Better Hate Than Never
See John Lofton taken to the cleaners yet again by the Kinists on Facebook.

Lofton begins by denouncing this excellent and sensible quote from James J. Kilpatrick, taken from a debate with MLK in 1960: “We [Southerners] believe it is an affirmatively good thing to preserve the predominant racial characteristics that have contributed to Western civilization over the past 2000 years, and we do not believe that the way to preserve them lies in fostering any intimate race mixing by which these principles and characteristics inevitably must be destroyed.” Thus the anti-Kinist promotes genocide. Behold the toppling of straw men:
Read God’s Word: What is it that exalts a nation? Color? “Race?” Tradition? Ancestors? Being a “Kinist?” Not mixing with other “races?” NO!!! “Righteousness” exalts a nation (Proverbs 14:34).
Blessed is the nation that…what? That has in it only “white” people? Where “Kinists” rule? NO! Ps 33:12: “Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD; and the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance.”
Can God choose for His inheritance people who are not “white,” people of difference tribes and tongues? Yes, and He has already done this! THAT’S the division in the world: God’s children vs. the devil’s kids, according to Scripture. All this “Kinist” crap, and other stuff like it, is a diversion, a rabbit trail that, alas, for many, takes the focus off of the Christ, His command that we must be born-again to enter the Kingdom of God and much more that is truly important.
Scott Terry – a pitiful post, sir. You are living proof that a mind is a terrible thing to waste. Me? – bound by the “Satanic chains” of “pop-unitarianism?”, not standing up for God or my ancestors – whatever that means since most of my ancestors I do not know of much less whether they were Christians or not. I am blessed beyond measure, sir, that I do not care what you think about me, even for a minute – if, indeed, a thought can last that long in your head.
As for your assertion that fighting for “Old Europe” is fighting for Christ, I’d say a more reliable statement would be that FIGHTING FOR CHRIST IS FIGHTING FOR CHRIST! – “Old Europe” being a rather ambiguous phrase, not very coherent – like most of your posts.
Finally, for now, these sorts of issues should, indeed, be confronted Biblically, as you say. So, please, be my guest, sir. Show me from Scripture ONE VERSE that says that anything other than righteousness, God, His Son, exalts a nation, a people, an individual, a family – ONE VERSE.
The Kinists give him plenty of verses, not for the first time, and not just once. For instance, David Opperman explains that miscegenation is implicitly sinful under the Fifth Commandment and Numbers 30. Lofton complains that David’s answer is too long! He insists that all answers to his questions be limited to a single word, and that logorrheic Kinists are like octopi squirting clouds of ink the size of the mushroom over Hiroshima “to escape a perceived threat.”
Bret McAtee explains to J.Lo. that the “SHOW ME ONE VERSE” nonsense is how baptists argue against infant baptism. “It’s just disingenuous for someone who embraces postmillennialism or infant Baptism to argue like a Baptist or a Dispensationalist when it comes to the issue of God ordained distinctions.” Lofton’s evasive questions continue, but they only show the vast gulf between his Marxism and the beliefs of his own Christian fathers, who praised God for His gifts to us.
[S]ince you are obviously saying “race” DID have something to do with the accomplishments of Western civilization, tell me, please, what exactly, or even approximately, what “race” had to do with the accomplishments of Western civilization.
To be sure each of us are discussing the same thing, do this, please: Tell me what YOU mean by “Western civilization;” tell me what you consider the 3 most important accomplishments; and then tell me, please, what “race” had to do with these accomplishments. Re: this last point, I am asking not a question about “race” and “accomplishment” being simply coincident but rather how “race” CAUSED any of these “accomplishments.” Thank you.


Lofton is basically teaching that Christ died to save us from all blood covenants but one, which is about as far from Christianity as you can get. He is living proof that there’s a very thin line of difference between the words “PUKE” and “PURE.”
Here’s an example of what it’s like to deal with Lofton’s childish prevarications and asinine rhetorical volleys. David says: “I don’t think that kinists are opposed to interaction between people of different races.” Lofton replies: “Hmmmm….interestingly ambiguous word ‘interaction.’ Could include hanging a black person, couldn’t it?” It really is wondrous to watch David go to work on Lofton.

Kinists like to play with their food before eating it.

Finally, Lofton agrees that interracial marriage is unwise, but only because in our time so many people are Kinists and would rain on the parade of matrimonial bliss. His exact (and almost illegible) quote:
Brett: For wht it’s worth — not much, what I think, the opinion of a mere man: Agree, that in our time, in part because of “Kinist” thinking, inter-racial marriage not wise.
But then Lofton slanders Scott Terry for stating that mixing human and animal body parts is “sick existential thought.” Lofton says this is a “revealing analogy that he likens some ‘races’ to animals.” You can see why Kinists grow accustomed to hearing lies told about them, and the best way to deal with it is the witty retort. For example, when someone asked him, “Was Moses sinning when he married outside his race? (Numbers 12),” Scott asked a question of his own: “Was Moses sinning when he married outside his faith? (Numbers 12).” This looks easy, but it takes a lot of practice to turn a questioner’s fallacious presumptions back on him in this way.
Lofton slanders Scott again when Scott affirms that whites and blacks are superior to each other in different ways. Lofton puffs up like the windbag that he is and says: “You’ve now admitted you are a ‘white supremacist.’” Yes, the victory is all yours, John. May you be wreathed with laurels.
Christians disagree about all sorts of things, but there is one doctrine that is held to be even more sacred than the Trinity itself. “That Christ died to make the world safe for interracial marriage seems to be the only absolutely unquestioned doctrine in the Catholic and Protestant churches.”

Our friend Shotgun explains the historic, pragmatic, exegetical, covenantal, and teleological arguments against miscegenation. He calls the covenantal argument the strongest, and though baptists will disagree, you can see why many proponents of Kinism come out of the Reformed tradition. Kinism has correctly been called applied theonomy.
“All our social myths presupposed some version of the corporate life – that man is a social being, fulfilled only in the natural associations built upon common experience, upon ties of blood and friendship, common enterprise, resistance to common enemies, and a common faith.” ~ Mel Bradford, Reactionary Imperative: Essays Literary and Political, p. 136
Bradford was tapped by Reagan to be chairman of the NEH, but when it was discovered that he considered Lincoln to have been “a dangerous man,” neocon darling William Bennett was given the job instead. Bennett’s entire career has been built upon agitation for the anti-Christs in Israel, while you can see that Bradford’s quote above is straight out of the mouths of John Jay and Henry Campbell Black.
“One encounters the curious fact that the more closely people are crowded together, the less they know about one another, and the less they care about one another.” ~ Richard Weaver, Defense of Tradition, p. 9
“The nature and direction of sin is to blur and finally erase all the God-ordained boundaries.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony
“Anyone who is opposed to discrimination will eventually agitate for the erasure of all borders because discrimination is the sole purpose of borders… Discrimination, disassociation and exclusion comprise the essence of private property.” ~ Christianity for Kinism
Erb und Eigen, Gut und Blut, Land und Leute. Heir and inheritance, Goods and Blood, Land and People. And in Christ we live and move and have our being. There is no dualism for the Kinist.
“To reject the spiritual makes one a materialist, and to reject the physical makes one a gnostic.” ~ David Opperman
“In a sort of ghastly simplicity, we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful.” ~ C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
“Kinism is the only alternative to the twin revolutionary forces of Imperial Statism and Anarchy.” ~ Daniel Brannan
“The men and women of [Walter] Scott’s Europe would not write a protest letter when barbarians murdered and tortured their own people. Nor would they try to vote an invasion away.” ~ CWNY
“War must be, while we defend our lives against a destroyer who would devour all; but I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.” ~ Faramir, The Two Towers
The neo-tribalism of the Left. It’s a pseudo-tribalism, really.
Joe Morecraft’s wife, on July 19, was assuring Bojidar the Vulgarian that she is well aware of Kinists, and he should defriend her on Facebook before he writes an anti-Kinist article so that she and Pope Joseph will not be dragged into it. (This was about two years after Morecraft began to ignore Harry’s entreaties.) By August 8, Morecraft realized that he could no longer ignore us and had worked an anti-Kinist statement into a sermon. The sermon topic was Psalm 82, but the statement that Kinism is “sinful” is based on Exodus 23:6, which tells us not to oppress an alien. Pope Joe really should have read and responded to Harry’s letter to him. Kinists are not trying to oppress aliens; we are trying to free our own people from alien oppression, which is our biblical duty.
“Except the LORD of hosts had left unto us a very small remnant, we should have been as Sodom, and we should have been like unto Gomorrah.” ~ Isaiah 1:9
The anti-Kinist soaks all the blood out of that verse and thereby perverts it. Perhaps the best of all Kinist arguments is found in 1 John 4. Love is of God, and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. He who does not love does not know God. Stop the genocide of the white race, and prove that you are a Christian by your love for the brethren!
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. (False in one, false in all.)
“We must have a special eye upon families, to see that they are well ordered. The welfare and glory of both the Church and the State, depend much on family government and duty. If we suffer the neglect of this, we shall undo all. Therefore, if you desire reformation, do all you can to promote family religion.” ~ Richard Baxter
“To Paul, the human race is made up of families, and every several organism, the church included, is composed of families, united together by this or that bond.” ~ Benjamin B. Warfield
We warned you about the Glenn Beck rally back on February 1. Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin sought to “Restore Honor” in the belly of the beast. It turned out to be a rally about nothing, but it was hilarious that Beck stole thunder from Al Sharpton and the Africans who gathered at the same time, less than a mile away, for a counter-protest at the location of the statue of the Korean Michael King. Beck called it “divine providence” that the event was scheduled on the anniversary of St. Michael’s “I Have a Dream” speech. Black hustlers are apoplectic over this and call the choice of the date “insulting,” because white people are trying to muscle in on their livelihood. King’s niece took the opportunity to pray that all white people will repent of their racism and “white privilege,” a term she claims to have invented. Beck, who publicly called Obama a racist, wanted no signs at his rally that would convey such a message.
As James Edwards puts it, “George Washington may technically be the Father of our Country, but Martin Luther King is America’s real Baby Daddy.”
The incomparable Michael Hoffman writes:
Beck is leading an enslavement movement posing as a revival of the Founding Fathers. It is double-minded to the core… His “conservatism” is of a piece with Talmudic neocon-ism and other alien alliances touted by the Republican Tea Partiers, such as, for example, the free ride which synagogues are getting while mosques are attacked as the pit of evil. Rational people do not primarily blame Muslims for 9/11, which was an inside job of the George W. Bush regime.
Rational people do not make a cult out of the suffering of only one ethnic group in a World War II that saw the deaths of 55 million people.
Rational people do not support a “free trade” policy that ships our jobs and industries to Communist China under color of building free enterprise in America.
Rational people do not legalize usury, a heinous sin for 1,500 years, until the ascendance of John Calvin, and build a financial system upon it, while hypocritical usurers like Beck talk piously about not working on the Sabbath…
Rational people do not make a hero out of Ronald Reagan, who knew very well that King was a Communist, a demonstrable liar, a serial adulterer and a woman-beater. Nevertheless, with a shrug of his broad shoulders, this “conservative” presidential icon sentenced the youth of America to perpetual King Holiday public school brainwashing every January…
Moreover, the mind boggles at the folly of including Abraham Lincoln in Beck’s patriot pantheon, the dictator who suspended the writ of habeas corpus, nearly jailed the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, closed newspapers, and arrested legislators and journalists (including the grandson of the author of the Star-Spangled Banner). Lincoln told the South that it did not have the right to secede from the Federal Union, even though the Founders of the nation had seceded from the British Union. When the smoke of Mr. Lincoln’s war cleared, 600,000 Americans lay dead in one of the worst acts of fratricide in the annals of the West. Glenn Beck enshrines the tyrant who imposed this incalculable horror on our nation. Every president who has endeavored to govern like a monarch, from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush, has invoked Lincoln’s despotic engorgement of the executive branch of government to serve as a template for their own executive usurpations.
By placing Lincoln and King on a pedestal, Mr. Beck is telling us what he really believes and who he actually serves, beneath his persona as the All-American exponent of the Constitution and apple pie. His adherents exhibit what William Blake termed, “mind-forged manacles.” They are willing to be enslaved as long as it is under a veneer of liberty. If they continue to march behind their pudgy pied-piper, they will have their wish.
“Now let me get this straight – Beck stands at a monument that deifies the man who transformed the voluntary union of States into a centralized behemoth, and invokes the legacy of a man tied closely to communists – for the purpose of restoring liberty and small government?”

“Beck implored America to turn back to the god(s) of our Jewish-Christian-Muslim-Hindu-Mormon-Sikh-Zoroastrian heritage that made America great.”


Literally! Beck is pushing the Christless civil religion held by Ben Franklin, without being bold enough to fully quote Franklin.
The kikenpress never fails to announce that Tea Parties are “overwhelmingly white.” Some examples:
- “The crowds turning out for the Tea Party Express rallies are overwhelmingly white.” – Ed Lavandera, CNN “American Morning,” March 31, 2010.
- “The crowd is still overwhelmingly white.” – Jessica Yellin, CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360,” April 15, 2010.
- “The crowd that greeted Palin did nothing to contradict the common description of Tea Party supporters as overwhelmingly white and mostly older.” – Ina Jaffe, NPR “Weekend Edition Sunday,” March 28, 2010.
- “They are overwhelmingly white and Anglo…” – USA Today, July 2, 2010.
- “But, [Tea Party rally attendee Jeff Link] says, looking at the crowd, which is overwhelmingly white and middle-aged, ‘it saddens me not to see this gathering more diverse.’” – Washington Post, Feb. 6, 2010.
- “The new poll offers a portrait of tea party supporters as overwhelmingly white, mostly conservative and generally disapproving of Obama.” – Washington Post, Feb. 11, 2010
- “They are overwhelming white (94 percent) and conservative (73 percent).” – Washington Post, April 2, 2010
- “Tea Party activists, like Perot voters, are overwhelmingly white.” – Washington Post, April 18, 2010
- “Gazing out at his overwhelmingly white audience, Mr. Mack felt the need to say, ‘This meeting is not racist.’” – New York Times, Feb. 16
- “Do you have any concerns when you look out at the crowds and they’re mostly, well, overwhelmingly white people?” – Terry Moran, ABC “Nightline,” Nov. 2, 2009.
- “You know, one thing to keep in mind about the Tea Party is that it is an overwhelmingly white movement.” – Ron Brownstein, NBC “Meet the Press,” April 18, 2010.
Needless to say, it would be hateful and racist to report that a host of other rallies for special racial interests are overwhelmingly black or mestizo. Jews will also never admit that their own news agencies have failed to meet “diversity” goals. See the ultra-liberal and all-white lineup on MSNBC.
The Mainstream Media, always vigilant against the wrong opinions.

Newspapers are admitting that they censor stories about race. I thought Eric Holder said we should have “a conversation” about it, and that to avoid one is cowardice.
Even the government is blocking access to websites that represent “controversial opinion.” Lifting the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy apparently does not qualify as controversial.
A Negro entrepreneur at the Tea Party.
“A movement that’s 95% white has somehow become solely focused on black people.” ~ James Edwards
The most diverse Tea Party rally EVER.
Rush Limbowel has THE ANSWER.
“Thanks to Lincoln, secession has a bad name in American politics. We’re not supposed to remember that the Founders were themselves secessionists. More important, the whole point of the Declaration of Independence is that government by consent is meaningless without the right of secession.”
“For every Southern boy fourteen years old, not once but whenever he wants it, there is the instant when it’s still not yet two o’clock on that July afternoon in 1863, the brigades are in position behind the rail fence, the guns are laid and ready in the woods and the furled flags are already loosened to break out and Pickett himself with his long oiled ringlets and his hat in one hand probably and his sword in the other looking up the hill waiting for Longstreet to give the word and it’s all in the balance, it hasn’t happened yet, it hasn’t even begun yet, it not only hasn’t begun yet but there is still time for it not to begin against that position and those circumstances which made more men than Garnett and Kemper and Armistead and Wilcox look grave yet it’s going to begin, we all know that, we have come too far with too much at stake and that moment doesn’t need even a fourteen-year-old boy to think This time. Maybe this time with all this much to lose than all this much to gain…or to anyone who ever sailed a skiff under a quilt sail, the moment in 1492 when somebody thought This is it: the absolute edge of no return, to turn back now and make home or sail irrevocably on and either find land or plunge over the world’s roaring rim.” ~ William Faulkner, Intruder in the Dust (1948)
“The Anguish that most of us have observed for some time now has been caused not by the fact that the South is alienated from the rest of the country, but by the fact that it is not alienated enough, that everyday we are getting more and more like the rest of the country, that we are being forced out, not only of our many sins but of our few virtues.” ~ Flannery O’Connor


Just five more years to wait before we can see the fully-restored Hunley on display.
Look at this cover of Confederate Veteran magazine (1917). “Three Great Americans: Washington, Lee, and Woodrow Wilson.” This goes to show that what might be considered “great” for a time does not necessarily stand the test of time. So-called “conservatives” now tend to think highly of Ronald Reagan, but history will not be kind to him either, nor to a great many other “conservatives.”
I don’t think Confederates in our own time are writing poems called “Equality, Liberty, Fraternity.”
This video of Rev. James Manning is hilarious.
Detroit, 65 years after Hiroshima.
“Rwandan and Congolese rebels gang-raped nearly 200 women and some baby boys over four days within miles of a U.N. peacekeepers’ base…” I know, I know, it’s hard to believe.
“Over 95% of all assaults involved a black and white, have a black perpetrator and a white victim. These crimes are regularly censured, blacklisted, and downplayed by the ‘mainstream’ [i.e., Jew] media. In the extremely rare event that a black is victimized by a white person, it is automatically made a major national news story.”
Ted Nugent said recently at a concert in Dubuque, Iowa: “There’s a lot of white people in this crowd! I like that! This a white town.” The Dubuque Telegraph Jew Herald frowned upon this statement as ”racially insensitive,” and the crowd’s wild applause as “racist.” No such sermonizing was heard after 30 to 40 blacks decided upon a “Beat Whitey Night” at the Iowa State Fair. You know how youthful recklessness can get out of hand.
Even though we shouldn’t be surprised, we still are surprised at the story of Omar Thornton, who was caught stealing and then murdered eight white people because he claimed they were “racists.” The surprising part is not the behavior of a black man who was fond of copulating with white women as a means of territorial dominance. The surprising part is that this hasn’t being called a hate crime anywhere in the Jew-media, despite the fact that Thornton tells police “the reason why I shot this place up” is because “this place here is a racist place… I wish I coulda got more of the people.” Meanwhile, the lapdog media accepts the murderer’s word that he was a victim of “racism,” which is worse than any other crime, and places the company on trial, implying that they should have known that the “racism” would spark a rampage. Here’s a Negro journamalist who comes right out and says it: “racism…gradually managed to kill Omar Thornton mentally and emotionally before the killing spree via attrition.” And now God is a racist for sending tender Omar to hell!
If only Oppressed Omar would have filed a racial complaint with his union, it would have made the media’s case, and the focus would now solely be on white “racists” rather than the black murderer. Just imagine if a white man had murdered eight blacks and claimed that he did it because blacks are racists. There would be no attention at all on the company or the victims, and the white man would be called not just a mass murderer but a racist mass murderer, which is two or three times as bad. The media would not be interviewing the white man’s friends, because the friends of a racist must be racists themselves. This is a perfect example of how Jews use the media to paint whites as evil and diversities as worshipful. Now, even in the minds of whites, the life of a white person is worth less than the “dignity” of a black person. As James laments, “If only a Tea Partier could have gotten to him [Thornton], and explained that the Democrats are the real racists.”
It’s easy to bear false witness by slinging the word “racist” at every opinion that is racial, as preachers love to do. But as this story proves, it can also make the slanderer complicit with murder. (Lying preachers take note.) Violent, borderline-retarded people, like Omar Thornton, are most likely to overreact when they have been stoked by the popular idea that “racism” (broadly defined) is evil. Christians have been guilty of taking this word, invented by Communists, and blowing it so far out of proportion that it is now commonly used for those who want to destroy a race and for those who want to preserve races. Thus, to the dim-witted, someone who wants his race to survive is a “racist” and someone who wants to exterminate other races is a “racist.” No difference.
You can see how the popular delusion promotes other injustices. Here’s a black man who got only 10 years (which will, in reality, be about 2) for shooting a white man who was displaying the Confederate flag. “Notice that the authorities claim the white guy ‘taunted’ the shooter, and made ‘racially disparaging remarks,’ as if that somehow justifies attempted murder. But other witnesses claim that the victim didn’t say anything; the shooter started the ‘argument’ because he didn’t like the Confederate flag.” If killing a “racist” brings so little punishment, the killing of “racists” will multiply.
Ignoring these injustices, Attorney General Eric Holder maintains that whites are “cowards” who are “afraid to talk about race.” He also believes that a criminal who says, “You want freedom, you gonna have to kill some crackas,” is merely a civil rights activist. Blaming Holder for “instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims,” J. Christian Adams has resigned from the Department of Justice. “Over and over and over again,” he says the department showed “hostility” toward such cases. “We abetted wrongdoing and abandoned law-abiding citizens.” Now we know what “transcending race” is all about. And what was the official reason given for why the case against the Black Panthers was dropped? Because the HNIC promised not to bring his billy club to polling places anymore. Oh, well, say no more. Live and let live! Let bygones be bygones. Que será, será. Try anything of the kind if you’re white and you’ll quickly get a lesson in double standards.
Speaking of the Black Panthers, you absolutely must watch this clip.
Here’s why Bill O’Reilly makes the big bucks, and here’s why James Edwards should too. You can be certain that any Jew-media story about criminal violence will omit any mention of the single best predictor of it in existence. That’s what “racists” are for.
Pat Buchanan is amazed that the NAACP, whose goal is stated in its very name, is “accusing another organization of being motivated by race.”
In the black community, the jobless rate is 15 percent, the dropout rate is sometimes 50 percent, the illegitimacy rate is over 70 percent, nearly a million black Americans are in jail, prison or juvenile detention – and the NAACP is passing resolutions denouncing some guys carrying signs portraying Obama as the Joker.
“Yes, the very same mental midgets who just a few weeks ago were condemning a Hallmark greeting card with an outer space theme because they think ‘black holes’ means ‘black hos,’ an organization which is explicitly organized for the exclusive benefit of one race of people, and whose name contains the words ‘Colored People,’ actually had the gall to pass this resolution.” ~ James Edwards

Now the NAACP vows to “monitor” Tea Party rallies for “racism,” which used to be called free speech.
Elizabeth Wright is right again when she writes that the founders of the NAACP “were socialist Jews.” Here she explains why so many names for black people are considered racist:
[T]he only reason that the word “colored” has been tinged with the charge of “racism” is because the left/multiculturalists discovered that they could make Whitey jump through hoops by denigrating any term they chose, and claiming that a new one is in order. There was no ignominy attached to the word when ordinary blacks used it to refer to themselves. It is only when the clever elites learned that they could use it as yet another bludgeon against whites, along with a host of other words and terminologies, that it was given a “racist” meaning.
Mugabe Negroes are now federal appointees in this once-white, once-Christian country. Welcome to Africa. After a lot of negative press and after being fired by the president and denounced by the NAACP, both came crawling back to Sherrod for forgiveness, despite the fact that she admitted to not merely being a “racist” 24 years ago, but actually abusing her office and committing a race-based crime. Now she gets a big pay raise! And somehow, this means that she deserves apologies for being fired, and anyone who disagrees is a racist! Don’t hold your breath waiting for anyone white to receive this kind of treatment. Trent Lott was forced to resign his senatorial seat for far less, a mere compliment.
“We must not be afraid to vote black, and we must not be afraid to vote a black out who votes against our interests,” says her husband. If you would like to join us in being called names like “racist” and “white supremacist,” look into a camera and say the words, “We must not be afraid to vote white.”
Pat Buchanan writes: “For the first time in our lifetimes, outside the South, white racial consciousness has visibly begun to rise.” The Sherrod affair is proof. She was sacked immediately because the White House is panicked at the specter of white retaliation.
Dinesh D’Souza, who got the great Sam Francis fired from the Washington Times when he wrote that Francis, at the first Amren conference, “attack[ed] the liberal principles of humanism and universalism for facilitating ‘the war against the white race,’” is now the president of the college where Anthony Bradley, the Michael Steele of the PCA, is a professor. It’s delicious irony that, after D’Souza got Francis fired, the SPLC tarred him as a wicked-racist-hater for wanting to repeal the Civil Rights Act.
Q: “Where Islam exists and advances you have nothing but death, war, bloodshed, poverty, misogyny. You see that wherever it advances…” Sam Francis answers: “Well, what’s the difference between that and Latin America?”
“NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a recent interview that his ‘foremost’ mission as the head of America’s space exploration agency is to improve relations with the Muslim world.” Hey, no jokes about the first black man to head NASA.
As proof that the SPLC and other Christ-haters have successfully lobbied the government to persecute Christians and “racists,” see page 17 of this Department of Justice anti-terrorism document, where “Christian Reconstructionism” is defined as “A theology common among many in the ‘patriot’ movement. It essentially argues that biblical law should be the basis for reconstructing earthly societies – in other words, it espouses an essentially theocratic government.” Horrors and blasphemy! Democracy has a challenger.

The vile, perverted scum at the SPLC have taken a proud stand against the “vulgarity” of James Edwards. Or at least, that was the plan until the “investigative journalists” in the “Hatewatch” department of the famous hate group decided to cut and paste Ann Coulter into the fundraising form letter masquerading as “intelligence.”

Let me just say that we here at SWB are very moderate on this topic; we believe that all unrepentant faggots should be executed, but we would compassionately allow them a whole 30 minutes of life following the trial, before being sent to the gallows. We’re known for being soft-hearted coddlers.
The only proper response to being accused of racism is derision. This is a very good review of Racism, Schmacism.
There is the case, why not, of the federal hate crime investigation triggered by a ham sandwich; and there is the case of a mayor’s lengthy written apology to a Black citizen for allowing police officers to eat bananas in public. There are also several examples of White so-called conservatives being far more paranoid, obnoxious, and vociferous in their denunciations of supposed White racism than the usual liberal suspects. I was astounded to read, for example, that in at least one case, said conservatives even complained about their not being condemned vigorously enough in the liberal media; and that a conservative radio talk show host branded high gasoline prices racist because they encouraged farmers to use corn for the production of ethanol, when that corn could be going to feed African children.
Speaking of which, this review of the book by the Jews and fags and Jewish fags at the SPLC is downright hilarious. They criticize everything from “a title devoid of wit” to “the cheap Photoshop job of the cover” to kind and appreciative comments left at Amazon. They say the book has “all the hallmarks of an amateur self-publishing effort,” apparently incognizant that this is even more true of their own website! The Political Cesspool has a budget of a few thousand dollars a year, mostly from donations from listeners. The SPLC has over $300 million in the bank. “And still the SPLC reacts to everything that we say and do. They wrote no less than three attack pieces about us last week alone.”
Now we know where Morris Disease is spending his poverty earnings. His wife, who has the stripperesque name “Susan Starr,” shows off a plastic overcoat with fur that she made herself, a gaudy poolside rickshaw, a matador’s outfit hanging in a bathroom, and a nest of writhing snakes on a coffee table. Poverty has been very good to these people. The next time I hear a story about the kitsch art of the Nazis, I’m going to remember these tacky pictures.
Here’s another very good review of Racism, Schmacism, from Steve Sailer. More reviews, including ours.
TPC is like NPR but without the estrogen.
As you read here first, after WorldNetDaily gave a quick nod to James Edwards for breaking the big birther story, they flushed James down the memory hole and pretended that they broke the story instead. Now they’re upset because Globe Magazine has done the same thing to them. I haven’t seen this much shamelessness since Susan Starr hired an interior decorator.
Jew-scum Eli Roth, the pioneer of the Jewish film genre called “torture porn,” has denounced the Political Cesspool hosts as “white supremacists” from his Twitter page. I know James Edwards can’t sleep at night, so humiliated is he from being called names by human filth like Eli Roth and Perez Hilton.
It took no time at all for the Political Cesspool, which is getting more than 10,000 visitors per day to its website, to make big news again. You remember the funny McCain campaign commercial where he turns to the sheriff who is pacing the border with him and says, “…and complete the danged fence!” The sheriff was interviewed for 20 minutes on TPC, and the fallout has been unbelievable. Watch as he apologizes again and again for doing nothing wrong, except lying. And he really has lied. Then he says he takes responsibility for the blunder, even as he blames it on his information officer. He also accused Obama of borderline treason on the Alex Jones show, apparently not realizing that the ADL hate group has said that Alex Jones makes TPC sound like George Will.
I’m glad that we didn’t have people like Sheriff Babeu defending the gates of Vienna in 1529. Had the men of that age been so weak all the Ottoman Empire would have had to do would be to call the European defenders “racists” and marched right through the city.
Predictably, J.D. Hayworth called for McCain to denounce his co-star. Just to even the playing field, David Duke endorsed Hayworth so that Hayworth could experience the joy of being asked by Ken dolls on news programs to explain the endorsement. Hayworth lost the race.
James Edwards has only helped the sheriff find coverage, of course. The sheriff first made big news by exclaiming, “Our own government has become our enemy.” These words were splashed as the headline on the Drudge Report and many other media outlets the next morning. Think of how silly and effeminate it is to correctly identify the empire as the enemy but apologize for being interviewed on the radio by “racists.” If white pride scares you, how are you going to face the Beast?
Evidence of the Political Cesspool’s “white supremacism” is said to be that it ”lists among its principles a desire ‘to revive the White birthrate’ and ‘to grow the percentage of Whites in the world relative to other races.’” Peter Brimelow asks, So “we should suppress the white birthrate? We should lower the percentage of whites relative to other races?”
With Mel Gibson all over the news for using the word “nigger,” above his many other problems, his father Hutton Gibson made another appearance on the Political Cesspool, this time to say that fags are running the Roman Catholic Church, and the pope himself is a fag. Jimmy Kimmel talked about it, and so did TMZ and many other media outlets, about 105 in all so far!
But let’s give credit to Bill Rolen, where it’s due. His excellent interview skills drew this confession out of Mr. Gibson. While mainstreamers like to denounce TPC as a “white supremacist” radio show, whatever that means, you need to realize that they all wish they could conduct themselves as professionally. They’re quite envious of the headlines that James and his crew produce.
Hutton Gibson responded thusly to the tempest in a teacup:
Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society. When an immoral society has blatantly and proudly violated all the commandments, it insists upon one last virtue, tolerance for its immorality. It will not tolerate condemnation of its perversions. It creates a whole new world in which only the intolerant critic of intolerable evil is evil.
Sodomy and pederasty are among the vilest of perversions. They have no right to exist. Perpetrators of these crimes have no right to commit them, no rights permitting their perversions, and no right whatsoever to an unsullied reputation. They are scum who must be exposed for the protection of the communities they infest. Their sole right is to early cremation.
The absolute worst of these criminals are those who hide their vices behind clerical robes, and any and all superiors who cover up their crimes instead of defrocking and prosecuting them. And the worst of these superiors is the man in charge of dealing with the “problem.”
It’s a pity that Mel is not as honorable as his brilliant father. Perhaps he could have been if he had learned to abstain from alcohol.
Mel’s agent promptly dropped him, not because he hit a woman and broke her teeth. No, Gibson can no longer be represented because he said a word that black people don’t like. Yes, this is the same agent who continues to represent P. Diddy, Ice Cube, Kanye West, Snoop Dogg, Mary J. Blige, Eminem, and 50 Cent, all of whom have made multi-million dollar careers while using the word “nigger.” Jews have taught Americans to believe that using The Nigger Word is worse than rape, even though this isn’t the true reason why Gibson is a target.
What man in his right mind wouldn’t be upset about the mother of his infant child running around dressed provocatively? Everyone talks differently when they’re extremely angry, even liberals. And Mel Gibson never used the word about anybody but potential rapists. Since when do rapists deserve respect? Contrast this to the reaction to Bill Clinton’s racial insult of Obama. When Ted Kennedy refused his request to endorse Hillary for president instead of Obama, Clinton angrily retorted that “a few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.” But that’s okay, because Bill Clinton never made a film about Jesus Christ, so he gets away with that sort of thing.
Secondly, I’m sick and tired of hearing about how horrible “the N word” supposedly is. It’s nothing but the Latin word for black, as anyone with half a brain knows:
Nigger is a noun in the English language, most notable for its usage in a pejorative context to refer to black people (generally people of African descent), and also as an informal slang term, among other contexts. It is a common ethnic slur. The word originated as a term used in a neutral context to refer to black people, as a variation of the Spanish/Portuguese noun negro, a descendant of the Latin adjective niger, meaning the color “black.”
I’m pretty sure that blacks don’t take Latin classes.
The reason it became a “bad” word is because of the behavior and lifestyle of the people it referred to. They’re the ones who turned the word into an insult, not white people. Just as the word that replaced it, “colored”, became pejorative after it was associated with black people, and was replaced by “Negro”, which became a “bad” word after years of news announcers saying “police are looking for two Negro males”, and was replaced by “black”, which has now become yet another bad word because of the behavior of the people it refers to, and has been replaced with “African-American”, which will no doubt be declared “racist” itself in a few years.
Our friend Chad mocks the prevailing hyper-sensitivity over names by asking: “If I move to South Africa, will I be an American-African?”
To avoid being hateful, please spell the word with snowflakes.
Jesse Jackson is outraged that Mel Gibson used the word “niggers.” Yes, this is the same Jesse Jackson who denounced Barack Obama for “talking down to niggers” and said he’d like to “cut his nuts off,” and who just called LeBron James a runaway slave. Civil rights for the win!
Leonard Pitts has even criticized Gibson for using the word “pack” to describe his wife’s potential rapists, saying that this word is even more offensive than “nigger” because “only animals hunt in packs.” Yes, this is the same Leonard Pitts who told whites who were outraged over the brutal Christian and Newsom murders in Knoxville that they could “cry me a river.”
What word besides “pack” or “troop” or “flange” would you use to describe these voters, shown in a scene from Mutual of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom?
We were most interested in how Mel used the word “Russian” in the string of abusive words he called his wife. We’ve not heard anyone else take notice of this, but in thinking of all the ways he could criticize her, Mel apparently thought that being Russian was another point against her.
Dr. Laura agrees “that there is ONE word in the English language that is allowed to be spoken by members of only ONE group.” There sure is a lot of equality out there. Failure to comply with double standards, according to black and Jewish wishes, is “wrong,” she says. More tortured logic. “Not only is it ‘racist’ for white people to use the N-word even though it’s fine for black to use it, it’s now ‘racist’ to even point out that blacks use the word?!” Since conservatives recently organized an “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day” to teach Muslims the Western, White concept of free speech, James wonders when they’ll also organize an “Everybody Say Nigger Day.” I’m pretty sure we can find some sponsors down at the Chamber of Commerce. Well, Dr. Laura decided that she had to quit her job in order to “regain my First Amendment rights.” James asks: “If she really believes her First Amendment rights were under attack the other day, then why in the world did she apologize for pointing out that black people say ‘nigger’ all the time?”
So let me get this straight, Dr. Laura has announced that:
- She “did the wrong thing” by mentioning the forbidden N-Word on air in order to make a “philosophical point.” She’s very sorry.
- She’s proud of her “self-policing” of her language.
- She’s going to leave radio in order to become a unencumbered, let-the-chips-fall-where-they-may Truth Teller.
Defiant and repentant, unapologetic and grovelling … this lady needs a shrink!
We’ve had about all we can take of the childish “N Word” theatrics, most especially the moronic distinction that blacks make between the words “nigger” and “nigga.” Remember when white children used to learn grammar, logic, and rhetoric? Now everyone is a child of a very different sort.
The saddest part of the Gibson story is that he has nearly ruined his life from his poor decisions, most notably abandoning his family. The second saddest part is that he has given the Jews who hate him what they want the most.
What’s the difference between Mel Gibson and Roman Polanski?
Mel Gibson says a bad word, and he becomes a pariah.
Roman Polanski drugs, rapes and sodomizes a 13 year old girl, and he’s a hero.
What’s the difference?
Mel Gibson, whatever his flaws, is a Christian.
Roman Polanski is Jewish.
That’s the difference.
“It’s just starting, but the gay civil rights agenda is going to have the same effect on freedom of association, freedom of contracts, freedom of religion, that the black civil rights agenda had on these freedoms.”
“In a California city where at least 80 percent of residents are Hispanic, parents no longer need to concern themselves with the annoying task of feeding the children: the taxpayer will handle that expensive chore.”
This Somalian had to be moved to a better part of London. It was uncharitable to ask him to live in a poor area.
The family’s new home is believed to be one of the most expensive houses ever paid for by housing benefit, which is administered by local councils but funded by the Department for Work and Pensions.
We Americans are even more generous to our freeloaders. We give them penis pumps.
This sort of insanity that has led Senator Jim Webb to made big news by calling for an end to racial quotas for all except those who are descended from slaves. Though he’s being called a racist anyway, there are two things that make this difficult: 1) he’s a miscegenist; 2) he wants to let blacks keep their quotas because we “owe” them. But blacks aren’t stupid, as you can see here. They know that there is no way to keep the gravy train rolling if genetic tests become necessary in order to keep getting checks from Mr. and Mrs. White Taxpayer. Therefore, they know they must present a united front against the white, Christian stock of the country (the same who are paying them perpetually), which is why they ally themselves with fags and other scum. Pat Buchanan’s agreement with Webb does not dissolve this opposition.
Even the exempt beneficiaries of quotas oppose Webb’s call for fairness and equality, even though they never stop talking about the need for fairness and equality. The Negro on the panel demurs from quotas unless they are “means-tested” for poverty, which is socialism. The idea here is that blacks will never consider themselves paid off for slavery until each receives according to his need. White people, who hate their own children, have gladly acquiesced to these demands. As Patrick Cleburne says, whites only exist to finance the lifestyle of black people. Politics is simply a means of seizing resources from whites and transferring them to blacks. Even indirect opposition to this theft is “racism,” which nearly all preachers denounce as sinful.
Someone named Gregory Rodriguez has also called for an end to racial quotas in the Los Angeles Times.
Peter Morrison writes: ” Theoretically, a descendant of one of the Japanese fighters who attacked Pearl Harbor could come to America, and he would be have a much better chance of landing a government contract than an American descended from a US soldier who died defending Pearl Harbor.”

Michael Steele’s incompetence plumbs new depths, yet his token job remains intact. As Anthony Bradley knows, being a token has its benefits. Steele’s latest gaffe proves that, as Pat Buchanan puts it, support of Obama’s war policy is now a litmus test for loyal Republicans. A war to invade and occupy a country that never attacked us, to strip it of weapons it did not have, has thus far “cost 4,000 U.S. dead, 35,000 wounded, and $700 billion, while making widows and orphans of half a million Iraqis.” And for what? There has been no perceived benefit to this horror, as we “racists” predicted from the beginning.

“What does it profit America if we save Anbar and lose Arizona?” - Pat Buchanan
The next token RNC chairman will be Jew Norm Coleman. The last three chairmen have been Steele (black), Martinez (Hispanic), and Mehlman (Jewish). Hiring a white chairman for an “overwhelmingly white” party would send the wrong message.
Obama agrees that Jews propelled him to the Senate.

The Jewish perception of illegal immigration. The goal is to displace whites.
I love James’s subtle reference to Jewish interference here.
Israel hates the children of undocumented immigrants!
In another step to limit the influx of foreigners, Israel is building a fence along its rugged 130-mile (200-kilometer) border with Egypt. Thousands of asylum seekers and illegal migrants cross the Sinai desert border every year, many guided by Bedouin trackers who live in Sinai.
Netanyahu said the border fence would be completed by 2013.
But you know who is really hateful? The racists in Arizona.
When Hasidic Jews dominate a town and pass a law requiring everyone to “maintain gender separation in all public areas,” you can be certain that this will not be denounced as “sexist” in the Jew-press. But when we Kinists say that racial and religious separation is needed for the protection of our own people, we’re obviously “racists.”
In Israel, miscegenation is rape. Claiming to be a Jew in order to bed a Jewess is the crime of “rape by deception.” If you think this is racist, it only proves that you’re an anti-Semite. Racism is anything that non-whites find disagreeable, especially any attempt of the white race to survive.
“If America had any meaning at all [to Jews], it lay in the peculiar attempt to rise above the trend of our present civilization – the identification of race with State… America was therefore the New World in this vital respect – that the state was purely an ideal, and nationality was identical only with acceptance of the ideal… Today, with race triumphant over ideal, anti-Semitism uncovers its fangs… If, then, the struggle between us [i.e., Jews and Christians] is ever to be lifted beyond the physical, your democracies will have to alter their demands for racial, spiritual and cultural homogeneity with the State.” ~ Zionist Jew Maurice Samuel, writing in response to the immigration law of 1924, quoted in Kevin McDonald’s The Culture of Critique, p. 244
The congressman from Tel Aviv is completely “unaware” of what the Justice Department is doing.
Eighty million Americans are anti-Semites! says the ADL.

This is funny. Jew Lawrence Auster jewily denounces a Belgian official as “openly anti-Jewish” for stating that it’s nearly impossible to have a conversation with someone who thinks he’s always right. Jew Auster’s characterization of this reasonable opinion as “anti-Jewish” proves the Belgian’s point.
Back in the 1960s, the Jew media dismissed all concerns about Israel stockpiling nuclear weapons. Now that Israel’s enemies are doing the same thing, disarmament is a moral imperative.

A glimpse of a time before the British media was Jewed. It was all to change in the 1970s, as you can see in the liberals who scorn the concerns of whites who had become a minority in their own neighborhoods. The hideous fembot, who is a patricide of the same generation as Obama’s slut-mother, says, matter-of-factly, that “racism is a white problem.” She concerns herself only with violence committed by whites. She exploits white viewers in their most naive state, still too “polite” to propagate “stereotypes,” still willing to accept that “racism” is resistance to being “swamped by an alien culture.” Now the camp of the saints is surrounded, and these videos are historical artifacts of a people who lost their way because they lost their faith.
Financial “reform” means fewer jobs for white men. The trick is to call Jews “white” so that the “white” quota will be filled by them.
A bright side to the Bernard Madoff scandal is that Bernard made-off with the endowment of the American Jewish Congress, and the AJC is now bankrupt. Poisoning the minds of Christian children with satanic cartoons will have to be placed on hold for “that accurséd tribe whose god is gold, whose rite is the bribe.”
“Need now means wanting some else’s money, greed means wanting to keep your own, and compassion is when a politician wants to arrange the transfer.” ~ Joseph Sobran
Jew Oliver Stone has had to beg forgiveness for saying that Russians suffered more than Jews during WWII. No one is allowed to suffer more than Jews!
A Lithuanian court has decriminalized display of the swastika, saying that the twelve year political reign of the Nazi Party should not define a symbol that is thousands of years old, and is strikingly beautiful besides. Rudyard Kipling loved it, as have countless masculine men down through the ages. We’re shocked that such common sense has emerged from a national court.
This photo from Kerala, India, is kind of funny:

Jewish math and Rainbow Confederate math are very similar. You will hear the Kennedy brothers and other Confederatards assert that more than 300,000 slaveowners served in the Union armies. According to the 1860 Census, there were 383,975 slaveholders in the entire Union, North and South.
It turns out that Haitians are also taking courses in Jewish math. After the Haiti earthquake, it was said that 200-300,000 people perished. Judeochristians mobilized their infantry, clad in the finest from L.L. Bean, crept in under cover of darkness, and smuggled orphans away to be raised in decent, white supremacist homes, far from the desolate black night of Negroland. The CofCC said from the beginning that the reported death toll was highly unlikely. The Huffington Post called them “racists” for denying the official estimates. Now the Haitian government admits that the population has not significantly changed. Who knew that Haitians could rival Jews in exaggeration?
Though Jews made feminism famous, they did not invent it. When confronted by manly Confederate veteran Basil Ransom, feminism is “relegated to the land of vapors,” in the words of Henry James. We continue to live in a world where most women do not realize they are “made for love,” and that femininity, as opposed to feminism, requires being “private and passive.”

“You take a very intricate system, the endocrine system…and you throw a Group One carcinogen onto those healthy women, what could you expect but disease?” I suppose cancer is the price a feminist pays to have a career.
A relic of the racist, sexist, homophobic past: girls wearing dresses.

The “first lady” and her “freakishly overdeveloped trapezius and deltoid muscles.”
We Kinists like some meat on our women.


The Navy, which is 15% female (a shockingly high number), gives the Sailor of the Year award to these four.
Stephen Hawking proves that you can learn far more about the universe from a decent theologian than an atheist. For decades, Hawking has searched for a unified theory of physics. The missing piece has been gravity. Now he asserts that since gravity exists, God must not. Behold the stupidity of this alleged genius: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing.” That’s right, the “world’s greatest physicist” is now claiming that something can come from nothing. “Professing to be wise, they became fools” (Romans 1:22). Cornelius Van Til made far more sense when he explained that the atheist must stand on God’s lap to slap him in the face. Without God, there is no science; there is no way to make sense of anything.
Pat Buchanan asks how the NFL can be allowed to survive on merit-based but male-only hiring in a world where everyone must be granted equal opportunity. And if the answer is that sports is the pursuit of excellence, why should education not also be the pursuit of excellence? Trillions of dollars have been wasted, and the racial achievement gap remains intractable. How many more trillions should be wasted before it occurs to someone in charge that we can’t keep printing money to bring liberal dreams of equality to fruition? “For an indeterminate future, Mexican kids are not going to match Asian kids in math. The beginning of wisdom is to recognize this world as it is, not as what we would wish it to be.”
Take up the white man’s high school.

“In 1970 California had the 7th most educated work force of the 50 states in terms of the share of its workers who had completed high school. By 2008, it ranked 50th, making it the least-educated state.” Since race has nothing to do with civilization, according to John Lofton, we need to think of some way to really, truly convert mestizos to Christianity.
“The white community not only abandoned the public school system physically, it withdrew its financial support as well,” says an attorney for a county in Lousiana. Blacks are demanding that higher property taxes be mandated. If whites don’t pay through the nose for black schools, who will? Certainly not Mexicans. Remember when Christians in America were “racists” and theirs was a fair land of freedom, and their children rose to call them blessed?
Now Sweden is outlawing homeschooling, which was never a problem prior to the West’s experiment in race-mixing.
There’s nothing a black man likes better than a good book.
Here’s an article that is critical of black book sections at Walmart. Most people will correctly see this complaint as stupid, because it’s a liberal jerk-off telling a company that it should ignore customer demand and pretend that race does not exist, even though the customers don’t. Of course there should be a black book section if it makes it easier for blacks to find what they want to buy. There should be white book sections too, and white bookstores, just as there is a black TV channel.
Mulattos and their perplexing “family” trees. I think the best solution is to pull a Michael Jackson and pretend to be white while naming your spurious brood “Prince” and other names of royalty to distract attention from your bastard lineage. No need to thank us for the helpful advice.

This just in: Ieshuh (eye-EE’-shuh) Griffin is not the white man’s bitch. Coming up in sports, Freepers hate black women!
The myth of the noble savage was easier to swallow in 1942 with a beautiful white girl cast in the role of the dusky native islander.
Racism topples what would have been the next mayor of Bessemer, Alabama.
The Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities has withheld King Tut’s DNA results from the public “because he feared the consequences of such a revelation.” This really is a very minor issue as far as whites are concerned, but Negroes and North Africans are eager to find royalty in their past because there’s certainly no evidence of it in the present. Therefore, they have claimed Tut as a Negro in order to justify naming their children “Prince” and “Queen” and “Archduke.” Okay, I made that last one up. Well, the leaked results show a 99.6% match with Western European Y chromosomes. That’s far western. Steve Martin was right! King Tut is “my favorite honky”! “Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia,” sing with me now!

Thanks to Peter Brimleow for observing that this verse from the hymn The Church’s One Foundation also applies to the white race:
Though with a scornful wonder
Men see her sore oppressed,
By schisms rent asunder,
By heresies distressed:
Yet saints their watch are keeping,
Their cry goes up, “How long?”
And soon the night of weeping
Shall be the morn of song!


September 7, 2010 






It’s hard to believe that Lofton expects anyone to take him seriously. You are correct about he his twisted “intermingled” to insinuate that kinists want to lynch blacks. The original context was a question being answered by Sara Healy in which she asked whether kinists were opposed to helping persecuted Christians around the world. The response was that kinists do believe that we have a loyalty to Christians around the world. People of different races are certainly allowed to interact, and boundaries don’t exist much to keep people apart as they exist to keep property separate. Lofton then claims that this has to do with lynching black people! What an ass!
He also twists kinists words when we say that we don’t want to live in a world that approves of interracial marriage, polygamy, pedophilia, etc. We want to live in a world of normativity. He then goes on to conclude that we make “what people approve of” the standard instead of the Bible, and that we would have approved of the Crucifixion since people “approved of” that. Clearly a warped man who loves to hear the sound of his own voice.
Another thing that you’ll notice about the Lofton thread is that there is very little exegesis on their part. For all the complaining that Lofton does about us not having God’s Word as the standard he evidently doesn’t feel very compelled to use it that much. The verses he does quote are completely irrelevant like saying that righeousness rather than racial purity exalts a nation. Obviously the burden of proof is on him to show that they are independant. It’s like saying that righteousness exalts a nation, not lack of pederasty or serial polygamy.
What an ass! is right.
David New is getting tarred and feathered on Lofton’s Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000422569879&v=wall&story_fbid=146478728725416&ref=mf
New is accusing Chad Coleman of various unspecified sins. (Kinists are just supposed to repent, with or without evidence.)
David Opperman had enough of this and posted this very good comment:
“It is wrong to accuse someone of sin without providing the actual offending charge against them. This is called a railing accusation, and we aren’t allowed to bring this against Satan himself (Jude 9).”
It turns out that New has his panties in a twist over some Photoshop work that was done on him, even though he and his friends knew exactly what message THEY were trying to convey when they represented Kinists with the swastika.
I don’t even see what’s so bad about the pictures. They’re hilarious but certainly not malicious.
Exactly Admin! I simply find it hilarious that New considers these photoshops to be damnable slander! Yesterday made me feel pretty good about being a kinist. This is like a WWF match in which anti-kinists get knocked over the head with folding chairs only to come back into the ring and pretend that they didn’t just get the crap beat out of them.
I’m always a little discouraged when I read a S/W/B post.
How can I ever read all this and keep up with all of it?
That you do, Mr. Admin, is a fact that is much appreciated.
I’m honored that you’d link to my blog as well! You’re an inspiration!
“To reject the spiritual makes one a materialist, and to reject the physical makes one a gnostic.”
A good nutshell principle.
I have seen an interesting thought that Satan has two symbolical forms in the Bible: serpent and dragon. Serpent represents devil as an undercover false prophet, infiltrating corrupter camouflaged as angel of light. Whereas dragon represents devil as a proud open oppressor that has thrown away his mask after having grown powerful enough and forcibly tries to make you bow down to his image.
Now applying this to Opperman’s idea: materialism is obviously a case of Devil being openly hostile “dragon”, tempting or forcin us to crude godlessness. But Gnosticism represents Satan doing his serpentine “angel of light” act, that is imitating righteousness. The sometimes absurdly altruistic-looking Gnostic ethics fool many people into believing in its moral goodness.
The basic switcheroo is that instead of seeing Jesus Christ freeing us from the burden of our OWN SINS, Gnosticism teaches redemption from the burden of our material BODIES, allowing humans to become abstracted universal spirits, enlighted little deities freed the restraining shackles of rotten flesh (and provincial fleshly prejudices).
This also nicely deflates the Christian doctrine of Original Sin, for according to Gnosticism people are “depraved because they are deprived” – people themselves are not evil, only their oppressive material environment causes them to act that way! The connection to Marxist ethics is easy to see.
Thanks, Shotgun. You’re a valuable asset for our side, and we thank God for you.
Good point, Petr. I’ve been thinking a lot about the nature of death since we lost our dear friend Stan. The trouble with death, it seems to me, is not that it separates us from our loved ones. The world is big enough that we are separated from many who are alive. The trouble with death is that it tears the flesh and spirit asunder, contrary to God’s designed purpose for us. Thus, our great Hope in this life is the resurrection from the dead, and we are confident in this Hope because we know that the Resurrection is a Person, and not just a Person but our own Kinsman-Redeemer (John 11:25). As it says in 2 Corinthians 1:9, “we had the sentence of death in ourselves, that we should not trust in ourselves but in God who raises the dead.” This is how Abraham was credited with righteousness – because he fully intended to obey God and kill his only son, knowing that God could not break His promise and would raise Isaac from the dead.
A Christian, who does not fall to the extremes of materialism or gnosticism, sees death for what it is but knows that it has lost its sting. I have gnostics in my own family who have fallen for John Shelby Spong-style teaching, and they sound very much like Darwinists, but in a different way, if that makes sense. A Darwinist like Richard Dawkins wants us to boldly accept our materialistic fate, just as the pseudo-Christian gnostic wants us to boldly accept that the flesh is dung, and everything to do with it, especially the distasteful subject of race, is now being vanquished.
Both sides accept death as not merely a needful but a desirable transition. They do not “rage, rage, against the dying of the light.” Proverbs 8 tells us why: all who hate God love death.
Another thing they have in common is their ever-shifting standards and frame of reference. While at opposite extremes, both seek the path to deity. The gnostic must constantly re-imagine definitions and relations for God and himself because he has exchanged the unmovable Rock of the Word with the sand of his own unnatural affections. He has exchanged Wisdom for sophistry. In the same way, the white man was blessed with science when he gave glory to God for creation. But when, like Lucifer, he sought to become God himself, he turned into the fool named Stephen Hawking.
Well, I’m rambling, but what I’m trying to say is that, just as we’ve seen Christians compromise in one area only to compromise in another later on (see acceptance of miscegenation in the 1960s to acceptance of faggotry today), we know that anti-Kinists are on a deadly path. If they don’t soon repent and return to the faith, and give thanks to God for ALL of His gifts, both spiritual and physical, they will pay a terrible price.
Just as we Kinists see death for what it is, we see salvation for what it is; salvation is both temporal and eternal. If any man comes to us preaching the false gospel that God wants to save us as ghosts, or wants to save us as individuals and cares nothing for our people as our people, we will call him accursed and his gospel perverted (Galatians 1).
I can sense the deep emotion in your words, and I mostly approve your sentiments. And yet I must again play a “devil’s advocate” (heh) here and express my opinion that anti-Kinism or anti-racialism is not THE great cause of modern apostasy and corruption – just one of its many manifestations.
A Christian should not be monomaniacally concerned with the race question (either for or against), or raise the principle of Apartheid into a dogmatic question of curse and damnation.
A person COULD be a good Christian and yet not very racially-minded. (While PC drones must concede that one can be even highly race-minded and yet a good Christian.)
Let us not forget that while Gnostics have always liked to “twist Scriptures to their own destruction”, the fact remains that there is clear Biblical basis also against over-estimating or idolizing (in the literal sense of that word) the importance of flesh-and-blood ties.
This “hard saying” alone proves it:
“If any man comes to me, and hates not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.” (Luke 14:26)
Or this:
“And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to [our] father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.” (Matthew 3:9)
But yes, I agree with your observation that the is eerie similarity in the way how dogmatic materialists would like us to Stoically accept the coming abolition of our being – or downright hasten the process by committing defiant suicide – and how anti-flesh dualists seem to almost forget the whole idea of material Resurrection and only wish to become a “spirit in the sky.” They both see death either as something perfectly natural or something to be celebrated in itself – not as the “last enemy.”
Btw, that German Romantic philosopher Johann Georg Hamann that I once told you guys about, he was definitely opposed to “ghostly spirituality” that he saw as tainted by philosophical abstractionism. He cleverly saw something highly symbolic in the fact that both Origen (whom we might call the real founder of highly intellectualized “Christian theology”) and Peter Abelard (whom we might call the founder of secular European philosophy) were both castrates – Origen castrating himself, Abelard getting castrated by his enemies. Hamann saw something eunuch-like in their un-fleshly rationalist worldviews…
And by the way, the phenomenon of piously despising flesh is not present only within Christian tradition (I would generally consider Gnosticism a perverted mutation of Christianity, with generous doses of pagan syncretism thrown in). It can be observed also elsewhere:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=623559&postcount=2
“In its most extreme departure from orthodoxy, Indian doubt retains its gods, only contesting their eternal duration. When, from examination after examination, philosophy reached the absolute void, instead of shrinking from the abyss like the European doubter, the Indian went on until he arrived at a new belief. Outside all created things, outside every form or limit, beyond light and darkness, beyond the bounds of all thought, he found a God who had no relation with the world. Never did Christianity, even in the heart of the Middle Age, so absolutely anathematise Matter. To the Oriental the visible world was an imposture; he wished to tear off the mask that covered the universe.
…
Since the dogma exacts the abolition of all private or collective personality, Buddhism left to itself tends to a rejection of such ideas as the Nation, the State, the Government, the only true society being the Monastery. The true believer has no country but the convent; and as all that recalls individual right is contrary to the spirit of his religion, it follows that he can possess nothing of his own. The Buddhist, from his very nature, belongs to the mendicant orders. All alliance, except with the invisible, being wrong, marriage is condemned; but since in this exaggerated idealism each reform goes so far as to become impossible, polygamy is simply corrected by celibacy, property by almsgiving. The rigorous consequence of Buddhist dogma would result in the absolute extinction of humanity.”
Yes, I agree with you that anti-Kinism is not the sole or even the major corruption of our time. Many factors have contributed to the downfall of our civilization, and as is true with Original Sin itself, it’s hard to blame anyone but ourselves.
I often wish that we could move beyond these fights over what essentially amounts to borders and whether they should exist. There is much more of importance, but the squeaky wheel tends to get the grease.
I’ve met many good Christians who are not “racially-minded,” as you say. But even among these, there is an implicit racialism. I’m always amused to see that white people generally live their lives the same way, regardless of their feelings about race, and the same could be said of other races.
For instance, Chuck Baldwin is a baptist pastor who talks a lot about liberty and the Constitution but never the white race. He would do just about anything to avoid being called a racist. Now he’s moving to Montana, and he’s using every excuse for it imaginable except for the most obvious one: "That’s where the white people are." God spare us from hypocrites! We need another hypocrite pastor like we need a hole in the head.
But I would say that, in terms of sheer numbers, I’ve been more greatly influenced by those who are not openly racially-minded than those who are.
That’s fascinating about Origen and Abelard. Wouldn’t you say this also relates to Constantine delaying his baptism until his life was almost over? It seems that he did this to avoid sinning in the flesh after baptism, perhaps because he believed that the flesh would be put away permanently and its nature would not follow him into eternity.
That’s also fascinating about pagans. I’m reminded of what Rushdoony always said about the difference between Christianity and anti-Christian religions. Ours is a living, familial relationship between children and Father. Theirs is an insurance policy. We give thanks to God for grace; they have rituals designed to assuage wrath. And as you said, with them the goal is always to escape the world and the flesh and attain some sort of higher consciousness. We don’t even conceive of God in the same way. We believe we are His image-bearers; they believe that he or it is outside the world, not just superior to it.
Of course, liberals in the West look on these satanic Oriental anti-faiths as all very enlightened, similar to the way we Americans hear a British accent and think it sounds so sophisticated, just because it’s foreign English. (No offense to our cousins in that once-green and pleasant land.)
This is what is driving the international controversy over the pastor in Florida who is going to burn Korans. It’s why Prince Charles calls himself the “defender of faiths” rather than “defender of the Faith.”
So it appears there will be no Quran burning after all.
However, we would do well not to forget a book burning that happened a couple years ago:
http://www.haaretz.com/news/orthodox-jewish-youths-burn-new-testaments-in-or-yehuda-1.246153
Yes, or when our own military burned Bibles that were printed in the two Afghan languages:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/05/20/us.military.bibles.burned/
In the wake of this controversy, I see a lot of preachers making up a new rule that books can only be burned, as they were in Acts 19:19, if they are owned by those who burn them. I wonder why no one explained this rule to righteous King Josiah, who did far more than burn books. God save us from biblicists and hypocrites.
The modern “Matrix” film franchise is deeply indebted to both Buddhism and Gnosticism in its storyline – the whole human reality in therein depicted as computer-generated illusion from which one can awake only through occult initation and enlightenment.
French writer Gustave Flaubert, who in his novel “The Temptation of St. Anthony” efficiently described the craziness of ancient Gnostics also provided within it a grim look into the mentality of Oriental asceticism. I guess today these depictions would be considered as insensitive mockery of foreign cultures…
Hindu Brahmin ascetic:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25053/25053-h/25053-h.htm#Page_77
“”As existence proceeds from corruption, corruption from desire, desire from sensation, and sensation from contact, I have avoided every kind of action, every kind of contact, and — without stirring any more than the pillar of a tombstone — exhaling my breath through my two nostrils, fixing my glances upon my nose; and, observing the ether in my spirit, the world in my limbs, the moon in my heart, I pondered on the essence of the great soul, whence continually escape, like sparks of fire, the principles of life. I have, at last, grasped the supreme soul in all beings, all beings in the supreme soul; and I have succeeded in making my soul penetrate the place into which my senses used to penetrate.
“I receive knowledge directly from Heaven, like the bird Tchataka, who quenches his thirst only in the droppings of the rain. From the very fact of my having knowledge of things, things no longer exist. For me now there is no hope and no anguish, no goodness, no virtue, neither day nor night, neither thou nor I — absolutely nothing.
“My frightful austerities have made me superior to the Powers. A contraction of my brain can kill a hundred kings’ sons, dethrone gods, overrun the world.”
He utters all this in a monotonous voice. The leaves all around him are withered. The rats fly over the ground.
He slowly lowers his eyes towards the flames, which are rising, then adds:
“I have become disgusted with form, disgusted with perception, disgusted even with knowledge itself — for thought does not outlive the transitory fact that gives rise to it; and the spirit, like the rest, is but an illusion.
“Everything that is born will perish; everything that is dead will come to life again. The beings that have actually disappeared will sojourn in wombs not yet formed, and will come back to earth to serve with sorrow other creatures. But, as I have resolved through an infinite number of existences, under the guise of gods, men, and animals, I give up travelling, and no longer wish for this fatigue. I abandon the dirty inn of my body, walled in with flesh, reddened with blood, covered with hideous skin, full of uncleanness; and, for my reward, I shall, finally, sleep in the very depths of the absolute, in annihilation.”"
Buddha:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/25053/25053-h/25053-h.htm#Page_107
“The Buddha: – “Having vanquished the demon, I passed twelve years in nourishing myself exclusively on perfumes, — and, as I had acquired the five virtues, the five faculties, the ten forces, the eighteen substances and penetrated into the four spheres of the invisible world, the Intelligence was mine, and I became the Buddha!”
All the gods bow down, those who have many heads lower them all at the same time. He raises his hand on high in the air, and resumes:
“In view of the deliverance of beings, I have made hundreds of thousands of sacrifices; I have given to the poor robes of silk, beds, chariots, houses, heaps of gold and diamonds. I have given my hands to the one-handed, my legs to the lame, my eyes to the blind; I have cut off my head for the decapitated. At the time when I was king, I distributed the provinces; at the time when I was Brakhman, I despised nobody. When I was a solitary I spoke words of tenderness to the thief who tried to cut my throat. When I was a tiger, I let myself die of hunger. And in this final stage of existence, having preached the law, I have nothing more to do. The great period is accomplished. The men, the animals, the gods, the bamboos, the oceans, the mountains, the grains of sand of the Ganges, with the myriads of myriads of stars, everything, must perish; and, until the new births, a flame will dance on the ruins of a world’s overthrow.”
Then a vertigo seizes the gods. They stagger, fall into convulsions, and vomit forth their existences. Their crowns break to pieces; their standards fly away. They get rid of their attributes and their sexes, fling over their shoulders the cups from which they drink immortality, strangle themselves with their serpents, and vanish in smoke; and, when they have all disappeared:
Hilarion, slowly: — “You have just seen the creed of many hundreds of millions of men!”"
Buddha’s famous “Song of Victory”, after his great enlightenment under the Bodhi-tree, was a declaration of open hostility towards corporeal existence – for “the house” spoken here is the human body, and Buddha rejoices at the thought of never having to reborn to a filthy body again:
http://www.vcn.bc.ca/ims-hq/Plainsong/songn/the-dhammapada.html
“I have passed in ignorance through a cycle of many rebirths, seeking the builder of the house. Continuous rebirth is a painful thing. But now, housebuilder, I have found you out. You will not build me a house again. All your rafters are broken, your ridge-pole shattered. My mind is free from active thought, and has made an end of craving.”
We see how Buddha boasts of his “knowledge” (which is “gnosis” in Greek) that has saved him and made him omnipotent:
“Among the Buddha teachings and beside his “Song of Victory” is the one that says:
“I am the conqueror of all, I am the knower of all, in all the states of life. I am unattached, I have relinquished all, and with the destruction of craving I am liberated. Having comprehended everything by myself, whom shall I call my teacher?”
Thanks to the influence of Christianity, and in spite of the advances of liberal narcissism, most Westerners would still consider this sort of self-praise as unbecoming of holy man…
The Gnostic, anti-body tendency in American protestantism probably has multiple culprits. Here is an interesting point to consider regarding late-Calvinism where the eternal decree is emphasized at the expense of the sacrament, more typical of revivalist informed calvinism. Note: According to Mark Noll, the New Schoolers were mutual exponents of free-will revivalism in the 1830′s, and this included abolitionism. Anyway, the quote is from a comment by Jonathan Bonomo at Wedgewords:
http://evangelicalcatholicity.wordpress.com/2008/08/25/unmediated-relationship/#comment-2841
“Historically, the more Calvinism has stressed absolute divine transcendence as a sort of “central dogma”, the more the means of grace in the context of ecclesial ministry and fellowship have been relativized. A certain tendency in this direction has been present within the tradition from earliest times, because of Calvin’s tenacious articulation of absolute divine supremacy and sovereignty. What is often missed, however, is that he articulated this while also holding (arguably just as tenaciously) to the necessity of the visible Church and divinely instituted means in the salvation of individuals. He was quite comfortable (as was Augustine before him) holding these things in tension, for he saw them as being equally biblical, and therefore equally true.
As time has moved on, however, many Calvinists have not been quite so comfortable, and have veered in the direction of emphasizing divine transcendence to the expense of earthly, visible means. As Steven notes, Kuyper and Warfield could both be taken as representative of this camp, and their understanding was pretty much that of the majority of Calvinists in their day. We see the trajectory set in motion for Warfield and the Old Princeton tradition in the thought of Charles Hodge who, though moderate in some areas, did show a tendency to stress the divine decree to the expense of means. He tried very hard to give place to the church and the sacraments in his system, but they really seem like little more than afterthoughts in his system when taken as a whole. This was Nevin’s beef with him and with the vast majority of Calvinism in the mid-nineteenth century. But here, Nevin’s own problem was that he was unwilling to hold things in tension himself, as he outright rejected anything resembling a Calvinist doctrine of predestination, chosing rather to emphasize sacramental Calvinism to the expense of decreetal Calvinism. However, for every Nevin, or John Adger, there were 100 Hodges, or William Cunninghams, or John Dicks, and therefore it was impossible to slow the onslought of dualistic thinking amongst Calvinist theologians.
As Steven rightly said, guys like Hodge, Warfield, and Kuyper were certainly giants in many ways. But I think it’s pretty clear that the willingness of Calvin and other sixteenth and seventeenth century thinkers to hold to a robust understanding of divine transcendence as well as the (ordinary) necessity of means as two equally true realities which the church must confess is the better and more biblical route to take.”
“Note: According to Mark Noll, the New Schoolers were mutual exponents of free-will revivalism in the 1830′s, and this included abolitionism”
One must wonder whether orthodox Calvinism can be blamed/credited for the actions of “free-will” people (more than indirectly). It would seem like a reaction against Calvinism, not its actual fruit.
(Likewise, French Enlightenment philosophés were deeply influenced by their RC background, Voltaire being a pupil of Jesuits, but they rebelled against it, they were not its actual fruit.)
Even Kevin MacDonald has recognized that the “Transcendentalism” that arose in New England in the 1830s and 1840s was a native-born, gentile “Culture of Critique”, undermining the traditional culture.
Transcendentalist Theodore Parker wrote the following back in 1840, rhetorically mocking the fears of conservative Christians – fears that turned out to be very justified:
http://www.alcott.net/alcott/home/remarks/Senex.html
“‘Alas’ said I, ‘alas for the churches in New England. We be all dead men, for the Transcendentalists have come! They say there is no Christ; no God; no soul; only ‘an absolute nothing,’ and Hegel is the Holy Ghost. Our churches will be pulled down; there will be no Sabbath; our wives will wear the breeches, and the Transcendentalists will ride over us rough shod. How shall we be delivered, from these desperate fellows; this ‘mixed multitude of devils?’”
A little update; I just came upon Robert Dabney’s opinion on Buddhism, and I noticed how he identified what you guys have called as “lack of natural affection” (among anti-Kinists) as the standard requirement of Buddhist piety.
http://www.archive.org/stream/DiscussionsOfRobertLewisDabneyVol.4Secular/DiscussionsOfR.l.DabneyV.4#page/n573/mode/2up
“The key-note of Buddhism is, that since feeble man’s pursuit of the objects of his appetencies results in failure and pain, his true virtue is to annihilate all appetencies, and thus win nirvana. Then, of course, not only the animal, but the social appetencies — sympathy, benevolence, pity, friendship, conjugal, filial, and even parental love — must be expunged out of the philosopher’s soul in order to make him holy, forsooth! For the appetencies set in motion by these affections are the occasions of far the deepest and most pungent grief of human existence.
That is to say: the Buddhist saint, in order to be perfect, must make himself a cold, inhuman villain, recreant to every social duty. Such, indeed, their own history makes their chief “hero of the faith,” Prince Gautama, who begins his saintship by absconding like a coward, and forsaking all his duties to his wife, his son, his concubines, his parents, and his subjects. But they say he afterward showed sublime altruism by offering his body to be eaten by a hungry tigress, which had not succeeded in torturing and devouring enough antelopes to make milk for her cubs. Bah! methinks he would have done better to care for his own deserted human cub!
Once more, the scheme founds itself on an impossibility. Man can not by his volition expunge native appetencies, because these furnish the only springs of volitions. Can the child be its own father? Eating results in dyspepsia; therefore, not only cease eating absolutely, but cease being hungry. That is the recipe for the distress of dyspepsia! But first, it is impossible; second, were it done, all mankind would be destroyed in a few weeks. Common sense says that when a man goes to professing the impossible he begins to be a cheat. And this is the practical trait of Buddhism.”