<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If You Seek the Monument to Our Folly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/</link>
	<description>1 John 5:7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Nada</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-17571</link>
		<dc:creator>John Nada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-17571</guid>
		<description>Andrew, 

Just out of curiosity, what did your wife&#039;s people, specifically her parents, think of you marrying their daughter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, </p>
<p>Just out of curiosity, what did your wife&#8217;s people, specifically her parents, think of you marrying their daughter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luther</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-17568</link>
		<dc:creator>Luther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-17568</guid>
		<description>Andrew: 

We honkies don&#039;t think we&#039;re superior. In fact, what can you say about a race so stupid that it makes a fetish of hating itself.

Maybe the only way we can survive is to be bred in captivity. Can&#039;t you just let us have a zoo or two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: </p>
<p>We honkies don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re superior. In fact, what can you say about a race so stupid that it makes a fetish of hating itself.</p>
<p>Maybe the only way we can survive is to be bred in captivity. Can&#8217;t you just let us have a zoo or two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-17566</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-17566</guid>
		<description>I like the word “Negro,” too.  

My wife uses it frequently to describe herself and her people.  Other than that, the rest of your site is pretty worthless.  Some of the stuff, like this --&gt;“&lt;i&gt; … which is why, even long after Christianity was introduced to Haiti, there is nothing like chivalry to be found there,&lt;/i&gt;” does provide some level of dimwitted, infantile humor—though far from unwelcome as a much needed break from that endless slog of begging for belief in Big Whitey’s high-end humanity and rare refinements that he so generously imparts to humankind. 

You should really develop some other interests, though (and fishing and hunting don’t count).  Honestly, to try this hard “proving” to  yourself—and maybe others—over and over again that you are indisputably superior to Negro’s, Jews, and “Asiatics”—can be pretty off-putting to a lot of people … and not simply, as you would think, because of all the racist, cracker nonsense.  

&lt;i&gt;(Also, from an editor’s point of view, you should just go with “Orientals” from now on.  If, for no other reason, to maintain a kind of nostalgic consistency to the simple, orderly, clear-cut world you seem so anxious or compelled to construct) &lt;/i&gt;

Anyway, what makes people cringe and want to get away is … again, not invariably the bigotry … but that great, gaping, unquenchable neediness they instantly sense from you.   You know?  The need to assure yourself of your certain superiority, or the need to feel self-certain, self-contained, or whatever it is … it’s the need that everyone feels … and not necessarily what the need seeks … love, respect, self-importance, specialness, whatever.  If you don’t know why it’s so hard to make or keep friends it’s that, okay? … That vacuum of need … that creeps out human beings and domestic animals right away. We all feel we’re being sucked in … engulfed by all that painful longing, all that need to feel that you are above, you are better than, all those clearly inferior people you carry with you, everywhere.

And then, there’s the fragility of the whole thing. And maybe that scares off people more than anything.  They can’t help but wonder, what would happen if something suddenly made you doubt or question your entitlement to automatic superiority over all other groups of people … Also, when there are clearly any number of Negroes, Jews and Asiatics who can run intellectual circles around you, people can’t understand, or foresee, whatever it is you use to explain that sort of thing away. You’ve obviously invested a great deal of shallow, superficial thought into your rationalizations. Skin deep, or not, I have no doubt you have an expansive array of defenses and fantasies to bolster or justify an absurd, inflated sense of self, and a baseless self-certainty in your divinely ordained social standing. 

If that’s not enough to make you feel special, even in the face of a never-ending progression of wogs showing up their betters, you can ultimately always end at the beginning. You will always have the indisputable First Fact as your hole card   There’s not much anyone can say when they’re eye to eye with absolute truth and the logic of God … You don’t have to be a Philadelphia lawyer to see that if God didn’t want Whites to be superior, He wouldn’t have made us better looking, richer and more successful than the other races.  And, if that’s not enough to convince every last mongrel and miscreant, point to any picture of God you can find and ask, in the Socratic manner, “Hey there, you hate-filled, Hell-bound insects and cretins, answer me this:  If God wasn’t thinking right from the get go, that White people were significantly better than everyone else, then why in the world did he make himself White?’ 

We fear what we don’t understand. We don&#039;t understand how incessant self-assurances and self-expression of superiority becomes an insatiable need for someone. 

If you made any sense … if your insecurities were easier to understand and not so bad to be around …  and if we could ever glimpse or fathom how bigotry could make someone feel good about himself … we’d all be stupid racists ...living happy in our hate-based brotherhood in Disneyland.  

Negroes, Jews and Asiatics, of course would have their own separate, but equal theme parks to live in.  Maybe not as big or clean as Disneyland, but equal in the most important sense that all the parks would be as equally culturally reflective of their inhabitants.  All would be equally comfortable and familiar to them. Ghetto Land, Loan Shark Land, and Overpopulation Land would feel as warm and welcoming, as heartfelt and real, to their kind of people, as Disneyland feels to us.  

Forever yours, in the shared certainty that the only good Darwinism is Social Darwinism, 

  ... Andrew
(Mongrelizing the Race ... 
one lovely, little mulatto at a time)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the word “Negro,” too.  </p>
<p>My wife uses it frequently to describe herself and her people.  Other than that, the rest of your site is pretty worthless.  Some of the stuff, like this &#8211;&gt;“<i> … which is why, even long after Christianity was introduced to Haiti, there is nothing like chivalry to be found there,</i>” does provide some level of dimwitted, infantile humor—though far from unwelcome as a much needed break from that endless slog of begging for belief in Big Whitey’s high-end humanity and rare refinements that he so generously imparts to humankind. </p>
<p>You should really develop some other interests, though (and fishing and hunting don’t count).  Honestly, to try this hard “proving” to  yourself—and maybe others—over and over again that you are indisputably superior to Negro’s, Jews, and “Asiatics”—can be pretty off-putting to a lot of people … and not simply, as you would think, because of all the racist, cracker nonsense.  </p>
<p><i>(Also, from an editor’s point of view, you should just go with “Orientals” from now on.  If, for no other reason, to maintain a kind of nostalgic consistency to the simple, orderly, clear-cut world you seem so anxious or compelled to construct) </i></p>
<p>Anyway, what makes people cringe and want to get away is … again, not invariably the bigotry … but that great, gaping, unquenchable neediness they instantly sense from you.   You know?  The need to assure yourself of your certain superiority, or the need to feel self-certain, self-contained, or whatever it is … it’s the need that everyone feels … and not necessarily what the need seeks … love, respect, self-importance, specialness, whatever.  If you don’t know why it’s so hard to make or keep friends it’s that, okay? … That vacuum of need … that creeps out human beings and domestic animals right away. We all feel we’re being sucked in … engulfed by all that painful longing, all that need to feel that you are above, you are better than, all those clearly inferior people you carry with you, everywhere.</p>
<p>And then, there’s the fragility of the whole thing. And maybe that scares off people more than anything.  They can’t help but wonder, what would happen if something suddenly made you doubt or question your entitlement to automatic superiority over all other groups of people … Also, when there are clearly any number of Negroes, Jews and Asiatics who can run intellectual circles around you, people can’t understand, or foresee, whatever it is you use to explain that sort of thing away. You’ve obviously invested a great deal of shallow, superficial thought into your rationalizations. Skin deep, or not, I have no doubt you have an expansive array of defenses and fantasies to bolster or justify an absurd, inflated sense of self, and a baseless self-certainty in your divinely ordained social standing. </p>
<p>If that’s not enough to make you feel special, even in the face of a never-ending progression of wogs showing up their betters, you can ultimately always end at the beginning. You will always have the indisputable First Fact as your hole card   There’s not much anyone can say when they’re eye to eye with absolute truth and the logic of God … You don’t have to be a Philadelphia lawyer to see that if God didn’t want Whites to be superior, He wouldn’t have made us better looking, richer and more successful than the other races.  And, if that’s not enough to convince every last mongrel and miscreant, point to any picture of God you can find and ask, in the Socratic manner, “Hey there, you hate-filled, Hell-bound insects and cretins, answer me this:  If God wasn’t thinking right from the get go, that White people were significantly better than everyone else, then why in the world did he make himself White?’ </p>
<p>We fear what we don’t understand. We don&#8217;t understand how incessant self-assurances and self-expression of superiority becomes an insatiable need for someone. </p>
<p>If you made any sense … if your insecurities were easier to understand and not so bad to be around …  and if we could ever glimpse or fathom how bigotry could make someone feel good about himself … we’d all be stupid racists &#8230;living happy in our hate-based brotherhood in Disneyland.  </p>
<p>Negroes, Jews and Asiatics, of course would have their own separate, but equal theme parks to live in.  Maybe not as big or clean as Disneyland, but equal in the most important sense that all the parks would be as equally culturally reflective of their inhabitants.  All would be equally comfortable and familiar to them. Ghetto Land, Loan Shark Land, and Overpopulation Land would feel as warm and welcoming, as heartfelt and real, to their kind of people, as Disneyland feels to us.  </p>
<p>Forever yours, in the shared certainty that the only good Darwinism is Social Darwinism, </p>
<p>  &#8230; Andrew<br />
(Mongrelizing the Race &#8230;<br />
one lovely, little mulatto at a time)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better Hate Than Never &#124; Spirit/Water/Blood</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-16841</link>
		<dc:creator>Better Hate Than Never &#124; Spirit/Water/Blood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-16841</guid>
		<description>[...] warned you about the Glenn Beck rally back on February 1. Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin sought to &#8220;Restore Honor&#8221; in the belly of the beast. It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] warned you about the Glenn Beck rally back on February 1. Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin sought to &#8220;Restore Honor&#8221; in the belly of the beast. It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-16064</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-16064</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always dangerous to read the philosophical musings of someone who starts off by admitting that he has read nothing and knows nothing of philosophy. The author&#039;s description of Plato and Aristotle at the link you provide would get an F in a Freshman philosophy course.

The Aristotilean philosophy is realism, not rationalism, and realism is exactly what we need to rediscover. We cannot build our future upon ignorance of our heritage, including Aristotle. Despite what CWNY may claim, while Walter Scott may have his place, it is not as a substitute for Aquinas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always dangerous to read the philosophical musings of someone who starts off by admitting that he has read nothing and knows nothing of philosophy. The author&#8217;s description of Plato and Aristotle at the link you provide would get an F in a Freshman philosophy course.</p>
<p>The Aristotilean philosophy is realism, not rationalism, and realism is exactly what we need to rediscover. We cannot build our future upon ignorance of our heritage, including Aristotle. Despite what CWNY may claim, while Walter Scott may have his place, it is not as a substitute for Aquinas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Fairlane</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-16058</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Fairlane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-16058</guid>
		<description>Choose Your Future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choose Your Future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-16052</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-16052</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good point. I was also just thinking of a story that ran recently about a married couple who has learned to be asexual. Jews LOVE stories about white people engaging in aberrant behavior. Basically, anything that causes fewer white people in the world is Pulitzer material.

I have no doubt that stick figure models find it easier to slip into any kind of clothing, but there is a huge parasitical benefit in requiring beautiful women to kill off their genes by robbing them of motherhood and at the same time imprinting an idea of beauty on the general public that is anything but. Real women have hips and curves, and there is no &quot;sexy&quot; without hips and curves.

Notice that Jew pornographers portray curvaceous women, but this is because their work is directed at men, yet with the same purpose - of killing healthy white relations. This will be covered in the next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point. I was also just thinking of a story that ran recently about a married couple who has learned to be asexual. Jews LOVE stories about white people engaging in aberrant behavior. Basically, anything that causes fewer white people in the world is Pulitzer material.</p>
<p>I have no doubt that stick figure models find it easier to slip into any kind of clothing, but there is a huge parasitical benefit in requiring beautiful women to kill off their genes by robbing them of motherhood and at the same time imprinting an idea of beauty on the general public that is anything but. Real women have hips and curves, and there is no &#8220;sexy&#8221; without hips and curves.</p>
<p>Notice that Jew pornographers portray curvaceous women, but this is because their work is directed at men, yet with the same purpose &#8211; of killing healthy white relations. This will be covered in the next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EG</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-16050</link>
		<dc:creator>EG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-16050</guid>
		<description>Women with curves....hmmm... crooksandliars would have us believe that common people believe that the voluptuous model woman is more desirable of the two pictured. Don&#039;t they know that a woman must have adequate bodyfat to support a healthy pregnancy?! We wouldn&#039;t want more white women trying to have healthy babies instead of being walking skeletons, would we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women with curves&#8230;.hmmm&#8230; crooksandliars would have us believe that common people believe that the voluptuous model woman is more desirable of the two pictured. Don&#8217;t they know that a woman must have adequate bodyfat to support a healthy pregnancy?! We wouldn&#8217;t want more white women trying to have healthy babies instead of being walking skeletons, would we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynda</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-16048</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-16048</guid>
		<description>Benedict as Darth Sidious.

He has a liking for hats does that Benedict - the fireman&#039;s hat, the santa hat, the Tyrolean hat. Don&#039;t miss the one of him flashing the &#039;il cornuto&#039; with both hands! Folks these Luciferians just can&#039;t stop themselves. They just gotta do them horns.  

The website Tradition in Action has an entire photo file on Benedict&#039;s hats. And he may yet don the cloak of a Darth Lord of the Sith for the cameras. And he won&#039;t be forgetting his designer sunglasses if he does.

www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A190rcRatzHats.htm.

The Church Revolution in Pictures section at www.traditioninaction.org is worth viewing.

Lot&#039;s of pix of Benedict in that file:

paying homage to the UN and expressing admiration for the Masonic Document &#039;the Rights of Man&#039; (April 18, 2008) Failed to mention the only name given under heaven by which men can be saved. (A mere oversight to be sure)

defying the Wrath of God and praying at the Wailing Wall with the rabbis

www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A314rcWailingWall.html.

venerating the torah scrolls in the New York synagogue

The world will construe all of this according to its lights. Catholics must construe according to the mind of the Church - which has not been silent on this &#039;type of thing&#039;.

The Apostolic Constitution of Pope Paul IV given on Feb 15, 1559 infallibly declares:

Paul, Bishop, servant of the servants of God, for a perpetual remembrance

6.  Adding that if at anytime it will be found that some bishop, even conducting himself as an archbishop or patriarch or already mentioned cardinal of the Roman church, even, as shown, a legate or even a Roman Pontiff before his promtion or assumption as cardinal or a Roman Pontiff had deviated from the Catholic faith or fallen into some heresy, before his promition or assumption as Cardinal or as Roman Pontiff, that promotion or assumption concerning him, even if made in concord and from the unanimous assent of all the cardinals, is null, void and worthless. Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, ex cathedra.

Benedict has been praising the totally heretical &#039;Rights of Man&#039; since the robber council of Vatican II. 

The correct term for Benedict is antipope - of which there have been at least 40 by name in the long history of the Church. One of them, Hippolytus even became a saint. But he was never the pope even though he acted invalidly in that office for awhile.

Roman Catholics are not excused from holding up the lens of the Church&#039;s own magisterium to Benedict, his heresies and scandals. Roman Catholics are not excused from looking at this debacle with the mind of the Church and drawing the only conclusion.

How many souls following this antiChrist is he going to drag to hell?

Our Lady of La Salette, pray for the Holy Father in exile.

&quot;Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the AntiChrist&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benedict as Darth Sidious.</p>
<p>He has a liking for hats does that Benedict &#8211; the fireman&#8217;s hat, the santa hat, the Tyrolean hat. Don&#8217;t miss the one of him flashing the &#8216;il cornuto&#8217; with both hands! Folks these Luciferians just can&#8217;t stop themselves. They just gotta do them horns.  </p>
<p>The website Tradition in Action has an entire photo file on Benedict&#8217;s hats. And he may yet don the cloak of a Darth Lord of the Sith for the cameras. And he won&#8217;t be forgetting his designer sunglasses if he does.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A190rcRatzHats.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A190rcRatzHats.htm</a>.</p>
<p>The Church Revolution in Pictures section at <a href="http://www.traditioninaction.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.traditioninaction.org</a> is worth viewing.</p>
<p>Lot&#8217;s of pix of Benedict in that file:</p>
<p>paying homage to the UN and expressing admiration for the Masonic Document &#8216;the Rights of Man&#8217; (April 18, 2008) Failed to mention the only name given under heaven by which men can be saved. (A mere oversight to be sure)</p>
<p>defying the Wrath of God and praying at the Wailing Wall with the rabbis</p>
<p><a href="http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A314rcWailingWall.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A314rcWailingWall.html</a>.</p>
<p>venerating the torah scrolls in the New York synagogue</p>
<p>The world will construe all of this according to its lights. Catholics must construe according to the mind of the Church &#8211; which has not been silent on this &#8216;type of thing&#8217;.</p>
<p>The Apostolic Constitution of Pope Paul IV given on Feb 15, 1559 infallibly declares:</p>
<p>Paul, Bishop, servant of the servants of God, for a perpetual remembrance</p>
<p>6.  Adding that if at anytime it will be found that some bishop, even conducting himself as an archbishop or patriarch or already mentioned cardinal of the Roman church, even, as shown, a legate or even a Roman Pontiff before his promtion or assumption as cardinal or a Roman Pontiff had deviated from the Catholic faith or fallen into some heresy, before his promition or assumption as Cardinal or as Roman Pontiff, that promotion or assumption concerning him, even if made in concord and from the unanimous assent of all the cardinals, is null, void and worthless. Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, ex cathedra.</p>
<p>Benedict has been praising the totally heretical &#8216;Rights of Man&#8217; since the robber council of Vatican II. </p>
<p>The correct term for Benedict is antipope &#8211; of which there have been at least 40 by name in the long history of the Church. One of them, Hippolytus even became a saint. But he was never the pope even though he acted invalidly in that office for awhile.</p>
<p>Roman Catholics are not excused from holding up the lens of the Church&#8217;s own magisterium to Benedict, his heresies and scandals. Roman Catholics are not excused from looking at this debacle with the mind of the Church and drawing the only conclusion.</p>
<p>How many souls following this antiChrist is he going to drag to hell?</p>
<p>Our Lady of La Salette, pray for the Holy Father in exile.</p>
<p>&#8220;Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the AntiChrist&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://spiritwaterblood.com/2010/02/if-you-seek-the-monument-to-our-folly/#comment-16047</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritwaterblood.com/?p=3701#comment-16047</guid>
		<description>With the fall of Christianity came the rise of Marxism, total war, multiculturalism, and a legion of other plagues.  Coincidence?  

Excellent post, lots of interesting links and good commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the fall of Christianity came the rise of Marxism, total war, multiculturalism, and a legion of other plagues.  Coincidence?  </p>
<p>Excellent post, lots of interesting links and good commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

