Things That are Racist
September 18, 2009 
31 Comments
Take a good, long look at this picture, and watch the video. “Public education” is just expensive child abuse, as we’ve always said, but that’s mainly because Equality is abuse of us all. Any government which declares savages from the vile fens of Africa to be our equals does not deserve to survive. When the South fell, we all fell. We only pray that our people endure long after this nightmare has ended. I also beg your indulgence for a personal note to all the “ministers of the gospel” who have allowed this to happen through their silence, complicity, and wholehearted support: We will never rest until we bring you to justice. You serve the father of lies, not the Lord God.
And how do you like that police captain “backtracking on whether the attack was racially motivated”? He must have received a come-to-the-Jew call from the mayor.
Rush Limbaugh is now calling for a return to segregated busses, and it’s not clear if he is being sarcastic.
The NAACP is defending the black pre-felons, as anyone could have guessed. But if the races were reversed in this incident, there would be no end to the noise. There would be congressional hearings. Obama would interject baritone platitudes. There would be 24/7 news coverage for weeks on end.
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch says it was a simple matter of bullying and accuses online readers of racism. When Matt Drudge simply reported it, someone accused him of wanting to start a race war. But no one accuses the black kids who were cheering on the attackers of any such thing. You can see a couple of white kids sitting in the front of the bus, too scared to move. You know that if they had swung arms at the attackers, the Jew-media would have called it a brawl or a “blacklash” and said nothing about what started it. The fabled MLK policy of non-violence isn’t working out well for whites. That stuff only works against whites. Africans must have a show of force demonstrated against them, as Albert Schweitzer and everyone else who has actually dealt with them knows.
Three days later in St. Louis, another white student was badly beaten on a middle school bus by black thugs. It was captured on tape but school authorities are refusing to release it.
MSNBC explains that shouting disagreement at Obama is “bigotry.”
This black “intellectual” calls it “terrorism.”
It has everything to do with South Carolina secessionist racism, writes Maureen Dowd.
If something isn’t done about it fast, people will be putting on “white hoods and white uniforms again and riding through the countryside,” says a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
A “black conservative,” who is the former head of the Dallas County Health and Human Services, knows what disagreeing with Obama really means: the secret desire to “start killing Black folk like back in the Klan days.”
A Dallas Darkie writes that criticizing Obama is “tantamount to spitting on the flag.”
Jimmy Carter wants to be heard too. Thanks, Jimmy.
No one really believes that rebuking Joe Wilson for shouting “You lie!” at the First Father is anything other than a political game and a witch hunt. So who are the real liars but those congressmen who are pretending that the rebuke (the first ever of its kind) is necessary to uphold decorum and civility? According to actual House guidelines, the words “disgrace” and “nitwit” are acceptable, but “liar” and “hypocrite” are verboten.
Something named Eboo Patel explains, in the Washington Post, that it is racist to quote black people. Oh, and Van Jones is a patriot.
Black lesbians rise up like a pack of unwashed slop-hounds to denounce the racism of Hank Williams Jr. Since Hank’s father was also a racist, now we know what “Hey Good Lookin’” was all about.
Refusing to go trillions more into debt to insure everyone is racist, writes a Jew.
Seriously, what are we going to do about all these racist babies and dogs?
Where, pray tell, is the “naturalism” so beloved by liberals? The “let nature take its course” attitude that they apply to sexuality, for instance? Can you imagine a sharp concern about “is your baby gay?” and efforts to uproot that?
Please go back to the previous post and read again the consensus definition of “racism.” Then I want you to realize that pastors have denounced this as not simply wrong but “sinful.”
Jesus was a racist, says someone with the revealing name of Miguel De La Torre. Jesus had to be “taught” by a “woman of color” that racism prevents the poorest among us from having free health care, and her lesson “shocked Jesus into realizing that faith was not contingent on a person’s ethnicity.”
This woman of color had to cross the “border” demarcated by Jesus’ culture. But she crosses this border not to worship her oppressor (Jesus), but to demand an equal place at the table of the Lord. She demands to be treated as an equal.
It matters little if she belongs. It matters less if she has proper documentation. Her daughter was sick and because of her humanity, she was entitled to a healing.
Robert Stacy McCain of the Washington Times had the crazy idea that “racism” means something like wanting to hurt someone of a different race, or at least hating them. So he made the mistake of saying that an instinctive revulsion against miscegenation is not racism. He even wrote it in all capitals. Oh boy. We live in the year 2009, and we should know by now that if MLK’s dream meant anything, it at least involved the legal deflowering of your daughter. When demands came for him to clarify, McCain weaseled out.
Blacks tried to show the world that they could maintain a library system, and it turned out about as well as when blacks try to maintain any other form of government. Please refer to our recent post on Philadelphia.
The Obamination machine funnelled millions of campaign dollars to ACORN. The founder of ACORN once supported a terrorist bomb plot, and Obama was once ACORN’s lawyer. In this video, you’ll see ACORN supporting prostitution, child sex slavery, tax fraud, bank fraud, immigration fraud, and money laundering, to name a few. Here is how the two architects of the sting were dressed, like actors in a blaxploitation flick. The girl who posed as the prostitute, Hannah, went on the Glenn Beck show, and the rest of the media ignored the story until pressure mounted to revoke all federal funding from ACORN. These “community organizers” who gave Obama his start are a front for Communism, and obviously much worse. The very same criminals were placed in charge of the 2010 census by Obama, the first time that the census rules set down by Thomas Jefferson have been subverted.
You saw the “teabagger” image in our last post, but it didn’t even register with us at the time that the gathering was going to be so huge. “It is a record,” says a spokesman for the National Park Service. “We believe it is the largest event held in Washington, D.C., ever.” But where were these people when George W. Bush was wiping himself with the Constitution?
The Tea Partiers and Town Hallers still love their niggerisms. That’s okay. The sleeping giant is beginning to stir.
“One of America’s top college football stars says murder is no big deal because everybody does it. And then they wonder why nobody wants to live around blacks?”
A beautiful white girl, Taylor Swift, surrounded by jungle creatures. That’s entertainment! “For those with short memories, Kanye West is the same diversity that took a whiz on his dressing room carpet last year in England. You can have a civilized country. Or you can have Diversity. But you can’t have both.”
Not a word yet from Obama on Serena Williams, who is about three stops past Crazytown, threatening to kill a referee. Sportsmanship has never been high on the list of black priorities, and whites have learned to emulate their babboonish behavior. Officer Crowley’s name was dragged through the mud by the niggerati for something far less serious, the arrest of a man for breaking into a house. When will we hear that the tennis referee “acted stupidly”?
Blacks are largely incapable of understanding politics and dissent, not to mention free speech and liberty. But Carol Swain, a professor at Vanderbilt, is the odd black woman of honor who disagrees that white “self-preservation” is on the “radical fringe.” Astounding.
You don’t know what you’ve got til it’s gone.
Twenty years after Peter Brimelow began to show, in the pages of National Review, what immigration was doing to us, followed by his landmark book Alien Nation, National Review thinks up a brilliant plan to save California: halt only illegal immigration. Let’s see, $40 per year for a subscription times 20 years equals $800 for an incomplete strategy two decades late. And seeing Pat Buchanan called an anti-Semite on top of it. Yeah, that’s “conservatism.” Not a day late and a dollar short; more like 20 years and $800 short.
Mexicans are sounding a lot like us: “Keep the Mexicans out!”
A “nation” of strangers. “We find children of immigrants so confused as to their identities that they take guns and blow people up as per example of the Korean immigrant kid at Virginia Tech who rampaged the campus with a killing spree. Seung-hui Cho killed 32 and wounded 25. He said on his video, ‘You forced me into a corner.’ Not Korean, not American, he lacked identity, thus meaning, thus balance. Everybody became his enemy.”
Man, Doug Wilson has some cute grandkids, but I’m stymied that the video for his daughter’s clothing company doesn’t show any of the local color in London, except for one suspicious character who is contributing to British culture by pounding a bongo drum on the sidewalk. Do they think this is still 1950? Did they think they were filming in Idaho? Should we not call them “skinists” for doing this? And to make matters worse, they used a soundtrack that refers to “the rosy red cheeks of the little children.” Shocking racism. I assure you that there are hardly any children being born in Britain today who have rosy red cheeks. The most popular name for baby boys born in London today is “Mohammed.” I wonder why the Wilsons are hiding the truth from us.
The Irish will soon vote for their own dispossession, and the disgusting pamphlet for the Lisbon Treaty doesn’t hide its goal: Europe is to be given to non-Europeans. And white women will be able to giggle all day at work with their black fag BFFs.
“And what are Americans to do, as their country fills up with the kind of people who name their children Jesus and Stalin?”
This is the reason why The Searchers is the greatest of all Westerns:
If it is no big deal for the stolen girl to live among the Indians as a squaw, then what would be the motivation for rescuing her?… In other words, absent Ethan’s view that living as a captive sex object among the alien is a fate worse than death, would her rescue be worth the effort and the risk?
TOQ is holding a contest to see who can write the best essay about libertarianism, and I think it could already be over after this essay by Prozium, which is like brass knuckles set to print.
There is something odd about an atheist libertarian homosexual engaged in an interracial relationship invoking “his legacy” of Christianity and conservatism in Randroid spittle to damn racialists… Libertarians and Objectivists strive to abolish/neuter/level all higher social orders (race, ethny, nation, culture, faith, family) with their prescription of anarchy and their ideological poison of radical atomistic individualism…
In Raimondo’s bizarro world, the decent and indecent have switched places: the man who takes pride in his race, the man who puts the long term interest of future generations above satiating his every whim, is now to be the object of cultural opprobrium, not the libertine iconoclast who flaunts every custom, tradition, and authority in the name of his ineffable “rights.”
And this is probably the simplest and most correct statement to be made about libertarianism:
As a libertarian, Raimondo acknowledges no debt to the past.
Coincidentally, this is precisely the Kinist diagnosis of what ails lying preachers.
The White Nationalist project is simple enough to understand. It can be boiled down to fourteen words: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”
Next Spring, will Israel’s expected war against Iran be the last straw for the American economy? We keep waiting and watching to see what will finally end it all. Oil at $300 a barrel and all other costs associated with yet another war will probably do it.
Some “climates of fear” are more racist than others.
“The sun has never shone on a more bloodthirsty and vengeful people than those who imagine that they are God’s people who have been commissioned and commanded to murder and slay the Gentiles. In fact, the most important thing that they expect of their Messiah is that he will murder and kill the entire world with their sword.” ~ Martin Luther, On the Jews and Their Lies, 1543
James Traficant, the #1 target of AIPAC, is back, with his wild toupee, from 7 years in the slammer. He alone is worth about a thousand “respectable” (i.e., Jew-paid) congressmen. John Demjanjuk, whom Traficant helped to free, is now back in custody, as you know. Show me one other congressman willing to place his neck on the chopping block like this. Just one.
I believe that Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American government. They control both the House and the Senate. They have us involved in wars in which we have little or no interest. Our children are coming back in bodybags. Our nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your mouth, you get targeted. And if they don’t beat you at the polls, they put you in prison.
“Are you an anti-Semite?” asks Professional Idiot Greta Susteren. It’s hate to guard our own people against foreign intervention. Scratch that – it’s hate to even think that we have our own people.
“Apparently, some Christians still haven’t gotten the message that they’re not allowed to express any religious beliefs outside their home or church that Jews don’t agree with.” Offending Jews is anti-Semitism, and nothing offends them more than Jesus Christ.
The government of Israel has launched a campaign against “mixed marriages,” but they can’t encourage whites to mix fast enough.
Imagine for a moment if posters in America or Europe showed White women who intermarried with other races or for that matter, with Jews, branded as “lost”? If any person of European descent dared to do this, he would be attacked by media, and the entirety of the political and social establishment. “Racist!” would be screamed from the headlines of every major newspaper. But, of course, the silence is deafening, in that the silence screams of the hypocrisy in our Koshered modern world. How many Europeans and Americans are even aware that in Israel, Jews and non-Jews cannot legally marry?… It gets even more bizarre. In Israel, the Cohanim, or the genetic priest class (or elite) of the Jews are forbidden by the Israeli Government to marry a fully religious Jew who has but a drop of Gentile blood, even many generations back.
Some examples here and here of Jews corrupting youth. They still like to use subliminal messages for the very young children. By the teenage years, it’s no longer necessary.
The Jew at the End of This Book, starring loveable, furry, old Grover.
The Harvard Crimson repents in sackcloth and ashes for running a Holohoax denial ad from Bradley Smith.
We recognize how sensitive a subject this is for our community and appreciate all the e-mails and letters we have received about it from concerned members of the University. We have made sure that the rest of the ad’s planned run has been terminated, and any money that has changed hands in exchange for the ad to date will be returned.
That was a close call. A university almost succumbed to the free exchange of ideas and rational debate.
Our good friend and colleague Bill Rolen on the Frankfurt School (part 1, part 2). It found refuge here in America at a Marxist university until Hitler was defeated, and then it was free to return to Germany. The basic idea is that anyone who thinks like our white, Christian forefathers suffers from insanity and needs to be treated by Jew psychotherapists.
How the virgin became a whore. “The ‘oligarchs’ are a tiny group of entrepreneurs who exploited the disintegration of the Soviet system to loot the treasures of the state and to amass plunder amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. In order to safeguard the perpetuation of their business, they took control of the state. Six out of the seven are Jews.” This is something to consider in light of the fact that the UN wants a new global reserve currency, and Jews are the only ones who can make it happen.
There’s nothing inherently wrong with the word “paleoconservatism.” It makes the point that true conservatism looks backward as much as it looks forward. Chilton Williamson, Jr. has the best definition of the word that I’ve ever read: “the expression of rootedness: a sense of place and of history, a sense of self derived from forebears, kin, and culture—an identity that is both collective and personal.” The trouble with the word is that, as you’ve read here before, nothing is neutral. Anything not explicity and self-consciously Christian will eventually become explicitly and self-consciously anti-Christian. Therefore, red flags should wave if a Jew, in this case Paul Gottfried, invents a word, in this case paleoconservatism, that is ostensibly designed to describe a worldview that encompasses white, Christian civilization. It would be better to use a different label for ourselves entirely.
This is the 2,000th anniversary of Hermann the German’s victory over Rome at the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. Hermann is also called Arminius, and he was the first great hero of Germany. His victory is said to have marked the origin of the German nation. But Jews today call this a dangerous, racist cult, because it gave rise to Hitler and the idea that Germany belongs to Germans. (Jews are not content to reprimand and punish Germans for events of the last century. They want to go back 2,000 years and delegitimize the basis for national unity itself. If Hitler were alive today, he would say, “I told you so.”) Now German men have all made appointments with Jew doctors to have their testicles removed. In high-pitched voices, they denounce both their ancestors and nationalism, but there are still some soccer fans who have avoided the testicle knife. These people are called “hoodlums” in the Jew-media.
You probably don’t want to look at these graphic pictures, but can I just ask, “What the hell?” Never mind. I’ll never understand strangers anyway. But I would love to know how white liberals with “Free Tibet” on their bumper stickers can believe that Tibetan liberty is more important than the cause of American liberty.
In Asia, white skin solves all problems (part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4). Pond’s Flawless White can help you too win back the rapacious land developer who once loved you, before he met a lighter-skinned woman and forgot all about your swarthy hide.
Black South African Internet speeds are bested by a carrier pigeon.
Ken Ham’s crude reductionism. Tim gives him a lesson in probability theory. I think I speak for everyone here when I say that Tim seriously needs to write a book. Srsly.
“Snow White is a selfless, sweet, maternal homemaker. She displays all of the peasant virtues. The message of Grimm’s fairy tale as well as Walt Disney’s movie is that the cheerful labor that goes into making a home and raising babies is the true royal quality, and it is that quality which ultimately merits the love of a handsome prince.” The Little Mermaid, twenty years ago, depicts a girl who is “completely self-absorbed. She routinely disobeys her father and the rules of her society. She is willful and headstrong… Finally, she abandons her family, her friends and her race—all those who should be most dear to her—never to see them again, so that she can become a human and marry her prince.” This was one of Disney’s last films about white princesses. Ever since, the focus has been on Indians, Gypsies, Chinese, and this year, blacks.
Excellent news: free podcasts of the Political Cesspool to put on your iPod and listen to while working or driving or streaking. You also want to load up on mp3s of conference speeches. David Duke and Jared Taylor post a lot of these.
The pro-life movement’s first martyr is Jim Pouillon. This was the poster he was holding when he was shot. This is a picture of Jim’s “truth truck.” This Jewspaper smears him by saying he had an “extensive background of civil violations,” as though that’s something bad, and listing every one. Anti-Christs would never do this to their own precious martyrs. Though we did not join them, many Christians denounced the killing of Tiller (we thought it was cause for a party). In fact, it would be fair to say that the vast majority of Christians denounced it. There will be no such reciprocation for Pouillon’s murder. On this page, the general feeling is that “the Pro-Incubation crowd just got a wake up call from the front desk of the Reap the Whirlwind Hotel.”
This is a very interesting exchange between Greg Johnson and Alex Linder. Johnson makes the point that, unlike aristocratic societies, social mobility in individualistic societies is dominated by those “who combine intelligence and ambition with a shallow, extroverted, conformist personality type.” They are far more likely to be semitically correct because they know that their status is determined by achievement and endorsement rather than birth; and while money can buy anything, it also guarantees nothing. “No sane society should be ruled by people like this.” And no one has learned how to exploit this inferior system better than Jews.
In my darker moods, I wonder if a race that allows itself to be led by people who put trivial issues of personal status ahead of collective survival can be saved, or even if it deserves to be saved. There is something disgusting about people who have all the money in the world and permit themselves less freedom to speak their minds than a truck driver or short order cook… The depressing truth I am struggling to come to grips with is that our race must be saved IN SPITE OF ITSELF, and AGAINST ITS WILL. No healthy organism needs to be provided with a moral justification for its survival. But white people do. From a biological point of view, this is morbid and decadent. But since we are not in a position to simply remove this weakness, we have to deal with it. That is the most important strategic question.
Linder is tired of strategy sessions, dinner parties, and conferences – what some have called “eat, meet, and retreat.”
Let’s not lie to ourselves. Just as the dumb guys with the swastikas fantasize they are warriors, we smart guys are apt to fantasize we are leaders because we are chock full o’ good ideas.
We should know, if we’ve ever been in business or had any experience in anything, the world is full to its eyeballs of good ideas. What is rare as hell is anybody to execute them.
“Of all those who consciously or unconsciously oppose the Majority cause, the modern conservative is the most dangerous.” ~ Wilmot Robertson
Pat Buchanan makes the same point that we make routinely, even in the previous post. Judeochristians, faileocons, and feebletarians want to believe that we can give away our country and subsidize mulattoes and teach them all to be Christians. But it doesn’t work that way, because no one who hates himself and his people like this is going to love Christ.
The European-Christian core of the country that once defined us is shrinking; as Christianity fades, the birth rate falls and Third World immigration surges. Globalism dissolves the economic bonds, while the cacophony of multiculturalism displaces the old American culture.
“E pluribus unum” – out of many, one – was the national motto the men of ’76 settled upon. One sees the pluribus. But where is the unum? One sees the diversity. But where is the unity?
To make their case, the race-mixing Christians just need to prove one thing to us: that a disjointed, disunited pseudo-people desires to be regenerated by the gospel. There is not a single example in history to go by, so they ask us to take their word for it. Meanwhile, they have the audacity to accuse us of sin for resisting their actions, even though they know that every one of our Christian forefathers would denounce them, not us. On another note, if Pat Buchanan is saying this, you know it’s on the right edge of the mainstream, which is still far to the left of us “haters,” but encouraging all the same.
Far from Christian faith, a pseudo-nation finds it impossible to retain even patriotism. Teachers in polyglot London are now calling patriotism A Bad Thing, just as we would expect. Do you think any people so mixed are going to call Christianity a good thing? If so, why do you think history has never provided us with a single example?
Just as new coins minted today are not allowed to bear the images of white men, a white man is not even pictured on the front cover of an advanced placement textbook on Western Civilization!
The man on the cover is Juan de Pareja. He was the Mulatto son of a slave girl who worked for the famous Spanish painter Diego Velazquez. The only reason this man’s name was recorded in history or his likeness painted, was because he swept the floor in Diego Velázquez’s workshop.
Rather than choose from the multitudes of famous people from Western society, Bedford/St. Martin chose a 17th century Mulatto janitor to grace the cover of a 1,050 page textbook on Western society!
Imagine the outrage if the same publishing company released “A History of Sub-Saharan Africa” and put a white man on the cover. The publisher would be denounced as racist and Al Sharpton would leads protests outside the New York publisher. Why are white people tolerating this slap in the face?
Bill Rolen made the same point on a recent show about Harry Alford, the black shakedown artist who, like Jesse Jackson, earns his living by threatening companies to hire blacks. Bill said that if he were to do the same thing, anywhere at any time, he would be thrown in jail for extortion, and he’s right. But blacks get away with it, not because they have good reason, but because parasites in power have a personal interest in protecting them. Then Bill O’Reilly and Dennis Miller call Alford a “conservative.”
What shall we say of these men who have lost all thoughts and cares of home? They are like the Lotophagi (Lotos Eaters) in The Odyssey, who feed on a plant that causes them to forget their families, their kin, and their homeland. The Lotos Eaters’ dehumanization is described in Tennyson’s poem by the same name.
Let us swear an oath, and keep it with an equal mind,
In the hollow Lotos-land to live and lie reclined
On the hills like Gods together, careless of mankind…They sat them down upon the yellow sand,
Between the sun and moon upon the shore;
And sweet it was to dream of Fatherland,
Of child, and wife, and slave; but evermore
Most weary seem’d the sea, weary the oar,
Weary the wandering fields of barren foam.
Then someone said, “We will return no more”;
And all at once they sang, “Our island home
Is far beyond the wave; we will no longer roam.”
“The culture of the white European is the culture of the Man on the White Horse. That man is not a Greco-Roman sage, he is not a Germanic or Celtic warrior, he is not a neo-pagan Nazi, and above all, he is not a modern, democratic-process man. He is a Christian man who knows not Kismet, who knows not fate.”
There are some excellent quotes at Waylander’s Keep. Try this one on for size:
Remember the days of old; consider the years of many generations; ask your father, and he will show you, your elders, and they will tell you. When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when He divided mankind, He fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God. ~ Deuteronomy 32:7,8
I will now translate these beautiful verses into Newspeak:
Remember the laws passed since 1950; consider the years since the Civil Rights Revolution; ask your pastor, and he will show you, your congressmen, and they will tell you. When the Great Spirit of Unity gave to the singular nation of Christians throughout the world their inheritance, when He amalgamated the church, He erased the borders of the peoples according to the decree of Joe Morecraft. ~ Al Goldstein 32:7,8
Here’s another verse I love: “And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in.” (Isaiah 58:12)
I AM the Lord of the Dance, said He.
http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/9284/51uktz2aclss500.jpg
At Pentecost, St Peter preached the Crucified to both the descendents of the Israel (Israelites) of the Fathers and to the Jews (Edomite descendents of Esau – conversos to the Israelite relgion in Roman Palestine). The Jews, had of course infiltrated the priesthood and at that time had an Idumean puppet king on the throne under the Rome of the Caesars. The more things change…
But Peter declared to them all: God has made this Holy One and the Just, whom you Crucified – both Lord and Christ “whom the heaven must receive until the times of the restitution of all things which God hath spoken by the mouth of his holy prophets from the beginning of the world.” Acts 3:21 DRV
Thus began the times of the Restutition. They continue still.
The thrones and altar of the Christendom have been thrown down by the JudeoMasonic Revolution for republic, liberty, equality and fraternity and this is now culminating in the Communist Revolution (by definition global)
But it is de fide that Our Lord who must reign until all enemies are under his feet, but he desires to reign over all nations by his Sacred Heart. He will restore both thrones and altar – the Christian polity in its nations (distinct ethne within their borders) and he will restore the Church. He will do it because he has declared it.
Thus, Omnia Instaurare in Christo is the great cause.
St Louis de Montfort prophesied that in the last times of the world “the enemies of God, idolaters, schismatics, Mahometans, Jews and souls hardened in impeity would rise in terrible revolt against God to seduce all those who shall oppose them and to make them fall by promises and by threats” approx 1700 A.D.
He also prophesied that for the times of the Restoration will be completed in the time of this great Rebellion, Our Lord would send his “ministers like a burning fire, who shall enkindle the fire of divine love”.
“They shall be clouds thundering and flying through the air at the least breath of the Holy Spirit, who, detaching themselves from everything and troubling themselves about nothing shall shower forth the rain of the Word of God and of life eternal. They shall thunder against sin; they shall storm against the world; they shall strike the devil and his crew; and they shall pierce through and through, for the life or for death, with their two-edged sword of the Word of God (Eph 6:17) all those to whom they shall be sent on the part of the Most High”
“They will tear down with one hand and build with the other” – rather like St Padraic who was one saint with an apostolic mission pro the Evangelium and contra the Druid Bond which held in thrall the entire population of Eire by the works of darkness.
“The Lord of Hosts shall give the word and the might to work marvels and to carry off with glory the spoils of His enemies. They shall sleep without gold or silver and what is more, without care, in the midst of the other ecclesiastics, priests and clerics”.
Enoch and Eliajah will return for their deaths were appointed to them in these latter times of the world referred to by St Louis.
And in these times, will come the fulfillment of what saints have long declared: ‘the three days of darkness’ in which the Lord will strike his enemies – the days of darkness and not light (Amos 5:18) and the destruction of Edom (Amos 6). In fact the entire book of Amos covers this subject.
The Great Work currently rolling over the entire globe is against nature and against God. It is against nature because there is no such thing as as a quantitative Level of equality in nature. There is quality, refinement of detail within order, hierarchy, aristocracies and monoarchy. There is also sacrifice – whose whose state in life obliges them to work and sacrifice for others. There is nobility (especially in the vows of baptism) and there is the highest nobility of our Lord’s example in poverty, chastity and obedience. In the Church, there is righteousness, peace and joy in the fellowship is in the Unity of the Holy Spirit of diverse peoples (nations) who adhere to their duties of state. Indeed, the Church is for all nations. But the Church also orders all nations who adhere to Apostolic Law. A nation like France has a very different station in the Church than a nation which has not communed in the Corpus Christi for over a millenia.
The Christ bearing race – the European race – is an aristocracy, not for any merit that we racially possess but because we received the faith and were baptised as nations. Upon us does the hammer stroke of the Revolution fall the hardest in the Great Apostasy. But to us is the greatest help and hope promised.
The Great Monarch who will arise will come from the Fleur de Lys. He will be of the Desponsyniac dynasty of Europe – those who are genetic descendents of King David – the messianic lineage. St Joseph was of that kin, so were Cleopus, Sts James and Jude, cousins of our Lord. Clovis, Charles Martel, Jan Sobieski and Charlemagne were of that kin. So was St Bernard of Clairveaux.
Eusebius confirmed that in Imperial times many of the Desposyni were bishops and kept their own geneologies and, of course, they were persecuted under Diocletian. Malachi Martin writes of this in The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church p. 44.
And, of course, Edomites insinuated themselves into this messianic lineage through Solomon and his idolatrous wives. So today we have virtually a Grail industry claiming descent from Christ and Mary of Magdamene – of which there will be assured more and much more ado. The ‘royal’ house of Anjou (the Jew) comes to mind.
Bottom line good people: “In man’s most dark extremity, oft Succour dawns from Heaven”.
Sir Walter Scott. Lord of the Isles, Stanza 20. And Sir Walter understood the Desposyniac legacy within Europe very well, the Tabernacle of David within the Church and the thrones of Christendom.
For those among us who think Democracy can ever flourist apart from a monoarchical guarantees and Apostolic law. Please think again. Democracies for degree of popular government were guaranteed by Constitutional Monarchies as under Magna Carta and the Declaration of Arbroath.
I will buy at leas 10 copies of Tim’s book, whatever it is about. Just write a book Tim, and they will come. If you’re worried about publishing, charge us full price for the pdf version.
Robert Stacy McCainiac, yeah I remember.
These are a few snips from the Great Southern League Race Debate, linked above in full @ http://spiritwaterblood.com/2008/08/the-great-southern-league-race-debate/ It pains me to read this debate from 1996ad. SO MUCH time wasted and damage done by the White haters.
God bless Dennis Wheeler! Dennis met them toe to toe! God bring us more men like Dennis, now! God save us from White haters, like R S McCainiac
#3.
From Stacy McCain to George Kalas.
July 17, 1996
Stacy McCain begins with a quote by George Kalas:
In a message dated 960716 14:02:37 EDT, you write: “Looks like the BOD may need to accelerate it’s efforts to publish a tract explaining why the SL’s agenda would benefit black Americans as well as white Americans.”
Certainly, you must point out the centrality of religion to the well-being of AfricanAmerican families, and that many blacks share with Southern whites a common culture of church-centered life. Of course, we also share many other cultural ties music, speech and cuisine, to name a few. And the economic and political benefit to black Americans of breaking away from the twin evils of welfare dependence and racially-oriented activism would be inestimable.
I have never understood those black or white who say that the South should necessarily be riven by racial antagonisms.
Robert Stacy McCain
__________________________
#14.
From Robert Stacy McCain to all.
July 20, 1996
Stacy begins with a quote from a previous post from Marion Lambert:
In a message dated 960719 19:07:17 EDT, you write: “Northerners can make good Southern League material but the Yankee can never.”
Stacy’s answer:
Something I’m having a hard time explaining to my Ohio-born wife, even though she went to school at Mount Vernon Academy in Ohio the same town where Vallandigham gave his famous speech in defense of the South!
Stacy gives a second quote from the same post: “We as White Southerners have much more in common with Southern Blacks than with the Yankee. The truth! Especially, this is true of hard
working churchgoing blacks in rural areas and small towns, who see how modern urban culture is deadly to their young people.” Jews, Blacks, etc. have a place in this organization based upon their ideology.”
Stacy’s response:
Dang straight. If the Martians landed tomorrow, that would be OK with me, so long as they believed in states rights, limited government, Western civilization and the Judeo-Christian ethic. But our luck, we’d get a bunch of Yankeefied Martian imperialists, just like in the horror movies.
By the way, has anybody here read the latest issue of New American. Some Yankee journalists showed up to cover a church fire in a little Texas town, went to the local newspaper office and said: “Take us to your racists.”
WOW!!!!
Robert Stacy McCain
That’s a slab of green-eyed woman there, Chris.
Which reminds me, I was just watching The Two Towers with the kids tonight. Tolkien speaks to us for this time in which we live. “The days have gone down in the West, behind the mountains, into shadow.” And with 10,000 orcs about to break down the door to the Keep and destroy the world of men, Theoden asks, What can we do in the face of such reckless hate? And then I saw the wonderful quote from Walter Scott: “In man’s most dark extremity, oft Succour dawns from Heaven.” That’s when God demonstrates that our salvation is from Him alone. And unlike most Christians today, we consider a God who saves the soul alone to be half a God. Instead, “He will restore both throne and altar.”
I second that motion, JPC, and when I think of the white-hating, cowardly clergy persecuting a great man like Tim Harris, it makes my blood boil.
Lee, I’m glad you reminded me about McCain. I knew the name sounded familiar, but I forgot that he squared off against Dennis. Dennis was a great and wise man, and my personal debt to him is inestimable. I know John Cripps feels the same way. Dennis was fond of Joe Morecraft, which was why Morecraft officiated at his funeral. But Morecraft has worked against us in every way.
http://spiritwaterblood.com/2008/03/comrade-morecraft/
He and McCain sound just alike.
I remember that scene, Admin. I thought it most meet that Theoden would recite those lines at that time in the film: The Two Towers.
In Tolkien’s second vol. the Poem “Where Now the Horse and the Rider? ” lacks the dramatic setting that I think it needs and particularly the final lines which were realized in Theoden’s onset at Pelennor.
As you have mentioned it, we might as well all enjoy it again:
Where now the horse and the rider? Where is the horn that was blowing?
Where is the helm and the hauberk, and the bright hair flowing?
Where is the hand on the harpstring, and the red fire glowing?
Where is the spring and the harvest and the tall corn growing?
They have passed like rain on the mountain, like a wind in the meadow;
The days have gone down in the West behind the hill into shadow.
Who shall gather the smoke of the dead wood burning,
Or behold the flowing years from the Sea returning?
A beautiful Anglo Saxon poem in modern English.
Look at how England’s great Bard picks up the last lines of this poem in ‘The Ride of the Rohirrim’
“The City was now nearer. A smell of burning was in the air and a very shadow of death. The horses were uneasy . But the king sat upon Snowmane, motionless, gazing upon the agony of Minas Tirith, as if stricken suddenly by anguish, or by dread. He seemed to shrink down, cowed by age. Merry himself felt as if a great weight of horror and doubt had settled upon him. His heart beat slowly, Time seem poised in uncertainty. They were too late! Too late was worse than never! Perhaps Theoden would quail, bow his old head, turn, slink away to hide in the hills.
Then suddenly Merry felt it at last, beyond doubt: a change. Wind was in his face! Light was glimmering. Far, far away, in the South the clouds could be dimly seen as remote grey shapes, rolling up, difting: morning lay beyond them.
….
For morning came, morning and a wind from the sea returning…
The Church expects a man of the Desposyni – the Davidic lineage of Europe through the Franks to reclaim the Crown of the Lilies. When upon the world stage you see the royal banner of the Fleur de Lys with the ensign of the Sacred Heart upon it – Por Dieu et France, then let the forces of the world Communist Revolution know with certainty their doom is at hand.
“Who is she that comes forth as the morning rising, fair as the moon, bright as the sun and terrible as an army with banners? Canticle of Canticles 6:10.
Our King gives great victories to the saints as well as to those who aspire – for his glory.
I had previously completely overlooked the two Morecraft articles and the Kinist response to them. I just zipped through all three very quickly and will go back and read them more carefully later. Rev. Morecraft is obviously saying various good things but one gets the distinct impression that he is conflating a lot of different “racisms” and that is not helpful. I’m still waiting for someone to invest the effort required to do an adequately nuanced critique of various “racist” perspectives. That’s one reason I hang around here and ask questions. Because of my lack of proper theological education, I should hate to think that I’m the only person in Christendom who is critical of Kinism and yet willing to take the trouble to actually identify my target before squeezing the trigger. If at some point in the future such a task falls into my lap (don’t expect it anytime soon), I hope my representations of people and positions will at least be recognizable to the parties concerned. I’m not all that surprised to see those sloppy features of Rev. Morecraft’s writing about racism, having already seen what a dog’s breakfast he made of the positions of Norman Shepherd, the so-called “Federal Vision,” the “New Perspective on Paul,” etc.
Back when the Great Debates were blazing away, I nicknamed Dennis Wheeler “Confederate Dreadnaught” for his iron-sided resilience to attack combined with his awesome intellectual firepower. Kalas, Lambert, Calvin Johnson, and, to a lesser extent, McCain, were literally driven to abstraction by Dennis’ historical facts and Kinist Christian doctrine. “Dixie” will never harmonize with “We Shall Overcome.”
The sad fact is that Dennis cast his pearls before swine. These nigrifiers continue their black-face-in-gray farce without shame. What they have managed to do is reduce the Confederate Cause to a shabby historical footnote. Without racial history on the side of the South, “Southern Nationalism” is just another propositional state.
The irony is that many yankees are coming around to our way of thinking. I noticed on the CofCC website some Copperhead in Brooklyn made the news for hanging a Confederate Battle Flag from his balcony every day. How many “black confederates” do that in Atlanta?
Beauregarde, I recall that George Kalas was the “rebmaster” (webmaster) for the Southern Party, which eventually deteriorated. Then he and another guy who was instrumental in the party decided that the Confederate battle flag was too stigmatized as racist, and they took it upon themselves to create a new flag for the South – some hideous triangular thing. Then they were never heard from again, possibly because they realized that there is no way to separate Confederates from the white race.
The League of the South took a lead role in helping the Southern Party soothe its personality flare-ups. And though there are a lot of good men in the League (including Hill and Sanders), the League has from the beginning insisted that Confederates can be non-white. This was true when Tom Fleming and Clyde Wilson were running the show, and it’s true now when Tom Moore is running the show. They were given the opportunity in 2001 to sign a Kinist statement of principles, and they refused.
Michael Hill: We oppose hate and racist groups, especially those mis-using our precious flag.
Question: Would you welcome more blacks in the South?
Hill: If more blacks wanted to come back to the South from other parts of the country…I got no problem with that.
Question: Do you have a problem with immigrants?
Hill: If they come here [from Mexico] to assimilate…then I don’t have any problems with it.
Question: Do you regard the United States as a Christian nation?
Hill: I don’t know if the United States has ever been a Christian nation.
Question: I’d like to ask Mr. Hill in his Republic of the South would they reinstitute any pre-Civil War laws of segregation?
Hill: I wouldn’t want to do that. I think that those days have passed.
Question: You are a racial separatist?
Hill: No, I’m not a racial separatist. All Southerners — Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals, Protestants, Catholics, Jews — the Confederate battle flag represents all Confederates, regardless of race or religion. It appears that they [the news media] wish to drive a wedge between Southern Blacks and Whites.
http://www.nationalist.org/alt/2001/041401.html
I should also point out that Dennis, in emails I received from him prior to his death, said as much as what Beauregarde and Lee said above – that he had wasted a lot of time with the League, and in his remaining years was much more involved with the CofCC. He came to realize that the CofCC was doing everything that the League should have been doing. In hindsight, he was correct. The CofCC has been MUCH more effective in the first decade of this century, and the League is rather irrelevant. I know Dr. Hill has been on Glenn Beck and other shows, because there has been a lot of talk about secession all over the country, but one has to ask what kind of leadership the League is actually providing, should secession become a reality. I think we would all have to conclude that, as Beauregarde said, “Without racial history on the side of the South, ‘Southern Nationalism’ is just another propositional state.”
Bearegarde is on very solid ground. Racial history is on the side of the South. Period.
And racial history is on the side of every European nation that has been Revolutionized in the JudeoMasonic Revolution inaugurated in 1789.
My grandson is just back from Europe where he has been on the Pilgram Way from Mont San Michelle to St James de Compostella in Santiago. And from his emails he tells me that the ancient pilgrim walk is flooded with young people his age or younger – young people of the European populations from all over the world are making the walk, kneeling at the shrines of the saints and reading the banned books. And of course, a deal of talk in the pubs and around the homes that are open to the young pilgrims all along the way.
The books in high disfavour in the new EU (and therefore essential reading) is Roy Campbell’s poem the Flaming Terrapin. My grandson called me long distance from Spain (at 3:12 am Australian time) He was in a dispute at a tavern over why this poem is so frowned upon in the EU. His Portuguese friends were telling him it was because of anti Catholic bigotry. He was arguing that it was because Roy Campbell, the poet soldier fought against the Red armies during the Spanish Revolution in the 1930s. The same banks (owned by the same Jews who financed the Bolshevik Revolution) sent Red Brigades from all over the world to overthrow the Catholic Church in Spain and throw down a republic on top of the ruins. The Catholic ‘fascists’ fought back and won a fruitless victory. But this was news over there. So they put in a call to Grandmother in Australia.
Quite an experience to speak to the young pilgrims over there and tell them yes, it is an historical fact that the ‘Abraham Lincoln’ Red Brigade from New York fought in the Bolshevik Revolution a.k.a. termed the Spanish ‘Civil’ War. Red Brigades from all over the world received Wall Street Bank finance to go over to Spain and fight. As nuns and priests were massacred wholesale and centuries of Catholic culture went up in flames, Catholics from all over the world also enlisted in Franco’s army to fight.
Roy Campbell and his family sheltered the Carmelite Fathers fleeing for their lives, but he managed to retrieve a lot of their archives from the burning library of the Carmelite monastery and he got many priceless mss right through the Red lines into France through the Pyranees.
Roy Campbell’s work is banned because he knows who was behind the JudeoMasonic Bolshevik Revolution in Spain. He fought in that war and he is a great poet whose works will always bear witness to his experience.
For the White Horse lovers of SWB who enjoyed one of Cambria’s latest posts “The Man on the White Horse”, don’t miss Roy Campbell’s poem “The White Horses of the Carmague”.
Nice story about the long distance call at 3:12 a.m. and the poem “Where Now the Horse and the Rider” The definition of Paleoconservatism, by Clinton Williamson Jr, “rootedness” is the polar opposite of Cosmopolitanism, meaning “rootless”
Yet, another example of the profound differences between Jew and Gentile.
Also, what about the head shots within the camp, of “conservative, “reformed”, “Southern” Whites adopting non-white children? Right from the script of “Camp of the Saints”, and the propositional New Confederacy. Former head of the Mississippi League of the South, Leslie Riley adopted a nigglet to stand in his family as a son, with his several White children. Riley is not the only Rainbow Confederate wannabe. How much permanent damage has been done, for lack of Biblical counsel/admonishment from leaders?
Quote every word Calhoun wrote? Home schooling? Full quiver? So what! Miscegenation and non-White adoption, are the end of the line.
O for crying out loud. Have you all seen the essay ‘Our Cause’ by Dr William Pierce over on http://www.DavidDuke.com.
Dr Pierce thinks a case can be made for the survival of the white race. Its just the politics of the cause which has him stumpted. But lo! a ‘spiritual base’ can be contrived for the cause if one identifies the purpose of white survival with the “purpose for which the earth was born out of the gas and dust of the cosmos.”
Great stuff. Not one to take the name of G_d in vain, I’ll tell you now, this kind of talk will scare the Bee Joosers out of the benighted Americans too dumbed down to even care about their own survival – must less the survival of the race.
Here is what Dr Pierce’s strategy is up against on his own turf: the political. Taken from a broadcast of James Joyce transcribed in The Synagogue of Satan.
“Bolshevism and international finance are the twin Jewish manifestations, a bulwark much too strong to invite attack. International finance is controlled by the great Jewish moneylenders and Communism is being propagated by Jewish Revolutionaries. These are at one fundamentally with the powerful captialists of their race in desiring an international world order which, of course, gives international sovereignty to the only international race in existence.”
Or this (Dec 3, 1942) from an address by Chaim Weizman, President of the World Jewish Congress – made in New York and carried by the New York Times and all the Eastern media. “We are not denying and we are not afraid to confess this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry…stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry.”
Two points. The U.N. charter is identical with platform of the Internationale. So the UN advances communism on all fronts. NATO (a Golem of the Zionist banks) is currently waging the war of the Kapital (wars for Communism) against sovereign nations in the Middle East. True communism is about all wealth concentrating in the hands of the private owners of the global super state. This Revolution has two world wars in its wake an is now far advanced on all fronts.
The mere existence of the international populations of the European race constitues a challenge to the “only international race in existence” and its imperium. And (get this Dr Pierce), they are coming from a true spiritual base – not a contrived one.
“You are of your father – the devil” Jesus of Nazareth
According to the Rosenthal interview and many, many authentic sources – the true spiritual base of Judaism is Lucifer. Its law is the Talmud. Its power is Ka Ba’ al ah. (The soul Ka of Ba’ al) The money thing is just applied Cabbalism. Its Agentur is Masonry – this is Joyce’ perception of “a bulwark much too strong to invite attack.”
Against this, Dr Pierce seriously proposes that we whites who just want to survive (oh please, please can we? please) look to the cosmic dust in its will to survive in the manifestation of the white race. This is a joke? Right?
Wrong. People who couldn’t agree on the smell of shyte seriously propose this.
Try this.
Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Rood (Sept 14 on the universal Western Kalendar)
Lesson viii in the Ordo is the Homily of Pope St Leo
Trans from the Latin: “The glory of the Cross shines over heaven and earth the Passion of our Lord wherein stands his judgement seat and the judgement of the world and the might of the Crucified.”
“Thou O Lord did spread out Thy hands all the day to an unbelieving and gainsaying people, yet the world is made to feel and own thy Magesty! Truly, our Lord, Thou has drawn all things unto Thee. For the senseless elements gave one wild cry of horror at the iniquity of Jewry; the lights of the firmament were darkened; day was turned into night; the earth quaked with strange tremblings…thus all God’s works refused to serve the guilty.”
“Now is the judgement of this world; now is the prince of this world cast down.”
Nunc judicium est mundi; nunc princeps hujus mundi ejicietur foras.
Psalm 109:4 “Thine, O Lord, is the dominion in the day of thy power amid the brightness of the saints; from the womb before the daystar have I begotten Thee.”
Tecum principium in die virtutis tuae in splendoribus sanctorum: ex utero ante luciferum genui te.
Hymn verse 4: Faithful Cross above all other, one and only noble tree
None in foliage, none in blossom, none in fruit they peers may be.
Sweetest wood and sweetest iron, sweetest Weight is hung on thee.”
Ant: The Holy Cross is exalted above all kings, the rod of power is lifted up, wherewithal the Saviour has triumphed.
Sanct Crux extollitur a cunctis regibus. Virga regina erigitur, in qua Salvator triumphavit.
This sign of the Cross shall appear in the heaven when the Lord shall come in judgement.
Hoc signum Crucis erit in cael cum Dominus ad judicandum venerit.
But before that Day, our Lord intends a restitution of all things to Himself. In this resitution, our Lord intends to triumph in his saints. Above all, he intends to triumph in the Immaculate Heart of Mary as she foretold at Fatima in 1917.
The new world order now abourning is neither new or an order. It is going to fall as nothing has fallen since Satan. This is certain. The only question for the white nationalist movement is where exactly do they intend to stand as these great events unfold? On what side of these battle lines do they want to lay down their lives?
There is no standard on this field for cosmic dust and its will to survival in the white race. There is either the standard of Christ or the standard of Lucifer under many names. Choose.
I wonder how Pierce was able to distinguish between spiritualism and flatulence. If I were going to make up my own religion, the sacraments would involve beer, Cheetos, and football. Everyone would take it about as seriously as I take Pierce’s own phony religion. Instead of jerking off about “cosmotheism,” he should have done something really impressive, like giving eyesight to the blind, healing the lame, sacrificing himself for his people, and raising himself from the grave. Then we would have paid attention.
We do agree with him that the white race must survive, but for a completely different reason. The Kinist desires this out of obedience to God. The Cosmotheist desires it because white people are closely-related accidents.
This has just been written by the Southern National Congress:
“Before all the nations of the earth we affirm that we are a separate and distinct People, with an honourable heritage worthy of the respect of all mankind. Bound together by a shared history, faith, and blood, we have endured hardship and tragedy but have also enjoyed the fruits of Christian civilisation built by God’s grace and the works of our hands. Under heaven, we possess the right to govern ourselves in our own land under our own laws, customs, and religion.”
And it would be a good statement if there were more than just the faintest hint that the South was founded of, by, and for white people, and so it shall ever remain. This is just more of the same. The LOS, the SP, the SNC, and many other groups have rejected Kinism. We’re very fond of the people in these groups, but they’re engaged in the biggest waste of time imaginable. For example, they think nothing of writing a statement like this and then inviting a token number of black delegates to their mock legislatures and Confederate balls, to dance with the women, and validate the gathering as non-racist. They enjoy having a token number of blacks in their churches for the same reason.
Saw this article in the NY Times, and had to post on it. A teacher is constantly absent and students decide to riot.
But when the students are not committing acts of barbarism, they are having MLK-like dreams of fantastic careers in engineering and accounting, so that’s good.
I love reading the headline and then the first sentence.
“Eager Students Fall Prey to Apartheid’s Legacy”
“Seniors here at Kwamfundo high school sang freedom songs and protested outside the staff room last year because their accounting teacher chronically failed to show up for class.”
Oh lawsy, the potential rocket scientists were eager to learn, and everything was going along fine until the legacy of apartheid returned. Damn that apartheid! Sure, they responded with violence to their teacher being late for class, but you’ve gotta keep your eyes on the prize, oh Lord, oh Lord. We shall overcome!
Ever read George Fitzhugh? I just finished Sociology for the South. It is the next best thing to Defense of Virgina!
Thanks for bringing that up, B.J. You’re right, Fitzhugh is must-reading. He’s not a one-trick pony, either. He covers a lot of ground, just like Dabney, and there is a lot to appreciate. He differed with what is commonly called the “neo-Confederate” viewpoint, as in the SNC statement above, that the white people of the South were different from the white people of the North. He saw them as being the same, and slavery was the difference. He showed that slavery was beneficial for both races by ripping into Adam Smith and everyone else responsible for the present system of capitalism, especially usurers. He saw such men as hawks who preyed upon the weak and defenseless.
He advocated natural hierarchy rather than artificial hierarchy, which was bound to be assumed by the rich who had no personal connection or dependence to those in their charge. Hence the rise of unions and social welfare, to compensate for what had been lost. And as we look around the world today, we see that he was right, and many of the rich abusers are not even of our own people, which is twice as bad because they are twice as brutal, having no long-term interest in our survival. He predicted that “democracy” would be hijacked by paid-off oligarchs.
Fitzhugh was heavily influenced by Thomas Carlyle, who also argued that slavery should never have been abolished. He said it should have at least been replaced by serfdom. But it seems that slavery’s existence at all in the New World was simply an attempt to closely approximate the feudalism of the Old World.
I think we need to look at these ideas with the benefit of centuries of hindsight and conclude that, though they were ingenious attempts to deal with the situation at hand, the importation of Negroes to our country was one of the worst mistakes ever made, if not the very worst. It does no good to argue for benevolence to the black slave, because he’s still black, and he will be freed eventually. The only solution is to exclude strangers from citizenship so that we can determine our own future. And pick our own damn cotton.
I’m always amused at people like the “neo-Confederates” and at Doug Wilson when he tries to defend the South. On the one hand, they’ll say that race doesn’t mean anything and that their version of the South would be multi-ethnic. To explain why, they will quote Galatians 3:28 to prove that racial differences are socially irrelevant. And then they’ll turn around and talk about how great the distinctive “Southern culture” is and how it excludes the uptight Anglo-Saxon Yankees. In other words, they’ll say that racial differences are meaningless, but vaguely-defined “cultural” differences are important and provide a biblically-sound basis for secession.
This is the main flaw in Doug Wilson’s critique of Kinism. He made some good points against certain manifestations of Kinism which display vainglory or pride or malice; certainly I have seen that, especially among the Kinists who associate closely with Christian Identity.
But, he was careless otherwise. In his writings he has no problem saying that God likes having distinct “nations” and that each “nation” should take care of its own – but he defines “nation” as a political, civic entity which is obliged to facilitate a multi-racial society, because whites or blacks or Mongoloids don’t have the right to look out for their own. In other words, separate spheres of responsibility for the U.S., Britain, Germany, Iran, etc., but not for white, blacks, Asians, etc. This is a queer hybrid between Bolshevism and patriotism that contradicts the very principle of Christian unity it seeks to uphold.
Yes, and I’ve never understood their theory of how culture originates. The most they ever say is that it grows out of the religion of a people (Henry Van Til: culture is religion externalized). But if this is the only factor involved, there would never have been so many distinct, sub-national cultures among European Christians. They go to great pains to pretend that race has nothing to do with it, as though anyone in the world could adopt our religion and maintain our culture. Nothing of the kind has ever happened, but lack of a single example has never swayed them. Even whites and blacks in America, after having shared 400 years of Christianity, are quite different in every way. And the very fact that they are different is often cited as the justification for miscegenation – to make them more alike. In other words, race does not exist, but since it does exist, it’s important that we eradicate it, so we can go back to saying that it does not exist. As silly as this sounds, it is literally the game plan of pastors these days, who have lost touch with the real Christianity of the past.
Doug Wilson is a very logical and reasonable man, yet he too falls into this logical pit. He’s like most white people, in that he has moved to where vast numbers of white people live so that he can hypocritically denounce the “racism” of other whites for whom racial difference is not a theory but a reality. This is essentially what Yankees have always done, and the mythology of their saintliness is now so many hundreds of years old that they can only go through the mindless motions when reciting the reasons for why Southerners had to be killed. They remind me of the buffoonish Iowan mayor in The Music Man who reflexively recites the Gettysburg Address at every town event. Not a single person pays him any attention, but he thinks he sounds very profound.
Still, I will compliment Wilson for reproving Michael Horton’s statement that “God has only one ‘nation,’ and that is the church.”
http://www.dougwils.com/index.asp?Action=Anchor&CategoryID=1&BlogID=6941
Wilson says no, God has many nations, but only one church. It takes a trinitarian to think this way, and it’s amazing that so many Christians have trouble with it. I grow weary of Horton’s Babelism.
Agreed. Where the cultural confusion really comes back to bite them is with regards to immigration. Most of the DeMar/Wilson types recognize that massive illegal immigration is causing a problem, and that immigrants need to assimilate. But it’s very difficult to define a principle of assimilation if race is rejected out of hand. They will appeal to some non-racial “culture” into which immigrants must assimilate – but how? What’re we going to do, pass a law that says Mexicans have to stop eating tacos and start eating hot dogs? Or worse yet, they’ll resort to the old “proposition nation” trick. This is just another failure of libertarianism.
That story about the dilapidation of schools in South Africa is sad, in part because the problem could be so readily remedied by hooking those students who really want to learn into Khan Academy over the Internet. Who needs a teacher when you’ve got Khan? The cost of computers has come down quite a bit in Africa and Internet access for school children should be a realizable goal, at least in South Africa. The NYT report and the accompanying video offered nothing at all in the way of suggestions for a viable solution. I guess the point was to stoke our sense of guilt and make us feel sorry for them?
What works, besides Henry Van Til’s The Calvinistic Concept of Culture are significant Reformed writings that examine how cultures originate? It seems like a difficult topic to work with, requiring both extensive research in historical anthropology and sound theology. It strikes me as an area of study where it would be particularly easy to go wrong. I should think it would also require a study of the future (eschatology), because we are after a theory not only of the origins of culture but also the transformation of culture. Anyway, even if you found them to be somewhat deficient, I’d like to know of any works that might be useful reading.
As for the many distinct, sub-national cultures among European Christians, doesn’t that have to do with the fact that they were largely in place before Christianity came in? (Haven’t linguistic differences traditionally been the primary boundaries between neighboring groups, beyond actual physical barriers?) I’m under the impression that Christianity transformed them and to a considerable (and probably continually growing) degree harmonized the subcultures of Europe, but each regional flavor was fairly stable, at least until the advent of long-distance mass transportation and mass communication. (My Mennonite ancestors were still speaking and writing in German 150 years after they relocated to America, and I just heard Kevin Swanson say in a recent Internet broadcast that even though the Amish make limited, selective use of modern technological innovations, they generally eschew use pneumatic tires on their horse buggies because they want long-distance travel to be physically uncomfortable.
Living in East Asia and seeing the gradual emergence of a Christian culture in some parts of it (there is reason to hope that China will eventually convert overwhelmingly to Christianity, and we should be praying specifically for that), I agree it seems hard to imagine cultures losing their distinguishing cultural genius over time as they Christianize. But achieving a high degree of harmony seems within the realm of the achievable, especially if the Holy Spirit wills it! Humanly speaking, this harmonization would seem to be easier to achieve among some cultures than among others . . .
“As for the many distinct, sub-national cultures among European Christians, doesn’t that have to do with the fact that they were largely in place before Christianity came in?”
It’s true that our culture has important pre-Christian elements that are worthy of being saved, but the question is whether Christianity works against small-scale national and cultural formation, and I don’t find that to be the case at all. In fact, if not for the widespread empire-building of the last several hundred years, we would see much more of what occurred during the prior thousands of years. But now there is the tendency to amalgamate everything – nations (properly understood), cultures, peoples, languages, economies, currencies, etc. Christians go along with this ubiquitous impulse and stamp the authority of Scripture on it, and this is where we think the Church has taken a very wrong turn.
Improved transportation and communication make the empire-building easier, no doubt. But if you think about it, technology has been used to overcome two of the safeguards that God has established to prevent amalgamation, geography and language. You can be taught a foreign language, just as you can be granted a visa to cross a border, but what you can’t do is deny that the rules of language or the laws governing borders are insignificant.
You cited a good example in the anabaptists, who make rules that seem peculiar to the rest of the world but actually serve the purpose of erecting important boundaries that all of us should honor. Tim Harris has cited the example of the Rechabites in Jeremiah 35, whose father told them to live in tents and never to drink wine. They obeyed, and God used their faithfulness as an example against Nebuchadnezzar. God’s approbation is important in this case because there are a lot of vows made in Scripture, not all of them legal, as was true of Jephthah’s rash vow in Judges 11. In a very real sense, today’s Amish are like the ancient Rechabites, and though most preachers today would tell them to disobey their fathers, God says differently, because blood is never less important than theological liberties and is always far more important than the abstractions in which white folks tend to lose themselves.
Without these boundaries, an entire group of people, with an important history of their own, would cease to exist. It is that much more important for the white race to exist, and some of us still honor the boundaries our fathers put in place, which are based on the same boundaries that have existed to protect all peoples throughout history. We are routinely told that we are “in sin” for doing this, but the accusation is a form of gnosticism, in that “knowledge” of what is lawful is being raised against duty, specifically duty to our kin, according to the Fifth Commandment.
Exactly so Admin. The Church has recognized the ancient Common Law of the nations of Europe where it was not in conflict with Apostolic Law. In the ancient coronation oath of Saxon England (Angleland), the monoarch swore oath before the Corpus Christi upon the high altar and the bishops of the Church to “uphold the law and libertie of England.” The libertie of England included the customary law: the freedom of the highways and byeways (where the king’s writ did not run), respect for the holy sancturaries of the holy wells, the forests, the rights of people there, foraging rights etc. There are many such laws of Christian England. And of course the pagans who chose to remain outside the jurisdiction of the Church (through baptism), lived under the Common Law.
Only benighted moderns rewriting our history under the influence of Jewish revision and grievances think that the Christians hauled our kinsmen off to the stake for their lack of faith. And the great pagan festivals of England: solstices (Midsommer and Sun Return), the Equinoxes, Imbolc (Candlemass), Belaine, Lugnasadh (St Michael’s) and Samhain (All Hallows) were kept right through Medieval times to the present. The works of William Shakespeare are a virtual compendium of English Faerie, traditions of the Greenwood.
The totally pagan myth of Europa riding the Bull from the Sea (the Bestia Neptunis) is one the ancient cults of Europe. It has never been extinguished (although its sacrificial aspects were suppressed by the Church) – but much of it survives: bull fighting and running in Spain, the white bull traditions of England associated with the Seven Sisters (the Pleiades and the White Cliffs, the Bulls Eye – Aldebran), today the Fifth European Parliament proudly boasts a naked Europa riding the Beast in Brussells.
Christendom might have been generous, fruitful, humane and tolerant of its non Christian populations under Christian law – but it was not liberal.
Contrast this with the hate-filled, persecuting infidelity of modern liberalism
This just in from Catholic League president Bill Donohue, his public letter to Patrick W. Hayes, Legal Director of Rockford, Illinois urging appropriate action against the Northern Illinois Womens’ (that should be Wymyns’) Center. http://www.catholicleague.org.
The Northern Illinois Womens’ Center is displaying a poster in the window depicing a graphic of Jesus giving the middle finger to the Christians with the caption: “Even Jesus Hates You.”
Now will the City of Rockford take action against this blasephmous deptiction of our Lord, this ‘in your face’ provocation and hate statement, labelled as a hate statement?
Wanna bet?
Maybe he was just looking for a set of wheels . . .
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/local_news/epaper/2009/09/19/0919homeinvasion.html
The “question of many distinct subnational cultures among the European Christians” is an important one for the White Nationalist movement.
They want to argue that these were in place before the advent of Christianity. They want to argue that Christianity tended to suppress (rather than protect) the flourishing of this diversity and its many legal institutions under monarchy and consitutional parliment, Appostolic Law and customary law. They want to argue for a unity on on the basis of race or racial moralities, rather than the Spiritual unity worked out on the basis of Church according to historical record of almost two millenia.
The West has been exercised with this debate in the past week. See the excerpt from John de Nugent’s book Honor being promoted on the News From the West blogspot: “Honour the Sacred Pillar of a Folk Community” Sept 22, 2009. http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com.
In this article he translates from Gustave le Bon who finds this idea of honour to express “what used to motivate Western man and woman for tens and thousands of years”.
According to de Nugent “whatever the factors that create an individual’s moral code, the ultimate expression of morality can appropriately be called the sense of honor.”
Not that this type of abstraction will ever reach the white masses, but this is the type of arguement that should be on the radar of those who intend to think seriously about our racial identity and the forces at work to destroy the European race as a race.
Frankly, I find these types of statements worse than the outright aggression of those who would see the European race destroyed – by whatever means. I put them in the same box as the K for Kosher – neonazis like the Jew Frank Collins and the Islamic jihadists like the Jew Adam Perlman.
This type of statment comes under the individual moral code called liberalism. The honor bound up with this code is very different to the honor of a Christian. And for the Christian, it should be of import that the ideology of liberalism subsists under the solemn anathema of the Patriarchate of the West.
We do know in our common sense (if it is truly common) and if we are at all in touch with our heritage of Spirit and faith and kinship, that in the conflicts of the age: “you can’t wield a sword with a limp-wristed, vague faith in the democratic process or in the benevolence of liberals.” CWNY “The Worship of Darkness” Sept 26 2009. http://cambriawillnotyield.blogspot.com.
The awareness of the weakening poison of liberalism extends into ethics and the realm of morals. On these subjects, the Church has not been silent. Liberalism and its ideologies have been under the solemn anathema of the Church since 1864. Re Syllabus Errorum. Apostolic Constitution decreed by Pope Pius IX. Dec 8, 1864. In Errors Concerning ‘Natural’ Ethics the following proposition (no. 56) stands under the anathema of Pope Pius IX, ratified by Pope St Pius X.
56. Moral laws do not stand in need of Divine sanction. Condemned.
In other words, not just any individual’s morality (liberalism) will do.
Christ established a living source of authority in his Church to teach the generations. The Holy Spirit Whom our Lord promised to send in His Name is teaching the churches through an Apostolic Succession and living magisterial authority that is collegial and Petrine – a great work that is built over centuries like a vast coral reef in nature, aliving fortress that creates the waters where vulnerable life may flourish. Yes, I do acknowledge we are in serious ‘F’ word territory here. For those who may wish to explore the common Western and Eastern patristics of this territory – a good place to go is http://catholicpatristics.blogspot.com/2009/08/filioque.html.
But the import of this, dear people, is: we are not in the dark. We are to be wise before the fact. We do not have to wait for the poison of liberalism to rot every social institution and corrupt all mores before we realise. Oh. Liberalism is not a good thing. It sounded so noble and right. But now we see it is the pit end of all hypocritical pits. A society in which every individual’s morality goes is a society in which everything will sell. (Duh) Christians are not to be found fighting this type of conflict.
We came from a Spiritual unity in which our propositions in morality, our common sense, our poetry and culture are flowing together. The Christendom was the revealed manifestation of that Spiritual unity worked out in race and nation and culture. The European Christians built it once on the basis of faith and prayer of the divine office. They can build it again because Christ the King wills a restitution of all things as the culmination of the Church Age or the ‘times of the Gentiles’.
The unity achieved and lived by European nations was Spiritual. It was never a racial or ethical unity. But the Spiritual unity became the unity of the European race in the diversity of its nations. It was a case of seeking first the Kingdom and all other things being added.
The Robert Stacy McCain "racism" story seems to keep growing. Now Victor Davis Hanson is weighing in, and a lot of people are commenting on this Alan Colmes interview. It all goes back to a 2002 New York Press column by Michaelangelo Signorile in which McCain is quoted as saying: "[T]he media now force interracial images into the public mind and a number of perfectly rational people react to these images with an altogether natural revulsion. The white person who does not mind transacting business with a black bank clerk may yet be averse to accepting the clerk as his sister-in-law, and THIS IS NOT RACISM, no matter what Madison Avenue, Hollywood and Washington tell us."
Of course, the funny thing to us is that McCain thought he could avoid the smear of racism while still being opposed to miscegenation. It’s also strange that in the Colmes interview, he says he does not belong to the League of the South, even though his membership in the League was the whole point of the debates at Dennis Wheeler’s site.
McCain wrote this three years ago: "I never posted anything at a site called ‘Reclaiming the South,’ which anyone with Google can easily discover is in fact operated by a white separatist named Dennis Wheeler. In 1996, I had debated Wheeler by e-mail – arguing strongly against his separatist views…"
But just two weeks ago, he wrote this, forgetting Dennis’s name: "I know that much of what I have written has been mischaracterized and that I’ve been accused of ‘contributing’ to a white separatist site (‘Reclaiming the South’) to which I never contributed anything.
Stogie, correct me if I’m wrong – all evidence of that site having apparently disappeared since its proprietor’s death – wasn’t that guy’s name Todd Wheeler? And wasn’t he from Marietta, Ga.? I hope I haven’t got the wrong name, but basically the guy was disruptively pushing white-separatist arguments in a Southern heritage discussion, was argued against strongly by several of us (including myself and George Kalas) and decided to take his ball and go home.
That’s one thing that burns me up about all this – when I lived in Georgia, I was known as an opponent of the very same doctrine that I’m now accused of advocating. And it seems that much of the evidence that might exculpate me has disappeared, while the same old smears are preserved in perpetuity by endless repetition."
It seems odd that no one is able to find the Wheeler pages at SWB. Instead, they link to a Google cache and these dead links:
http://kelticklankirk.com/dennis-wheeler_mark-of-the-beast.htm
http://www.kelticklankirk.com/dennis_wheeler_great_internet_debates.htm
http://kelticklankirk.com/dennis_wheeler_a_plausible_lie.htm