fact that facilities were equal.
But if the problem was merely that races were separated, why did no whites raise a clamor to be admitted into the black inner sanctum?
If the black man was equally free to use his initiative to grow and prosper his own communities, why all the fuss? Where were the whites who were upset that they couldn’t pee in the black man’s urinal? The reason for the fuss is that the goal of of equalitarianism is to amalgamate the races, not to make them politically equal.
And the races are being amalgamated because this is the most effective way to dilute the white race, eventually killing it. It is far more effective and inexpensive than waging formal war against our race. This is also the objective of the government-sponsored credits for businesses owned by minorities, women, the crippled, and anyone at all who is not an evil white male. It’s a war against white men dressed up as compassion for the oppressed.
Second, I ask which is worse: the enforcement of separate but equal facilities or the enforcement of whites to hire, live among, and fund certain classes against their will? Free association or enforced integration? Third, please tell me how a man who edited an anti-feminist book which repeats the argument that love and equality are defined not by emotion but by God’s law, can claim that something is unChristian because it is “not loving?” What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
It’s an excellent article, so read it. Don’t be stupid. Of course, when you’re finished you’ll still be no closer to understanding what “racism” means.
For Piper, racism is anything from encouraging blacks to remain in their own churches to kidnapping, gassing and incinerating 6 trillion Jews, or however many it was.
Fantastic. This means that, to the Alienist, every Christian who lived prior to 1950 was a genocidal maniac.
Our friend Phinehas wrote the following in dishonor of impastors and Christsheviks everywhere, with apologies to Johnny Cash.
One Foreigner at a Time
Well, I left seminary back in ’89
An’ went down south to spend my time,
The first year they had me preachin just to whites.Every Sunday I’d teach them from up on high
And I’d always hang my head and cry
‘Cause I always wanted me a church full o’ browns and blacks.One day I devised myself a plan
That should be the envy of most any liberal Preacher man,
I’d fill my church with peoples of every land.
Now gettin’ caught meant gettin’ fired
But I figured I’d teach those stuffy old whites before I retired,
I’d have the most mixed-up congregation in Dixie Land.[CHORUS]
I’m building it one foreigner at a time
And it’ll cost you a hefty dime
Lock your doors when you come through our town
We’ll guilt you in to giving in style
You’re gonna know we’re completely wild
‘Cause we have the biggest rainbow church there is around.So the very next day into the big city I drove in
With my big church van and with help from my friend
I went to the ghetto to round up any hoodlums I saw near.
Now, I wasn’t concerned with a dealer or a thief,
The whites wouldn’t mind a few with gold teeth
Especially if I spun stories to squash their fear.The first day I got me a black hooker in pumps
And the next day I got me a drunk Injun and his junk,
Then I got me a carload of spics out sporting their chrome.
The numerous thugs I could get in my big church van
Like crooks, an’ spooks, and Chinamen
But the loads of drug smugglin’ illegals we snuck in my mobile home.Now, up to now my plan went all right
‘Til we tried to get them to behave one night
And that’s when we noticed that something was definitely wrong.The carload of spics turned out to be MS-13
And the hooker turned out to be a teen mother just 15
And when we tried to get them to sit quietly, all hope was gone.So we found some ex-cannibals we thought would fit
And with a little help from a Wise Jew named Tim
We had that church singing a new song.
Now the church photo was another sight,
We had foreigners on the left and scared whites on the right
But when I pulled out my One Blood book the old folks did oblige.The parking lot looked kinda funny too
But we ignored the gangsters and the riff-raff zoo,
Well, that’s when I noticed that the cars had been stripped clean.
About that time the head deacon walked out
And I could see in his eyes that he had his doubts
But he opened the church coffer and gave to the savages ‘til we were lean.Next we moved the church uptown cause we’re low on fags,
All I teach is silly anecdotes, even to the black tranny in drag.
The Kinist pastors have laughed for years I found
But up at the Police Department, they didn’t laugh
‘Cause they had to hire and train additional staff
And every Sunday the SWAT team makes us their training ground.[CHORUS]
I’m building it one foreigner at a time
And it’ll cost you a hefty dime
Lock your doors when you come through our town
We’ll guilt you in to giving in style
You’re gonna know we’re completely wild
‘Cause we have the biggest rainbow church there is around.Ugh! Yow, KINIST
This is the ALIENIST PREACHER
In the MULTI-CULTURAL DEAD CHURCH Come onHuh, This is the ALIENIST PREACHER
And negatory on how much I twist scripture to make a buck, KINIST
You might say it’s built me a big mansion on the hill
And I get no flack from the NAACP or SPLC.
Huh, now what percentage of foreigners does every church need?You need 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 – is getting close
But you’ll need 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 to atone for your white skin.
“Do you know what the future historians will regard as the most important event of this age? It will not be Hitler or the Second World War, it will not be the release of nuclear energy, it will not be the menace of Communism. It will be the abdication of the white man.” ~ Lord Cherwell
It’s like Idi Amin all over again but on a much larger scale.
Otto Scott on terrorism (21:18):
Most of the people that I know have been acting like sleepwalkers. We’ve been living under the threat of physical violence in this country for a number of years, in every city, and pretending that it’s not true, that these are isolated, unrelated incidents. And when we hear “racism” in blaring tones, and when we look at the crime statistics, how can we deny the fact that there is an undeclared war underway? We’re afraid to even mention it. That’s terror.
At 27:48 in this Easy Chair talk, Douglas Murray demurs from the “racist” banter of Rushdoony and Scott:
Murray: What we’re saying is that, you know, we’ve got a group of tribes here on earth that can’t seem to get along. You know, if we were all created by God, why can’t we live together in harmony? Are we inherently tribal?
Scott: Yes.
Rushdoony: Yes, the family, the clan, or tribe, is still basic in most of the world, and it is a pattern that reasserts itself in time even in areas that become very cosmopolitan, because when you make life too impersonal, people rebel against that.
Scott: New York was a very reasonable city when we had an Irish neighborhood, a German neighborhood, a Spanish neighborhood, etc. We marry congenial people, we associate with congenial people. A certain distance allows for toleration, whereas familiarity, somebody once said, is contempt. For people who are very dissimilar, the reasons for arguing become very common and numerous, because their reactions are different and very unexpected…
Murray: We don’t seem to have progressed to the point where the family of man is achievable. We only extend our family group so far, to a tribe, and we can’t get beyond that…
Scott: There is an effort to deny that there are tribes. There is even an effort to deny that there are nationalities, or people as such, that there are Celts, that there are Anglo-Saxons, that there are Malays, that there are Germans or French or Spaniards. There is an effort to say that all cultural differences are on the surface, are trivial and unimportant, and everyone is basically the same, which comes very close to arguing that everyone is an integer, like a number, that you can shuffle back and forth, and that we’re not real personalities, we don’t represent separate cultures, or individual cultures even.
Rushdoony: Well, I think tribalism is as natural to people as is the family. There is an instinctive drawing together with those who are close to you, as against the outsider… We cannot destroy it. It is something that is basic to people. They want to feel common ties.
Scott: Aren’t we all creatures of God, and aren’t all families creatures of God, and aren’t nations creatures of God?
Murray: But we don’t seem to be able to get past the tribal stage. We accept the tribal group as the extended family, but when we get to the nation part, the next step, we can’t seem to…
Scott: Well, let’s take Great Britain… My people came from the British Isles, and I remember the first time I went to Britain, I was astonished to discover that everybody looked as though they were cousins. They looked very much alike… I looked like everybody’s cousin too over there… Well, the French have been in France forever. I mean, all of them can trace their families back for hundreds of years. All of us can… Russia’s family goes back forever, and there have always been Armenians. And yet we keep listening to a group of educated sophists who keep trying to tell us that this is unimportant.
“Tribalism is the family lived out consistently.” ~ Dan Brannan
“For the very fact that two men are alike, having, as it were, one form, makes them to be, in a manner, one in that form: thus two men are one thing in the species of humanity, and two white men are one thing in whiteness. Hence the affections of one tend to the other, as being one with him; and he wishes good to him as to himself.” ~ Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica
Pseudo-philosopher William Lane Craig flat-out denies that Christianity is “a white man’s religion,” yet seconds later says that “if anything, Christianity is today an Oriental religion.” He is yet another self-loathing white man who is repulsed by the thought of the white race continuing to be the standard-bearer of Christ, and who hopes that the white race is never more than a sliver of the world’s Christian population because he believes that the faith will have stagnated if it remains disproportionately white.
Whites used to preach their faith all over the world, but they never felt guilty about being the foremost representatives of Christ. Notice that Craig is positively giddy to characterize Christianity as “an Oriental religion,” not merely as having gained converts in the Orient. He talks about meeting with Chinese academics who are disillusioned with Confucianism, and one of them tells him that “Christianity in China is a flourishing, indigenous, Chinese religion, and we need to embrace it as such. Well, we were just blown away by this sort of admission on the part of this Chinese academic and this embrace of Christianity as an indigenous Chinese faith.” You must be a racist if you think that Christianity is indigenous to the white man. Craig hints at the source of his confusion when he claims that “Christianity is birthed out of Judaism.”
If you want to see how bad it is in the so-called churches, look at this nonsense from a coven called Grace Outreach Center.
You see distinct white, black, Mexican, and Chinese families, but this is only because the race-mixers need for families to come as they are. The end result will be an orange-mocha vomit color, as the next generations intermarry. Some friends pointed out a few other important things:
- The white family is the only family not “at” the church.
- The black family is closest to the church.
- The church is called an “outreach center,” and the proximities make it clear who is most in need of evangelism.
- The white male is the only one frowning.
- The white male has a broken foot and is on crutches. This strips him of his power.
- An apple is hitting the head of the white male. This makes him appear foolish and the subject of ridicule. Further, the apple is an Edenic sin association.
- The white child specifically asks his mother for permission to go to church, not his father. The mother obviously runs the household.
- The hair of the non-white females is of the same nature as the hair of white females.
- But oops, the pointy hair of all the boys makes the Negro boy look like a piccaninny.
Problems with frankenfamilies.
A new excuse for other races to take on the appearance of white recessive genes. Tattooed irises and ironed hair will be the official Negro Halloween costume.
And still, Ken Ham churns out ridiculous fantasies like this:
“A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains. Conducted by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race were more likely to have other health problems as well.”
A hapless wigger discovers that skin color makes a difference.
Gen5 is back with a fascinating lesson from the recent past about how we can triumph in the near future. It takes all types to bring about a revolution. Though Christians have the biblical example before them of one who plants, another who waters, and yet another who reaps the harvest, conservatives tend to split into factions. Ironically, as Dabney pointed out long ago, theirs has become the politics of expediency, not of principle. Liberals, on the other hand, are able to organize parties in which blue-haired grandmothers cast ballots alongside dreadlocked pimps and turtlenecked Marxists. Yet moderation is not the answer. Gen5 shows that the greatest ethnonationalist revolution grew from a slim minority of radicals all the way to a majority of opportunists, with principle at every step along the path. (Jefferson Davis, the most famous of the opportunists, became a great and eloquent defender of the cause of the South.)
To make an analogy, the abolitionists provided the raw fuel to provoke Southern secession. The rhetorical radicals like Rhett labored endlessly to cure and dry the wood and provide kindling for the fire, though always intensely discouraged that their efforts never resulted in spontaneous combustion. The reformed radicals of Yancey’s stripe, mostly in Alabama and Mississippi, provided the spark. The revolutionary insiders fanned the flames, and the opportunists availed themselves of the warmth of the fire and pushed those who created it aside.
Conditions will grow ripe by circumstances outside our control, like the collapse of the dollar, but when the time comes, groups that might not particularly like each other must learn to work together to secure a future. This is why racial awareness is of crucial importance, and why the dualism of the corrupt “Church” of today must be purged.
Good to know:
If we can use the language of positive morality to advance our cause, we will have the wind at our backs when fighting the moderates whose sole motivating spirit is that of calculating delay and obstructionism…
Like ecological die-offs, political revolutions are never seen in advance by those who are its victims.
Dabney versus Locke in this very good article on civil authority, by David Opperman.
“Obedience to God and Caesar are not incompatible, provided each stays within his own proper sphere… The powers that be are ordained of God to protect the good and punish the bad (Romans 13), but if they start to persecute the good, they are no longer ordained of God.” ~ The Confession of Magdeburg, 1550
“If magistrates go against the rule of Christ they may be deposed.” ~ Ulrich Zwingli, Swiss reformer
“Just government is not founded on the consent of the individuals governed, but on the ordinance of God, and hence a share in the ruling franchise is not a natural right at all, but a privilege to be bestowed according to a wise discretion on a limited class having qualification to use it for the good of the whole.” ~ R.L. Dabney
What’s good for the state is also good for the church. Dabney extends the principle to ecclesiastical government. Read Ecclesiastical Equality of Negroes. “[W]hile the blessings of redemption are free to all, of every race or caste, the privileges of church office may be properly withheld from some, at the dictate of a sound discretion. This is scriptural truth.” And scriptural truth is quite foreign to the ears of the pious churchman of today, for whom the Unpardonable Sin is to transgress “the people,” the abstract entity that is always the excuse for waging war against real flesh and blood, kith and kin.
In this article, you can become more acquainted with the low-IQ voters who now determine your future.
When a black person “promises” he means “maybe I will and maybe I won’t.” But, I said, this makes nonsense of promising, the very purpose of which is to bind one to a course of action. When one is not sure he can do something he may say, “I will try but I can’t promise.” He said he’d heard whites say that and had never understood it till now. As a young Romanian friend so aptly summed it up, when a black person “promises” he means “I’ll try.”
These Danes are speaking very frankly about IQ differences.
“Why we don’t own this?” asks a concerned member of the local Rotary Club.
How to properly apologize for racism.
Tintin’s comic book adventure in the Congo is so dangerous for sensitive young eyes and delicate young minds that it is now being shipped in shrink-wrap and with a warning about its content. (It was long ago banned from bookstore shelves. Do bookstores still exist?) One of the frightfully racist panels in the book shows a black woman bowing to Tintin, saying, “White man very great… White mister is big juju man.” Hell, my wife tells me this every Sunday evening after dessert, and I haven’t shrink-wrapped her since our honeymoon.
Steven Spieljew has made a new movie about Tintin. I wonder if he’ll hire Whoopi Goldjew to tape a segment for the video release explaining that, yes, this is from a racist time, and yes, white people are racists, but to not release the film would be to pretend that the horribly racist past never occurred. This is what Warner Brothers hired her to do for the Looney Tunes DVD collection.
Pippi Longstocking is a racist, which is to say that she was written during the White Era. Her father becomes king of a South Seas island and is called the Negro King. Then black children throw themselves in the sand in front of white children. But there are redeeming qualities to offset the racism, says a German sheologian. It “has a strong female character, she is against adultism, grown-ups being in charge, and she is fiercely opposed to violence against animals…” Yes, one of the greatest problems in the world today is that adults are in charge. “Adultism” and “racism”; it’s hard to say which is worse. The sheologian defines racism as anything that meets the disapproval of blacks. “Only then can you say whether it is okay or not.” And should white literature continue? “It simply isn’t helpful if we want to help our children find their place in a multicultural society.”
The primary reason for Southern secession was not the tariff nor the Tenth Amendment. It was slavery.
To blacks, the enslavement of their ancestors by American Christians was the worst thing that has ever happened in the history of the world. But with relatively few exceptions, they were treated very well. They cost $40,000 each in today’s dollars, and no one shells out that kind of money without a whole lot of caretaking to protect the investment. Slaves today cost $90 apiece, and they are treated like dirt: a “disposable commodity, like styrofoam cups.” Tens of millions are now enslaved, most of them in Asia and Africa. James writes: “Apparently, it’s more important to talk about a tiny percentage of whites that held slaves hundreds of years ago than to talk about the non-whites who are actually doing it today.” That’s called equality.
“It was a veteran soldiery that repeopled the plantations and the homesteads of the South, and withstood the forces thrown against them during the period of Reconstruction. In addition to such racial traits as personal pride, self-reliance, and physical courage, they possessed also race pride, which is inestimable in a great popular struggle. This race pride after the war had only increased. However beaten and broken they were, the people of the South came out of the war with their spirit unquenched, and a belief that they were unconquerable.” ~ Thomas Nelson Page
Here you go, some of the best books you’ll ever read: Dabney’s Discussions (part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5).
Anthony Jacob, from his book White Man Think Again:
Unlike the white man, the Negro has never dominated his environment, and has always been completely dominated by it. In this respect we might compare Africa with Iceland and African art with Icelandic art. In spite of Iceland’s isolation and its almost absolute lack of raw materials suitable for artistic reproduction, Icelandic art – let alone Icelandic literature and poetry – has been incomparably superior to anything produced in Africa, notwithstanding the very great natural advantages enjoyed by Africans. In all branches of endeavor, the Icelanders have far excelled the Africans, and have behaved as a biologically refined people can be expected to behave, no matter how isolated and barren their country…
The Negro has been in contact with the Egyptian civilization, the Phoenician, the Greek, the Roman, the Arab, the Persian, the Indian and more latterly our own civilization; yet no spark of emulation was ever struck in his dull breast. If we travel up the west coast of Africa we find substantial building and ruins all the way from Mozambique to the Balun Islands, all showing unmistakeable evidence of foreign culture and occupation. But there is never any sign of any attempt by the Africans to copy or improve on these buildings. As has been noted, when East Africa was colonized in the late nineteenth century, the Africans possessed neither a road, nor a wheel, nor a piece of money despite the contacts mentioned. Today they have changed (changed, not evolved) because they have been literally snatched up in the white colonial machinery, and have had no choice but to change. But they obviously resent it, and revert violently whenever they have the chance. The very first things they destroy are the schools and mission stations and clinics which they associate with their enforced emancipation; and the first people they kill are those who have done the most to help them advance.”
“If you succeed in the passage of this [anti-lynching] bill, you will open the floodgates of hell in the South. Raping, mobbing, lynching, race riots, and crime will be increased a thousandfold; and upon your garments and the garments of those who are responsible for the passage of the measure will be the blood of the raped and outraged daughters of Dixie, as well as the blood of the perpetrators of these crimes that the red-blooded Anglo-Saxon White Southern men will not tolerate.” ~ Senator Theodore Bilbo
Soon we can expect to see African-style billboards in Dixie:
I prefer the billboards of white farmers.
This is funny. Some jackoff liberals in Idaho are preaching universal equality to a room full of white kids. Why don’t these Jacobins ever decide to live in south-central Los Angeles, or East St. Louis, or Detroit? Some people apparently have trouble appreciating diversity.
This venture capitalist, Michael Arrington, says he doesn’t know a single black entrepreneur in Silicon Valley, but he funds 100% of the black entrepreneurs who pitch ideas to him, but this has “nothing to do with skin color,” he says, because there is “zero race or sex bias in Silicon Valley.” Uh, what? It’s funny how white men always lose when someone claims to have “zero bias.” If there is no bias against merit, all the high-tech jobs will go to whites, Jews, and Asians, and relatively few women. (Silicon Valley companies are keeping their diversity data top secret.) Instead, two-thirds of Arrington’s investments go to women and non-whites, and he says this is “solely on the strength of their ideas,” which is obviously false. He even admits that investors are eager to “diversify” their portfolios, for the same reason that colleges openly break the law against racial quotas. And it’s not just whites who are the victims of “zero bias.” Imagine what goes through the mind of an Asian who reads articles like this which pretend that black people are the center of the universe. Blacks are only 13% of the population, but they have been given so many handouts that anything less than double representation makes them want to join in a chorus of We Shall Overcome. Bryant Gumbel is worked up about obscenely-paid black men in the 90% black NBA being treated like “slaves” on the commissioner’s “plantation.”
At Apple, which now has the highest stock market valuation in the world, Steve Jobs’s seven executives were all white. Even Asians are rare at Apple.
I’ll tell you one thing, they don’t make good TV like this or this anymore.
“Here’s to yesterday.”
Rick Perry, the man with a plan.
We secretly hope for a presidential race between Obama and Cain, or as Harry calls them, Amos & Empty. See Pokemon poetry, for example. The campaign will be a fantastic year of skinning, grinning, and bojangling.
This Republican ad campaign is comical on several levels. First, it appeals to black racial solidarity, including references to “our people” and “my own seed” as valid reasons to oppose abortion. (The white people who made the video are thoroughly deracinated.) Second, a black character uses the niggerism “ho” as well as the French term “tout suite” (“at once”) in the same sentence. Third, it asserts that opposing the Iraq War now makes you both a “racist” and an opponent of the pro-life cause.
A friend of ours sent to us this story of Croatia’s first interior minister, believed to be the first time in history that anyone affiliated with Stalin’s Communist regime has been arrested and charged with “crimes against humanity.” That’s right, at least 50 million deaths, and no one has been formally punished, in large part because of Jews like Elan Steinberg, the vice president of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors and their Descendants, who is outraged by last week’s arrest in Croatia.
Hilaire Belloc on usury, the cancer of the modern Jewified world.
The modern world is organized on the principle that money of its nature breeds money. A sum of money lent has, according to our present scheme, a natural right to interest. That principle is false in economics as in morals. It ruined Rome, and it is bringing us to our end.
The Official Counterfeiter, a PDF comic by Vic Lockman. Also see Money, Banking, and Usury.
“Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits.” ~ Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England
Even John Calvin placed a 5% cap on usury and said that usurers were below whores and weren’t allowed in church.
But this is 2011, and so the Vatican has called for the creation of a massive new “world political authority” and “central world bank” with “universal jurisdiction” for the purpose of “building a more fraternal and just human family and, even before that, a new humanism open to transcendence.” Because, you see, independent states are “sectorial and isolated,” but the New World Order is “systematic and integrated…and geared to the universal common good.” And if you’re opposed to “good,” your name must be Satan. We say to hell with globalism in both church and state.
It’s interesting that Kinists are fighting the Jew from two angles: first in the Church, where usury is now a sacrament, and second among atheist white nationalists, for whom morality evolves, and is defined at any given moment by what is good for the white race. This elevates the white race to a god (a puny god that is helpless to save itself) and precludes the possibility that our race is being righteously judged. Jews, Jews everywhere.
“The socialist who is a Christian is more to be dreaded than a socialist who is an atheist.” ~ Dostoevsky
On the eve of Yom Kippur, the Jews transfer their sins to a chicken. At Kaparot, they twirl the scapechicken over their heads and recite their idolatrous prayers to a god who can’t hear. Michael Hoffman writes:
After the kaparot voodoo concludes, the perjurer’s ceremony begins: on Yom Kippur the infamous rite of Kol Nidrei takes place, almost always explained away to the outside world as a blessed ritual of begging God for forgiveness for oaths that were violated, contracts that were broken and promises that were not kept in the past year.
The trouble is, that pious picture is a phony.
Kol Nidrei is actually a ceremony whereby: 1. all the perjury you will commit in the coming year and 2. all contracts you will sign and violate in the coming year, and 3. all the promises you will break in the coming year, are absolved, with no heavenly punishment accruing as a result…
It’s a kind of invincible circuit that reinforces its own deceit. You have to pity people ensnared in this sordid charade of cajoling God into helping them cheat.
The Jew York Times doesn’t bother with any of these details, of course, but writes simply that Yom Kippur “is the Jewish Day of Atonement, the culmination of 10 days of contemplation, self-renewal and rededication to the path of righteousness.”
Big news: Get Judaism Discovered, Michael Hoffman’s masterpiece, for the Kindle and other e-readers, and get the second edition of Judaism’s Strange Gods at a very good price.
And now, something guaranteed to put another smile on your face.
“Let no Jew take a Christian woman to wife, nor any Christian seek marriage with a Jewess. For if any one admits anything of this sort, he will be charged with his crime just as if he has committed adultery, and furthermore liberty for accusations of this nature has been granted to the general public.” ~ Theodosius the Great to Cynegius, Codex Theodosianus, cited in J.E. Seaver, The Persecution of Jews in the Roman Empire, p. 47
“We wish to make clear to the Jewish elders and patriarchs that if, after the enactment of this law, anyone attempts…to reconvert a person who has given up the baleful sect of Judaism and has joined the cult of God, forthwith he and his accomplices are to be given to the flames and burned. Furthermore if anyone of the people has joined their evil sect and frequented their meeting places, he shall suffer his deserved penalty with them.” ~ Constantius (Constantine’s father) to Evagrius, Codex Theodosianus, cited in J.E. Seaver, The Persecution of Jews in the Roman Empire, p. 31
Christ-killers are pressuring the pope to punish Bishop Richard Williamson once again for writing that “only the Jews were the primary agents of the deicide because Pontius Pilate would never have condemned Jesus if the Jews had not asked for blood.” This is absolutely true, but the truth is anti-Semitic. On May 17, the executive director of the US Bishops’ Conference’s Secretariat for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs said that one cannot charge the Jewish people with deicide at any time in history without falling out of communion with the Catholic Church.
“Jesus died on the Cross to save all of us sinful human beings from our sins, and in this sense all men were and are the purpose of his death. But only the Jews (leaders and people) were the prime agents of the deicide because it is obvious from the Gospels that the Gentile most involved, Pontius Pilate, would never have condemned Jesus to death had not the Jewish leaders roused the Jewish people to clamour for his crucifixion (Mt. XXVII, 20). Certainly the learned leaders were more guilty than the unlearned people, says St. Thomas Aquinas (Summa III, 47, 5), but they all cried together for Jesus’ blood to come down upon them and their children (Mt. XXVII, 25).” ~ Bishop Richard Williamson
“An ‘anti-semite’ in actual usage, is less often a man who hates Jews than a man certain Jews hate. The word expresses the emotional explosion that occurs in people who simply can’t bear critical discourse about a sacred topic, and who experience criticism as profanation and blasphemy. The term ‘anti-semitism’ doesn’t stand for any intelligible concept. It belongs not to the world of rational discourse, but to the realm of imprecations and maledictions and ritual ostracisms.” ~ Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 16, 1992
Once you get past the corny laugh tracks in the beginning of this video, there are some very interesting points raised about Auschwitz.
If you need a gift idea for Christmas, here’s a Lego concentration camp.
Watch out for Android phones. They’re anti-Semitic.
The Holocaust cult, writes Gilad Atzmon, “has priests (e.g., Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel, Deborah Lipstadt) and prophets (…those who warn of the Iranian Judeocide to come). It has commandments and dogmas (‘Never Again’) and rituals (memorial days, pilgrimage to Auschwitz, etc). It has an established, esoteric symbolic order (kapos, gas chambers, chimneys…). It also has a temple, Yad Vashem, and shrines – Holocaust museums in capital cities worldwide. The Holocaust religion is also financed by a massive global financial network… This new religion is coherent enough to define its ‘antichrists’ (Holocaust deniers) and powerful enough to persecute them (through Holocaust-denial and hate-speech laws).”
The Holohoaxers are showing this video of when the Nazis hosted a degenerate art display in Munich in 1937. Some of it is grotesque, some of it is lewd, some merely abstract. But the hoaxers won’t show what really outraged the Nazis and all good Germans, which was the sewer of Jewish “art” and “entertainment” typified by the pornographic cabarets of Berlin a few years earlier. From 1921 to 1933, Jews turned Berlin into the most debauched city in Europe, and when compared to Paris and Amsterdam, that’s really saying something. This book shows what the hoaxers will not show you: cabaret acts featuring queer boy scouts, theatrical spanking machines, nudist priests, gleefully incestuous families, and dentist chair molestations, not to mention the countless massage parlors, sex clubs, and torture dungeons. In short, it was Hollywood 2011. This lust for Jew-vomit did not abate from natural causes but because the Nazis brought an iron hand down upon the filth and sent the villains away in cattle cars. And if you think this was all in the past, you need to realize that a party is going to someday clean house in America too. Pornographers should prepare for the day by studying what happened to Magnus Hirschfeld.
“By 2050, Palestinians west of the Jordan will outnumber Israelis two to one. Syria, Jordan and Egypt, which had 40 million people at the time of the Six-Day War, will have 170 million. Militarily, Israel remains dominant, but neither time nor demography seems to be on her side.” Demography. It all comes back to blood, which the neo-Christian kingdomtards are preaching is as insignificant as dishwater.
Arabs call Negroes “abd,” which means “slave” in Arabic. And blacks here think that the word “nigger” is bad, when it simply means Negro. By calling them slaves, the Arabs mean that blacks are still slaves by nature, which is largely true even here.
It’s almost impossible to spot mixed couples on the streets of Basra. Women who marry a black man – it’s never the other way round – have to walk under the eyes of Iraqi tribal society.
“I know a mixed couple,” says Doha Abdulreda, a 20-year-old black hostess at Basra’s trade fair. “She’ll always hide under her Niqab (the Muslim covering over the face) when she walks next to her husband. Her family rejected her, that’s not uncommon here.”
American Indians also call blacks slaves, as you will hear in this Rushdoony lecture (8:41). Rush said that no one is more contemptuous of the Negro, for this very reason.
“There is not a single public Christian church left in Afghanistan, according to the U.S. State Department.” Meanwhile, almost half a trillion dollars has been taken from us and given to the government of that country.
A European member of parliament who has had enough of the threat of Islam. Imagine one of our worthless American politicians speaking with such passion about anything. Of course, when a white man is able to work up such conviction against the other famous anti-Christs in our midst, the Jews, you’ll know that Christendom has returned from the dead. And when it happens, liberty will dawn as the world has never seen.
European schoolchildren being forced to bow to a false god.
From 1969 to 2009, the number of employed, prime working-age men fell from 95% to 81.2%, and median annual earnings fell by 27%! But the important thing is that women can experience the fulfillment of a career. Children can be raised by the Almighty State.
When the Darkness Falls is an excellent history lesson for your kids, except that there are some parts with bad language. History is racist. And I’ll let you in on a secret: it also wants to kill six million Jews. The words truth and hate both contain a “t” and an “h,” if you know what I mean.
Strunk & White’s Elements of Style is now available online for free! Indoctrinate your children and turn them into grammatical supremacists.
“Reverse racist” means that many white women put themselves in situations they would not otherwise enter if the men were white. They assume their lack of trust in black men is racist, when actually it may be quite appropriate. Their overcompensation for “racism” often gets them killed.
Listen to our friend Winston Smith’s excellent radio show.
This makes me want to stab my eyes and ears with sharp objects.
Instauration Online now has 87% of the back issues scanned and available. This is remarkable. Bloggers stand in awe of Wilmot Robertson’s accomplishment in publishing so much material over the span of 25 years, not even including his groundbreaking book, The Dispossessed Majority.
“[E]quality as a philosophical and religious faith is at work. All people are equals; woman is equal to man, and man is equal to God.”
Here is John Calvin’s treatise “Against the Fantastic and Furious Sect of the Libertines” available online – it’s against a neo-Gnostic cult that preached antinomian ideas back in Calvin’s days. He could clearly see the nihilism their levelling pantheistic theory would lead to.
I also find it interesting that CALVIN – not exactly known for his enthusiastic defense of “the will of man” – noticed with disapproval how the monistic determinism of the Libertines destroyed the whole concept of free will:
http://www.solideogloria.ch/reformation/english/libertines.htm
“On the Libertine View that a Spirit Comprises Everything. And what pestilence is hidden under this view.”
After creating a single spirit among themselves, by means of which they destroy the nature of both the angels of heaven and the devils of hell, as well as human souls, the Libertines maintain that this single spirit constitutes everything. By this they do not mean what the Scripture means when it says that at the same time all creatures subsist in Him, are equally guided by Him, are subject to His providence, and serve His will, each according to its order. But they mean that everything in the world must be seen directly as His doing.
In making this claim they attribute nothing to the will of man, no more than if he were a stone. And they cast aside every distinction between good and evil, since nothing can be badly made in their view, seeing that God is its author.
Now in order for this to be more clearly understood, I shall cite several examples illustrative of their idea.
This notorious swine Quintin4 once found himself in a street where a man had just been killed. By chance a faithful believer was also there who said, ‘Alas! Who has committed this wicked deed? ”
Immediately he replied in a jesting way, “Since you want to know, it was I. The other being completely surprised said, “How can you be so flippant?” To which he replied, ‘It isn’t I, but God.” “Why,” asked the other, “must you attribute to God evils that He has commanded should be punished?” At which this swine disgorged even more forcefully his venom, saying, “Yes, it’s you, it’s I, it’s God! For whatever you or I do is God’s doing! And whatever God does, we do; for God is in us!”‘
If you concede this point, then we must either attribute sin to God or dissolve the world of sin, inasmuch as God does everything. Thus, any distinction between good and evil is eliminated.”
“Only Kinists remain the true conservatives and the true Christians.”
I cannot accept this statement as literally true, and I don’t think you really mean it that way either. There are innumerable Christians in this world – imperfect and sinful as they are – whose faith you cannot question just because they are not consciously committed to “Kinist” dogmas which really seem rather vague.
Kinists would drive themselves into cultic unorthodoxy very quickly if they were to deny, for example, that a Mulatto could not potentially become a very good follower of Christ in spite of his garbled lineage. One can legitimately argue that we should not produce people like him, any more than we should produce extra-marital bastards, but that does not change the main point.
The Unitarians do seem to love mischievous race-mixing. The following comes from the remarkable autobiography of Thomas Pellow, a youth from Cornwall who was captured in 1715 by the Barbary Corsairs and spent the following 23 years in Morocco as a captive before being able to escape.
(Here is a recent book about this man and his fellow-sufferers: “White Gold: The Extraordinary Story of Thomas Pellow and Islam’s One Million White Slaves“)
Pellow describes how Moulay Ismail, the ruler of Morocco, once jokefully decided to marry him to a Black woman. He refused about as firmly as he dared (Moulay being an utterly ruthless bloody tyrant), and begged that if he absolutely had to get married, to receive a wife of his “own colour.”
I wonder whether modern Babelists would dare to condemn Pellow for his primitive bigotry, this simple “kinist” sentiment that gave his courage to test the temper of a vicious man who could slay him without any qualms or consequences?
http://www.archive.org/stream/adventuresofthom00pelliala#page/74/mode/2up
“One day, the Emperor being on the merry pin, ordered to be brought before him eight hundred young men, and soon after as many young women, who also instantly appearing (as being, no doubt, before ordered to be ready at hand), he told the men, that as he had on several occasions observed their readiness and dexterity in obeying him, he would therefore, as in some part of recompense, give every one of them a wife; and which, indeed, he soon did, by giving some by his own hand (a very great condescension), and to others by the beckoning of his head, and the cast of his eye, where they should fix.
After they were all coupled and departed, I was also called forth, and bid to look at eight black women standing there, and to take one of them for a wife. At which sudden command, I (being not a little confounded, as not at all liking their colour) immediately bowing twice, falling to the ground and kissing it, and after that the Emperor’s foot (which is the custom of those who desire to be heard, as well as a very great favour and condescension to be permitted to do), humbly in treated him, if, in case I must have a wife, that he would be graciously pleased to give me one of my own colour.
Then, forthwith sending them off, he ordered to be brought forth seven others, who all proved to be Mulattoes; at which I again bowed to the ground, still entreating him to give me one of my own colour; and then he ordered them also to depart, and sent for a single woman, full dressed, and who in a very little time appeared, with two young blacks attending her, she being, no doubt, the same he and the Queen had before particularly designed for me. I being forthwith ordered to take her by the hand and lead her off, which she holding out to me, I perceived it to be black also, as soon after I did her feet; at which I started back, like one in a very great surprise, and being asked what was the matter, I answered him as before; when he smiling, ordered me to lift up her veil (it being the custom of the country for women to go veiled) and look at her face; which I readily obeying, found her to be of a very agreeable complexion, the old rascal crying out, in a very pleasing way, in the Spanish language, “Bono! Bono!” which signifies, “Good! Good!” ordering me a second time to take her by the hand, lead her off, and keep her safe.”
I fully agree that the test of being a Christian is not whether one agrees with me. Instead, according to 1 John, we know that one of the marks of being a Christian is that we do not hate our brothers. The Alienist hates his brothers of the flesh, AND hates his brothers in the Spirit who disagree with him about the importance of the bonds of kinship in the flesh. I was just reading where the utter lunatic, Daniel F.N. Ritchie, wrote, in all seriousness, that Kinists ought to be stoned to death.
It’s clear to me that there are Christians who love the Lord and His blessings, and there are “Christians” for whom faith is everything, and the world and all it contains is like a burden they must bear until they enter full ghosthood. The latter are not Christians at all, and they conserve nothing.
Personally, I wouldn’t mind disagreeing with Admin and using S/W/B as a test of orthodoxy despite his opinion otherwise, but then I’d be caught up in a paradox… lol
So instead, I’ll offer a quick opinion:
I despise semantic arguments but lately, I’ve seen the term “Christianity” thrown around like its an established and meaninful concept.
I can’t (for the life of me) remember the last time I used the word “Christianity” in a discussion.
What is “Christianity” other than the agregate acts of a particular body of people? Their prayers, their songs, their good deeds, their confessions?
I hope you guys forgive that sort of juvenile observation on my part. I think it’s important for us to remember, though, as we talk about who is and is not a representative of “Christianity.”
Alienists, like our wee lil’ leprechaun pal, effeminate pastors like Piper, and compromisers like (the otherwise likeable) Joe Morecraft, may all be officially inaugurated into the covenant with Christ…but that doesn’t mean that they belong to that long and cherished tradition and culture of people known as “Christendom.”
The alienists’ attitude and mindest is antithetical to “Christianity” in that sense.
I agree with admin…we Kinists are the only self-conscious defenders of Conservatism, which by default implies we’re the last of the Christians.
Remember how Nisbet defines conservative:
“The essence of this body of ideas is the protection of the social order: family, neighborhood, community and region, from the ravages of the centrailized political state.”
Plato posed the question of primary causation in ethics. If “..in Him we live and move and have our being.” Acts 17:28 (St Paul is quoting from the Timeus), then the question of the will “what is the good and how do we then live” (The Phaedrus) must be resolved (ethically) in terms of a single, dominant will that is can answer the question of The Phaedrus.
The Philosopher King of The Republic is the practical outworking of this question of the good – if it is posed and answered in the limited terms of ethics as a rational system.
The Church answers these questions not ethically but theologically and its answer is not abstract. It is the manifestation of the Covenants and the Christendom.
That is one nifty little gun that he has there.
“I agree with admin…we Kinists are the only self-conscious defenders of Conservatism, which by default implies we’re the last of the Christians.”
I am suggesting that Kinists should show some Christian humility, for I can see that Kinists have doctrinal troubles in their own camp to settle with. They can thus hardly afford boasting of being the only true-blue Christians of the world.
Take this “Fr. John” for example that posts often in Kinist sites – he has apparently become a de facto CI heretic who believes that only Whites are descendants of Adam. In other words, he has adopted the moronic “Pre-Adamite” theory that was originally invented by Jewish Kabbalists to deny the full humanity of gentiles (it is notorious how Christian Identity is a like cheap Aryan knock-off of Talmudic bigotry), and which was originally seen as wildly heretical idea by orthodox traditional Christians:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Adamite
At most, IMHO, Kinists could see themselves as “the stronger brethren” of apostle Paul’s famous metaphor that are more spiritually developed than such timid “weaker brethren” that do not dare to become involved in racial politics out of fear of worldly pollution, so to speak. You CAN consider their “spiritualist” objections against becoming too involved in earthly business as misguided, but that does NOT give you the right of dismissing their pietistic scruples entirely – like Paul did not consider himself capable of denouncing “weak” people whose conscience allowed them to eat only vegetables, as long as they did not try to push this belief as binding to others.
Romans 14:
“1 Accept the one whose faith is weak, without quarreling over disputable matters. 2 One person’s faith allows them to eat anything, but another, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. 3 The one who eats everything must not treat with contempt the one who does not, and the one who does not eat everything must not judge the one who does, for God has accepted them. 4 Who are you to judge someone else’s servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall. And they will stand, for the Lord is able to make them stand.”
“…the famous Hebrew Rabbi Wiener, who in his work ‘The Jewish Food Laws’ confesses that the Jews were the instigators of the Christian persecutions in Rome. If one considers that under the rule of Nero in the year 65 of our calendar, when Rome had the Jewess Poppaea as Empress and a Jew as prefect of the city, the era of martyrs began which was to extend for over 249 years. [ Rabbi Wiener: Ie judischen Speisegesetze ] With these instigations of the Hebrews to call forth the Roman persecutions against Christianity, participated in by even those Rabbis outstanding in the history of the synagogue, such as the famed Jehuda, one of the authors of the Talmud, the sacred books and the source of the religion of modern Jewry. Jehuda was ‘successful in the year 155 of our calendar in obtaining a command, according to which all Christians of Rome were to be sacrificed’, and on grounds of which many thousands were killed. The executioners of the martyrs and Popes, Gavo and Marcelino were in fact Jews.”
Maurice Pinay. The Plot Against the Church. St Anthony Press, Los Angeles, Ca. 1982, p. 229 – 230.
Gulag Archipelago – the red pill is not for cowards.
Was the Red Terror mainly Jewish Terror, as the Nazis believed…?
Thanks to Kevin MacDonald’s lead, Sozhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together, a 2 vol. work on the history of Russian-Jewish relations is being translated, step by step in the Occidental Observer blogspot.
http://caesartort.blogspot.com/2010/07/gulag-archipelago-redpill-is-for.html.
Kinism simply has nothing to do with “Christian Identity.” The principles are well-defined:
http://spiritwaterblood.com/about/
http://www.kinism.net/index.php/weblog/index_about/
A CI adherent who calls himself a Kinist or speaks fondly of Kinism might means that he shares goals in common with Kinists, just as we Kinists share some goals in common with atheist white nationalists. But just because some people have trouble with categorical distinctions doesn’t mean that we face a doctrinal crisis. We can’t do anything about the problems that some people have with reading comprehension.
Great article, love that Boss Nigger poster!
As a Coeur D’Alene local, I’m always amazed at how hard the white liberal self haters work to destroy our little occidental enclave. First it was the Human Rights Institute and their embracing of every culture except their own. Next it was running every pro-white group out of town and calling them damnable minions of the devil. Then it was having black Pilgrims on display at the library, sans a hint of white pilgrims, for the past three years. Next was the hideous demonic statue of Ganesha, plopped on street corner like a giant metal turd, just to make white liberals gush. Earlier this year the craze was to lock up white guys attacked by blacks, because the white guy looked ‘racist’, thereby making the black guy a victim of a hate crime. Now our latest is droves of illegal aliens being filtered in by Mexican restaurants and cheap neo-con builders, bringing in their drugs and violent crimes.
This pattern is a well organized attack to destroy every last vestige of cultural pride the European people of this great town built! What was built with hard work and years of determination is being destroyed overnight by Sauron and his wicked army or orcs.
Here is an example of what we’re dealing with. This person, Rachael Dolezal, was the leader of the Human Rights Institute up until last year. Every year she claimed Nazis were painting swastikas and placing hate stickers on the HRI building. However no proof aside from her word was ever written up in the numerous articles her stories drummed up. She also kicked a guy I know out of the building for simply wearing a German WWII officer’s outfit. It was a symbol of hate and he should rot in jail is what he was told. This mud-shark, who teaches a diversity class at the local college and earns money painting black culture, is the epitome of a white-race hating liberal. She is a part of what is destroying this wonderful town. Check out her Facebook photos and see how pale her skin is, as she poses with her halfling. You can see her pose in front of the Human Rights Monument and hock her African only art. http://www.facebook.com/rachel.dolezal1?sk=photos
Thanks again S/W/B for making a stand and educating people on the history of our people and the war against our future.
Hey Petr,
Seems to me like it’s the theologians up at Westminster (and the hundreds of other seminaries just like it) that need humility.
The more theology I read, the more I realize no one has the final say.
There’s no “camp” I know of that doesn’t have a peculiar set of doctrinal issues to work through.
At least Kinists (so far as I’ve known them) are less concerned with working out theological systems and more concerned with loving their wives, kids, and extended kin.
That’s something a farm-wife as well as a Westminster grad can (and should)understand.
So I, for one, don’t look at “Kinism” as a given body of theological propositions. We do our people a disservice to think of it like that.
We are the last knights of Christendom, you and I (and our fellows here.)
As I said previously: there may be plenty of others inaugurated into the covenant of Grace (or however you want to say it.)
But we’re the last of the Christians.
And our affections are like our ancestors’.
In closing, I’ll speak a quick word in favor of my friend Fr. John. He, of all people, is least likely to be taken in by re-fried kabbalah. The man’s jew-dar is more impressive than Mel Gibson’s.
I’ve given “CI” ideals a fair hearing (though I’m no expert and I realize that Fr. John’s view is modified and different than much CI rhetoric)and whatever I may think of them, I’m not willing to use pejorative terms (like “moronic”) or speak in vulgar generalities (it’s notorious how…)
The position (especially as handled by Fr. John) is subtle and full of complexities that deserve a fair hearing before callous dismissal.
I also have to disagree with the idea that CI comes form the kabala. Books like the Talmud and the kabala are essentially the Bible turned on its head. For some reason, a certain faction of the enemy likes to identify themselves with biblical symbols and that sort of thing despite fairly obviously having no racial connection to them. Thus, they share the divine number (3) and use similar concepts (such as David’s heir, the union of light and darkness to produce life, all of the historic prophets etc.), but turn everything on its head. This is essentially the doctrine of Lucifer who claims to be the light unto the nations, but who in reality only brings hellfire. The Kabala (which is not highly regarded among most jews btw) is essentially a jewish sorcery textbook that was apparently dictated to the sorcerers by demons. While not taken seriously by most jews, there is a lot of evidence that some factions of the elites take it seriously.
The roots of CI appear to have been an attempt to merge some german national socialist religious ideas with more conservative mainline Christianity. Some of the more polygenic elements of CI and the idea of serpent seed come from certain Sumerian tablets (which apparently tend to read like some kind of science fiction novel from what I have heard, but anyways). I also have listened to Swift argue from hindu Aryan sources and some other ancient texts that relate to the idea of serpent seed. Having thus found a framework to work their targeted enemy into (in this case, the jews), it only took a little bit of literal interpreting to look at genesis four in a new way that was more in line with the other ancient texts. The national socialists tended to reject the OT and see Christ as essentially an Aryan warring against the jews for which he was crucified. Thus, CI sought to reclaim the OT while still subscribing to certain aspects of national socialist theology. CI is essentially the stated national socialist theology adapted to be more conservative and blended with a somewhat expanded Anglo Israel racial idea. I have listened to some of Wesley swift’s stuff and he has some odd ideas (for example, he believed in the preexistence of the soul in the same vein as Mormon theology), but then again also some interesting ideas. CI tends to be a mixed bag as far as it goes. A lot of the people in it are not exactly orthodox, but some of their stuff can be useful if used with discretion and discernment.
There are of course several different variations of CI out there. Some types will reject the duel seedline idea and say that those who embrace it are heretical and vice versa. The fundamental unifying factor that makes someone CI is likely the idea that the twelve tribes of Israel make up the German and Celtic peoples of Europe. Of course, there is typically a lot of baggage that comes along with that view, some of it being problematic which is why some who hold to that idea will reject the CI label.
Thanks for providing the link, Phinehas, to Rachel Dolezal’s Facebook page.
Clearly, for Coeur d’Arlene, The Bagel has landed. Looks like she got a nose job for her bat mitzvah and headed over to your town.
For Rachel to run her number in Coeur d’Arlene, the torrent of Diversity had to be unleashed by her co-ethnic Sen Jacob ‘open the floodgates’ Javits.
Once the Diversity begins to swamp a White enclave, the Jews like Rachel will swarm in and go to work on the Whites with the Kulturekumpf.
They will badger away using their controlled media to conceal the Black on White crime and Black or Mexican tribal expressions of racial superiority.
Only bad ebil Whitey (of course) gives vent to horrible racist expressions.
The Jews will finance and create community actions to promote White guilt for the whole litany of White sins – capitalism, slavery, racism, anti-semitism, sexism, religious bigotry, homophobia, Nazism, hate, carbon footprint the size of a Yeti etc.
They’ll be running programs for the youth on multiculturalism, they’ll be exhibiting non-Christian art, blasphemous anti-Christian art and organizing the holocaust memorial exhibits.
How doth the busy little Jewbee improve each shining hour…
Rachel is not a self-hating White. And she is not a Liberal.
Liberalism is an ideology created by Jews for post Christian Europeans. Rachel is in your town promoting liberalism for Whites in the way that Pest Control promotes Rat Sac for rats.
She is a jewess who believes in her tribe uber alles. To her mind, what stands in the way of her tribe coming into its own globally is the White demographic of America.
So there is Rachel up there in Couer d’Arlene doing a job on the Whites by promoting White sex ups with the Shooks (Yiddish for Black person).
She probably has a whole list of crap she promotes for deracinated White women who have been edjewmacated in the public schools to apologize to Black rapists.
What is needed up there are people to just stand outside her ‘exhibits’, elevate the Holy Cross and pray the Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin followed by the Litany of the Sacred Heart. They hate that. It really makes them cough up their furball and start caterwauling about ‘freedom’ of religion.
Phinehas, this could be a lot of fun – in addition to Christian duty.
“Seems to me like it’s the theologians up at Westminster (and the hundreds of other seminaries just like it) that need humility.”
FYI, Petr wouldn’t know about Westminster Seminary. He lives overseas and isn’t a Calvinist. His database of historical links is, however, astounding.
In this conversation, I think Petr’s concerns are valid. I have run across “Kinists” who talk as if white people are a new chosen people. That’s just not true. In the case of Fr. John, isn’t an ex-Rushdoony follower who converted to EO?
As for Westminster East and West, they seem to be bastions of overrated academics. That these people treated Peter Enns as a serious theologian for years is pretty pathetic, IMHO.
“I’ve given “CI” ideals a fair hearing (though I’m no expert and I realize that Fr. John’s view is modified and different than much CI rhetoric)and whatever I may think of them, I’m not willing to use pejorative terms (like “moronic”) or speak in vulgar generalities (it’s notorious how…)”
You know what’s “vulgar”? The notion that non-Whites are not descendants of Adam (and thus by implication outside the covenant of Christ). There’s no way around it – this is a DUMB, very un-traditional heresy, something that pre-PC Mormons could have come up with:
http://www.utlm.org/onlineresources/sermons_talks_interviews/brigham1852feb5_priesthoodandblacks.htm
http://www.christiandefense.org/mor_black.htm
Brigham Young was a very “kinist” theologian. Does that make his tripe OK?
Shotgun, I can’t help seeing that you allow your personal relationships and preferences influence your judgment. And ironically, being misled from objective truth by wishful thinking and emotionalism is not very “White” behavior. Actually any neutral observer can see the embarrassing similarities between Christian Identity and the Nation of Islam.
PS:
I can see “Fr. John” is frothing at the mouth about me in his blog and thus only confirming my suspicions:
http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2011/11/13/line-upon-line-precent-upon-precept/
Kinism is not Mormon either. It’s not fair to anyone involved to label ANY attempt to help a race or ethnicity survive as Kinist. Kinism, as I said, is well-defined. It is orthodox Christianity wedded to love for one’s kin, which is simply gratitude to God for His gifts.
I share the concern with Petr that we should be careful about suggesting that Kinists are the only Christians. To be sure the babelists are strongly tainted with the gnostic heresy and other failings, but we must consider that God is merciful and surely tolerates great shortcomings in many who are still His genuine followers. In the end it is only God who can judge the heart.
We kinists are rightly angry when babelists deny that we are of the faith, and our tendency is to lash back by doing the same toward them. Here we should consider the principle of not returning evil for evil.
We should indeed pray for our opponents, in hope they will come to the truth. But at the same time, until they do, we must resist their errors with all our strength.
Petr, unless you can demonstrate that CI borrows from mormonism or the kabala explicitly, you should not be making those sorts of arguments. One can just as easily say that since judaism and islam both promote monogenism, then monogenism is wrong. That doesn’t really say anything about the strength of the argument one way or other. Since there is some textual borrowing between christianity, judaism and islam, one might expect that they would come to the same conclusions on certain ideas. Again, that doesn’t say anything about if something is right or wrong, it just means that it tends to be interpreted in the same manner.
In some cases, one can wrongly apply a dominant cultural idea to textual exegesis. This is the case with modern christianity applying a secular humanist framework on race to the Bible. I have yet to see however mormonism or kabalism have that sort of position in our culture. As I noted before, most jews do not even like the kabala. Needless to say, I think that I provided the intellectual foundation of christian identity in my previous post, at least with its founder’s ideas.
btw, isn’t the whole idea in the nation of islam that some wizard opposed to god created white people in a laboratory whereas god had originally created black people? No one except for the couple of black whack jobs promoting that idea will take it seriously.
What modern Christians can not seem to get hold of is that the Christendom whether at the furthest extent of its polity as Byzantium – the empire of Eastern and Western Christian nations or its Western remnant in Europe was always and continuously assailed by invasion – the Sassanid Persians, the Huns, the Avars, the Moors, the Vandals, Islam – with Babylonian Jewry always active in the finance of these alliances and campaigns.
The Churches, public statuary, paintings and latterly ‘museums’ are filled with memorials of the national deliverances of the Christendom .
What these memorials chiefly commemorate are saints who were instrumental in these victories.
To the modern mind all this is legend. These deprived unfortunates can only think in terms of politics and armies.
But to the historians of Christian civilization, to the Church and to the rulers who created these monuments, records and art – it is history.
Take for example the Hunnic invasions of the West. This was a victory of the Christian forces under the Roman general Aetius in 451 AD.
And the French credit the instrumentality of St Genevieve with turning back the invasion of the Huns under Attilla from Paris. That is why she is (with St Denis) the patron saint of Paris.
The French record goes on to declare that in her work of deliverance for the city, she was counseled in a visionary way by the Christ bearing St Simeon Stylite of Syria who reposed in 459 A.D.
The modern mind can not get hold of the historicity of political and military facts of this nature.
It is incapable of seeing that a saint who lives on top of a pillar in Syria praying, fasting and teaching pilgrims can, through the strength of the holy faith and the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, reach out to the Christ bearing spirit of a young nun in Paris and counsel her in a visionary way about what she is to do to help save her city from the Hunnic invasion.
The modern mind thoroughly Jewed with materialism, infidelity, sin and corruption can not get hold of reality at this level.
And that is its great weakness. And that is why it will be defeated.
Just Google – images St James Moor Slayer or Santiago Matamoros – the most politically incorrect of all saints.
The Apostle St James led the Christian forces of the West to victory in the Reconquista according to the monumental record of Spain and Portugal. Statues, paintings, monuments, records of St James the Moor Slayer adorn both churches and public spaces throughout Spain and Portugal.
He is not a legend and neither is his legacy which lasted in those nations for almost a thousand years.
The Christendom was built, maintained, defended and extended against decisive natural odds in terms of the power of its enemies.
That there was a Christendom is due to the fact that supernatural forces played a decisive role in its existence.
That it is today destroyed is due to the fact that those same supernatural forces no longer are active in force on its behalf – those nations were given over to the enemies of Christ the King, God and his rights and indeed the enemies of nature itself because the holy faith in those nations became too weak to maintain the Christendom.
Renew the holy faith, then let us see what God will do for a mortified, chastened and repentant people.
What limits could here be set by mere human imagination and resources?
“…nationhood and kinship..are great gifts of God.”
Before the mandated Diversity in Europe, it was possible to see this on the playing fields.
Nations play as nations and in their national character. Mixed race national teams prevent this experience. And this is (of course) why the Overseers do not allow a national team to reflect the national demographic.
They don’t want mass crowds to see exhibitions of national character as demonstrated at the NZ All Blacks stand-off with Wales over the NZ haka in Cardiff 2008.
Rugby – both League and Union is a supreme test of strength and strategy. It is a White game, but other nations have demanded to play as nations. NZ Maoris are no exception and the famous All Blacks are a mixed race team.
The Cymru line, however, is ethnically Welsh. And in Cardiff they did not accept the haka – the traditional Maori challenge.
What follows is now legend in Rugby League. The End of Season game at the Cardiff Millenium Stadium 2008 – listen to the Welsh crowd down out the NZ Haka. Look at the body language on the Welsh line. Can you spell Cymru Am Byth!?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncu6SzmHe3E
Tribal Theocrat does a splendid job of eviscerating John Piper’s ethno-mascochism. What a pity that many people will view this weird self-flagelation as Christian ethics.
I have a sincere question. Can anyone tell me why so many Reformed people take this man seriously?
I think it’s because he’s the most prominent Reformed *baptist* in the country, along with John MacArthur. Not many baptists remain in the Spurgeon mold, and so the other Reformed types puff him. Also, his book Desiring God has sold a lot of copies. But I think the true reason that he has become popular is that he mastered very early on the effeminate and empathetic approach to preaching that is geared for modern, feminized, emasculated, deracinated audiences.
I agree with Admin about Piper’s peculiar allure for the women and the capons in the pews. After all, the man cries or comes close to crying in almost every sermon to which one might listen. The postmodern church are suckers for the catch in the throat and the warbly bawl.
I have seen in PCA and OPC circles an almost cultish reverence for Piper’s pablum. His fans are mostly women, but some of the males crawl after him, too. They talk about him like he’s the Great Leader. Nauseating and frightening.
Thanks, Luther. I’ve enjoyed your comments on this site, too. Are you on Facebook? Look me up: http://www.facebook.com/ChristianGray1861
Piper’s primary influence has been in the pastoral realm where he tends to teach counseling/sermon techniques to other pastors. He tends to teach in line with modern reformed views (with some more emotional stuff thrown in there). That whole two wills of God (where God chooses to damn someone, but still really wants them to be saved) that piper promotes is an example of his more emotive theology. Piper has also promoted and defended rick warren (of purpose driven fame) at his conferences.
Excellent point about self flagellation being promoted Luther. They can’t control your mind with this nonsense unless you are being conditioned to feel guilty about something. This is why Piper will always use examples of white on black crime to get his white audience feeling guilty. For example, he chooses to use an example of whites dragging a black guy to death by tying him to a pickup when there are examples of blacks doing exactly the same thing to whites. The reason of course is that is strikes an emotional cord with his audience. His whole racial theology is based upon this wonderful feel good, let’s all get together for a big hug and forget who we are nonsense that does not have a place in reality.
Another thing to note about Piper is his
Surprisingly naive view of Reformed ideas;
Seeing as how he’s supposed to be smart.
Part of the problem is, as Joshua implied,
Irritating, effeminate Christians eat this
Retarded theology like thanksgiving dinner,
And Piper’s the turkey!
They don’t realize the bill of goods he’s selling them! His
Every word is poison!
Hilarious! I think there’s a hidden code in there.
Pat Buchanan says, “It’s “not the government’s job” to support and defend the Christian faith and the law of God!” while you say: “On the contrary, the government has no greater responsibility; it is a far greater responsibility than protecting the unborn, which is now the holy grail of conservatism.”
On an issue which is truly vital and strikes right to the heart of both faith and nation, you are right and Pat Buchanan is wrong. I say that even though Pat is a Latin-Mass going traditional Catholic like myself. Pat simply doesn’t know his own faith because he grew up in a church that had mixed the true Catholic Faith with Americanism. Pope Leo XIII had warned about this danger, but Americans didn’t listen, and eventually they spread their heresies of “tolerance” and “diversity” to the rest of the Catholic Church at Vatican II.
Like you, I admire Pat Buchanan intensely. But at the same time I recognize that he has these huge blind spots based on the faulty instruction in the faith he received during his upbringing.
Joshua:
“The roots of CI appear to have been an attempt to merge some german national socialist religious ideas with more conservative mainline Christianity.”
I don’t agree; maybe you could explain further? It looks to me like the root of Identity is the idea that the Bible means Israel when it says Israel, but “Israel” and “the Jews” are not synonyms. Some forms of CI add other, stranger doctrines, but this basic idea is demonstrable with normal exegesis and is in no way unorthodox. (as an aside, “Christian Identity” is one of those vague terms that can span everything from British Israel to the Aryan Nations. It is important to be precise with our language.) The earliest systematic exposition of the Adamic/non-Adamic question I have located is a work called “The Negro a Beast, or Made in the Image of God” by one Charles Carroll and published in St. Louis by American book and Bible House in 1900. Carroll raises several interesting questions, but I have never been able to find out much about him or to what denomination he belonged. Anyway, German national socialism as such did not exist at the time, unless you are counting Bismarckianism.
Interestingly enough, Independent Baptist evangelist, temperance leader and revivalist Mordecai Ham, the man under whom Billy Graham had his conversion experience in 1935, was a believer in the teaching. He received an honorary doctorate from Bob Jones University, and was printed and biographied in the Sword of the Lord magazine (published by John R. Rice originally and which is a bastion of Independent Baptist Fundamentalism). He was in every way a early twentieth century firebrand Baptist teetotaler and revivalist, but also authored the work “The Need of the Anglo Israel Truth.” Not everyone who believes this message is a national socialist. Nor is the seedline idea essential for it. Carroll, mentioned above, wrote that he believed Cain was Adam’s son, but miscegenated with a pre- existing hominid not from Adam.
Carroll:
http://biblical-truth.info/In%20the%20Image%20of%20God%20-%20by%20Charles%20Carroll.pdf
Rice:
http://spiritwaterblood.com/docs/negro%20and%20white.pdf
Caradoc, I was thinking more in lines of the social ideas/roots of CI rather than strictly the theological roots (which were anglo israel doctrine). While there were a couple of guys who promoted it early on, the original was Wesley Swift who did indeed have national socialist connections. You can see the influence of some national socialist ideas too when he goes into more esoteric areas of knowledge. The clearest area where the national socialists influenced CI can be seen in the CI position on the jews. Earlier anglo israel theology promoted the idea that the jews were judahite apostates from the faith, but racially the same as the English and related germanic/celtic peoples (which was wrong headed admittedly as was their position on the germans). I have heard of some different variants of that belief which taught that only whites and jews were the descendants of adam, but you would have to go to someone like Voltaire to get a different origin position on the jews. Anyways, all that is to say that I was talking about the guy who founded CI and the ideas that influenced him rather than every other form of CI out there. There are plenty of national socialist types of CI out there (such as Butler et al.), but there are also quite a few non national socialist types out there.
Happy Thanksgiving, all you heathens.
Happy Thanksgiving to you too, racist!
admin: Thanks for the link to Carroll. John R Rice…not so much. I used to get his Sword of the Lord many years ago when I was going through Baptist realm.
“Instead, according to 1 John, we know that one of the marks of being a Christian is that we do not hate our brothers. The Alienist hates his brothers of the flesh, AND hates his brothers in the Spirit who disagree with him about the importance of the bonds of kinship in the flesh.”
And yet one should be careful with this teaching, for anti-Kinists could turn it around and claim that it is YOU who hate your non-White brothers in Christ.
And I would respond by reminding them that we show love to our neighbor according to the law (commandments 6-10, specifically), and every Kinist I know wants to see every race and nation protected by these laws. The real question is what to do about those who deny us our right to survive and thrive. As “Christians,” they make excellent Satanists.
I believe that in ethnic questions, all true Christians should show certain amount of reverential reservation, because it is one of those grand issues that can easily spawn idolatry, to one direction or another.
I mean that a “common” temptation is like an urge to do something that the person being tempted knows and feels quite well to be a sin – and may even get an extra thrill from its forbidden naughtiness.
Whereas idolatry is a “higher” temptation to sin that appears in the guise of holiness. It is Satan’s angel-of-light act, as the idolater is led to believe that what he or she is doing is something just, honorable and pleasing to God (or gods).
“They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.” (John 16:2)
You yourself give a good example of this spirit in that one guy who would like to see Kinists stoned. But do not think that your own camp is immune to this temptation either.
I have no doubt that to many hardcore ethnic idolaters, racial self-worship may well feel like a holy act – submission of one’s individual wishes and needs to the collective good of the Volk.
(Whereas liberal-leftists for their part may flatter themselves that they are virtuously denying their own petty selves and provincial prejudices, working for the well-being of the whole mankind or global-eco-system.)
C.S. Lewis depicted this idea of higher temptation in his “Screwtape Letters”:
http://pasx.5u.com/upload/Lewis,%20C%20S%20-%20The%20Screwtape%20Letters.
html#23
“Through this girl and her disgusting family the patient is now getting to know more Christians every day, and very intelligent Christians too. For a long time it will be quite impossible to remove spirituality from his life. Very well then; we must corrupt it. No doubt you have often practised transforming yourself into an angel of light as a parade-ground exercise. Now is the time to do it in the face of the Enemy.
The World and the Flesh have failed us; a third Power remains. And success of this third kind is the most glorious of all. A spoiled saint, a Pharisee, an inquisitor, or a magician, makes better sport in Hell than a mere common tyrant or debauchee.”
Petr, your critique is valid of some types of WN who do indeed worship themselves. Ironically enough, those who do so have bought into the drug of the system and are really no different in essence from the system. Is there really any difference between a WN of the type who wants to become a God and a luciferian who has the same goal? Is there any difference between a WN who justifies their existence on evolutionary principles and a luciferian who does the exact same thing? Is there any difference between a WN who believes that he is the arbiter of truth and a luciferian who believes the exact same thing?
However, you also would have to say that the luciferian enemy forces also worship themselves and one of their religious rituals is the destruction of those opposed to their NWO. Needless to say, I do not think that kinists or christian paleoconservatives/nationalists advocate self idolatry of the above forms. I tend to use the prophets as good examples of how christians should act. They weren’t afraid of being tossed out of their communities or isolated from them for preaching the truth, yet they were also very focused upon ethnic preservation.
You have to know the good in creatures and things to be able to detect the real evil.
Satan can not create anything. He can only corrupt, pervert, ruin and instrumentalize what he has corrupted.
The family (which bears the signature of the Triune Godhead) in the natural order is good, was created to be good and becomes the basis of kinship, clan, tribe, people and nation (ethne).
The family should reflect the nation which is its extended expression.
It is a foregone conclusion that Satan would attempt by all means to corrupt the signature of the Holy Trinity within creation and endeavor to use that corruption to create a false ethne that he can engineer for his Babylon project.
Contrast this with the Church which is built of nations baptised into Christ.
Administrator: You are quite right to relate love of neighbor and brother to the law. Biblical love recognizes the distinctions between God and Man (the first four commandments) and the distinctions of property and kinship among men (the last six). See Romans 13:8-10
The alienists, conforming as they do to the world’s trendy opinion, define love as removing all distinctions, making everyone equal, and blending all together as One.
This notion of love, a mishmash of Gnosticism, Marxism, and New Age negates love in its very essence. Love exists as benevolence between distinct entities. “Love” in one entity alone is narcissism. As G.K. Chesterson observed, God is love because God is a Trinity.
Good words, Luther. You’re right, solitary “love” is not love at all but rather narcissism. This is why the followers of Allah and the other unitarian nothing-gods can never pretend that their gods are Love. Before anything existed, the triune God loved Himself, and it was only because His nature made this possible that, by His own volition, He was able to satisfy the demands of justice on our behalf. Such wonders have never entered the minds of idolaters. To them, the doctrine of the Trinity is blasphemy.
Kinism is fundamentally trinitarian. We deny that God is a monolith, and we deny the same of His people. The word “polylith” is more accurate.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/polylith
The Bible itself uses the analogy of a body containing many members, all of which are unified in purpose but none of which are equal.
Kinism is a synonym for sound doctrine.
“This is why the followers of Allah and the other unitarian nothing-gods can never pretend that their gods are Love.”
Or alternatively, they can see (in the wild forms of antinomian mysticism) their deity as LAWLESS love that can authorize even debauchery. All non-Christian thought zig-zags between the extremes of loveless law and lawless love.
But indeed, “pure” unitarian monotheism that knows neither Trinity nor Incarnation is in constant danger of slipping into all-out monistic pantheism – which we might call the state religion of Babelism. Call it the “suicide of monotheism” if you will.
Samuel Zwemer, a veteran missionary to Muslims, could observe:
http://answering-islam.org/Books/Zwemer/God/chap4.htm
“Whether Mohammed himself intended to teach the ideas of pantheism or had any idea of the import of these terms does not alter the fact that they spell pantheism to many of his followers. If pantheism is the doctrine of one substance, it is taught here. God is the inside and the outside of everything. He is the phenomena (Dhahir) and the power behind the phenomena (Batin). It is this verse that is the delight of the Sufis and the mystics. On this revelation of God they built their philosophy after the Vedanta school of the Hindus. How far this teaching was carried is best seen in the celebrated Masnuvi of Jalal-u-din-ar-Rumi, translated into English by E.H. Whinfield.1 He puts these words as emanating from Deity: –
I am the Gospel, the Psalter the Koran;
I am Uzzi and Lat – Bel and the Dragon.
Into three and seventy sects is the world divided.
Yet only One God; the faithful who believed in him am I.
Lies and truth, good, bad hard and soft
Knowledge solitude, virtue faith.
The deepest ground of hell the highest torment of the flames,
The highest paradise,
The earth and what is therein,
The angels and the devils, Spirit and man, Am I.
What is the goal of speech, O tell it, Shems Tabrizi?
The goal of sense? This – The World Soul Am I.”"
The different seasons of the liturgical year of the West mirror the different aspects of God’s love for his people, for Christ’s body the Church – new Israel.
The season of Advent begins with the invocation of Deliverance. The prayers at the foot of the altar for the First Sunday in Advent begin with Ps 24.
“To Thee have I lifted up my soul: in Thee O my God, I put my trust, let me not be ashamed: neither let my enemies laugh at me: for none of them that wait upon Thee shall be confounded.”
Traditional Advent material is the Book of the Maccabees. Kinists take note – Mac means son of. This is a book about the people of Jacob.
In those days Alexander the Great had died and the empire of the world is divided and divided against itself.
In the nation of Israel, there went out of of Israel wicked men, and they persuaded many, saying: “Let us go and make a covenant with the heathens” 1 Macc 1:12
Antiochus (the satrap over the people of Jacob) grants licenses to do after the ordinances of the heathens 1 Macc 1:14
And the people of Israel join themselves to the heathens, they build gynasia after the manner of the Greeks, even sewing prepuces onto themselves – so they could compete in the Games. 1 Macc 1:16
The Temple, is overthrown by Antiochus and “all the House of Jacob is covered with confusion.” 1 Macc 1:29 The land of Judah becomes a “stranger to her own seed’. 1 Macc 1:40
“Her dishonour was increased according to her glory.” 1 Macc 1:42 And everyone was a law unto himself. 1:43
The abominable idol of desolation is installed upon the altar of the Temple. 1:57 And the Jews (the people of Edom in Judah) follow the commandment of the Antiochus to offer sacrifice to the idols in the city of Modin. 1 Macc 2: 23.
Judas Machabeus with his family and kindred contest this state of affairs and seek to gather them who were perishing.
1 Mac 3:8-9
To the fact that all the heathen nations were in occupation of the lands of Jacob, the Maccabees record this:
“It is an easy matter for many to be shut up in the hands of a few: and there is no difference in the sight of the God of heaven to deliver with a great multitude or with a small company. For the success of war is not in the multitude of the army, but in the strength that comes from heaven.” 1 Macc 3:18-19
There is no closer parallel to the time of the Maccabees than our own time.
Tis the season for the Alienists (to use Luther’s term)to busy themselves with “removing all distinctions”, leveling and equalizing.
“Holiday tree” time is upon us and the holiday tree in the Capitol rotundas of the state legislatures would be so many cases in point.
The problem for Alienists and Levelers (which do serve one specific ethnicity btw) is that secular, de-racinated Euro Americans still call ‘the holiday tree’ a Christmas tree.
Even the Freedom From Religion Foundation acknowledges that most people do not call or want to call the Christmas tree – a ‘holiday tree’ and this exercise in “inclusivity” is in fact – divisive.
And worst case scenario, the sheeple are beginning to refer to the “holiday tree” exercise as a species of intolerance excercised by those who wish to remove “Christ” from all public reference and discourse.
Savour the pungent aroma of the liberals stewing in their own juice.
Bojidar Marinov is again on the warpath against familism, seeking to prove that Biblical concept of family is different from “the pagan cultural practice of clan society”:
http://americanvision.org/5395/covenant-responsibility-and-elderly-care-cont%e2%80%99d/
“Dishonesty again. Not a single one of these quotes says that “family” is defined as the clan. It only sets the responsibilities of the son to his father but doesn’t define family as more than the nuclear family. You are trying to find in Calvin . It is not there. The honor the son owes his parents does not nullify Gen. 2:25, and Calvin does not deny his own interpretation that the son must prefer his wife over his father. The family is a husband and his wife. Your attempt to baptize pagan cultural practices by twisting quotes from Calvin failed.”
Marinov clearly seeks to make a pious virtue out of dumping traditions and ignoring history:
“Christianity’s uniqueness as a religion is in its view of the future. Not that it has a unique view of the future but that it does have a view of the future. No other religion has it, at least not consistent with their own presuppositions. Christianity is the only religion that is not bound to the past and actually looks to the future in history with positive expectations, and therefore has the time, the resources, and the emotional fuel to build a future. Its success in the first centuries after Christ was due to a great extent to its optimistic outlook concerning history. The pagan world had nothing to offer except a desperate obsession with the past, with the imagined Golden Age of the forgotten antiquity. Time, change, future were a threat to the pagan mind and the pagan social order. They weren’t for the Christian mind and the Christian social order.”
Thanks for bringing this to everyone’s attention, Petr. It’s sad that DeMar is allowing the faith to be misrepresented in this way. Unfortunately, Marinov’s anti-Christian views have become standard among the race-mixing patricides in the churches today. He very clearly states that blood only has significance for the immediate family, and anything beyond this is “pagan.” But it’s just as clear that our orthodox Christian fathers and mothers believed the exact opposite. They would never have written anything so stupid as “Christianity is…not bound to the past.”
Marinov is pushing a pretty simple rhetorical strategy:
“I expected this to grow into a defense of the pagan practice of patriarchy. No, patriarchy is not the Biblical standard for the family. It is pagan to the core, and it was the foundation of the Greek and Roman social order. Gary North made it very clear in his book, Baptized Patriarchalism.”
http://www.facebook.com/americanvision/posts/209642275779579?notif_t=share_reply
But as I have provided evidence in my posts around here, there are also other forms of paganism that are far from praising “blood and soil” and rather promote scorn or indifference towards the wicked or unreal material world, like Buddhism or Manichaeanism.
Even the ancient pagan Greeks, whom Marinov brings up, knew such teachings via Orphism:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/pr/pr06.htm
“Plato made full use of this Orphic conception, and in his Gorgias he quoted “a certain philosopher,” who said, “We are dead and the body is a tomb.” Pindar earlier stressed the divine origin and nature of the human soul in contradistinction to the mortality of the human body. “While the body of all men is subject to over-mastering death, an image of life remains alive, for it alone comes from the gods,” he affirmed. This sharp dualism of soul and body appears again and again in the Orphic tablets, though it is not always clear that the myth of the origin of man from the ashes of the Titans was in mind. On the Petelian tablet (south Italy, third century B.C.) the soul is represented as asserting its divine nature thus:
I am a child of Earth and of Starry Heaven;
But my race is of Heaven.
Similarly, on three Cretan tablets the soul answers the challenge “Whence are you?” with a reiterated declaration of its dual origin, “I am son of Earth and of Starry Heaven.” On the Compagno tablets found near Sybaris the soul makes a like affirmation to the “Pure Queen of Them Below . . . .,” “I avow me that I am of your blessed race.” The dualism thus fixed between body and soul was fundamental in Orphic theology. Though the body was an evil thing, the soul was divine and immortal.”
DeMar is a greasy shyster trying to squeeze shekels from a very small group of Christians with his ‘patriotic’ shtick.
The fact that he uses the same ‘living document’ spin to support his ‘Christian’ mongrelization ethic (when he wouldn’t let that by in regard to non-racial Constitution-related issues) just goes to show what a hypocritical dirtbag he is.
The thing is, he can’t even be making that much money with what and how he’s doing. He’s hustling a set of judeo-’liberal’ positions that anyone on the planet can get 24/7 from any media outlet, to say nothing of the vast majority of these God-awful churches.
So he’s reselling the same bilge. . .only in a less appealing fashion. This guy couldn’t sell shovels in a gold rush. Worse for Gary is not that he’s wrong but that he’s ridiculous.
Marinov’s own parents apparently weren’t believers, so I can sort of understand the background from which this sort of scorn of flesh heritage comes from:
http://americanvision.org/5393/covenant-responsibility-and-elderly-care/
“With the rise of Christianity in the last two decades, there are many Christians in their 30s and 40s who are facing a problem of unbelieving parents of the baby-boomer generation. Many of those parents may not be addicted to spending but they find other ways to be a burden to their children and their families: by constantly attacking and ridiculing their faith, or may be even trying to lead their grandchildren away from it when given the chance. (I have been in such a situation and I know how difficult it is to deal with it.)”
I’m confused here. If Christianity doesn’t care about the past and lineage, then why does the Bible have page after page of genealogies?
And why does the traditional parish keep books and books of baptismal records? memorials to generations of families that have contributed to the life of the parish? and hallowed ground for the burial of Christian souls with their families marked by ancient yews?
So many of those graves in the fields of the lilies bear only the family name and crest – the name of the individual being erased by time. And the oldest bear only the cross and the epitath of the ancient declaration – Gus an Breasch an La. (Until Break of Day).
In my rambling throughout the web world (and even networking in real life) I’ve noticed a disturbing trend among racially-self conscious folk: they shy away from buzz-words like “racism” and “supremacist.”
“No, no, no! We’re not supremacists” they’ll cry. Or “…I’m not a racist, but…” (fill in the blank with a common racially-aware talking-point.)
Of course, if looked at by a cynic, it might be suggested that the rabid dishonesty of Mr. Marinov (who has proven himself to be an intellectually dishonest coward, not only in my personal interactions with him, but in his general attitude and dealings with my friends) is only a few steps beyond the “shyness” of white-nationalists today.
Could the difference between Marinov and these “shy” white nationalists be only a matter of degree? When one of our own here at S/W/B reprimands Kinists for being “ethnic idolaters,” it’s hard to see how its not.
“Yes,yes, yes…all your racial posturing is well and good, but don’t forget that you yourself are not immune to the temptation of ethnic idolatry!”
Well, I’m sorry.
When I hear that sort of rhetoric coming from racially-self conscious whites, I feel like I’m back on the U.S.S. Enterprise.
I remember once, I was hard at work hauling these massive bags of laundry down to the washers (which involved moving 50 one-hundred pound bags down 10 stories, often through hatches that one could barely squeeze through.) Helping me was my buddy Pike, an Alabaman with a thick-accent, and two other, similarly endowed individuals.
Just so happens, that day, the cast of the show “NCIS” was touring the ship and had to pass directly through the P-Way where we were moving these bags. Well, I don’t watch that garbage so I had no idea who these guys were. They were being escorted through the ship by a pompous negro senior-chief.
“Get these damn bags out da way!” He yelled, as the party crowded into the p-way! “Yes, chief! No problem!” When we had gotten them all into a side room, he ducked in and chewed me out (I was the leader of the working-party) and among other insults, he derided me for not having shiny enough boots.
Well, he left, and the party passed by, but one of the men at the end of the line stuck his head in and thanked us for our service.
I said, in characteristic good humor, “Oh, no problem sir. So, who are you guys?”
He said, “oh…we’re actors on a T.V. show, we’re kind of famous” then went on his way.
I found out later, that was Mark Harmon, the lead actor in the show.
At anyrate, my point is:
When a white man is involved in an intense struggle, pulling him aside to complain about how shiny his boots are, is damn-near treason.
I feel the same way sometimes about the “shyness” among white-nationalists.
“When a white man is involved in an intense struggle, pulling him aside to complain about how shiny his boots are, is damn-near treason.
I feel the same way sometimes about the “shyness” among white-nationalists.”
Complain all you like, but the true Biblical principle is not to let EITHER side of the quarrel get away without criticism (if the occasion calls for it):
“You shall do no unrighteousness in judgment; thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbor” (Leviticus 19:15)
Or like Michael A. Hoffman II put it:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/revisionist13.html
“You write, “Horst Mahler is a son of that Germany. He has stood up to defend his country, his Vaterland. It is his right.”
This sentence plays on a certain filial chauvinism that brooks no dissent. As a non-conformist I don’t like to be confronted with constructions that offer no alternative. It seems that my patriotism is being called into question: a son of Germany is defending his fatherland! It is his right! All doubts must be suppressed!
There are many men who are sons of the German fatherland and who seek to defend it. But their pedigree doesn’t guarantee their infalliblity. I am no respecter of persons.”
Well, it’s a rare man that can speak authoritatively about Biblical principles.
My mom on the other hand, never had leagues of theologians diagnosing her wisdom. One thing she taught me: when you point your finger at someone, you’ve got three more pointing back at you.
That in mind, I find your argument a little ironic.
Should we accept you or Michael Hoffman, infallibly? Are you playing on a filial chauvinism that none of us can dissent to (no matter how much we complain?)
I suppose in the end it’s not that important. Just a personal inclination of mine (that runs strong in the people of my region.)
Let’s not forget this bit of Scripture:
“…make it your ambition to lead a quiet life and attend to your own business and work with your hands, just as we commanded you…”
Hoffmann has been influential in my thinking, I have had dinner with him, he seems like a good man… but his haranguing against Horst Mahler, without even pausing to acknowledge the greatness, the magnanimousness of the man, is really quite unseemly.
Great story, Shotgun.
I thought you might enjoy seeing this posting by Maximilian:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=8315
It seems to me that there is this great cancer consuming the souls of all the people on earth. It’s progress has been accelerating for decades now. Most people thought the Church would stop its progress, or at least it would be the last to fall. Instead the Church fell like a house of cards at the first breath of wind, or like a house built on sand when the rains come.
Today it seems there are just a few people holding out, providing resistance. But the funny thing is, at all the critical points, on all the crucial issues, the issues that the cancer has identified as being the key questions from which it will not allow dissent, nearly all the “resistors” agree with the cancer.
So first there was a great war that involved the whole world and millions of people died. But in a strange twist of fate, the cancer was the “good guys” and the men fighting the cancer were the very embodiment of evil. They burned 6 million people to death, or maybe it turns out they killed them with poison gas, or something, but they killed 6 million innocent people, and you’re just as evil as them if you question it in any way. Meanwhile, billions of people fell under the power of communism as an Iron Curtain fell across Europe (and Asia) as a result of our victory in the war, but that was just an unfortunate coincidence that couldn’t have been predicted, and it was still a glorious victory anyway for “the good guys,” who may be soul-destroying cancers in other circumstances, but this time they were holy crusaders.
Then after the war there was a racial revolution. The “Allies” who won the war lost all their colonies overseas so that native peoples could have “self-determination,” while America saw it’s black population moved to the front of the bus. Here again, in another strange twist of fate, it was the cancer which undertook this heroic and charitable action. Cancer once again took the lead in fighting evil. Even the resistors admitted that the cancer was fighting for all that was good while their opponents were the very embodiment of evil. One couldn’t help but think of Hitler when one saw Southern sheriffs turning firehoses on freedom marchers, or when one saw suspiciously germanic boers instituting apartheid. Meanwhile the continent of Africa is reclaimed by the jungle, both physically and morally, but that part is not the cancer’s fault.
Then after all the oppressed minorities had gained their liberty thanks to the wonderful, self-sacrificing actions of the cancer, next there was a sexual revolution. Women were freed from centuries of bondage. Once again, mirable dictu! it was the cancer which was most instrumental in ending the Nazi-like slavery of “kirke, kuche and kinder.” Female resitors may have deplored some of the cancer’s excesses like the murder of millions of unborn children, but still they could not help being grateful that the cancer had made it possible for them to wear pants and got to university. Nor do they have any intention of giving back these valuable new freedoms won for them by the cancer.
Meanwhile, all the nations which have embraced the cancer are literally dying. Their populations are declining, the native peoples are being replaced with foreigners, young people spend all their time on “sex and drugs and rock-and-roll” while the old spend their inheritances at the casinos. No one goes to church on Sunday or follows any out-of-date moral laws, while most people are unaware that they even have a soul. Their cities are falling into ruins, art has ceased to exist, church services are ugly abominations, no worship is offered to God.
The resistors are puzzled by this outcome. How can we blame the cancer when we know that it was always in the right on all the major issues?
And now a new revolution gets under way. Another oppressed minority will be freed from its historic bondage and granted its rightful liberty. Homosexuality is the revolution du jour. Today there may still be a few fundamentalist resistors who want to keep them in the closet, but soon even the resistors will come to acknowledge that once again the cancer was right. Freedom, tolerance and respect are the rights of everyone.
Mark Harmon is a fine example of healthy racial hygiene. His father, Tom Harmon, was a famous football player. Mark Harmon married Pam Dawber, the pretty actress who played opposite Robin Williams in the “Mork and Mindy” tv series.
The Harmons are related by marriage to the Nelson family (Ozzie and Harriet). By all accounts, Mark Harmon is a decent, morally upright individual. Too bad more White actors are not like him and his family.
Great writing, I loved the new term “ethnomasochism” which seems to be a uniquely white race epidemic. Also, those dollar bills, backed by silver, were truly works of art. Keep up the outstanding work!
I did read Maximilian’s comment in the context of the Ignis Ardens forum. Ignis Ardens is the prophetic name of Pope St Pius X given by St Malachy when the Christendom was at the height of its temporal power.
The Church has not collapsed like a pack of cards. The Church is already regrouping, purged of those who have been working ruin from within.
The Pastor has been struck and the sheep have been scattered as Pope Leo XIII foretold. This would be at the time of the eclipse of the Church.
As in a solar eclipse, the sun – which is the natural light of reason and the supernatural light of Christ – “True Light from True Light” abides. But it is occulted. So we do not see the sun during the eclipse – it is blocked out.
We do see its corona – the ordinary constant magisterium of what the Church has always and everywhere taught. And this is what reveals the occulting body absolutely.
Pope St Pius X characterised the end stages of the Liberal cancer as Modernism – the sum of all heresies. And one of the most hateful aspects of the Liberal cancer is its kinslaying in the name of a universalism that is the basis of Liberal power in the temporal sphere.
Here is Shakespeare’s version of it:
“O, my offense is rank, its smells to heaven
It hath the primal, eldest curse upon it.
A brother’s murder. Pray, can I not
Though inclination be as sharp as will”
Hamlet (Act 3, scene III – lines 36-37)
In this scene, the conscience of Claudius the murderer / usurper is captured by Hamlet’s play. He confesses his deed, but though he has a keen desire to repent, he can not forfeit the throne.
It is the soul of Hamlet’s father who returns to Elsinore from Purgatory to demand justice for a crime that will destroy the state of Denmark.
The purgation of crimes by means of satisfaction to our Lord’s righteousness is what must be expiated in the outworking of the temporal consequences of those crimes.
Hamlet is fundamentally a theological play.