St. Boniface Versus Thor’s Sacred Oak Tree
October 7, 2009 
49 Comments
Eddy Morrison of the National Front has written the Eight Principles of White Nationalism. Much of it is very agreeable, and while we do identify as White Nationalists, it is necessary to point out that Kinists disagree vehemently with these two points:
Our race comes above all.
We have a philosophy that teaches that we are but another link in the gradual evolution of man towards a higher state.
(I don’t really understand point 7, so I’ll leave it alone.)
Nietzsche believed that the Bible promotes a slave mentality that Christians adopted from Jews, and it was this slave mentality that caused them to emasculate themselves. He was woefully ignorant of actual Christian history, but he was half-right, and dangerously half-wrong. The Word of God teaches us to serve one another, and it was steady service and self-sacrifice throughout our generations that produced what we know as the West. All the wealth being squandered even today is embezzled from that account. Foolish, neo-pagan racialists are attempting to replace the one true faith of the West with Nietzsche’s false, man-made faith, and if they are ever successful, they will certainly not end up with anything that resembles our civilization. One does not feed widows and orphans with a man-centered faith that is a phony excuse for selfish gene propagation, and which, on the rare occasions when it has progressed beyond the level of theory and become a foundational principle, has been responsible for some of the greatest bloodshed the world has ever known. Statism and national socialism will always be the result of this false faith. It will once again place our race at death’s door, because white nations will slaughter each other in exercise of their “masculine” religion. But the Lord Jesus Christ showed us true masculinity, offering Himself up as the sacrificial Lamb for the sins of His people. Neo-pagans are ignorant of what Christ, the apostles, and prophets actually taught and did (thus the need for Kinists), yet they ask me to reject my Savior; the Savior of my wife, the Savior of my children, the Savior of my grandchildren, the Savior of my people.
For example, Anthony Hilton, writing in TOQ unfortch, considers Christianity to be “fundamentally a malevolent Jewish stratagem for emasculating goyim.” He asks: “Why in the world would any sane person value, desire, or want to emulate what Christ recommended?” He recommends a new Golden Rule: “He who has the gold makes the rules.” Never fear! Hilton is allowing us to “keep the harmless features of Christianity.” What a relief. The Occidental Press is now pushing the stupid, ahistorical, and blasphemous idea that pride is better than humility, might makes right, and ruthlessness is better than servanthood. Since the people of Europa will not live without religion (curse them), the best Darwinists and Nietzcheans among us need to get together for a weekend with some kegs of Heineken and “develop a religious alternative to Christianity.” Since every religion needs rituals, the new Hilton religion will look to paganism and Druidism in order to “be more consistent with scientific knowledge” yet exude a “hopeful, optimistic view of life.” Yes, whenever I think of human sacrifice in wicker men, reincarnation, and mistletoe promoting fertility, the first word that comes to mind is Science. And though the sorcerers, astrologers, and philosophers who were the proto-Druids in Pharaoh’s court were utterly powerless against God’s messenger, Moses, I’m sure they were vibrant members of the local community. They might have even founded a glee club.
A slogan recently seen on a T-shirt, “Fighting Solves Everything,” may be an oversimplification. But the attitude is a good one. Inculcate it in your children.
Hilton is confident that the West can be saved with this fabulous new t-shirt religion once a team of evolutionary psychologists makes the case “that our values and morals” have “evolved biologically. Actually, David Hume pretty much figured this out back in the eighteenth century.” This will be so much more effective than Jesus Christ taking upon His innocent body the sins that would damn us all to hell. Jesus only did this because He knew nothing of eighteenth-century philosophy. If Hume had been around to explain to Him that morals evolve over time, He would have realized that there are no sins; there are only depressed genes. So turn that frown upside down, Gene!
I’m tempted to laugh at this nonsense, but there are many in the pro-white crowd who take it seriously. Mankind has been down the same prideful road countless times, and some people never learn. It will all come to nothing, not only because this is what it deserves, but because we already know the Way, the Truth, and the Life. The sheep follow the Shepherd. They will not follow a stranger. When St. Patrick banished animal sacrifices to demons and rid Ireland of the polytheism and animism that held our people in bondage, the dog did not return to its vomit.
Until Christ came, no one had ever opened the eyes of a man born blind or raised the dead to life. As Paul reminded Agrippa, these things were not done in a corner. Hilton must think that ancient paganism was swept from Europe on a wave of new superstition that replaced the old, but he is not above returning to the old superstition as long as it serves his purpose in disposing of the new superstition, which he perceives as emasculating. Here is where we encounter the curiosity of fallible men of finite intelligence, limited to natural dimensions, arrogantly dismissing that which supercedes their senses. They understand neither what the Bible actually says nor how the gospel of redemption utterly transformed Europe, from the small to the great; but these neo-Druids, these learned sages, are going to lead us into a new dawn of liberty with nothing more than the golden calf of the Caucasian Gene.
We are Kinists. We are not neo-pagans. Make sure you understand the difference. If there is no such thing as sin and damnation, nor of election and eternal reward, then the white race is an accident, love is a viral infection, truth is relative, beauty is an island of proportionality in a sea of chaos, logic is no more meaningful than a 5 a.m. dream, and purpose is a phantom. Richard Dawkins says it requires courage to face these facts, even though courage itself is meaningless if Dawkins is correct. But if, for the sake of argument, it is true that we are crawling like bugs on the surface of an accidental ball of cosmic dust, and that which is “good” is that which fills our bellies, it must require mental retardation to be a white nationalist. The old Christian Europeans understood very well the reasons why they had to survive, and the story of their redemption is a constant theme running through the best music, art, poetry, architecture, and scientific advances the world has ever known. Bach honored his Savior through his music, and he was not emasculated in the slightest. Charles Martel’s purpose for living was not merely to rescue European genes. It was to rescue Christendom and civilization. He was the crucial supporter and protector of St. Boniface, the apostle of the Germans. And with Boniface, German idolatry fell.
Heroes like Charles Martel are not produced by atheism and skepticism. Instead, these ideologies produce terrorists like Joseph Stalin. Anyone who thinks the West is in need of another 20th-century-sized dose of atheist philosophy is in serious need of a cranial-rectal extraction. Any organization that professes to aid the West by foisting such bullshit upon it should close its doors and its website for the betterment of mankind.
Next time I’ll tell you what I really think.
If pagans, atheists, libertarians, and other failed ideologues want to be taken seriously, all they need to do is show us one example of a society that has been formed on these principles and has thrived, has encouraged childbirth, has cared for the poor, has improved education, has built wealth, and has done all the other things that numerous Christian societies have done. They are disingenuous when they speak affectionately of “religion,” for they don’t believe in anything beyond the material. It is all for the sake of expediency. Here is the real question that Anthony Hilton and other neo-pagans need to answer for a curious public: If you lie about religion, why should anyone trust what you say about race?
A friend passes along this definition of racism from the Fourth Assembly of the World Council of Churches, 1968:
By racism we mean ethnocentric pride in one’s own racial group and preference for the distinctive characteristics of that group; belief that these characteristics are fundamentally biological in nature and are thus transmitted to succeeding generations; strong negative feelings towards other groups who do not share these characteristics coupled with the thrust to discriminate against and exclude the out group from full participation in the life of the community… By white racism we mean the unconscious belief in the inherent superiority of persons of Euro-ancestry…which entitles all white people to a position of dominance and privilege, coupled with the belief in the innate inferiority of all darker peoples, especially those of African ancestry, which justifies their subordination and exploitation.
In 1991, the WCC declared that “racism, one of the most dreadful of human sins, is incompatible with the gospel of Jesus Christ.”
A number of things can be said about this. First, notice the first line in the definition, about pride (more properly regard and affection) and preference for one’s own. This alone is sufficient to be condemned as “one of the most dreadful of human sins,” even though it accurately describes the instincts of almost every person on earth, in all places and times. The parts about “inherent superiority” and “innate inferiority” are left undefined, as usual, and so responding to the accusations is designed to be futile. We will only say that this is nonsense. There is no such thing as a “superior gene” or an “inferior gene,” as even Dr. Rushton will tell you. This is like saying that the sun is superior to the moon. There is certainly a difference in heat, light, and size, but the purpose of the sun makes the purpose of the moon no less important. The WCC is really opposed to the concept of difference.
Our friend very astutely observes that if racism is an “unconscious belief” then denial of racism is actually proof of racism.
And here is a question to ponder: What other “unconscious” beliefs could be among “the most dreadful of human sins”? I always thought that rape and murder were two of the most dreadful sins imaginable, but those don’t qualify because rapists and murderers are quite conscious of their actions. And yes, they are actions, not merely beliefs. Are there really beliefs that are as horrendous? And how could anything be called a “belief” if it is held unconsciously? Wouldn’t that be more like an instinct? I realize that these are racist questions that only a racist engorged on racism would ask, but if you think I’m bad, you should hear my Auntie Semmitt.
The WCC’s solution for ridding the world of this stealthy cancer of the mind is to “support resistance movements, including revolutions, which are aimed at the elimination of political or economic tyranny which makes racism possible.” Fidel Castro just called and is threatening to sue the WCC for copyright infringement.
Tim Harris asks Ken Ham why a distinction between superior and inferior must “entail hatred or a desire for genocide.”
…[T]he desire for racial separation does not necessarily imply a sense of racial superiority, any more than separating squabbling children… Think: let it be that the Aryan is inferior to the other races. Fine: now can we have our own country? Indeed, if there is any legitimacy to desiring to see one’s tribe continue qua tribe into the future, then the desire for separation would only become stronger when said tribe is mingled with a superior and dominating rival tribe.
Ham’s “meme-planting intent…is clear: if you want to live where you can raise your children far away from Negroes, then you are equivalent to a Nazi, acting like Hitler.”
Superiority versus inferiority has never been the issue when hostile and deleterious races have been expelled from any country down through history. Do you think Ferdinand and Isabella took a moment to wonder whether Jews and Muslims are human or sub-human? Of course not. It was their job to protect their people. Do you think a divergent evolutionary path was a criteria for Eisenhower’s Operation Wetback? Ridiculous.
If [Hitler] had heard that the Slavs regarded their race as superior, I suspect [he] would have taken that with bemused humor. He would not have cared if you did not agree that the Aryan was superior. Indeed, he would probably respect you more if you held a similar view of your own race. Think of C.S. Lewis’ friends observing that the men of every nation believe their own women the most beautiful, when one of the old ones murmured, “Yes…but in our case, it is true.”
The question of Jewish genetic advancement would not have changed Hitler’s intent. But Ken Ham, like the rest of the lying preachers out there who babble endlessly about things they don’t understand, tells lies in order to sell books. It doesn’t even take much thought or effort to whip the sheep into a panic by chanting the Hitler-Nazi-holocaust refrain. It is what Tim calls a “cheap rhetorical trick.”
The point is, that Ham’s pulling of the H-card is confused and probably exploitative of current political shibboleths; it cannot be marshaled to his thesis about evolution, or even race… The Hitler treated by the Hamites is actually just a cartoon character created by Hollywood… It is a stock character, to be dragged out on demand from the back-stage closet, like “the Mummy” or “the Vampire”…
One gets the feeling that Ham never tests his premises by the free variation of imagination. After a while, one starts to wonder if he is just a cliché-monger, not a thinker at all… A Christian should be doubly careful to be fair and just in his treatment of his enemies, knowing the proneness of human nature to self-deception… This is a very serious matter. If people claiming to be Christians continue to do it after being corrected, the credibility of their profession will eventually need to be questioned.
You must read it. Tim scores again. “Cliché-monger” is the absolute perfect word to describe Ken Ham.
Could fertility be related to the degree of inbreeding and outbreeding? A recent study in Iceland suggests it does. “Iceland has become a big laboratory for…large genetic studies because they have super-accurate kinship records going back into the Middle Ages.” But over the past two centuries, mean kinship in Iceland has decreased by a factor of 10. “This is equivalent to a change from couples being related on average between the level of third and fourth cousins to couples being related on average at the level of fifth cousins.” The study shows that fertility decreases as relatedness decreases. But this should not be a surprise to us, because we know that the most fertile among us, such as the Amish, are also very closely related. The most fertile couples of all are related up to the level of fourth cousins. (One can speculate that Anglo-Saxons found it easier to conquer the New World because their stock was drawn from closely-related cousins.) We all know of the dangers of being too closely related, but it seems that only we “racists” have considered the dangers of being too distantly related. Though it’s politically incorrect to say so, many researchers believe that exogamy has wrought havoc on immune systems, and this doctor says as much: “[H]igh genetic dissimilarity between the parents might render one more likely to get autoimmune diseases because your MHC genes might recognize the genes of the other parent as foreign. (I don’t really have any evidence for that, but it is the reason you try and get a bone marrow transplant from a genetically-similar match. It limits the chance of graft vs. host disease.) Low relatedness might also lessen the ability of sperm to recognize eggs or limit egg implantation. I am just speculating here, but I can think of a variety of biological causes to explain this.” Then he lists one of the social benefits that should also be obvious to everyone, namely that more closely related families are simply closer to each other and support each other better. Once again, our lying pastors, who are approving of marriages between any two people who can produce offspring, have completely missed the point. All that matters to them is that our far wiser forefathers were “racists.”
The old English political culture had lost control over…the polyglot peoples of America [who] had no common heritage but only ideas to bind them together… What would be really at issue was whether America would be transformed, in the name of Opportunity, simply into a Place, a gathering of discretely defined and entitled groups, interests and heritages; or whether it could continue to be a nation, where all heritages joined under the same roof—ideas of communities within government.
We now know the answer. But all is not lost. Some of the fastest-growing areas in America are also the most Caucasian. This black author calls Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, “Whitopia.” We have some friends who live there, of course. What did you expect?
Slick Willy recognizes that the white folks who gave him well-deserved trouble are fewer in number now, not because his party has convinced them to become more liberal but because of blood.
Several things could qualify as The Edwards Law, but one of them is surely that “conservatives” are powerless to halt the advance of liberalism because they embrace liberal premises. Specifically, this means that faggotry will be the law in all 50 states because Christians and conservatives long ago accepted the egalitarian doctrines of King and the rest of the Communists.
Almost all of them will say the courts were right to do that, because opposition to interracial marriage was hate and bigotry, even though far bigger majorities opposed interracial marriage back then than oppose gay marriage now. You point out that most of these people back then were Christians who thought the Bible forbids interracial marriage, and they’ll reply that they were deluding themselves by reading their own prejudice into the Bible. You ask them how it was hate and bigotry and discrimination, since the law applied to all races equally. They’ll reply that if a black man couldn’t marry the woman he loved, simply because she was white, that was discrimination, because a white man would be allowed to marry that same woman.
Now the homos come along, and make the very same arguments, and the conservatives and evangelicals can’t effectively oppose them, because they’ve already granted the legitimacy of their arguments…
And obviously, Christians and conservatives would rather live with gay marriage than outlaw interracial marriage. Because that would mean they would be called racists, and getting called racist is the truly unpardonable sin for evangelicals.
It’s so rare to find someone who disagrees with us but is actually doing the legwork to objectively study the material that whenever I see it, I feel obliged to give an electronic round of applause. When keyboard pounder Keely Mix solicited condemnations of Kinism on the Vision2020 forum, this person wrote the following:
A Christian sect can have some “nutty” features while remaining within the framework of orthodoxy. Kinism, and perhaps some (though definitely not all) of the groups subsumed under the rubric of “Christian Identity,” have two important distinctive features that require fellow Christians to deal with them very carefully. First, they seem to manage to stay within the bounds of historical Christianity as regards the great theological and Christological controversies of the past. Now I put the qualifier “seem” in there because there is always an intimate connection between theology and anthropology, so if our doctrine of man is screwed up it will almost certainly tend to be accompanied by a corresponding theological problem, at least implicitly, and it may be that on closer inspection I will be able to discern problems that were not visible at first. Second, they seem to be trying hard to peg all their positions to Scripture, and they try to deal with the entire Bible. Any Christian who wants to criticize them needs to get deep into exegetical and hermeneutical issues…
In a certain sense, it would be easy to just go along with the world’s sense of outrage at such people and condemn them as “haters.” But I can’t in good conscience do that. I think they are wrong, but I feel it is incumbent upon me to attempt a thorough and decisive refutation that deals with all the pertinent aspects of Scripture. It’s a big project. If someone with the wherewithal to do so were to undertake such a project, in the end, I think that neither the Kinists nor the world’s popular wisdom concerning racism will be vindicated. However, God would be vindicated. And that is what all parties concerned should be desiring—that God would be vindicated, always.
Mrs. Mix, you could help me (and many others too, I’m sure) a lot by providing a biblical definition of racism. Not necessarily by pointing to a definitive proof text but at least by drawing on a network of texts to show how God defines racism. Even looking at the Wikipedia article makes it clear that people can’t agree on what constitutes racism… Surely if millions of Christians are lamenting racism, we can biblically define what it is we are lamenting. You know, like the way millions of Christians can define the evil of, say, abortion.
The response, from one Joe Campbell:
You are a sick man.
Et tu, Bruté?
R.J. Rushdoony criticized Billy Graham for participating in this 1966 conference called “One Race, One Gospel, One Task.” The same thing is happening today, of course, but race-mixing was still controversial in 1966. At this year’s “Churches Against Racism” conference hosted by the World Council of Churches, it was taught that the Bible is the “ultimate immigration handbook.” “It speaks to us in this week after virulently anti-immigrant parties made unprecedented gains in European elections.” HATE!
Dr. D. James Kennedy was a Lincoln-loving Yankee race-mixer who pretended to be a conservative and gave “statesmanship” awards to neocons, but I always thought his sermons were more engaging than most. When he died, a grandson of Billy Graham by the consonant-laden name of Tullian Tchividjian took over as head pastor, and he has proceeded to tear the church apart. Kennedy had the largest church in the PCA, but he refused to join the fledgling denomination for several years because he said he wanted to make sure it would not be racist. This is documented in Kennedy Smartt’s history of the PCA, I am Reminded.
Fascinating quotes on race from abolitionist Orestes Brownson:
Why is it that you can rarely get a negro to embrace anything of Christianity but its animality, if I may so speak, or its exterior forms, and that after generations of Christian worship and instruction, he falls back to the worship of Obi? Why is it that you can scarcely get a single Christian thought into the negro’s head, and that with him religion is almost sure to lapse into a grovelling superstition? Why, because he is a degenerate man, and superstition is degenerate religion, and the religion of the degenerate…
We may talk as we will, spin any fine theories we like, praise the negro as we please, and sneer at the boasting Caucasian to our heart’s content, but we cannot alter the fact of negro inferiority, or make it not a fact that the negro is the most degenerate branch of our race. This is no reason why we should enslave him, oppress him, throw obstacles in his way, but it is a reason why we should not seek to form one community with him, or seek to mould blacks and whites into one people. The basis, under God, of society, is family, and the basis of family is marriage, and where there are classes between whom intermarriage is inadmissible or improper, they do not and cannot form one common society. Society proper did not exist in the middle ages between the nobility and the serfs, for they did not intermarry. It exists now in France, Italy, and Great Britain, to some extent, because intermarriage between the nobles and commons has ceased to be infrequent. Between blacks and whites marriage is anomalous and never desirable. Both races suffer by it, because the distance between them is too great to be leaped by a single bound…
Under this pet theory of negro equality, a perversion, as understood and applied, of the Christian dogma of the unity of the [human] race, no discrimination is allowed, but everything is brought to its Procrustean bed. The government has no freedom of administration, individuals no freedom of action, justice itself no free course, and common sense is cast to the dogs…
Now, my dear friend, let me not shock you, but I do not believe your poor, ignorant, and inexperienced negroes, whose religion is for the most part mere sensibility or animal excitement, and whose moral habits are those of lying, stealing, and cheating on a small scale, are better than white men of a corresponding class, or any less likely to be used by wily and unprincipled demagogues. The gentleness, docility, and even affectionateness, you admire so much in them, are due in the main to the dependent condition in which they have lived, to their habits of deferring to superiors, and consulting only the will of their master or mistress. Free them, give them votes, and put them on the footing of political equality with their former masters, and these amiable qualities, these virtues, if you please, will disappear, and your beloved negroes will become vain, proud, insolent, overbearing, and exhibit the usual vices and manners of freedmen. They are nothing without leaders, and at present their leaders are their preachers; and the demagogues have only to gain their preachers to gain them. These preachers, for the most part themselves very ignorant and vain, can be bought, wheedled or deceived, and gained over to the support of measures anything but advantageous to their own people…
We are for knocking off the fetters of the slave, recognizing the negro as a man, but not for elevating the negro to the level of the white man, any more than we are for lowering the white man to the level of the negro. We would leave the negro free to raise himself to equality with the white man, and above him, if able, but we have never discovered that we did any man, black or white, any good by elevating him above his natural level…
Now we look around at what was once our own country, and it appears to us as foreign as Zulu noise to the heavenly music of Wagner. That’s a great movie, Zulu, about one of the greatest military feats in white history, Rorke’s Drift. Notice, in the clip, how much more sense the missionary’s daughter has than the missionary himself. He even chokes on his own words when he tries to convince her that the natives are jumping about like animals to demonstrate their “chastity.” He then compares the oogah-boogahs to John the Baptist!
These were actually for sale at Costco:
Nicholas Stix has a good article at VDare about how Letalvis Cobbins, one of the architects of the Knoxville Horror, escaped execution. In the eyes of the jury, a “horrific childhood” and an endless stream of oh-my-baby half-relatives who blamed it all on his crackhead mother provided “mitigating” factors that outweighed any “aggravating” factors, meaning rape and murder. Stix explains that integration has broken the legal system. “This sort of behavior has become pervasive among black and other minority jurors. Their refusal to punish, or in some cases even to convict, heinous minority criminals amounts to a form of ‘jury nullification’ that threatens the entire justice system.” Tom Jefferson was right; whites and blacks can’t occupy the same government. There are always honorable exceptions, of course, including the black prosecutor in this case, but the exceptions don’t disprove the rule. Racial self-interest can never be suppressed, but this involves much more. It is demagoguery (the same that Orestes Brownson warned against) that entices blacks to seek vengeance for perceived wrongs. The vast majority of them will never understand the concept of justice, and this is one of many reasons why Equality is a millstone around our necks.
Another recent example: Last December, Brian Nichols’ confessedly racially motivated, 2005 Atlanta mass murder spree resulted in only a life sentence, “without parole.”
The last case I know of…in which black jurors sentenced a black defendant to die for his crimes, was the 1992 trial in Los Angeles’ Mount Olive Church of God and Christ double-murder, in which both victims were black.
However, even that case required that prosecutors excuse numerous black potential jurors via peremptory challenges, after the latter expressed attitudes that were “anti-police, anti-prosecution, or anti-death penalty.”
Black potential jurors have since gotten smarter, and now publicly conceal their true views…
Thus has the racist black lunatic fringe become the racist black mainstream…
Today, black civilians, lawyers, and felons alike routinely invent non-existent legal requirements as a pretext for acquitting black criminals, or diminishing their punishment, e.g., variously denying, expanding, or twisting legal principles such as criminal culpability and “acting in concert” (in Tennessee, “criminal responsibility”—under the pre-diversity understanding of “acting in concert,” Letalvis Cobbins would also have been convicted of Channon Christian’s boyfriend’s murder, of which he was acquitted), “burden of proof”, and even the presumption of innocence, in order to rationalize acquitting guilty blacks, railroading innocent whites, and generally turning the law on its head…
America can have “diversity”—or it can have justice.
That really is the bottom line. We would have a great deal more money and a great deal more peace if we would stop pretending that we can make a multiracial nation succeed. What madness has taken whites that they would sacrifice their own children and their own future in pursuit of this lustful, idolatrous deathwish? We will answer to the rudder or we will answer to the rock.
“What kind of sick, corrupt culture would do this to their elderly?”
Your farm isn’t safe and neither is your daughter. You can thank the preachers when this happens in your country.
A massive hate crime narrowly avoided. Do-gooders are on top of this problem! Chicago taxpayers will cough up $30 million to give these thugs full-time mentors and part-time jobs. The non-racist white man’s solution to any problem is to make paper boats of hundred dollar bills and float them down the river. After all, in light of root causes and systemic injustice, the Chicago incident was whitey’s fault anyhow.
Time Magazine blames whites for the armpit called Detroit.
Similarly, racist buildings in Alabama are targeting black kids and inducing low test scores. There is only one mighty-white thing to do about it, which is to spend a fortune bussing the hapless and victimized students to less racist buildings on the white side of town. Send us your poor, malodorous, and downtrodden! The honky’s yoke is easy and his burden is light.
Hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of people show up at tea parties, and about 7 of them are black, and now one of them has become the public face of this white movement…
So once again, a white movement has been completely neutralized by political correctness. Millions of white people are looking for a group that will speak out for them, and speak up for their interests, without apology. Then they find out that the tea party crowd not only won’t speak up for them, but their public mascot is a black man who’s engaged in white genocide.
Yeah, that’s a real smart plan for winning the hearts and minds of the millions of fed up white people in this country.
And conservatives wonder why they never make any progress, or win any big battles?
It’s fine for white women to marry black men, but two men getting married is a big deal?
Interracial marriage is hunky dory, but high taxes are an abomination?
Immigration is bad because we’re replacing the founding stock of this country, but it’s just dandy for the founding stock of this country to breed themselves out of existence by “marrying” blacks?
This is insane.
The insanity is what our friend Lee calls the “White Industrial Guilt Complex,” and Jews don’t have to worry about it. In Israel, there is a “state-sanctioned anti-miscegenation program” and an “Anti-Assimilation Department” which “works to prevent Jewish girls from dating Muslim men.” The program “enjoys the support of the municipality and the police.” And the people, of course. But if whites do the same thing, they’re racists and anti-Semites.
Jew politicians in America support abortion rights while opposing the right of abortion for Jews in Israel.
Incog Man has an excellent post on the Jew rapist, Roman Polanski, and this is the best thing I’ve ever read at Slate. The way in which celebrities and “important” people are defending the Jew brought to mind Bob Dylan’s song, The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll. There’s a striking line in that song: “the ladder of law has no top and no bottom.” But which system of law is that? Dylan was a Jew and Polanski is a Jew. Every Jew I know is defending the rape. Jew-Thing Whoopi Goldberg says Jew Polanski didn’t commit rape-rape. To get a hint of what she means, consult the Talmud:
“If a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for having intercourse with a girl less than three years old is like putting a finger in the eye.” ~ Ketubot 11b
“The Gentiles are outside the protection of the law.” ~ Baba Kamma 37b
“The reality is that a bunch of mostly self-righteous secular jews are upset that a fellow jew, who just happens to be a convicted criminal, has been arrested. They know anti-semitism when they smell it. They can’t see why else a brilliant jew who drugs and anally rapes a 13-year old girl needs to be held to account.” ~ Tanstaafl
When little girls are being dressed like this, it’s a wonder that anyone is surprised by rape.
It’s bad enough that we’ve given $3 trillion to Israel. Now Paul Fromm sends word that Canada has a fund for groups at risk of being attacked in “hate crimes,” and Jews receive 84% of the funding (46 of 55 projects). The money goes for security improvements, including gates, alarm systems, closed-circuit televisions, digital video recorders, intercoms and security assessments. Jews are about 1% of Canada’s population and receive 84% of federal security funding. They could very well be the most despised people on earth, through no fault of their own, of course. It’s due to widespread, irrational anti-Semitism and holocaust denial.
In just the previous post, we said there is only one “holocaust” as far as Jews are concerned, the Holohoax. Now a Jew congressman who called health care in America a “holocaust” has been forced to apologize to the ADL, that great “national arbiter of anti-Semitism.” Strangely, making perpetual war against actual Semites in the Middle East is not anti-Semitism. If you’re confused by this, please don’t question it openly, because that would be anti-Semitic. We at SWB work very hard to protect our public image. When we tell you something is anti-Semitic, you can take it to the kike bank.
I once hoped to have a career in stand-up comedy, but it was cut short. My first joke was “How many Jews does it take to light a grill?” and it all went downhill from there.
“Historians were rocked yesterday after a DNA test showed Hitler’s skull to be from a woman… A rational human being would be curious as to how much else the Russians lied about. And that sacred cow of the Jews always makes for interesting discussion.”
Zbigniew Brzezinski has made an interesting point about a soon-to-be attack on Iran by Israel. He says the Jews would have to fly over American air space in Iraq. (It’s easy to forget, but the bought American government is really the only friend Israel has on this entire planet, and the only one capable of defending it. No other country will assist them in any way without American pressure.) “Are we just going to sit there and watch? We have to be serious about denying them that right. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not.” Obviously, the Jews want to make war on every Muslim state in the region, but this is possibly an unforeseen circumstance. The American Empire’s occupation of Iraq could end up being the best thing for Iran.
It seems that this scenario has made Jews very nervous. When they feel cornered, they start calling everyone names, as Carolyn Glick does in Jewish World Review: “Brzezinski has long distinguished himself as one of the most outspoken Israel haters in polite circles in Washington. Under normal circumstances, his remarks could be laughed off as the ravings of a garden variety anti-Semite.” But name-calling is only a short-term way to keep headlines sympathetic. Jews will eventually have an actual game plan, and it may include another false-flag operation (actuated by bribery or blackmail), or perhaps a maneuver similar to the U.S.S. Liberty, in order to give Obama the excuse to open Iraqi air space. If the latter option holds, you could expect Jews to commit terrorist acts against us or an ally in the hope of sparking a regional or world war, all for the purpose of destroying the armies and navies of their enemies. (Sweden, Singapore, and Greece have larger military budgets than Iran.) We spent decades worrying about the Soviet threat, but we could actually be closer to nuclear war than ever before. It’s difficult to foresee Israel ever making a unilateral move against Iran without American support. The question is how to coax this support, because right now it does not seem likely. Perceptive Iranians are already thinking about this, I assure you. They know the impostor American government does not have the money to wage another war (although two “conservative” senators are calling for “all or nothing”), and they know that Israel wants to seize upon the final opportunity in history to annihilate pre-nuclear Iran. So when you hear Mahmoud say that Israel’s days are short, I doubt that he has an offensive strategy in mind, for this would guarantee American retaliation. He could reasonably believe that the Jews are going to destroy themselves by biting off more than they can chew. You won’t find any speculation of this kind in the Jew-press, of course, because it’s the job of the Jew-press to shout that the president of Iran is an anti-Semite and the reincarnation of Hitler.
Jew William Safire has shuffled off the mortal coil and descended to the Great Rabbi of the Underworld. He often praised the dictator Lincoln. He said Lincoln knew “that the democratic experiment centered on the Union and that majority rule was everything.” Jew Irving Kristol just died too. The wind from the east smells fresher.
A scarf-wearing Muslim girl seeks a job from a Jewish pornographer.
Two years in prison for failing to document…legal orchids. Justice cries out.
“Four cameras in four different locations going blank at basically the same time on the morning of April 19, 1995. There ain’t no such thing as a coincidence.”
“A tyrannical king can be deposed when he violates his oath to protect and defend his nation’s people and sacred traditions, but a tyrannical, anti-Christian democracy is an unending nightmare because the people can never be deposed.”
Paying for health care is racist. “That kind of inequality is unacceptable in the United States of America,” says Obamination.
The Fire Eaters worked to ensure the election of Abraham Lincoln, just as some clever white nationalists worked to get Obama elected and drew attention to what Peter Brimelow calls “implicit community.”
Ohio would rather honor Tecumseh, an Indian who made war on whites, than a former governor who supported the rights of slaveholders, as most of the founders did.
America’s best sheriff pulls a George Wallace.
California, the eighth largest economy in the world, is paying its state staff in IOUs, teachers are on hunger strikes, and unemployment is at its highest in 70 years. The biggest reason for the problem is only stated openly by us “racists.” (The Guardian article only lists the symptoms of the illness.) As Alex Linder says, you don’t make anything better by adding 30 million Mexicans to it.
Promoting breakaway republics (i.e., secession) is “fomenting hate.”
It is hate to say that “Turks with low IQs and poor child-rearing practices [are] ‘conquering Germany‘ by breeding two or three times as fast.” Sure, it’s true, but it’s also HATE.
The Muslim idea of heaven: 72 white virgins for every martyr.
The British have been trying to save their native red squirrels after someone imported American grey squirrels to the island. This was almost as bad as importing Negroes. There are frequent grey squirrel hunts because eradicating foreign invaders, both plants and animals, is considered necessary for biodiversity. Himalayan parakeets, which are said to be “as British as curry,” were introduced during the filming of The African Queen, and since then have exploded in numbers, driving out native species such as woodpeckers. But a plan to legalize parakeet shoots is actually being denounced as “racist.” It’s strange that native plants and animals are important to some people in Britain but not human beings. Nor are Ecuadorans considered natives of Galápagos.
If you missed Bill Rolen’s excellent interview with Eustace Mullins on the Cesspool show, go here to dial up the second hour of the 10/3 show, and do it expeditiously. Mullins was an associate of Ezra Pound. T.S. Eliot is widely considered to be the greatest poet of the 20th century, but Eliot called Pound il miglior fabbro (“the better craftsmen”). Even though it’s not much of a comparison, every time I think of these men I recall what John Lennon said about how musical notes on a page have nothing to do with music itself. Most people can’t make music without reading it, but a genius pulls music out of the air and puts it on paper for our benefit. The same is true of genius poets.
The Czechs have exonerated Dr. Duke!
And now, a word from the Marxists:
U.S. astronaut Jose M. Hernandez, a Mexican American, said one of the most memorable experiences during his recent trip to space was being able to look at Earth and marvel at a world without borders.
Thanks, Jose!
Remember all the orgasmic talk about the center of Christendom moving to Africa, and white Episcopalian churches submitting to the African communion? Well, it doesn’t appear to be working as planned. This African archbishop clearly speaks of Obama in divine terms and considers race to be more important than Obama’s support for abortion.
The president of poverty-stricken Senegal is building a $27 million statue of a man balancing his wife and child on his biceps. Since Negroes don’t know the first thing about statues, 50 North Koreans were brought in to build it because of their expertise with bronze art.
Meanwhile, the president of Namibia has literally declared war on whites and is advocating Zimbabwe-style land theft. “The British want to be beaten up. Anyone find an Englishman, do so, beat him up.” Oh, but you’ll still be expected to feed this simian when he’s starving to death.
We tend to focus on the black race, but blacks have ethnic groups like everyone else, and they suffer tension and bloodshed when modern states are forced together across ethnic lines. See this map of the ethnic groups in Uganda.
Life took a bitter turn for Thing 3 after failing to get a part in The Cat and the Hat. He began loitering at Walmart, hoping someone would buy him a quart of cheap wine.
Spongebob has also fallen on hard times.
Heidi Klum is taking the last name of her “husband,” whose name is Seal Henry Olusegun Olumide Adelo Samuel. His baby daddy must have been an auctioneer.
Country music these days, which is run through a formula determined to be most pleasing to women, is a lot like contemporary Christian music, gospel-centered filmmaking, and personality-driven ministry: a load of crap.
I absolutely love this website. I think the Hubble telescope could be the only good thing that the imperial government has ever done.
While we’re on the subject of websites that I love, see the Mt. Olive Tape Library. I highly recommend the Otto Scott lectures. You’ll notice that Rushdoony’s lectures are absent. I hope these are added someday, because George Calhoun, a postal carrier who assembled this library beginning in 1969, had more than 200 Easy Chair discussions alone, not to mention hundreds more Rushdoony recordings. Back before Al Gore’s interwebs, we were renting cassette tapes from Mt. Olive for 25 cents apiece. The good news is that Chalcedon is going to debut a new website before the end of the year that may have it all, and it will all be free for the listening!
The first part of this article was much appreciated. White ethno-nationalists are infiltrated with pagans, and though they wish a glorious future for their people, they can never hope to obtain it from Odin, Thor, or Baldur…or from a civic religion like national socialism. We often see Babel as a historical precedent of Communism, and rightly so. As an historical precedent of national socialism, I see the Hebrew zealots of the first century, who wanted freedom for their people but rejected the Messiah and therefore brought bloody ruin upon themselves. Neither Babelists or Zealots can get it right, since neither is Trinitarian. I want peace and harmony among races – but not by building a one-world government and obliterating distinctions. I want prosperity for my own people – but not by creating a totalitarian state with an idolatrous civic religion.
On a different note, I have a question for you Kinist folk I’ve been wondering about for some time. How do you use your real names (like “Laurel Loflund” and “Winston Smith”) and write Kinist literature without losing your jobs or losing your lives? I have made some comments of a Kinist nature on other sites; these comments are completely orthodox and follow a principle of Christian gentlemanly courtesy, but I have already received a rather graphic death threat and I am very thankful this angry Latino does not know my real name or address. What’s a Kinist to do?
I have a pet theory that if Christians would only seek as many children as possible and homeschool them (or private/church school them in a setting where the schools are answerable to the parents), more than half the battle would be won.
C. Gregg Singer’s The Unholy Alliance: the Definitive History of the National Council of Churches and Its Leftist Policies – From 1908 to the Present (http://www.freethechurch.org/Way/Library/Unholy%20Alliance.pdf) provides some very astute insights and a lot of good information on the NCC; it does not read like an “old” (30+ years) book, as all of this stuff is still very much with us in the age of Obama.
The section of Singer’s book starting on page 184 (by the PDF numbering; there are no other page numbers on the individual pages) headed “The National Council and the Public Schools of the Nation” is recommended reading. You can see the same sort of serious schizophrenia and perverse logic (such that it can be called logic at all) in their dealing with educational issues as we see in the WCC’s statements relating to “racism.” The NCC was SERIOUSLY troubled by church schools; probably the very idea of homeschooling would have given those guys a heart attack. And that is a VERY comforting thought. Homeschooling and family devotions are a great blessing in their own right but the thought of wolves in sheeps’ clothing dropping over dead with a heart attack on account of Christians obeying Scripture is VERY yummy icing on the cake.
Thank you, nice writing and interesting links.
I don’t doubt most of what you have written, but I have a question about Christianity vs. paganism that I believe Kinists are not addressing properly. What about the Greeks, the Romans, the Celtic and Germanic nations? They were non-Christian, had multiple gods and a strong belief in those gods, yet kept their racial and spiritual integrity for a long time, didn’t they?
It seems today that 99% of Christians proclaim they are against racism and are pro-Jewish. I have visited several churches in my area and all proclaim that racism is unbiblical and are working hard to bring the entire brown world here, and most seem eager, at least in words, to mix with them. Most churches are also Judeo-Christian, meaning they will never oppose the efforts of our Marxist overlords.
The neo-pagans at least are willing to say out loud that this is suicide. My point is that, for the average racially-conscious young White person, the pagans are much more attractive.
Rusty, I don’t doubt that paganism is more attractive to young people. It’s human nature to think that wisdom was born with our generation and will die with it, and young people are particularly susceptible to this fallacy. Many of us have had 3-year-old children who think they can speak to us as though they are our peers and they share our experience and knowledge. They do the same kind of thing at age 20, but then they’re dismissing the collected wisdom of the ages as obsolete, because the world prior to their birth was just not as complete.
When this sort sees what the Church has become, they don’t invest any time to learn that this has been a recent development. Our country and our churches have had a death wish for a very short time, but false gods have been inferior to the true God forever. I use the words false and true purposely, because religion is not about “strong belief.” There is a world of difference between “rise and walk” and “patiently await your reincarnation.” The Europeans that you mention could see the difference clearly, and this is why neo-pagans are fools if they really think that Europeans adopted Christianity because it was the next big trend. If that had been the case, Europe would never have emerged from polytheism and animism.
Being human, we must constantly deal with error, and churches today have succumbed to the errors of our age. We need to deal with it. But along come the neo-pagans and use the errors as an excuse to reject the One who has given us everything we have. (Some people do this to their own parents, and we call them patricides.) This is exactly what happened when God led His children from bondage in Africa with miracles unlike anything the world had ever seen. It took the people no time at all to be convinced that God had abandoned them in the desert, and they fashioned a golden calf to be a god that they could see, and most importantly a lifeless god, which is the best kind of god for supervising orgies. Neo-pagan white nationalists are just like this, and they will come to the same end.
In short, don’t ever think that just because idolaters are saying what Christians used to say but are no longer saying, that Christians never said it. As our pal Badonicus says, Jesus Christ did not die on the cross so that white women could give birth to brown babies. Every Christian on earth used to know this.
Yes indeed, Chris.
Siegfried, others may disagree, but it has not been my experience that employers care about personal religious and political views. They just want their employees to do a good job. But we all know about the vindictive types who try to get their enemies fired, and we’ve had our share of experience with them. Fortunately, it is our right to not be discriminated against for what we believe, and if even those who define themselves by their sexual perversions are protected against discrimination, you can be sure that we will sue any person and any company that tries to take our livelihood from us illegally. But as I said, I don’t see this as being a problem with the employers themselves. There are some “Holy Terrorist” Christians out there who like to hack into the servers of “racists,” and there are people on both the Left and Right who enjoy threatening the employers of their enemies with bad press, but these are all losers.
I advise against using real names online, and it’s not out of fear of the cowards I’ve mentioned. You just don’t want to make things easy for them by painting a bullseye on your chest. For instance, the SPLC has drawn up “hate maps” that are LOADED with errors, and we laugh about it all the time. They look like fools for passing false information, much of it obviously false. A person should write anonymously online for the same reason that Christians used to worship in the catacombs. We also need leaderless resistance, not corporations that become easy targets.
As for death threats, it’s good to be heavily armed. Trust in God, but put some trust in Gaston Glock as well. There could always be a crazy person out there who wants to die by attacking one of us, but most people are smarter than that, and I think police would agree that the kind of person who issues a death threat is a coward who has no intention of emerging from his parents’ basement.
Lots of good stuff in here, admin.
I have a friend who was a firefighter that helped with the OKC recovery effort. He never was big into conspiracy theories until after his dealing with that affair. I’ll have to post his story on the matter somewhere public, with his permission.
That Coeur d’Alene, Whiteaho is a good spot for anyone looking for the mythical white man’s land. The only spot you’ll find the couple misplaced negros is crossing the street from the liquor store with a brown bag, and heading into the KFC (actual sighting by myself). But their numbers seem to gradually grow by a couple every year, ever since Richard Butler cashed in his chips. But we’re awfully close to that Washington border, and they tend to creep over now and again. But that’s where I remind them that this isn’t Compton, and they’re on my turf now.
@Siegfried – I’ve mentioned kinism to folks before and have been attacked on the matter, even here in north Idaho. I also suggest a moniker for any discussion or rants on the matter.
“I am very glad that our fashionable fiction seems to be full of a return to paganism, for it may possibly be the first step of a return to Christianity. Neo-pagans have sometimes forgotten, when they set out to do everything the old pagans did, that the final thing the old pagans did was to get christened.”
-G.K. Chesterton
Thanks. Perhaps you could draw more contrasts between Christianity and paganism; there’s a lot of confusing information out there. Why not Rome, Greece, Germania, Gual, Albion/Britannia?
And what scriptures do you use to enforce separation between races? I need a few more arrows in my quiver. My pastor, a White man who has had 6 children with a Guatamalan women, and needs a little education.
Even though I have tried to make it clear that I am not a Kinist, and am actually hoping to either see (or do) a solidly biblical refutation of Kinism, simply the fact that I comment here has raised a few eyebrows among my friends, and I have taken some heat in quarters that are not charitably disposed toward me to begin with. (I.e., the same people who insinuate that Doug Wilson is a closet Kinist who only distanced himself from Kinism as a matter of expediency.) I have never received any death threats that I can recall. Just to be on the safe side, my home is surrounded by a shark-infested moat, and after getting across that, anyone who might want to do me harm would first have to penetrate my large entourage of Ninja bodyguards. People who can’t take my approach to self-defense might do well to comment anonymously . . .
Hi Rusty,
The nations (ethnic peoples) of Gaul, Britain, Germany, the Lomabards etc converted as nations. Look up the saints with Apostolic mission to these nations: St Boniface (mentioned in the current post), St Remigius (to the Franks), St Augustine, St Irenaes of Lyon, St Patraic (to Eire) etc and etc. None of this was done ‘in a corner’.
Pagan populations (unregenerate) members of the nation always existed with within the Christian polity and their beliefs were known as the folkway or old religion. Shakespeare preserves virtually all of English Faerie in his works. But they were minorities. And certain of their cults dealing with blood drinking and human sacrifice were proscribed by the King’s writ and the Church. These rituals went underground – but the powers conferred by these rituals were as coveted then as they are today.
Silas, I look forward to that OKC story.
Winston, excellent quote! No one could say it like Chesterton.
Chris, what if zombies attack?
Rusty, I may not understand the question about the Greeks, etc., but I think it’s important to remember that even pre-Christians cherished their own people because it is natural, normal, and healthy to do so. The fact that Christians no longer meet this very minimum requirement of humanity tells us that they have become worse than infidels, as the Bible itself tells us will happen when we cease to provide for our own people. The surprise is not that pagans protect their own; the surprise is that white Christians no longer believe and practice what they once believed and practiced.
Admin, if zombies attack, I’ll play possum.
Life-long (suburban) Detroit resident and Amazoness-with-a-gun Karen De Coster can be quoted with some authority:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/38801.html
“The surprise is not that pagans protect their own; the surprise is that white Christians no longer believe and practice what they once believed and practiced.”
It’s not surprising to me. I have never heard a good sermon about nationhood, much less several. I know of no leaders or preachers today who seem to have ever given it much thought. Not to say they are not out there, just that I’ve never heard them, and I’ve been looking. A lot of contumely is heaped, a lot of beautiful but abstract prose is written (think: CWNY) but nothing I could use on my fellow Christians. So, as far as most people are concerned, it doesn’t exist; Christianity is a kum-bah-ya bunch of globalist/communist/multicultural nonsense to them.
Neither is there a really good convincing argument against paganism, compared against a proper understanding of Christianity. Id est, no Christian preacher I have ever read really seems to have a deep neo-pagan understanding of wyrd, revenge, the ancient gods, Judaism, etc. Without this, Christians cannot reach the neo-pagans. (I also have never heard a good pagan sermon, much less one with any understanding of traditional Christianity.)
Do you know where to find such words?
Gratias.
Admin stated: “We are Kinists. We are not neo-pagans. Make sure you understand the difference. If there is no such thing as sin and damnation, nor of election and eternal reward, then the white race is an accident, love is a viral infection, truth is relative, beauty is an island of proportionality in a sea of chaos, logic is no more meaningful than a 5 a.m. dream, and purpose is a phantom. Richard Dawkins says it requires courage to face these facts, even though courage itself is meaningless if Dawkins is correct. But if, for the sake of argument, it is true that we are crawling like bugs on the surface of an accidental ball of cosmic dust, and that which is “good” is that which fills our bellies, it must require mental retardation to be a white nationalist.” Brilliant my brother. Encouraging and refereshing. When the Christian discerns the fallacious foundation in which the unbeliever stands, his attacks and rantings are empty and foolish.
The Greeks, the Romans, the Germanics, and the Celtics were all pantheists and had strong nations which endured for many hundreds of years. The Romans in particular were close to our understanding of civilized and had similar societal and governmental problems. The Germans among all the barbarians were known (compared to the Romans, anyway) for their faithfulness, chastity, and courage. They were not civilized, but they lived and died bravely for their own people, something a vanishing minority of Christians can say today. Most of all, they endured through faithfulness to their religion and to their people. This is one vital ingredient we have lost almost completely today in the Church. When Christians get exegesical against the neo-pagans, they always ignore these facts. Neo-pagans do not miss the omission.
Christopher, there is a golden opportunity for Grandparents here. If they could only use their retirement to help with the grandchildren and homeschool their children would be able to have and support larger families.
The single parent family and the 2.5 children demographic would be a thing of the past. Grandparents have time and skills and a huge interest in seeing their grandchildren properly educated and protected from a sociopathocracy.
Rusty, you definitely have to go in search of old books, and we try to do our part here to bring the old way of thinking to light. In any denomination, you can still find books by the paleo-Christians. I’m a member of a Reformed Presbyterian church, and there are several men of this group who drive race-mixers nuts, but none more than R.L. Dabney. You should definitely read A Defense of Virginia, by the way.
Here it is, for free and searchable:
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=moa;cc=moa;rgn=main;view=text;idno=ABT6096.0001.001
Since no one has yet refuted what Dabney teaches in this book, your pastor certainly has no hope of doing it. That’s the great thing about Dabney.
You should force the race-mixers to condemn the great men of the past with whom you agree, if they ever hope to condemn you. I’ve had several pastors chuckle nervously and walk quickly away when I’ve suggested this.
That’s Salon, not Slate.
BTW that’s the FORMER president of Namibia who incited violence against whites. I used to work with a guy whose parents were founding members of SWAPO; he has been back in Namibia for about a decade but I still exchange emails with him so I’ll have to ask him about this. In the meantime, catch a load of this:
http://www.informante.web.na/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=4973
Wouldn’t you know it? I would have been surprised if something like that was NOT the case.
I never cease to be amazed and am invariably at a loss reading the statements of these caucasians of European nations or diaspora who are arguing for pagan, pre-Christian beliefs of the Celtic or Germanic peoples (for example) when in reality what they are really promoting is: liberty, fraternity and equality.
This last unholy trinity is a delusional system. At the time of Lucifer (a.k.a. the Enlightenment), these ideolatries were deliberately crafted by the Masonic Agentur of Jewry to ( 1 ) advance its own imperium and ( 2 ) demoralize, confuse and destroy the Christian nations. I think we are now in a position to assess the effectiveness of that strategy.
The princes of the Jewry (who style themselves the Learned Elders) state this explicitly in their Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. They also state their religion is a secret and membership is both dynastic and by initiation. Rosenthal speaking of his fellow Satanists both Jewish and Gentile stated this also.
So the true religion of the Elders is not any exoteric version of Judaism that we know. The princes of Jewry have sacrificed Jewish populations routinely. Or as Theodore Herzl famously stated of the launch of the Judaic Elite’s new ideolatry: Zionism – at the first World Zionist Congress: “the Jews must suffer more.”
By the same token the Satanism of the Elite is not any version of JudeoChristianity held by the judaized churches. JudeoChristianity is merely a vehicle for Luciferianism.
Historically, there is no such thing as a liberal pagan who just individually believes what he or she wants (or nothing at all), makes up his own situational ethics and lives a happy life of equality and democracy feasting and fornicating with all the fellow pagans. This idea is just stupid.
A pagan serves tribal gods of clan and kin that give him the best deal against his enemies and the very real powers of darkness which must be propiated. Sacrifice both human and animal is a big part of the old ways. This reality has not changed.
To take a current example, suppose the Elite wants to ignite a world war (and they do) – they are going to have to sacrifice a lot of human lives to create the mojo with the “spiritual powers seated in wickedness”.
From time immemorial the nations of Europe are warrior nations and they were constantly at war with each other over the issues of life. Even as members of a Christian empire they did not fully succeed in keeping a lid on it.
Christopher, my friend, you remind me of me. I don’t post as much as you do, but I think and read a lot; and I’ve been trying to punch holes in kinist arguments for 10 years. At some point, you’re going to have to shed your denial and come over to the dark side. Don’t worry.. you’ll find it’s really the right side. The old right that is.
Admin, you are so right about Dabney. The man is irrefutable. His ‘Defense of Virginia’ rocked my world.
Randall, I can honestly say that Dabney’s book changed my life. I can think of a couple other books that had profound impacts on me, but not to that extent. And if it had been the only thing Dabney ever wrote, it would have secured his place in history, but that’s just the beginning of it. We Southerners call him our prophet.
Here’s a free PDF of the book:
http://www.portagepub.com/products/causouth/dabney-virginia.html
By the way, I bought my first copy from Greg Durand, and this was nice because it was a copy of the original, with the same typesetting and spelling, etc.
It should be said, for those who are unfamiliar with it, that slavery was the occasion for Dabney to unleash holy scripture on various Christ-haters and Jacobins, but now, in the 21st century, we need something like it that will be our testament to the world on the issues we face.
Chris Whitmer: I appreciate your willingness to engage in rational dialogue. How different that is from the politically correct hysteria of so many kinist critics. One thing I’m wondering about. Do you believe that race and ethnicity have any legitimacy and significance in the Christian scheme of things? If so, how can they exist without some degree of separation? Or do you believe that Christians must try to eliminate all forms of race and ethnic consciousness, perhaps even to the point of telling Christians not to participate in any kind of ethnic celebration, such as St. Patrick’s parades? I don’t wish to start an argument with you. I’m just genuinely curious as to where you stand.
Yes, Chris is a rare bird. He is the only person I know who has actually considered refuting us in a logical fashion instead of simply calling us racists and pretending that the charge of racism itself is sufficient proof. I welcome his critique, because I know it will be responsible and well-reasoned. We truly desire to approach such critiques with an open mind and be willing to receive correction. The only trouble is that we’ve never seen one.
We normally deal with pastors in personal interaction, and their tendency is to denounce anything they don’t like as sin, rather than merely error, without first taking the steps that Chris is beginning. As a result, they tend to swim in logical fallacies, such as straw men, red herrings, and ad hominem.
We grant that most people have differing views of Scripture, and it is possible to believe that some of these views can be considered wrong without even being unorthodox, much less without being heretical.
Alex Linder responds to this post here:
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=101829
Alex is one of the best writers you’ll find anywhere, although many of his ideas are wrong. You can see him in our video of the second Knoxville rally (he organized the first):
http://www.youtube.com/user/spiritwaterblood
We need to upload those videos again, I think, because the quality is not as good as it should be, for some reason.
We have a thing going on this weekend, but we’ll respond to Alex next week. In the meantime, leave your comments on Alex’s arguments.
Brilliant demolition of the white neo-pagans!
(Except that the use of vulgar language near the end detracts from your message.)
Here is another quote from the Orestes Brownson article where he connects 2 of SBW’s favorite themes — racism and evolution:
http://www.orestesbrownson.com/359.html
The inferior races had the same origin that you and I had, but they are inferior, because they have, with or without their fault, degenerated farther from the normal type of the human race than we have. Pray, do not doubt, whatever you think of me, that you, with your tall queenly figure, your graceful walk, your Grecian face, your sparkling eyes, bright golden hair, and bewitching smile, approach nearer to our common mother Eve, than that black, greasy, thick-lipped, flat-nosed, woolly-headed, tub-figured, and splay-footed Dinah.
The inferior races, the yellow, the red, or the black, nearly all savage, barbarous, or semi-barbarous, are not, my dear sir, types of the primitive man, or so many stages in, man’s progressive march from the tadpole, chimpanzee, or gorilla, up to Bacon, Newton, Napoleon Bonaparte, George B. McClellan, and you and me. They mark rather so many stages or degrees in human degeneracy. The African negro is not the primitive man, the man not yet developed, the incipient Caucasian, but the degenerate man, who, through causes which neither you nor I can explain, has fallen below the normal human type, and stands now at the lowest round in the descending scale of human degeneracy, and for him, save by the transfusion of the blood of a less degenerated variety, there is no more development. He has ceased to be progressive, and when a race has ceased to be progressive, nothing remains for it but to die. Get a deeper philosophy, my friend, and read history anew.
Interesting. I don’t know exactly what he means by degeneracy, but he kind of answers it himself when he says “through causes which neither you nor I can explain.”
I hope that misplaced words don’t detract from the message. Mark Twain once said that the difference between the right word and the almost-right word is like the difference between lightning and the lightning bug. Vulgar words are sometimes needed to accurately describe that which is vulgar. The negative is also true. For instance, the word “homosexual” has been used to mask vulgarity.
I went to the link at VNN. It looks like you really hit a nerve there, because Linder’s been posting responses every few minutes yesterday and today. He’s now up to dozens that he’s posted personally on that thread.
Unfortunately, your statement “Alex is one of the best writers you’ll find anywhere, although many of his ideas are wrong,” is not an adequate description. He’s clearly both insane and monomaniacal.
Despite what tidbits of information and/or inspiration one might find there, I couldn’t go back to that website since even reading those postings feels like participation in evil. Encountering such blasphemy is contaminating.
Linder’s arguments would be easy enough to refute except for the fact that:
1. One couldn’t possible consider posting on that site, even anonymously.
2. His mind is closed to reality, despite his high-flown talk about “reason.”
For example, he seems to pin an awful lot of his faith on a single statistic that NS Germany had a higher birthrate than before Hitler took power. So how well did that work out for the Germans? Not so well as I recall. This hardly qualifies as his “one example of a society that has been formed on these principles and has thrived, has encouraged childbirth, has cared for the poor, has improved education, has built wealth, and has done all the other things that numerous Christian societies have done.” The thousand-year reich only lasted a decade, and then it came to a very nasty end for the Germans who lived to see it.
Christianity has lasted for 2,000 years. Things look pretty grim right now, it’s true, but the “reality” that Linder likes to talk about but doesn’t have any grasp of is that the world we live in is a fundamentally supernatural phenomenon and God will not be mocked forever.
Luther, your question is certainly representative of the sorts of things I am currently trying to answer from Scripture and tie into a consistent Christian life and worldview. The big picture and all the parts need to be kept in view. It won’t do to sweep inconvenient parts under the rug in order to keep a cherished “big picture” in place; to my way of thinking, that suggests a real possibility that the big picture in question might be in error. Conversely, neither will it do to focus on lesser matters in such a way that Race and ethnicity definitely have legitimacy and significance in the Christian scheme of things. Christians are NOT called by God to try to eliminate all forms of race and ethnic consciousness. I don’t think the two alternatives you presented are the only possible positions to take with regard to race. (Not that you said they were, of course.)
The “some degree of separation” that you mention is pretty broad — theoretically it might mean a strictly enforced apartheid-like system or it might mean a much more laissez-faire approach because — in a world where people are being taught to obey the fifth commandment (along with everything implied thereby) — by the force of sheer inertia the essential integrity of each “ethne” is naturally preserved over time, even though there might be a tiny percentage of intermarrying going on between different groups. (That latter possibility must assume, of course, that people are having children as God intended! If an entire “ethne” is gripped by a severe and protracted drop in the birth rate, then preservation of identity is the least of their problems.)
I’ll give a few examples of the questions going through my mind –
If the races’ imaging of the Trinity is ‘non-trivial’ (for want of a better word), how can we avoid the need for something analogous to perichoresis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perichoresis) among the races? (It would have to be a ‘perichoresis’ that does not eliminate the identity of each race.) And if the imaging is ‘trivial’ (again, for want of a better word; i.e., just a manifestation of ‘oneness and manyness’ that is not deliberately and essentially Trinitarian), then why do we need to get bent out of shape about interracial marriages that increase diversity? (Because if the basic integrity of the various races is not lost as a result, then up to a point intermarriages can represent an increase in diversity, analogous to the way a composer might combine two separate melodies to create a new polyphonic work: the two original melodies continue to exist but now something new has been created out of them. (Here Bach himself plays an example of what I’m talking about: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvmfsivdavQ) Obviously there are creaturely limits on how we can image God in His Triunity, but this aspect is one thing that concerns me.
Another question in my mind is, we pray for God’s will to be done in earth as it is in Heaven, what are the implications for us now of the fact that in the eschaton we see all the ‘ethne’ being brought into the kingdom of God (Rev. 21:22)? Marriage and procreation will become a thing of the past, but presumably we will spend eternity not only getting to know Christ but also fellowshipping with one another in our glorified, sinless estate; if that’s the case then shouldn’t we in principle at least be committed to promoting amicable relations among the various ‘ethne’ here and now?
Sorry, I screwed up part of my post above. There is an incomplete sentence that runs into the next one following and makes the meaning unclear —
Conversely, neither will it do to focus on lesser matters in such a way thatConversely, neither will it do to focus on lesser matters in such a way that we lose sight of the big picture.
John, I should have been more clear. I should have said that Alex is one of the best craftsmen of words I know, which is not really the same thing as being a great writer if the main criterion of the latter is that he consistently writes what is true.
Alex admires Mencken more than anyone, and I see the similarities. But for all of his polish, Mencken was an iconoclast, not a truth-teller. He translated Nietzsche’s book, The Antichrist, and it’s easy to see a common line drawn from Nietzsche to Mencken to Linder and other neo-pagans. The final page of their life story involves dying childless and alone. I don’t mean that in a condescending way; I only mean to point out that the actual history of the West has depended on the graciousness of the Lord of Life. He preserved us through the ages when we did not know Him, but the neo-pagans think we saved ourselves, even though many other peoples down through history have utterly perished.
If Life was our genetic destiny regardless of Christ, why did Nietzsche, Mencken, Spengler, Oliver, Ludovici, Yockey, and on and on, not leave a legacy to prove that their atheism and skepticism could provide the West with a future that was at least comparable to Christianity? William Pierce had children, but they rejected him, and Kevin Strom became his “son” instead. Now, if a man doesn’t want to get married and have children, that’s his business, but one would expect that if saving the West is paramount, at least some of these men would practice what they preach. No, their lines have died off because their philosophy itself is dead. All who hate Christ love death, even if they don’t realize it.
Mencken himself never understood the disconnect between Nietzsche’s existentialism and America’s Christ-affirming faith and optimism. But there aren’t too many tricks you can teach to a 3-legged dog, and so he condemned Christianity as unnecessary.
In spite of this, there is much to appreciate in Mencken, and in Linder as well. Mencken said: “It is hard to believe that a man is telling the truth when you know that you would lie if you were in his place.” Neo-pagans should think long and hard on this quote.
But you’re right, VNN is blasphemous, and I wouldn’t recommend a visit there for just anyone.
You’re right about the pretensions to reason and rationality. If the most important goal is to have white children and save the white race, and Christians are doing this times three but atheists are nowhere near replacement level, then on the face of it, even a Darwinist should conclude that Christianity = Life, and Atheism = Sterility. Which is more rational, life or death?
Just as there is racial ‘degeneracy’ by means of ’causes which neither you or I can explain’, there is also racial regeneracy through Amazing Grace.
It is important for Christians to comment on this within the White Nationalist fora, because unfortunately, there are too many materialists and atheists who write about White nationaism from the position of pride of life. This is a sin and a delusion.
The Darwinist ideolatry is a myth of desperation. Rather, it is the historical record which bears witness to racial regeneration.
The European nations converted to the Christic Light of the Gospel as nations. A Christopherian race emerged from the font of baptism and the holy fire of Chrismation. This race – a God-man race – is new creation in Christ, a work of Grace upon human nature. One can not expect an entire race, in its nations, to commune for almost two millenia in the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, the Lord from Heaven – and nothing to come of it. By our faith response to the Evangelium, this Christopherian race became a new race – a race of the kings of men – different not just in degree, but different in kind from unregenerate nations.
And like the angels that did not keep their first estate, as apostates, this once Christopherian race is degenerating into sins, vices and wretchedness that are the equal and opposite of that estate to which we were once elevated by Amazing Grace. As apostate nations we have turned our backs upon the holy faith in preferance to all manner of antiChrist jew ideolatries. And in this state, we are in dispute with unregenerates who have always preferred their idols, their customary delusions, vices and sins to the Evangelium. They know their ground and we are disputing with them over it and every husk fit only for swine. What is worse, we are in contest with them over survival through totalitarian conflicts that can only benefit a Satanic agenda.
Christ our King can turn this situation around, if we return to our King. And we are invited to do so through the infinite merit of His Sacred Heart and the prayers of the Immaculate Heart of Mary whom the Fathers called ‘the New Eve’.
I know a story about this from among the oral histories of World War II collected by my home school. I am going to dig it out and send it along. If it is posted, maybe it will interest those who read and post here.
James Thornwell posted links to the Bahnsen-Stein debate at the VNN thread, but I doubt it will get any attention. It’s a shame because Linder’s schoolboy atheism was exactly echoed by jewish Stein and thoroughly trounced by Bahnsen. But, as Ferrel Griswold said, you can’t prove a man wrong who doesn’t want to know the truth.
It’s a tough call. I first heard of Alex in connection with his stand at Knoxville, and that was magnificent. His discussion of the Mary Phagan case was electrifying and paradigm-shifting. But…
about a year ago I stopped going to the VNN forum. It was filled with enough blasphemy and obscenity to make a jew blush — every other word in some cases. At the time, Alex was more reasonable. I chalked the posts up to all the 14-year-old mighty sons of Wotan living in their parents’ basement and dreaming about having their way with Aryan goddesses and getting back at the snotty geeks in Math class, or whatever. At any rate, I gave it up.
Scanning the thread you linked to, it looks like Alex has gone over the cliff as well. He must really think that if he just blasphemes and insults in a long, steady and scintillating stream, the Christians are going to wake up and ‘fess up, “yes Alex, I’ve just been pretending all this time; thank you for expressing my true thoughts.”
If Alex were to become our Führer, there is no longer any doubt in my mind that we would be sent off to concentration camps, unless we promised to keep our mouths permanently shut. Indeed, I’m now pretty sure he would join with the jews to try to defeat us — for he explains that he doesn’t see the jew as evil, just clever –, even as I predict the jews will publicly link back up with the Muhammedans once the dispensationalists are no longer useful to them. In short, I once venerated Alex for his courage and clarity; I now say, leave him.
Harris’ rule: anyone that publicly blasphemes the name of Jesus Christ will eventually be revealed as pure evil. I have never seen an exception in my life, though of course such is possible by God’s grace.
I still do go daily to the public postings managed by “Socrates.” That is actually an excellent news and analysis source.
Tim, that’s an excellent point. Linder really is playing the role of Jew Stein. Perhaps this unenviable position is what draws out the shrill blasphemies. You and I know that on other subjects, Linder is much more focused. I feel pity for him, though. He’ll never know the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit as long as he clutches the idol of pride.
Re: Linder
Tim’s comments are pretty good and reflect my sentiments toward Alex as well. Although, a distinction needs to be drawn between blasphemy and using the Lord’s name in vain. Bahnsen spoke about this, I believe.
Theologically we understand why otherwise bright men cannot realize that they have no justification for any sort of morality or thought. Yet it is sometimes very puzzling to watch these exercises in “might equals right”. An even more brilliant man who writes under the pen Jerry Abbot or David Simms has argued correctly that one of main problem fallacies in our liberal enemy’s thinking is the moralistic fallacy; namely, that because (they perceive) that all men should be equal, therefore all men are equal, and therefore we should arrange the social order accordingly.
But, oh that these men would see that the opposite fallacy (naturalistic fallacy) is their main error. They way they make their case is persuasive, but not sound. They’re excellent at gathering the facts and setting the stage for the obvious choice as to what is safer for our kinsmen, but they don’t have the worldview power to go beyond their data collection–indeed they have to reason to trust their senses that gathered the data or to tell us why they studied the issue in the first place.
One thing admirable about Linder is that he doesn’t use any sort of PC in his weaponry. Yeah, equalitarian legislation is horrible and murderous toward the white, but it doesn’t exist apart from the Jew. Period. So, yes, his analysis and solutions are something to read, but he is an anti-Christ, and as Tim has said, ultimately pure evil.
Is it true that Howard Fieldstead Ahmanson Jr. has Tourette’s Syndrome and can’t speak without taking the name of the Lord in vain? I heard this after a Discovery Institute debate on Intelligent Design in Seattle. If true this is the irony of ironies.
Isaiah 57
New American Standard Bible
Evil Leaders Rebuked
1 The righteous man perishes, and no man takes it to heart;
And devout men are taken away, while no one understands.
For the righteous man is taken away from evil,
2 He enters into peace;
They rest in their beds,
Each one who walked in his upright way.
3 “But come here, you sons of a sorceress,
Offspring of an adulterer and a prostitute.
4 “Against whom do you jest?
Against whom do you open wide your mouth
And stick out your tongue?
Are you not children of rebellion,
Offspring of deceit,
5 Who inflame yourselves among the oaks,
Under every luxuriant tree,
Who slaughter the children in the ravines,
Under the clefts of the crags?
6 “Among the smooth stones of the ravine
Is your portion, they are your lot;
Even to them you have poured out a drink offering,
You have made a grain offering.
Shall I relent concerning these things?
7 “Upon a high and lofty mountain
You have made your bed.
You also went up there to offer sacrifice.
8 “Behind the door and the doorpost
You have set up your sign;
Indeed, far removed from Me, you have uncovered yourself,
And have gone up and made your bed wide.
And you have made an agreement for yourself with them,
You have loved their bed,
You have looked on their manhood.
9 “You have journeyed to the king with oil
And increased your perfumes;
You have sent your envoys a great distance
And made them go down to Sheol.
10 “You were tired out by the length of your road,
Yet you did not say, ‘It is hopeless.’
You found renewed strength,
Therefore you did not faint.
11 “Of whom were you worried and fearful
When you lied, and did not remember Me
Nor give Me a thought?
Was I not silent even for a long time
So you do not fear Me?
12 “I will declare your righteousness and your deeds,
But they will not profit you.
13 “When you cry out, let your collection of idols deliver you.
But the wind will carry all of them up,
And a breath will take them away.
But he who takes refuge in Me will inherit the land
And will possess My holy mountain.”
Comfort for the Contrite
14 And it will be said,
“Build up, build up, prepare the way,
Remove every obstacle out of the way of My people.”
15 For thus says the high and exalted One
Who lives forever, whose name is Holy,
“I dwell on a high and holy place,
And also with the contrite and lowly of spirit
In order to revive the spirit of the lowly
And to revive the heart of the contrite.
16 “For I will not contend forever,
Nor will I always be angry;
For the spirit would grow faint before Me,
And the breath of those whom I have made.
17 “Because of the iniquity of his unjust gain I was angry and struck him;
I hid My face and was angry,
And he went on turning away, in the way of his heart.
18 “I have seen his ways, but I will heal him;
I will lead him and restore comfort to him and to his mourners,
19 Creating the praise of the lips.
Peace, peace to him who is far and to him who is near,”
Says the LORD, “and I will heal him.”
20 But the wicked are like the tossing sea,
For it cannot be quiet,
And its waters toss up refuse and mud.
21 “There is no peace,” says my God, “for the wicked.”
Jeremiah 16
New American Standard Bible
Distresses Foretold
1 The word of the LORD also came to me saying,
2 “You shall not take a wife for yourself nor have sons or daughters in this place.”
3 For thus says the LORD concerning the sons and daughters born in this place, and concerning their mothers who bear them, and their fathers who beget them in this land:
4 “They will die of deadly diseases, they will not be lamented or buried; they will be as dung on the surface of the ground and come to an end by sword and famine, and their carcasses will become food for the birds of the sky and for the beasts of the earth.”
5 For thus says the LORD, “Do not enter a house of mourning, or go to lament or to console them; for I have withdrawn My peace from this people,” declares the LORD, “My lovingkindness and compassion.
6 “Both great men and small will die in this land; they will not be buried, they will not be lamented, nor will anyone gash himself or shave his head for them.
7 “Men will not break bread in mourning for them, to comfort anyone for the dead, nor give them a cup of consolation to drink for anyone’s father or mother.
8 “Moreover you shall not go into a house of feasting to sit with them to eat and drink.”
9 For thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: “Behold, I am going to eliminate from this place, before your eyes and in your time, the voice of rejoicing and the voice of gladness, the voice of the groom and the voice of the bride.
10 “Now when you tell this people all these words, they will say to you, ‘For what reason has the LORD declared all this great calamity against us? And what is our iniquity, or what is our sin which we have committed against the LORD our God?’
11 “Then you are to say to them, ‘It is because your forefathers have forsaken Me,’ declares the LORD, ‘and have followed other gods and served them and bowed down to them; but Me they have forsaken and have not kept My law.
12 ‘You too have done evil, even more than your forefathers; for behold, you are each one walking according to the stubbornness of his own evil heart, without listening to Me.
13 ‘So I will hurl you out of this land into the land which you have not known, neither you nor your fathers; and there you will serve other gods day and night, for I will grant you no favor.’
I’ve never noticed that before! Isaiah 57:5 seems to be a reference to Druids, or some other idolaters like them.
“I’ve never noticed that before! Isaiah 57:5 seems to be a reference to Druids, or some other idolaters like them.”
My sentiments EXACTLY, admin!
That most Holy and sublime Scripture is speaking ABOUT US, and ONLY US.
Please ALL my Anglo-European brothers and sisters, come back to your Saviour, and your rightful inheritance as a nation, and as a People.
Isaiah 57:5
Who inflame yourselves among the oaks,
Under every luxuriant tree,
Who slaughter the children in the ravines,
Under the clefts of the crags?
~
Oh my Lord, you are so right.
It seems like a DIRECT REFERENCE to the very title of this article — Thor’s “Sacred Oak Tree’!!
Dear Angel-Sachsen and Admin,
Have a look at Ezekiel 27 – the prophecy against Tyre. In Masonic lore, you may recall that Prince Hiram Abiff was the architect of Solomon’s temple. The King of Tyre of the famous prophecy Ezekiel 28 is of course Lucifer.
Tyre in ancient Phoenecia is very close to the Ur of the Chaldeans in what is today Syria – one such site which was excavated at Ebla. This fourgated city had Ba’ al (Or Bel or Marduk – as he was called in Babylon) as one of the gods. The great pagan fire festival Beltaine (pronounced Bel’ un in Britain) marked this in N.W. Europe.
The Chaldean cult of Ur went out on the Phoenecian trade routes to Britain (Ynys Prydain of the Brithonic Celts). Beli Mawr was a god of the groves – the Oaks of Bashan ref in Ezekiel 27:6 refers to this cult. The star worshiping cults of Ur were hieratic cults; they worshiped in groves – especially the mountain groves. That is where they made their human and animal sacrifices. In the old religion of Britain this sacrifice is bound up with the sacrifice of the Oak and Holly Kings at Yule and summer solstice. The Yew groves were also ‘sacred’ in Gaul and Britain.
This ancient religion of Ur continues through the Moriah Dynasty of the power elite today and they have initiated ‘Illuminists’ of their secret societies into their rites. They coveted Mt Moriah a ridge of Mt Hermon / Sion then; they covet it today. You can read all about their Yew Grove stuff in information about the Bohemian Grove ceremonies conducted by their Illuminsts / Secret Societies of the world power elite. Just Google Bohemian Grove. These are rites of the Yew held in another grove of ancient conifers – the Sequoias. Nothing has changed with these people. They still worship the stars as the thrones of the fallen angels. They still worship devils and make human sacrifices in their sacred groves.
But the peoples who left the plains of Shinar, holding onto their religion of the Patriarchs going back to Adam forsook the Nimrod project and its Annunu.Ki gods and the persecutions. The people of Japeth migrated out of that part of the world holding to the religion of the Patriarchs and their faith in the promise of the Redeemer. They might not have held onto it in their migrations across the Caucasus and into N.W. Europe, but I expect many of their clans did preserve some of its traditions even though their rulers degenerated into idolatry or it may have been imposed upon them through conquest. At any rate, they remained as nations less degenerate in their appearance and abilities from the first parents of the human race (of ruddy complexion), so perhaps there were among the caucasion nations of Japeth’s sons many kin who did not completely degenerate from the monotheism of the Patriarchs.
But tribes of those nations refounded upon the antedeluvian idolatries pursued them into the north with war.
I don’t think there is any case to be made for racial supremacy through evolution or creation or bio-engineering by space aliens or Divine creation / election. The latter is Talmudism pure and simple.
I do think there is a case for racial degeneracy through idolatry with the nations holding most closely to the faith of the Patriarchs of the human race also being closest to our parents and originals in appearance and abilities. That faith became covenant relationship in the tribe of Shem. Once the Redeemer in which the faith of the Patriarchs hoped and awaited had come, then all nations could be regenerated in Him – even (especially) those who have fallen the furthest.
But the religion that is described in these passages of Isaiah and Ezekiel is the religion of racial supremacy, and it is the religion of the power Elite today. Nothing has changed.
This is fascinating stuff. Now I understand the connection that runs through Baalism and Druidism to what President Richard Nixon called the “faggots” at the Bohemian Grove and their Cremation of Care.
http://www.infowars.com/bg_photo_natl_geo.html
Alex Jones snuck in and filmed this pagan ceremony which glosses over human sacrifice by pretending to be the purging of carnal concerns. Redwood trees play a necessary role in the idolatry, but the focus of worship is now a 40-foot-tall owl. It is amazing enough that this is a cherished ritual among the elites, but it would be even more amazing if the masses were also enthralled by the false worship, as was the case in the first millennium. If this were still the case today, we would have a new St. Boniface to take a chainsaw like this to the trunks of the “sacred” redwoods:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvAI7-Qa2Io
And he would turn to the neo-Druids and, like Isaiah, ask if their god is too busy on the toilet to hear them.
“And so it was, at noon, that Elijah mocked them and said, ‘Cry aloud, for he is a god; either he is meditating, or he is busy, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is sleeping and must be awakened.’ So they cried aloud, and cut themselves, as was their custom, with knives and lances, until the blood gushed out on them. And when midday was past, they prophesied until the time of the offering of the evening sacrifice. But there was no voice; no one answered, no one paid attention.”
1 Kings 18:27-29
“This is fascinating stuff. Now I understand the connection that runs through Baalism and Druidism to what President Richard Nixon called the “faggots” at the Bohemian Grove and their Cremation of Care.”
Lynda and admin,
Great verses and conclusions.
Here is another one to consider -
Revelation 2
New International Version
14 Nevertheless, I have a few things against you: You have people there who hold to the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to entice the Israelites to sin by eating food sacrificed to idols and by committing sexual immorality.
15 Likewise you also have those who hold to the teaching of the Nicolaitans.
16 Repent therefore! Otherwise, I will soon come to you and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.
[...]
20 Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols.
21 I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling.
22 So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways.
23 I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds.
24 Now I say to the rest of you in Thyatira, to you who do not hold to her teaching and have not learned Satan’s so-called deep secrets (I will not impose any other burden on you):
25 Only hold on to what you have until I come.
26 To him who overcomes and does my will to the end, I will give authority over the nations—
27‘He will rule them with an iron scepter;
he will dash them to pieces like pottery’
just as I have received authority from my Father.
28 I will also give him the morning star.
29 He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches.
Yes, Angel-Sachsen, this reading from the Apoc comes more clearly into focus with each passing year. I meditated on those verses when I first became aware that the post conciliar R.C. Church had changed the rubrics of the canonized Roman Rite in the English ‘translation’.
Anti pope Paul VI (the rabbi) together with that prince of darkness Anibale Buganini (later revealed to be a Mason) changed the Apostolic canons for the consecration of the chalice (in the English version). They changed the confession of the Mysterium Fidei. And specifically, they changed the rubric so as to bring it under the anathema of Trent which forbids the current usage of the consecration “for all.” Such a lex orandi opens the way to the ecumenical doctrine of universal salvation. Forbidden by the Church – in the ordinary constant magisterium – as a heresy.
The Church distinguishes very carefully between our Lord’s sacrificial atonement for all – the Divine magnanimity and the tragedy that all do not avail themselves of the Redemption. Magnanimity on the part of the God man and churlishness on the part of men – indeed entire nations. No heretical change of the canons can (or should) conceal this truth.
But the ‘for all’ in novus ordo missae has become the basis for the antipapal leadership in the new, one world ecumenical church currently aborning in W.C.C. and the Orthodox / Roman Catholic ecumenical relations – esp with the Moscow Patriarchate subverted since the Bolshevik Revolution.
I want you all to stay well clear of the ecumenical kissy-kissy with the anti pope. There currently do exist rites in the novus ordo that blaspheme our Lord in His Mysterium Fidei. And the end is not yet. In the U.S. the fifth American diocese (Iowa) is in liquidation to pay for sex crimes against minors – specifically sodomy of minors. The rites of the fallen Archangel and sins crying to heaven.
I see no fruits of repentence. What I see is that for a bishop to even be considered for a cardinal’s hat, he has to have a sex tab of at least a billion – like that satan Roger over at the Taj Mahoney, like that William ‘sod em all’ Levada of Portland and San Francisco. This latter cadaver is currently in occupation of St Mary Major in Rome.
In the 1950s, high ranking legal officer to the Communist Party in America, Bella Dodd, testified before the House of UnAmerican Activities Committee that the CPA had sent 1111 men into the seminaries to bring down the Church in America. They have done their work only too well. It will take the entire patrimony built up during centuries of faith and practice to pay for these crimes.
No wonder Our Lady wept at La Salette and the Prince of the Host prostrated himself upon the earth at Fatima begging for the conversion of poor sinners for infinte merit of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts!
Our Lady of Guadalupe, Patroness of the Americas and Protectress of the unborn, pray for America.
Your assertion that Charles Martel was a Christian is false. He was a pagan. His line did not adopt the scourge of christianity until his grandson, Charlemagne. But rewritting historical facts are what your ilk are all about.
Rusty,
I recommend Pastor John Weaver’s sermon entitled: “Interracial Marriage, Idolatry
and Multiculturalism” (http://www.dominionministry.com/single8.shtml) as a good start for answering some of your questions. Here are some of his sermons free of charge on SermonAudio.com:
http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?SpeakerOnly=true&currSection=sermonsspeaker&keyword=John%5EWeaver.
Jon, I wrote, “Charles Martel’s purpose for living was not merely to rescue European genes. It was to rescue Christendom and civilization.” This is not up for debate. It’s absolutely true. Then you wrote, “Your assertion that Charles Martel was a Christian is false.” Yes, he was a Christian (baptized by St. Rigobert, bishop of Reims), and as Edward Gibbon said, he saved Christendom and made your life and my life possible as the descendants of a free, Christian people rather than the thralls of Muslims. Much like the apostle Paul, he had a checkered early life, and a mistress too. But my statement stands, and yours is nonsense. As soon as you have real proof that we have rewritten history, you’re welcome to share it, as long as you don’t turn it into a speech.
Oscar, not only is that an excellent sermon (which the SermonAudio people don’t want on their site, for obvious reasons), but John Weaver is one of the best Southern preachers to be found – if not the best. Be sure to hear his sermons on Jews too.