<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Then Shall We Live?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/</link>
	<description>1 John 5:7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confirm Thy Soul in Self-Control, Thy Liberty in Law &#124; Spirit/Water/Blood</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16641</link>
		<dc:creator>Confirm Thy Soul in Self-Control, Thy Liberty in Law &#124; Spirit/Water/Blood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16641</guid>
		<description>[...] friend Petr left the following quote from Aelius Aristides (second century AD) praising the Roman concept of a &#8220;proposition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend Petr left the following quote from Aelius Aristides (second century AD) praising the Roman concept of a &#8220;proposition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CL</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16630</link>
		<dc:creator>CL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16630</guid>
		<description>So is Bill running an evangelical she-male ranch or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is Bill running an evangelical she-male ranch or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: confed</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16629</link>
		<dc:creator>confed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16629</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s not forget about the drive-by shooting, a legitimate Negro invention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget about the drive-by shooting, a legitimate Negro invention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wheeler MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16627</link>
		<dc:creator>Wheeler MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16627</guid>
		<description>Good one, Admin!

The Soopahsoakah ranks right up there with (or &quot;wif,&quot; if you will) the traffuhlike and peenabuh. I strongly suspect that we&#039;ll soon be learning that the cloud chamber and the particle accelerator were also invented by Diversities. Probably while they were constructing the pyramids and riding elephants oe&#039;r the Alps.

Of course, I realize that such  observations will likely enrage the woman who calls herself &quot;Bill&quot; (the writing style is very feminine...also very Piperish; not much of a distinction, come to think of it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one, Admin!</p>
<p>The Soopahsoakah ranks right up there with (or &#8220;wif,&#8221; if you will) the traffuhlike and peenabuh. I strongly suspect that we&#8217;ll soon be learning that the cloud chamber and the particle accelerator were also invented by Diversities. Probably while they were constructing the pyramids and riding elephants oe&#8217;r the Alps.</p>
<p>Of course, I realize that such  observations will likely enrage the woman who calls herself &#8220;Bill&#8221; (the writing style is very feminine&#8230;also very Piperish; not much of a distinction, come to think of it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16621</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16621</guid>
		<description>Wheeler, would this be a good time to discuss black inventions? I&#039;m thinking of the Super Soaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wheeler, would this be a good time to discuss black inventions? I&#8217;m thinking of the Super Soaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16622</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16622</guid>
		<description>Wheeler, would this be a good time to discuss black inventions? I&#039;m thinking of the Super Soaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wheeler, would this be a good time to discuss black inventions? I&#8217;m thinking of the Super Soaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wheeler MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16620</link>
		<dc:creator>Wheeler MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16620</guid>
		<description>Bill&#039;s comment brought tears to my jaded eyes. I see things in a new and brilliant light. I&#039;ll never be able to sponge from my mind the horrific image of all those poor Negroes, miserable and stained with soak.

Incidentally, what IS &quot;soak?&quot; And why on earth would my people want to stain black people with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill&#8217;s comment brought tears to my jaded eyes. I see things in a new and brilliant light. I&#8217;ll never be able to sponge from my mind the horrific image of all those poor Negroes, miserable and stained with soak.</p>
<p>Incidentally, what IS &#8220;soak?&#8221; And why on earth would my people want to stain black people with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16619</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16619</guid>
		<description>Uh, what?

I wish I knew what you&#039;re talking about, Bill. Why are you changing the subject to supremacy? I have a very simple question for you. Is it morally wrong for us to work for the survival of the white race? Put another way, is the only morally legitimate policy the extinction of our race? If your answer is yes then are you not advocating genocide?

&quot;Supremacy&quot; is not even on our radar screen. In fact, I believe Asians to be superior to us in some respects. All we want is the right to claim a name and place among the nations of the earth, without foreign interference. How is this supremacy? It sounds like equality to me.

Then we can talk about inverted penises, if that&#039;s how you get your kicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, what?</p>
<p>I wish I knew what you&#8217;re talking about, Bill. Why are you changing the subject to supremacy? I have a very simple question for you. Is it morally wrong for us to work for the survival of the white race? Put another way, is the only morally legitimate policy the extinction of our race? If your answer is yes then are you not advocating genocide?</p>
<p>&#8220;Supremacy&#8221; is not even on our radar screen. In fact, I believe Asians to be superior to us in some respects. All we want is the right to claim a name and place among the nations of the earth, without foreign interference. How is this supremacy? It sounds like equality to me.</p>
<p>Then we can talk about inverted penises, if that&#8217;s how you get your kicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16614</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16614</guid>
		<description>Of course you realize that this supremacy of the white race (well, the WASP) didn&#039;t really become apparent until the mid-19th century or later. The British Empire lost millions of settlers and colonizers along the North African Coast and elsewhere, something that shouldn&#039;t happen to a supposedly superior race. The almighty Anglo-Saxon&#039;s standing army numbered less that all European nations minus Sardinia in the late-eighteenth, early nineteenth century. The imperial majesty of the United States did not dawn until around the era of Mark Twain or thereabouts. 

The cowardice of the racist who insulates himself from the world of tragedy and despair, who seeks perpetual shelter from the big, nasty and godless world is the ultimate cultural mollycoddle. The fearful milksop who cares for absolutely nothing other than his own sheltered little world. The glory days of sitting on the patio with children playing in the cool breeze. While all the while soak-stained black people work like dogs (I would like to take a moment to note an observation by the character Edith Cortwright from &quot;Dodsworth&quot; by Sinclair Lewis ((The most American of novelists!)). This woman noted with disdain the mongrel American culture of the 1920s what with black jazz bands, Greek waiters and Italian patrons. But if whites are indeed superior then on what grounds are WASPs superior to Frenchmen and Frenchmen superior to Greeks? Was not Ancient Greece a cultural powerhouse while savage England indulged in perpetual rapine!) 

Ultimately the admin and his compatriots care for nothing other then the sanctity of their own fragile skin. To think it is your God-given right to live sheltered lives free from the rough and tumble is the height of folly. 

(To add further to the observation of white supremacy one must note the folly of 17th century Englishmen who had a fascination with hermaphrodites and believed it was indeed possible to morph from a man into a woman (What with the Galenic notion of the vagina being the inverted penis.) It was also thought possible to convert one&#039;s race during the eighteenth century as written by Dror Wahrman in &quot;The Making of the Modern Self.&quot;)

Is this blog about propagating the Christian Message? Or is it written from the simplistic notion that the almighty WASP stands first and foremost amongst the bedraggled peoples of the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you realize that this supremacy of the white race (well, the WASP) didn&#8217;t really become apparent until the mid-19th century or later. The British Empire lost millions of settlers and colonizers along the North African Coast and elsewhere, something that shouldn&#8217;t happen to a supposedly superior race. The almighty Anglo-Saxon&#8217;s standing army numbered less that all European nations minus Sardinia in the late-eighteenth, early nineteenth century. The imperial majesty of the United States did not dawn until around the era of Mark Twain or thereabouts. </p>
<p>The cowardice of the racist who insulates himself from the world of tragedy and despair, who seeks perpetual shelter from the big, nasty and godless world is the ultimate cultural mollycoddle. The fearful milksop who cares for absolutely nothing other than his own sheltered little world. The glory days of sitting on the patio with children playing in the cool breeze. While all the while soak-stained black people work like dogs (I would like to take a moment to note an observation by the character Edith Cortwright from &#8220;Dodsworth&#8221; by Sinclair Lewis ((The most American of novelists!)). This woman noted with disdain the mongrel American culture of the 1920s what with black jazz bands, Greek waiters and Italian patrons. But if whites are indeed superior then on what grounds are WASPs superior to Frenchmen and Frenchmen superior to Greeks? Was not Ancient Greece a cultural powerhouse while savage England indulged in perpetual rapine!) </p>
<p>Ultimately the admin and his compatriots care for nothing other then the sanctity of their own fragile skin. To think it is your God-given right to live sheltered lives free from the rough and tumble is the height of folly. </p>
<p>(To add further to the observation of white supremacy one must note the folly of 17th century Englishmen who had a fascination with hermaphrodites and believed it was indeed possible to morph from a man into a woman (What with the Galenic notion of the vagina being the inverted penis.) It was also thought possible to convert one&#8217;s race during the eighteenth century as written by Dror Wahrman in &#8220;The Making of the Modern Self.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Is this blog about propagating the Christian Message? Or is it written from the simplistic notion that the almighty WASP stands first and foremost amongst the bedraggled peoples of the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siegfried Himmel</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/06/how-then-shall-we-live/#comment-16505</link>
		<dc:creator>Siegfried Himmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3809#comment-16505</guid>
		<description>The Aristides whom Peter discusses is, of course, to be distinguished from Aristides the Apologist, a Christian.  The only reason I mention him is because he had some interesting racial opinions: he said that the world was composed of four races, Barbarian, Greco-Roman, Jew, and Christian.

Calling Christians a &quot;race&quot; of their own in the figurative sense is not without New Testament precedent, of course, but Aristides seems to have used the term in a more literal sense and without allowing for nuance (e.g., admitting that one could be a Christian and be a Barbarian or Roman without any contradiction.)

At first, it seems that his ideas are in line with what most evangelicals believe today; but actually, most American evangelicals think more like the other Aristides, and would say, &quot;My race is American,&quot; thinking that, by defining race along civic rather than genetic lines, they are somehow escaping &quot;racism.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Aristides whom Peter discusses is, of course, to be distinguished from Aristides the Apologist, a Christian.  The only reason I mention him is because he had some interesting racial opinions: he said that the world was composed of four races, Barbarian, Greco-Roman, Jew, and Christian.</p>
<p>Calling Christians a &#8220;race&#8221; of their own in the figurative sense is not without New Testament precedent, of course, but Aristides seems to have used the term in a more literal sense and without allowing for nuance (e.g., admitting that one could be a Christian and be a Barbarian or Roman without any contradiction.)</p>
<p>At first, it seems that his ideas are in line with what most evangelicals believe today; but actually, most American evangelicals think more like the other Aristides, and would say, &#8220;My race is American,&#8221; thinking that, by defining race along civic rather than genetic lines, they are somehow escaping &#8220;racism.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

