End This Night, If It Be Your Will
May 3, 2009 
21 Comments
We wish a very happy, hopeful, and healthy 70th birthday to Ernst Zundel, a legend among men. We eagerly await his release from prison.
Zundel is like Paul Revere. In this video (part 1, part 2), he explains that most people are exactly wrong in how holocausts begin. They do not begin by caricatures of goose-stepping Nazis marching down Main Street and spraying onlookers with Zyklon B. They begin by totalitarian governments that imprison those who publish historical facts that challenge the regime. If anyone thinks this persecution has anything to do with Adolf Hitler and the “incontrovertible” number of six million, you haven’t been paying attention. It’s a fundamentally anti-Christian extortion scam. Did I say Paul Revere? Mix in some Martin Luther and it’ll be about right.
The following video of Zundel on Crossfire is particularly absurd because Tom Braden charges him with a “virulent form of anti-Semitism.” Wow, that sounds serious. It must involve cold-blooded murder, right? No, it’s just questioning a number and a policy, which Braden himself does when he says only about five million Jews died. He compares anyone who questions the official story to being a believer in a flat earth. Just listen to the ridiculous, illogical arguments used by the hosts of the show, including that great “conservative,” Bob Novak. There was no “crossfire” at all. It was Zundel against two men who knew their jobs were on the line.
The Synagogue of Satan finally arrested David Duke. To be specific, 20 to 30 cops arrested him in a restaurant. In this video, the police spokesman explains that Duke was taken away secretly for the sake of public safety. What, has Duke joined a gang? There was a flurry of activity at Stormfront – about 800 posts in 24 hours. As every historian knows, history is a science of interpretation, because fallible men are never omniscient. Duke’s “crime” of conscience is freely discussing history to understand what has truly occurred. The Self-Chosen have decreed that there is to be no free discussion, and anyone with opinions of his own is to be thrown in jail. Moreover, they have lied, saying that Duke “approv[es] of the Nazi genocide and other Nazi crimes.” But Jews freely allow themselves to adjust their own opinions based on evidence, such as when they quietly changed plaques at Auschwitz in the 1990s to show that 1.5 million, not 4 million, died there. Revisionism is yet another double standard in their arsenal, but an honest approach to history forbids the use of double standards. And this is Duke’s actual “crime”: honesty.
Every U.S. Representative deserves the title appended to his name, but Dr. Duke is always introduced as Former KKK Member David Duke. But if you’re a former Communist, you’ll never be introduced as such on CNN. And if you’re a Jew, you can be a former terrorist and still become a head of state. Or in Jane Harman’s case, you can be a traitor and keep your job in Congress.
Duke writes:
I was invited to the Czech Rep. originally to speak at one of the oldest and most famous universities in Europe, Charles University in Prague. It is also famous for being founded by heroic Czechs like Jan Hus who stood up and told the truth and believed that truth and its pursuit is the most important thing a man can do in his life, even if costs him his life and freedom. This is the man who is the national hero of the Czech people.
As those who read my material know, I do not seek the suppression of any people, race or religion, but simply believe that Europeans have the human right to preserve our homelands and that our governments should be in the service of our own people and not the International Zionist Global matrix of financial and political power. I am not a man who denies that atrocities took place against Jews in the Second World War, but I argue forcefully that freedom of speech on this or any other issue is a basic human right of all people.
Jan Hus paved the way for Martin Luther and the Reformation. Today there are still men being imprisoned for pursuing the truth. And what are most Christians doing? Watching CSI, Lost, and American Idol. What is to be done with salt that loses its savor? We raise a fermented beverage in Dr. Duke’s honor and extend the middle finger of Christian charity to the anti-Christs who are downtrodden by the news of his release. Perhaps they could fly the Star of David flag at half mast, or more appropriately, turn their ovens down ten degrees.
Now of course, when Emperor Obama marks the 1915 anniversary of the Armenian holocaust, not only does he refuse to call it a holocaust at the bidding of his Jewish masters (see why they’re screeching), despite his campaign promises, but he calls for an examination of the past “so that it can be better understood,” according to a senior administration official. What in the name of Moses Maimonides do you think David Duke is trying to do but this very thing? It’s yet another double standard. One case must be “investigated” (yeah, right) because it’s good for Jews, but one must not even utter the desire to investigate in the other case because it’s bad for Jews. Our entire lives must be spent protecting Jews and their tender feelings, not pursuing the truth.
“We have an opportunity and an obligation to confront these scourges” who have their own opinions and delusions of free speech, Obama said at the U.S. Holocaust Museum‘s Days of Remembrance event. He shared the podium with Oily Weasel, who “forgot” to mention the existence of gas chambers in his autobiography, writing instead that Jews were exterminated by being thrown alive into flaming ditches. He also forgot to mention the lethal steam and electrified floors, but he did remember that babies were thrown into a flaming ditch of their own. And he has it on good authority from another Honest Jew that “month after month, the ground never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of blood spurted from it.” Nevertheless, Oily and his father chose to leave the camp with their German “executioners” rather than await their Soviet “liberators,” because they might be liars but they’re not stupid. Question Oily’s account and you can bid farewell to your family. Question any part of the Armenian holocaust and you will not be inconvenienced in the slightest.
The Nazis were apparently the most incompetent goons ever to walk the earth. Here’s another sterilization that they totally botched. I’m not sure the Nazis were actually German, because Germans have always been famously efficient. Perhaps they were Sicilian.
Christians have been conditioned to respond predictably in these matters. Like Yankees, they believe that opinions and practices that meet their personal disapproval should be outlawed. But as Zundel has said, we are not even trying to get anyone to agree with us. We are not campaigning for votes or lobbying anyone to enact our will. We have not sought the incarceration or punishment of our enemies. All we have ever tried to do is state the truth as we see it so that others who seek knowledge will be able to weigh facts that are routinely kept hidden from them. We have done this at great cost because we love truth and hate lies. This is precisely what motivates Duke and Zundel and many more like them. Jews will discover, like every totalitarian regime that has preceded them, that if they strike one of us down, a thousand will rise to take his place. They have no hope of winning. A day will soon dawn when men will wonder at the blindness and cowardice of our generation. Our one great hope as Kinists is that the true church of Jesus Christ on earth will be represented to future generations, and that the names and memories of the impostors will be blotted out.
Can Rod Dreher really be this stupid? Yes, yes he can.
A Jew at TED explains why “sustainable cities” (oxymoron alert) are necessary for vanquishing “racism.” The worst malefactors, he says, are those homogeneous hicks in the White Belt that stretches from the Ozarks to the Appalachians. It is the Jew’s primal instinct to make what everyone else thinks and does his own personal business. As Fred Scrooby writes, it’s scarcely possible to find any sort of pathological obsession without a Jew at the center of it. Fred then points out that this particular Jew is so self-obsessed that his bio at Wikipedia “is longer than Julius Caesar’s, Abraham Lincoln’s, George Washington’s, Aristotle’s, Einstein’s, or Jesus Christ’s.” “An empty man is full of himself,” said Ed Abbey. There’s nothing more absurd or pernicious than scrutinizing opinion polls on race when Whites know full well that their jobs are on the line, and quite possibly prison, for “wrong” answers. The glaring double standard here is that “racism” correlates with exclusion, and in the case of Israel this exclusion is said to be necessary for survival, but the Jew will never admit of the need for White ethnic survival under any circumstances.
“Shylock” is an eponym made famous by Shakespeare for a money-hungry usurer who demands a pound of flesh for payment. The governor of Florida has now signed a bill that removes the terms “shylock” and “shylocking” from state law, because Jews don’t like it, seeing as how they’re the chief usurers. “I think one of Florida’s greatest strengths, obviously, is our diversity, and the fact that we have such a strong sense of mutual respect for all races, all religions, all people,” said Governor Crist. In fact, there is so much “respect” in circulation that none remains for God and what He calls abominations in His changeless law. Needless to say, rooting out sinfulness is not “one of Florida’s greatest strengths.”
The ears of Jews and Moose-limbs are so sensitive that one must not say the words “swine flu” in their presence.
Pork is the “staple commodity of North Carolina,” said William Byrd, the Englishman who demarcated the border between the Carolinas. “These people live so much upon swine’s flesh that it does not only incline them to the yaws, and consequently to the [loss] of their noses, but makes them likewise extremely hoggish in their temper.”
Swine flu is on the rise and the southern border remains wide open. Janet Napolitano says Mexicans are not committing a crime by wetbacking across it.
“It was once said that a black man would be president when pigs flew. Well behold… 100 days into his presidency, the SWINE FLU!” ~ Talbot Buxomly
The Christian Reformed Church calls for “our best minds to do some fresh, serious Bible study that is also informed by the latest scientific research on the subject” of faggotry in order to reverse what Christians have always believed about it. The same was done about 50 years ago for miscegenation.
“Homosexuality is not a civil right. Its rise almost always is accompanied, as in the Weimar Republic, with a decay of society and a collapse of its basic cinder block, the family.” ~ Pat Buchanan, omitting the name of the tribe responsible for Weimar decadence
What will you find at the sixth most influential church in the country? Reggae and video game music.
There could have been a much better turnout at Pentecost if the apostles had known how to unleash this Holy Ghost constipated glory.
A minister in training gets his mojo working.
Impastor Joel Osteen “preached” an Easter “sermon” last month in which he stated that Christ’s resurrection from the dead gives us “comeback power” over life’s obstacles.
For his next sermon, Osteen will explain how the face of Jesus in this Kit Kat can help you be a better parent.
An Anglican priest defends the BNP but unfortunately stumbles just before he crosses the finish line.
[W]e are to live as nations, in our nations, and not to submit to a “resurrection” of the Babel thesis of one undifferentiated mass under some form of, probably dictatorial and very unstable, world governance.
The BNP undoubtedly accept that all mankind are equally human and, therefore, equally imperfect; so the worst traits of Darwinism are rejected by the party.
Good stuff. But then he says:
The BNP would also have no truck with any form of national or racial hegemony of any group over another. As far as the BNP is concerned supremacism—whether white, black, or multi-racial—is out of the question. One of their key principles is, in fact, national independence for all, including our own people. They would not, however, see racial differences as superficial, or as simply a matter of physical appearance: rather, every racial or ethnic group does have a collective and distinctive character, which is to be both valued and critiqued, making up the rich diversity of humankind.
The first sentence in that paragraph is at odds with the rest of it. He says “our own people,” recognizable by our “collective and distinctive character,” deserve “national independence.” But this “independence” is not to take the form of “national or racial hegemony” over other groups. The data does not compute. If a nation is not exclusionary it is not a nation. I realize that the evil genius of Abraham Lincoln has infected rational thought processes, but facts are stubborn things. The Japanese have made it plain to foreigners that Japan is theirs; this is not hate for others but love for their own. Tibetans refuse to be unified with China, and it’s not because they hate the Chinese. Still, I think we can give the reverend the benefit of doubt. His main point is that Christians, who know that all men are dead in their sins until they have been regenerated, cannot logically be called “supremacists” of any kind. But more importantly, “supremacism” is as fluid a word as “racism.” Such words have no use at all except as rhetorical brass knuckles, which is all the more reason why they should not be used even to defend our biblical practices and beliefs.
But sadly, this is exactly what the BNP does, for instance in this graphic:
The enemy adopts a word invented by Communists, changes its definition on a whim, makes it broad enough to encompass all conservative principles, and grins like a spider when we agree to play according to his rules. As soon as we admit that “racism” is an evil, wicked thing, we have conceded that the word has a right to exist, and condone by inference its multitudinous definitions.
To call racial foreigners “American” or “British” is a “bloodless genocide” because it denies indigenous peoples their own identity.
So-called “multiculturalists” have no intention whatsoever of learning about multiple foreign cultures. Black school administrators, for instance, who push “multiculturalism” as a religion haven’t a clue about Croatian or Finnish or Icelandic culture, or any other White cultures. Like everyone else in the world, Blacks have their own culture to tend, but the difference is that they lie and pretend to treat all cultures as equal.
“The colored people of the world have united,” says Rev. James Manning, and “White people are on the way out… What did you do when you voted in Obama?”
“The end is where we start from.” ~ T.S. Eliot
“White people have a penchant for abstract thinking,” writes Sam Dickson. “This is one of the glories of our race, making possible advances in philosophy, mathematics, science, and technology. But it is also a danger, for white people can become so fixated on abstractions that we lose touch with reality.”
Was Charles Martel a bad man simply because he sought and used power? Remember that Martel used his power to unite the Franks and defeat the Moslems, who were on the verge of conquering Europe, which would have been catastrophic for our people. Would Lord Acton have deemed it better if the Franks didn’t have a powerful leader? Would it have been better if the Frankish lands had been divided and decentralized and incapable of uniting as the Moslems poured over the Pyrenees into France?
Was Pope Urban II a bad man, because he had power and helped rouse Europe to the Crusades? The crusades drove back the two pincers of Islam that were coming through Spain and the Balkans to take our continent from us…
Charles Martel and Urban II are long dead, but every person of European descent owes them a great debt, a debt that increases with every new generation that is born.
But “America is a totally Whig version of England. It is all Whig sail with no Tory anchor.” The American tendency is to be “enchanted and enslaved by a philosophy of powerlessness, by an abstract principle that tells us that coercive power is per se wrong and must never be used.” Sam explains, in his brilliant and inimical way, how this has played out in history. (There is no one on earth like Sam Dickson. Has he ever had an unprofound thought? In a happier time, he would be one of our greatest leaders.) He tells of the innate White tendency to cling to principles at all costs, such as the principle of free trade, “even if it means the destruction of our nation and race.”
Now is it conceivable that anywhere in China a group of comparable young men would be saying that China must be destroyed to adhere to the principle of free trade? Could you find any Chinaman this nutty? No. Only White Europeans are subject to such goofiness.
Consider also the issue of private property. During the time when Australia had an immigration policy designed to maintain its identity as a white and British nation, one of the largest groups that fought it were Anglo-Saxon farmers with large plantations. They didn’t want to have to hire free British immigrants. They wanted cheap labor. They wanted Chinese coolies who would work for less. Do we really want to respect that kind of private property right?
In our own circles here at SWB, we have heard Christians agonize endlessly over biblical precepts for coercion, and it is because of this Whig/Yankee mentality that Sam mentions. Even Reconstructionists, whose entire method is the establishment of God’s law, like to deflect criticism by saying that change will come voluntarily, and not for at least 500 years, so there’s no reason to be alarmed that they actually advocate law enforcement right now.
To save our people, it will be necessary not merely to change those who hold public power but also those who hold private power. A vast share of the nation’s wealth is held by our enemies. They are particularly heavily invested in the news and entertainment media. That has to change. But it cannot change except by the dramatic use of public power to change who holds private power.
Imagine that by some fluke a libertarian like Ron Paul were elected president. Imagine that he really could bring American troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan, block the drive for war with Iran, and end Israel’s ability to loot our treasury and control our foreign policy.
Private money and private media power would immediately be used to thwart his policies. He would be lucky to avoid impeachment or assassination. And, as a libertarian, his own principles would prevent him from doing anything about it. After all, his enemies have freedom of speech and the right to use their money however they wish.
How many conservatives are exposing the fatal flaw of libertarianism, as Sam has done? Perhaps this article will be remembered for being ahead of its time and will prepare us for what lies ahead.
It’s racist to believe that Western civilization is superior to Eastern civilization. Make a note of it. Some more hatefacts.
Jay Severin on Mexican exports.
Californians are stymied. “Our education system used to be the best in the country, now we’re 49th or 50th. Our transit network is the worst in the nation, our water system is on the verge of collapse, and our prison system is overflowing.” Those aren’t political problems, writes James Edwards. “They’re racial problems. There is no bill you can pass that will restore the former greatness of the CA public school system, because no bill can turn Mexicans and blacks into white people… The problem in California isn’t the constitution. The problem is trying to fund a first world economy with the population of Mexico and Guatemala. That’s impossible.”
Steve Sailer’s proposed solution to get hateful test scores in line.
White boys are once again preventing everyone else from graduating. Why must they spend so much time hating? Notice that the word “stereotype” is used in the linked article. In liberal usage, a stereotype can’t possibly be true unless it becomes true when enough people think it’s true.
Stereotypes can often have amusing consequences involving fried chicken.
“The implied message of Tiana, that black American girls can be as elegant as Snow White herself, is a milestone in the national imagery, according to a range of scholars and cultural historians.” But of course, the Black “princess” and the Black Barbie dolls are not modeled on Blacks or Black culture at all. They’re modeled on Whites and are colored black. “The message that Tiana learns in the film—Disney characters always learn something by movie’s end—is that balance is important in life. Jazz Age woman that she is, Tiana needs both love and a career to find happiness.” {gag}
Dawn Brooks will have some nice words spoken at her funeral by her race-mixing preacher, who is almost equally responsible for her murder. Talking of which, miscegenist clergymen should pray to their Judeojesus thrice daily that Kinists never rise to power, because they’ll receive the seventh-circle-of-hell treatment. The cement shoe treatment is too good for them (Mark 9:42).
A public school graduate and reader of People magazine is taken hostage, robbed, and raped in front of her baby, all for not wanting to appear racist. By God’s grace, we will put an end to stories like this. The solution is before us; it is within our grasp. But most people refuse to consider it because they are just like this woman – they don’t want to be called racists.
Integration is evil, and Christians who approve of it are indirectly guilty of murder, rape, and mayhem.
“A culture that views crime as a societal failing for which individuals cannot be held responsible is one that has also made choices about which genes to favor. Likewise, there are very substantial reproductive consequences when America glorifies non-whites, reviles whites, and encourages miscegenation.” ~ Jared Taylor, 1999
British totalitarian thought control.
Winston Smith in Newsweek! He’s one of our favorite haters. In fact, we love him so much that we hate him.
The shrews at Racialicious are always entertaining; they never fail to be offended when Whites mimic non-Whites. Liberals are absolutely humorless and dour. Behold the Botticellis who have been spray-painted with gang graffiti:
Jew Leonard Cohen’s If it Be Your Will sung by the lovely Aryan Webb Sisters:
Not to be outdone, here are Siegfried and Brünnhilde of the ghetto.
Actually, that’s the new president of South Africa. He’s kicking one of his wives out the door so she’ll go earn a living. “And don’t forget to bring home one of those specials from Popeye’s, bitch!” If you ever see “P _ M P” in a crossword puzzle, the clue is probably “African husband.” And if you come across “voluminously redundified” for a clue, you’re on your own, but I think it has something to do with Amos & Andy.
A Canadian hockey coach tells White kids to act like sportsmen and not put on a nigger-show:
Jack Kemp, a fitting symbol for the impotence and now death of the heralded “conservative” Republican movement.
A school teacher who is failing to educate children about root causes. A man who is this ignorant about race has no business being in his business.
What part of the country has the highest murder rate? The South. What part of the country has the highest rape rate? The South. What part of the country has the highest…church attendance? The South…
In the industrialized world the people least likely to go to church are the Swedes. The people in the industrialized world most likely to go to church are the Americans. America has the highest crime rate of all industrialized nations, and Sweden has the lowest. The next time somebody tells you religion is connected with morality, you might want to ask them about that.
Can someone really be so blind? Scandinavia is being inundated with non-Whites so quickly that this guy will have to change his moronic theories, and fast.
Robert Jew Novak — gag me with a spoon. You can take the judaica out of the jew, but you can’t take the jew out of the kike. Everyone needs to watch that video.
http://youthforwesterncivilization.blogspot.com/2009/05/tribute-to-youth-for-western.html#comments
Anyone contacted these kids yet, to see if they REALLY grasp what it is they are fighting against?
Your comment on the Rev. West initially gave me hope, until I read the CCOB’s constitution at one point, in which they blow it – in short, this is multicultural heresy in full flag, and/or British limp-wristedness in all its’ sissified glory:
“The Gift of Race and Nation. The Christian Council of Great Britain and Northern Ireland resolved that it recognises that all men are of one blood (or proto-race) in Adam through to Noah; and that from that one proto-race divergent races have historically devolved – Russian doll-like – (Genesis 11: 1-9) so that we are now different, though related, races and nations of men, all of whom God has made (Psalms 86: 9); which are each to bring their own distinctive glory into the kingdom of God (Revelation 21: 26).”
{Please.)
As I pointed this out at an utterly useless site that equated Rev. West with the CI folk:
http://barthsnotes.wordpress.com/2008/11/22/more-on-bnp-christianity/
“I’m afraid this webpage is utterly useless in detailing Truth, but is (like most sources of ‘media’ these days) completely co-opted by the disinformatia types, and the propagandists for a Zionist-worshiping Weltanschauung. What with the BBC itself corroborating one of the long-held beliefs of CI
http://www.bbc.co.uk/gloucestershire/content/articles/2009/03/30/jesus_in_gloucestershire_feature.shtml
I find it duplicitous of you to demean and denigrate those who merely do NOT want a multicultural Europe or America!! What- do you prefer shari’a law? God forbid such- or the equally damnable Noachide law the Jews want to impose! For that is what this scurrilous reportage is advocating. For a pagan Europe is an oxymoron- you cannot exist in a moral vacuum, or go back to the ‘good ol’ days’ of Wodinism, or a sexual amorality. God is not mocked.”
(end paste)
I have just read Gerard Schroeder’s “The Science of God.” If one knows the CI paradigm, this book clearly is corroboration (even when written from a false ‘chosen people’ attribution to the Jews, rather than White man) of the view that Adam IS a ‘special creation,’ created some 6-10,000 years ago, just as the Bible seems to indicate- but that it came after a series of billions of years of physical, quantum mechanics, speed of light preparation, that Schroeder details in such depth as to make the head swim. http://www.amazon.com/Science-God-Convergence-Scientific-Biblical/dp/076790303X
But because the Ziophilic Evan-jelly-goos can’t believe that ancient Hebrews thought of themselves as a different- a SUPERIOR creation, apart from ape-men (can you say, “Out of Africa, boys and girls?”), or that Schroeder’s ‘old-Earth’ cosmology destroys the ICR/Hamite credo, this Jewish scientist’s work has been shunted aside…
“Schroeder’s other theories include an odd insistence upon a pre-Adamic, soulless hominid ancestor. It’s important to Schroeder that the literal Adam be the first ensouled human being, and since Genesis chronology (almost 6,000 years since Adam) doesn’t mesh with what science tells us of the age of humankind, Schroeder sets out to prove that the Bible only picks up the story near the close of human development. Such hermeneutical gymnastics seem strangely outdated and obscure in an often intelligent, cogently argued book.” – from the Kirkus review on the site.
Actually, it pretty much confirmed me that what I have read of anthropology, scripture, and science is correct. White men ARE a unique creation, the Bible clearly posits it as the ‘crown of God’s handiwork’ and all the rest….
Why I never heard of Schroeder’s work is a mystery, until I read Holzmann’s blog entries a few weeks back here on SWB, and looked at some of the other links and ties to the hatred the modern multiculturalist (whether pagan or pseudo-Xtian- darwinian evolutionist or Hamite clone) just cannot allow in their demented belief that the ‘black man is our brother.’
It would appear that the BNP just doesn’t have any more of a clue as to how far the rot intellectually has set in over on that side of the pond, than they do here…
Let’s not forget that the idea that all men come from one blood is straight out of Acts 17 and has been believed by almost all Christians throughout history. Dabney, for instance, took the trinitarian and orthodox view that this was so, yet it did not infer that all people should mix into one amalgamated, undifferentiated mass, as race-mixing pastors teach today. It also holds up scientifically, based on what we know of mitochondrial DNA.
So I see only one problem with the statement: From “one proto-race divergent races have historically devolved – Russian doll-like – (Genesis 11:1-9) so that we are now different, though related, races and nations of men, all of whom God has made (Psalms 86:9); which are each to bring their own distinctive glory into the kingdom of God (Revelation 21:26).” And that problem is the Russian doll. It would be more correct to call it a tree with diverging branches. Just as is true of a tree, sour fruit can be grafted in, affecting an entire branch. If this has happened, God will prune the tree Himself (Romans 11).
The very fact that we share common humanity is what allows races (potentially) to work in harmony. But it seems to me that a lot more can be said about this. For one thing, this idea that a 35,000-year-old man looked like Whoopi Goldberg is insane. Regardless of whether human life originated in Africa, we know that Adam could not have been black. His very name means “ruddy,” and dark-skinned people don’t blush. Secondly, no scientist has yet explained how recessive White genes can overcome ubiquitous dominant genes. How many redheads do you see in China? I rest my case. As Obama’s whore-mother saw for herself, you can’t unmix a can of paint.
I think it’s inappropriate to make dogmatic statements about history that is largely hidden from us. We don’t really know how the races came about, and it hardly seems important, but Christians have always believed that it is according to God’s design.
It’s quite right to say that God made His covenant with Israel and the descendants of Israel, but God cut off the fruitless branches before Israel and He still does it today. So you’re right back to the plain fact that salvation is not of race but of grace. The race-mixers have twisted this (and sinned, causing a broad path of destruction), saying that one’s race is no more significant than what he had for lunch yesterday.
The main point is that we have our own garden to tend, and one can set an example for all men by living a life of holiness. I think it’s quite wrong to base a system of ethics on who is really descended from both Adam and Israel.
“the idea that all men come from one blood is straight out of Acts 17 and has been believed by almost all Christians throughout history.”
Believed, yes. BUT HOW is the clincher. Who was Being spoken TO, and by Whom? What was the ‘earth’ that was known back then? St. Paul is speaking to the GREEKS, and he a Roman Citizen. The ‘world’ or the ‘earth’ of their day ended at the Bosporus, and died off somewhere east of the Arabian desert, Alexander the Great’s conquests notwithstanding. The first rule of Biblical exegesis is NOT to put something IN where it is not found, and that is EXACTLY what you do when you state that the ‘world’ is the Globe, as we know it today, in [mis] quoting Acts 17! This is of the same variant (albeit from the opposite side of the coin) when non-catholic Christians say ‘but it isn’t REALLY Christ’s BODY and BLOOD- that would be cannibalism’ when the EXACT words state, “This IS my Body, etc.” Either we believe in the words of the Bible where they speak of physical realities, or we don’t. I’m not saying we cannot divine anthropomorphisms, and poetic allusions, but here we have an Apostle speaking in a specific PLACE, to a specific ETHNOS, about the ‘world’ that they BOTH shared- and that world is/was Europe. So, unless European man is extinct, and you wanna make a case for universalism based on that, go ahead. But as long as there remain seedtime and harvest, morning and evening, sunrise and sunset, there will ALWAYS be an England/Europe/Christendom, if you follow. And, since WE still exist, the parameters of the Great Commission are still BOUND to that vision of Humanity and the World.
I realize that I am not the first person to point this out, but in Acts 17:26, the word “blood” is not found in the original. It was inserted by translators. This changes the sense of the statement. To quote from Ferrar Fenton’s translation, the passage reads, “Because He made by One every race of men to dwell upon the whole face of the earth, having provided proper methods and guides for their research in seeking God – if only them would feel for and find Him – and yet He is certainly not far from every one of us…”
To say that He made by one every race of men to dwell upon the face of the earth directly supports John 1:3 (“All came into existence by means of Him; and nothing came into existence apart from Him.”)
That’s a very good point. I don’t know if the omission changes the meaning, but it’s definitely a good point. I see that several translations reflect this:
http://scripturetext.com/acts/17-26.htm
What I am also arguing for is again so beautifully worded by Cambria will not yield in his most recent blog post:
“The neo-pagan wants to sever Christianity from the white European in order to save the white European, and the half-way house Christian rationalist wants to sever the white European from Christianity in order to save Christianity. But the half-way house Christian, in his rejection of “European Christianity,” is really rejecting Christ.”
I see this sort of view that you at first exhibited to be (au fond) nothing more than this sort of ‘half-way house’ Christianity. I appreciate your mild retraction upon my rather heated reply above….
Oh, I haven’t retracted anything, but I am always open to other ideas. I was speaking to Wheeler in my comment above. I thought he made a good point, and I thought yours was rather convoluted. Though you quote from Cambria, I doubt that he agrees with you either.
Are you actually suggesting that the belief that all men came from Adam, which almost all Christians have always believed, is “halfway house Christianity” because it severs the European from the faith?
What I am saying is that NOWHERE in the Bible, does the phrase ‘all men came from Adam’ exist.
One can read BACK into the Bible almost anything, and this latter-day universalist appeal to the Church being a ‘house for all nations’ is not what the Prophets, Apostles, and Christ himself meant. So, are you being faithful to Christ, or being faithful to Obama’s ‘Office of Diversity’? Yes, this IS a ‘halfway-house’ Christianity when viewed in this light, and I DO think that Cambria and I are on the same page, contrary to popular belief. If you have his contact info, I’d love to compliment him on his insights, which have only served to undergird my own…
Conversely, even if you do not believe ME, who is it who most stresses this universalist, unitarian approach ‘let’s all race-mix to cafe au lait’? LOOK TO YOUR ENEMIES- LOOK AT THE OTHER SIDE. IT is the Feminazis, the Faggots [e.g. Perez Hilton] and most of all- TA DA! The Jews. Along with the Modern Liberal apostate Churches – the last, who (under ‘interfaith consultations) have misapplied the Covenantal structure of the Bible (and, as Reformed, you do understand Covenants, don’t you? -lol) and warped it to fit a universalist/unitarian paradigm.
What IS the concept of ELECTION, anyway? If it does not mean the EXCLUSION of the “Other” as much as it means the Inclusion of ‘the In Crowd’, then it actually means NOTHING. I do not say this to brag, but to point out that the Yids have LONG kept this ‘we are true, you are dogs’ – even though they are squatters, and ‘no true sons’ – or the Orthodox, who have a far greater claim to the ‘only We have the faith, as to the others, no’ paradigm. It’s only in the altruistic, idiotic West that we actually THINK that by wishing the Black Man (for example) to be different, he WILL be. THAT’S what OCR, Head Start, NCLB all really are- wish fantasies founded on taxation of the gullible!
As I’ve recently noted on my blog,
http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/the-god-of-science-and-the-science-of-god/
– when one removes the Hamite/ICR paradigm from the realm of rational discourse on Origins, one can begin to see reality. First off, one realizes that a) the Flood cannot be worldwide, as the timeframe for the biblical account of the Flood coincided with already-established races (Babylonian and Egyptian) whose written records show NO SIGHN of a flood to disrupt their statist empires; b) moreover, the Egyptians on their stele and in their tombs, show ALREADY EXTANT the races of ‘Men’ we see today; so that the seed of Ham, Shem, and Japheth that were supposed to have fathered -i.e., the ‘one blood’ that Ham et al. are so desirous of proving, to make up all ‘men’ today, already existed in the ‘days of Noah.’ Sorry, nothing to see here, move along. My earlier comment about the CCOB (Christian Council of Britain) is a case in point….
So in noting just one incidence of history, we have: neither a worldwide flood, nor do we have the ‘creation of the races’ from the ‘godly seed’… as these ‘races’ ALREADY existed PRIOR to the Flood…if biblical timetables can be trusted. [And I DO trust them]
What I AM willing to acknowledge (which is what I believe you and I ACTUALLY hold as viable) in answer to your question, is that all EUROPEAN MEN came from Adam – of that I have NO DOUBT. As for the rest, I deny it- after years of research, study, reading Scripture, seeing praxis in Christendom, etc. For reading Scripture in THIS fashion, we neither negate the truth of the antecendenat nor the subsequent Noahic genealogies, (‘perfect in his generations’) – nor do we either wrest them into a universalist falsehood, but acknowledge that: c) all three sons of Noah are technically ‘semites’ (as we use that term today) in that Shem is full blood brother to Japheth, as well as Ham. Which means that d) Japheth, who has long been given the moniker of ‘father to Europe’ is just as “semitic” as Shem, who settled (we are told) in the Near East. Which means the races of Europe (Caucasoid all) are ETHNICALLY/RACIALLY related (as in DNA) to ‘Semites’. Now, who CALLS themselves ‘semites’ today, is a TOTALLY different matter, and not one I am going into at the present moment. But, for the record, I don’t believe for one instant that the Semites we ‘think’ are semites, are actually the Shemites of the Biblical record.
Ham’s son, e) Canaan clearly did SOMETHING that is unforgivable. In that later commentators associate his sin with the African sub-saharan, what he must have done is to INTERBREED with the extant pagan civilizations around him (remember those Egyptian and Babylonian civilizations contemporary with the Flood?) and thrown away his ‘inheritance’ (both covenantal and genetic!) after the Flood.
Therefore, in reading Schroeder, I came to understand the last link. When Schroeder posits that ‘MAN’ does not appear until Adam was created, I realized HE thought that meant HIS KIND. [Jews] I know for a fact (as Koestler pointed out, and as other Jews subsequently have shown) that this is NOT SO. Adam IS Caucasoid Man, if he is ANYTHING! And therefore, even the ‘rabbinic commentaries’ that Schroeder was using to prop up his very good science, ARE NOT EVEN HIS OWN. Even that- the talmud, stripped of its’ blatant antichrist accretions, is still ‘the traditions of”’ who? OF ADAM’S SEED. Even the ‘Jews’ [Rev. 2:8,9] have been ‘holding in trust’ for lo, these 20 centuries both ‘good’ and BAD ‘traditions of the fathers’ [Talmud, etc.] that are not THEIR possession, that detail not THEIR familial/ethnic/racial history, but the “True S[h]emites” – i.e., but the TRUE Adam, for whom the Second Adam, came ‘to save HIS PEOPLE from THEIR sins’ [ Matt. 1:21]
European Man, the only one left that has not [YET!] succumbed to the interbreeding/race-mixing, that BOTH the Hamites and the Shemites have done, (the latter statement I think I can make quite easily, what with Koestler’s chronicling it in his ‘The Thirteenth Tribe’- and with Josephus as corroborator, and Christ’s cleansing of the Temple and anger at the Edomitic Pharisees of His day.
Japheth’s seed ALONE stayed pure, until starting @1965, and the Celler [Jew] Kennedy/Humphrey Immigration Reform Act, Lovin vs. Virgina, Civil Rights legislation, etc. all have SOUGHT WHITE GENOCIDE. It is no coincidence that intermarriage/multiculturalism is the new Baalism today. This push for white genocide is UTTERLY SATANIC- literally. And, as f) such a form of race genocide is what Kinists are fighting against, it seems utterly bizarre to me, that you would say that ‘all are welcome’ when the entire weight of history, the Bible’s own self-attestation that it is the record of ONE People, and ONE people alone; and that g) Christ said Himself “I am come ONLY for the ‘lost sheep of the house of Israel,’ we should take Him at his unchangeable Word.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yBMdwKMpi4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab1EixVFKZE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKDe-09EpNM&feature=related
And most importantly of all:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0TQ1gj8GQo&feature=related
Who are the REAL ‘sons of Shem’? Who are of ADAM’S seed and David’s Line?
http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/of-adam’s-seed-and-david’s-line/
It would appear they look like US- Irishmen, Scots, Nordics, Angles, Saxons, et al. – even when you find them in Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, and India. Adam’s seed IS True Man, and it is this seed from whence Christ took on His indissoluable Manhood joined to the Godhead, never to repudiate EITHER- Flesh or Divinity.
‘God became Man, so that men could become god.’ – Patristic Fathers (But only ONE race of ‘Men’- I now see this as plain ‘as the WHITE nose on my face.’)
http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/of-what-race-are-abraham’s-seed-gal-329/
As I’ve said, this is all very convoluted. I’m in agreement with much of what you’ve said above, but your central point is that Christianity is incomplete (a “halfway house”) if it countenances the belief that Adam was the first man living. Of all Christians who have ever lived, 99.9% believe this to be true. And so the faith that has been handed down to us through the centuries is to be discounted as incomplete on Father John’s authority. I think this is ridiculous. Now, you could be correct that Adam was not the first man living but was the father of Whites, and Cainites mixed with older lines, some of which survived Noah’s flood, taking us to the present day. I’m open to the possibility, and I think parts of the argument have merit.
For instance, I completely agree that Noah’s flood was not global. There is not enough water on the planet to cover Mount Everest. And if there were, we would also have to believe that all animals in the fossil record lived at the same time, Noah took all the animals in the fossil record on the ark to be preserved, and more than 90% of the animals God created went extinct immediately after the flood. But it is not my duty to reject as heretics those who differ (because they have biblical reasons for differing), or to establish and enforce a system of ethics based on my theory.
Moreover, in this case, as is true for everything we discuss here, the view that we hear is absolutely necessary today has not always been so. For one example among thousands, Josephus wrote: “Now the sons of Noah were three – Shem, Japhet, and Ham born one hundred years before the Deluge. These first of all descended from the mountains into the plains, and fixed their habitation there; and persuaded others who were greatly afraid of the lower grounds on account of the flood, and so were very loath to come down from the higher places” (Antiquities of the Jews, Book 1, Chapter 4, Paragraph 1). Others?
I think it’s dead wrong to do what Doug Phillips and Ken Ham do, and say that if you don’t agree with their theory, you’re a heretic who worships a different god. So if it happens to be your opinion that nowhere in the Bible does it say that all men come from Adam, it can be the opinion of others that it does, and the latter just so happens to carry the weight of history. But this is not merely a theory of yours; it also affects your agenda. You pronounce, entirely on your own authority, that “all” are not welcome to the free gift of salvation because Christ came only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And which individuals comprise these hallowed ranks? Just ask Father John. In his book they all are numbered.
Some things are hidden from us, but we have all the tools we need to live as God expects us to live, to help our people survive, and to serve as examples to others.
‘but your central point is that Christianity is incomplete (a “halfway house”) if it countenances the belief that Adam was the first man living.”
I never said any such thing. I DO believe that Adam was the first ‘Man.’ I merely deny that status to those not of Adam’s line, as the anthropological and scientific record is coming to show. That was why my fascination with Schroeder. He (along with the other authors Holzmann mentioned in his blog entries) show that the ‘Out of Africa’ scenario Leakey et al. posited a mere forty years ago, along with the ‘Evolutionary Tree’ showing how Homo Sapiens Sapiens ‘evolved’ from Australopithecus, via Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon to US, is now no longer tenable. That’s my point. Schroeder does all this in passing in his book, but then attributes the ‘divine status’ of neshama to Jews alone, as the Talmudics have long done.
And you clearly misunderstand ME, in that I am pointing out these things to REFUTE Ham et al, who have too long held to a ‘we alone have the truth’ mentality in matters scientific/creationist.
As to the vulgar statement “You pronounce, entirely on your own authority, that “all” are not welcome to the free gift of salvation because Christ came only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And which individuals comprise these hallowed ranks? Just ask Father John,” is a red herring.
I am NOT stating this on my own authority. God forbid. If had read my blog posts over the last two years and more, as I have studiously done with yours (and with the LG site that was your predecessor) you would see that I am actively trying to collate a more authentic Weltanschauung for looking at the lies and subterfuge of the evil ones, whether incarnate or merely demonically spiritual. That THEY say we are descended from apes, and that we are ‘all one race, the human race’ is reason enough to DOUBT the VALIDITY of their statements at face value… but minds benumbed of logic need reasons, and a means to think things through.
You state that the ‘hidden things belong to God alone.’ I concur. But so much of this is now NOT hidden, that to hide one’s head in the sand, and NOT look objectively at history, science, anthropology, DNA research, etc. is almost heretical, if not intellectually criminal. As to the verity of this statement, “You pronounce, entirely on your own authority, that “all” are not welcome to the free gift of salvation because Christ came only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. ”
May I point out that it is Our Lord’s Words here. DO you obey them, or the Multicultis? Are you fellows not reformed, and does not your own TULIP teach unconditional ELECTION, that is etched in the heavens for all time. How does my pointing out that the ‘lost sheep of the House of Israel’ means some other race than the Talmudic Khazars become specious, when your own confessional standards note that ‘if you ain’t Dutch, you ain’t much’ to coin a popular distilation of the Reformed position?
Just once more on the merry-go-round for me.
Again, I agree with you that it is no more certain that Whites came from Africa than it is that a 35,000 year old Al Sharpton was the first European. There’s nothing necessarily wrong with your theories or with collating Weltanschauungs or blanching asparagus. The problem is with going beyond this and stating that your beliefs are now suddenly imperative for the body of Christ. This is stunning:
“You state that the ‘hidden things belong to God alone.’ I concur. But so much of this is now NOT hidden, that to hide one’s head in the sand, and NOT look objectively at history, science, anthropology, DNA research, etc. is almost heretical, if not intellectually criminal.”
Amazing. So Christians got along for ages, but now we discover that theirs was a halfway house Christianity because science has made what they believed heretical, if not criminal. If this is not said on your own authority then I’d like to know whose.
Of course, anyone can be wrong. We’re wrong about many things and so were our forefathers. This is why theory is not the same as essential doctrine. What we believe about the age of the earth is not to be compared to the fact that Christ died to atone for our sins. Anyway, there you have it.
“Impastor Joel Osteen “preached” an Easter “sermon” last month in which he stated that Christ’s resurrection from the dead gives us “comeback power” over life’s obstacles.”
We’re going to need a whole lotta “come back” power when Whites become a minority, in America. Finding such power in Osteen’s feel-good Church, is about as likely as reading the answer in a fortune cookie.
“Amazing. So Christians got along for ages, but now we discover that theirs was a halfway house Christianity because science has made what they believed heretical, if not criminal. If this is not said on your own authority then I’d like to know whose.”
Sigh, beating a dead horse, you are.
What we know today is applicable to determining the will of God, if only because how we have been TRAINED via the Marxist/Jewish/Talmuddied indoctrination via our print and TV media, via the unrelenting barrage on our consciousnesses since Boas, and the unending propaganda that the non-European, the non-white, the non-elect (however you want to read that) are now all the fit recipients of God’s favor…. when, up until, say 1950, such a POV was in the MINORITY (pun intended) among all those of Christendom.
I have learned from this site and LG before her, that Americans and Europeans once thought DIFFERENTLY than we do now, and have spent a long time trying to figure out WHY. Once I did, I realized that one can turn the tables (geologic, scientific, anthropological) using the SAME evidence that THEY mounted to buttress THEIR faulty, lying positions, to buttress the OLDER view of Christendom. Perhaps my insights in this regard on the filioque, and how it has blinded the eyes of the West, ARE my own insights. (though I am merely pointing out what Oxford educated philosophers have stated, and simply applied those insights to the present situation)
I am loathe to say, “Yes, I alone have these insights,’ simply because my tradition looks askance at those who say, ‘I alone have the truth.’ But then, I suppose they said the same of Luther, Calvin, and Cranmer at the time those men lived. I cannot help finding these things out, and clearly the comments over at my blog state that others have been thinking the same things.
I merely point out the dichotomy of saying that if there is such a thing as a kinist position, and then saying that all are welcome at the altar, it seems schizophrenic to mention the former, when you follow the world’s siren song, in being in agreement with the latter. That position seems to deny the Elect nation status that is suffused throughout the ENTIRE OT, and was never abrogated by Christ in the NT, even in the Epistles of St. Paul, Peter, or James.
Oh, I grant you that you can READ INTO the pages of the NT a ‘universalist’ view of salvation ‘to all nations’, ‘the whole world’ etc. if one is predisposed to view that as normative…and in this ‘all one race, the human race’ era, such a view seems almost ‘state-approved dogma.’ But that doesn’t mean that is what the AUTHORS meant, who wrote same under the guidance of the H.S. And it also does not mean that THAT is how the inhabitants of Europe viewed Christendom themselves, or how they actually practiced it, in the eras before Marx and Lincoln.
Reading all this, I seriously doubt that Fr John has read Cambria the way in which Cambria should be read. Printed out and away from the computer, a winter fire (in the Southern hemisphere) on the hearth, the complete works of Shakespeare, Sir Walter Scott, Dickens, the New Testament on the sideboard, the window open so as to permit whatever bit of garden may lean in, look over the reading and remark on the Wildwood passages. Ideally, there should be some young people seated around to listen. The essays should be read aloud.
They do not lend themselves to being mined for nuggets to be prized out and then embedded in mere theories. They exist as a single body of work.
This is not from Cambria – this idea that all men came from Adam constitutes merely a half-way house Christianity because it severs the European from the faith.
The term “half way house Christianity” comes from the essays Cambria posted on June 18, 2006. It has nothing to do with European man alone as Adamic creation or the non Adamic identity of other races. It has everything to do with the loss of new creation in Christ that was European man and the post Christian reality.
For Cambria, the white European race is a unique re-creation in Christ.
In “The Unholy Alliance” – June 18, 06 – Cambria writes of European man as “the only race of people that accepted Christianity in depth and breadth – meaning that most whites were Christians – and it penetrated deeply into many. Certainly other races had Christians among them but not to the extent of the white race.”
It is the loss of this race, itself, as new creation that is the subject of the “half way house” metaphor for churches as memorials to this loss. It was this race (European man) that responded historically to the Evangel not as individuals or families or tribes – but as entire nations. European man as a race was new creation in Christ and this Europe is now lost. That is what Cambria mourns. He does not occupy himself with the question of whether the nations of other races could or could not have responded to the Evangel in this way; or the impossibility (in theory) of a Christian Africa, for example, comprised of Christian nations of Bantus, Hottentots, Zulus, etc. He is not elaborating some theory to explain why – as ‘non-Adamic races’ – the nations of people were not called or elect anyway.
Cambria deals only with the historic reality that European man, alone of all the nations responded to the Evangel as a race. And this new creation in Christ (a racial new creation) attained both cultural expression and polity in the European land mass. Why (in theory) Africa, MezoAmerica or Asian man did not attain this, really does not come into Cambria’s half way house metaphor except indirectly.
What interests Cambria is the many facets of the historical reality that was Christian Europe. He is interested in the present consequences of the loss of that reality. In his essay “The Unholy Alliance” he looks at the difference between the coloured barbarians and the post Christian barbarians. Although the barbarians are at the gate, he perceives that the post Christian barbarians are the darker continent.
“The post Christian barbarians are technocratic barbarians. Whereas Aztecs tore out the hearts of human adults and children in public ceremonies; post Christians tear out the hearts of human infants behind closed laboratory doors.” (June 18, 06)
In terms of race, Cambria does not perceive that racial differences are differences in kind: i.e. the European, Adamic race as distinct from the African hominid or non Adamic race. He perceives that it was this penetration of the Christian faith into European man and the nations of European man that has elevated European man to a unique difference in kind. He understands this penetration at the level of race; the God-man race. And the issue of this historical reality, for Cambria, is rule.
“The glory of European civilization was that for a time Satanic principles did not rule it.” “The Lost Thread” June 2006
“The coloured races, whether Aztec or African have a simple pagan view of race: ‘my race shall conquer and subjugate all other races’. The white man, when he was Christian had a different view: ‘my race must conquer and then rule benevolently, because without white rule, mankind will descend into darkness.’ “Not a Proposition II” June 18, 06
He is against the secular, racemixing, porn-loving society as a race-mixing alliance that will extinguish the only race that ever (as a race) inherited the royal blood of the New Covenant. He does not deny that individuals, families, tribes of other races inherited it; but alone of the races of man, Europe as Europe inherited it. In Cambria’s imagination, the post Christian modern society takes on the dimensions of a wind swept house in a racial sense.
This is the half-way house according to Cambria. This half-way house is not a Christian Europe that got it wrong in the begining according to some theory of Divine Election (European man alone is Adamic man). The half way house appears in the historical context of European man’s return to paganism. Yet “The white man’s return to Baal has not made him happy”…”this is why the Christian churches have not completely disappeared. They exist as halfway houses for the [post Christian] white man.” (Sunday June 18, 2006) And he finds these half-way houses as barren as the windswept house of our Lord’s parable. Which raises the question: And to this half-way house, what will come to occupy it?
Lynda, that is a fascinating synopsis of Cambria’s work, and needless to say, we wholeheartedly agree. You’re essentially retelling the parable of the seed sower. The White race is fertile ground, and the passing of the White race bodes ill for pure and undefiled religion. We’ve seen what kind of “Christianity” is produced by minorities, and we’ve had all we can stand of it. But rather than succumb to pride, we recall that God can raise up sons to Abraham from the rocks in the road. We are not prideful, and we are not “supremacists,” whatever that means. We are simply going to do whatever it takes to help our people live another day, as God requires of us.
It’s comforting to know that there are sensible White folks like yourself in Australia.
I think it would be a terrible loss if Spirit Water Blood (the three witnesses in the earth) were ever to becomme associated with the pride of racial supremacism, Admin. So in the context of the discussions on this thread, I am glad I had the opportunity to revist some of Cambria’s early (and still some of his best) essays.
Christ’s rebuke to the Pharisees on the subject of genealogical pride is stern and fair and true. As a warning to all vain geneologies and racial supremacies – of which the Talmud is chief, it will always stand. But I do not read any of your mainstream website posts that invoke it. Cambria’s discourses on race do not invoke it.
Even so, the ‘sons from rocks’ idea does not really strike me as the Divine signature. Wine from water – yes; life from the dead – yes; sons from rocks – no.
What you perceive and have expressed as the passing of the white race, I perceive as a great river finding an artesian course when it has come down from the heights, lost its momentum and become mired in the shallows of the plains and river meandows. There it convolutes into many channels and wanders off into sinkholes and marshes. But a single stream of such a river will run true, it will plunge into the earth, becoming a hidden stream purifying its waters and regaining its currents. When it again breaks into view it will rise in many springs in places entirely unlikely and surge into a new course. Definitely the type of ‘white plume’ moment that Cambria likes to write about from the perspective of the literary and cultural heritage of Europe.
I too like this type of thing very much, although my interest focuses more narrowly on the history of the Sacred Heart event beginning in France 100 years before the Great Revolution of 1789. This event has generated many, I guess you would call these ‘white kerchief’ events in history that speak to me of that artesian stream purifying its waters, gathering its forces. And of course this history is still unfolding.
I like your site very much, Admin and I read it often.
Lynda
“I like your site very much, Admin and I read it often. – Lynda”
Which is astounding. Lynda has raged against me at my blog, out of the blue, accusing me of stating things Orthodoxy does not state (even when I quote source, and multiple authors) Now, if Lynda IS ‘liking this site very much,’ this is even more confusing, if Lynda is Orthodox (as she has inferred to me from perusal of my blog). As the Orthodox (as an ethnic exclusionary club, too often) view SWB’s Calvinism (indeed, ALL calvinism) to be heretical, with no ifs, ands, or buts, then either Lynda is confused about her patristic faith, or is being…shall I say, ‘typically feminine’.
From my own pov, at least I have seen, have tried to draw out, and infer to my readers that Calvinists (who, by and large, built America, as our mutual history shows) are owed a great debt from the Byzantines out there, who were ‘johnny-cum-latelies’ when it came to America. I have tried to walk a middle way, while pointing out to evangelicals the trap filioquism entails, and while mentioning to Orthodox the fact that common grace exists, even among the West’s most augustinian denomination.
So, either Lynda is playing both sides against the middle (a very bolshevik tactic) -as I owe much of my insights to both RJ Rushdoony as well as David Chilton- (and to which I often point out, and have admitted); or she still misguidedly assumes the magnanimity of Western Man (which COULD have been offered as a noble gesture, via our common altruism and our knowledge of our history, as the inhabitants of a dwindling and increasingly impotent Christendom, (as late as the 1970′s) still prevails in the West, without fear of either being rebuffed, or our own race becoming extinct.
Sad to say, I no longer believe in either. With the election of Obama, the race hatred blacks have for Whitey -that has long simmered, or been made to simmer, since the Watts riots of the 1960′s- has boiled over time after time; and each incidence has increased in bestiality, extent, and lawlessness. It was this site that brought to my mind the realities of Christian White FOLK trying to help other Christian Whitefolk, and how all familial, particularist attempts at charity, were being ‘stopped at the border,’ as it were, by our own government, in the Katrina aftermath. It was quoting statistics here and at LG, in matters as varied as IQ, national wealth, crime stats, religious attributes etc. from authors like Dabney, Rushton, Vanhanen and Lynn, Taylor’s ‘the Color of Crime,’ Rushdoony, and a whole host of other, older authors that led me to see whether or not there was a ‘pattern in the heavenlies,’ that is to be expected to be followed on this earth, by those who are called Christians.
What at first was a trumpet blast of reality at this site, has petered out to an ‘uncertain sound’ that clearly is as brainwashed in its’ efforts to ‘have one’s cake and eat it, too,’ as anything the liberal churches could have devised. Surely, God can do whatever He wants with whatever racial group on earth that was created. Never has that possibility been excluded on my part. What I HAVE said, however, is that the covenant that was established at Calvary, and ratified at Pentecost, is based on the OT paradigm, which was racial, exclusionary, and strongly familial. If the Incarnation means anything, (and I believe it does) then the act of Incarnation is the physical equivalent of ‘being spoken to’ in these last times’, that Hebrews 1:2 alludes to. To deny that the Incarnation is of the race of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is to be outright Docetists. What boggles my mind, is that either Lynda or you folks, (I can’t tell which) seem to think that is ok……
Fr John, you’ve mentioned the names Rushdoony, Dabney, and Chilton, all of whom denied your theory that non-White races are not created in God’s image, did not come from Adam, do not share in the covenant, and have no greater chance of going to heaven than my dog. (Oh, I know, you’ll post a comment after this that you have said no such thing, and it will undoubtedly contain the word “filioquism.”) There are almost no Christians in history who agree with you on this, yet you take it out on Lynda and denounce this website as liberal and docetist. If it bothers you that much, I implore you to stop reading and commenting.
However, we will retract this statement if you will agree to send us a free copy of your revised and footnoted Book of Life as soon as it is published.
Dear Fr John,
I assure you that I am not a Bolshevik, although I might plead guilty to typically feminine – and by that I do not mean setting people (men) against each other for fun. I mean that if you were to meet me personally you would meet a typical old fashioned Grandmother. And I would consider most Grandmothers in my circle are typically old fashioned and feminine. We also have our opinions and we do state them.
But what I most truly am is a Roman Catholic who opposes the antipapacy currently seated in Rome and its partnership with the Sanhedrin. As I work at my own business, I can blog during my coffee breaks and this gives me the opportunity to speak (particularly with Catholics) all over the world and help them with the religious delusional system that is emanating from Benedict and his fellow rabbis who are promoting the Noachide laws for Western nations. On this subject, I have a great deal to say, the Apostolic admonition for women to be silent notwithstanding.
I am not with a ‘Trad’ congregation. I fundamentally agree with CWNY who perceives these as “half-way” houses. I really get this (because I lived it).
When I read your usual offering on this thread, I saw that the bloggers were not buying it (and why), I said to myself – ‘well, good they Get It over at SWB’. But instead of disputing this issue with the SWB bloggers in scripture, patristics and sensus fidelium, you proceeded to cite one of CWNY key metaphors, (a metaphor that – point of fact – opens up this entire issue) as an illustration of your position. You remarked that the import of the “halfway house” placed you and CWNY were on the same page in this debate.
Now, CWNY does not need me to blog in and defend his position. But the blogroll does need to hear, I think, that people read the posts of SWB and their associates with more appreciation and understanding than they might realize. And the bloggers are not going to sit while “half-way house” gets warped out of the context in which CWNY placed it AND applied against Our Lord’s words:
“Going therefore, teach ye all nations (ethnos); baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and the Holy Ghost” Matt 28:19
Ethnos means: nation, Gentiles, heathen, people. And scripture uses it in all these senses.
I have argued this point with you on your weblog and pointed out on numerous occasions that your definition of ‘all nations’ as the oikoumene of the European nations is false. The oikoumene is the whole world of all nations – pan ethne. Indeed your argument makes Our Lord’s own words to none effect. You didn’t get it then; you don’t get it now.
I am not “raging at you” but I take this opportunity to reinterate a point upon which your eternal salvation may well depend, as I am banned (for the benefit of SWB) -from commenting on your weblog. But, then, I am also banned from the local novus ordo church from pointing out that ‘inclusion’ of prayers from the Talmud does not belong in the Catholic liturgy; that we don’t do liturgical dancers and Wiccan nuns and speak about Christ as ‘our Sofia’ and the Holy Trinity as ‘Our Mother / Father God’ – etc. Don’t worry, you are not alone in being annoyed at my well-intentioned comments. And, for my part, I enjoy being banned, because it gives me more free time to blog and watch YouTube.
BTW loved the one about the two Arab teenagers who put two camels in Dad’s car and were filming it on phonecam. Dad (Abdul) got a call at work and was told, ‘Do you know your kids have put two camels in your car and have posted the video on the NET? It’s getting a million hits every 5 minutes.” Loved the Two Angry Camels in a Car video. Oh the blessings of being banned from the blogs and the novus ordo.
Anyway, I digress.
But where we really butted heads, Fr John, was on Brother Nathaneael’s Real Zionist News Comment section. The Orthodox Chinese Brothers had written in. YOUR fellow Orthodox KathJulianne and Stav were assisting them with comments and links. And then you took this opportunity to write in with your theories about the non-European races and non-Adamic hominids and what not. The Orthodox are not going to correct you because you are an Orthodox priest, Brother Nathaneael is out of town to process the Cross to the ADL, the threads on his website are melting down and his moderators are at a loss, so the Catholics (one of whom was myself) landed on you for your comments which were HIGHLY OFFENSIVE to your fellow Orthodox Chinese brothers.
So, maybe I did come across as ‘raging’ at you. It was not my intention. My temper does get away from me sometimes and I apologize. But I have not budged from my opinion and betcha anything neither have you. When God created woman -what was He thinking?