A New Birth of Freedom
March 21, 2009 
17 Comments
This is an image of sodomites being burned at the stake in Germany:
You can see why they’re called faggots. The state has a duty to execute those who destroy natural order and the future of God’s people. For the same reason, “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live” (Exodus 22:18). As Rushdoony taught, witchcraft is more accurately defined as the practice of abortion than merely an attempt to harness the occult. And he makes this very interesting statement: “In Leviticus 19:26, divination and soothsaying are forbidden in the same sentence as the eating of blood.” Blood represents life, and knowing this, it’s not hard to discern the intent of such laws. Whether we’re talking about faggots who spurn the blessing of life or the worshippers of Baal and Molech, who both castrated themselves and committed februation (child sacrifice by fire), it all equates to genocide. It all has the purpose of destroying God’s people, and those who participate in such evil works hate God, themselves, and their race. Miscegenation has the same effect, of course.
For as long as anyone can remember, witches were put to death for spreading the knowledge and practice of birth control and abortion. This became a major issue in the 14th century after the Black Death killed one-third of Europe. In the aftermath, God-fearing people couldn’t have babies fast enough, but witches thought they were doing humanitarian work by preventing births. Perhaps they thought too many births would cause the plague to return. Now we routinely hear Christ-haters bring up ancient and aberrational history like the Salem witch trials to paint Christians as bloodthirsty maniacs. But witch hunts in Europe were not just promoted by the Church. Every civil authority threatened capital punishment against those who sought to extinguish life. Thankfully, there was such a population boom because of this Christian doctrine that White Europeans went on to colonize one-third of the globe. But there was so much danger in allowing women to be midwives that to this very day, gynecology is dominated by men. All along, the Church stood forthrightly against birth control, until our own time when “Christians” have learned to hate both God and their race.
We raise this topic because of a dreadful and nauseating video that has come out of Africa, the center of the “New Christendom.” (WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC.) Witch doctors have learned that they can control superstitious Blacks by pretending to be Christians. They are kidnapping children for ransom and convincing others to murder their own children by fire. This is exactly why cannibalism was so widespread in Africa; the dim-witted people are unable to resist. Even here in our own once-White country, we now have witch doctors running churches. Notice that the modern witch hunts taking place in Africa, as shown in the video, are occurring for precisely the opposite reason that witch hunts occurred in Europe. The “Christians” of Africa have become the witches, sacrificing their own children in an act of worship to their devil-gods.
Newsweek has published an article called “Extreme Motherhood,” about the Quiverfull movement that is helping to save the White race. This is because Nadya Suleman and the Duggars have been in the news. Notice this line: “Unlike Suleman, who was vilified as the freakish, government-assistance-dependent ‘Octomom,’ the Duggars’ abundant progeny often attract admiration.” Yes, and yes, for good reason. But Jewsweek considers the Duggars to be the freaks because they’re biblical.
It is a pro-life-purist lifestyle known as Quiverfull, where women forgo all birth-control options, viewing contraception as a form of abortion and considering even natural family planning an attempt to control a realm—fertility—that should be entrusted to divine providence. At the heart of this reality-show depiction of “extreme motherhood” is a growing conservative Christian emphasis on the importance of women submitting to their husbands and fathers, an antifeminist backlash that holds that gender equality is contrary to God’s law and that women’s highest calling is as wives and “prolific” mothers.
Yes, sexual equality is contrary to God’s law, and so is racial equality, and so is family equality and individual equality. Equality is the sworn enemy of liberty. But like everything else, anti-contraception can be taken to extremes. For instance, it makes good sense to have children while young; physical risks compound with age, and many older women are faced with dilemmas. Still, “militant fecundity” and “demographic dominion,” as promoted by pro-White organizations like Vision Forum, is a good thing. These are honorable mothers and fathers who are not asking for bailouts from Uncle Hymie. They hate feminism, and thus are rarely faced with teen daughters getting knocked up by cads, as happened to self-described feminist and full-time neglectful mother, Sarah Palin.
Newsweek gets some of the inside-baseball terminology wrong. The “patriarchalists” are full-bore and even prevent daughters from going to college (not a bad idea in this integrated zoo we still call a country), voting, or being paid for labor, and “complementarians” disagree with them.
The article also mentions Jon and Kate Gosselin, about whom we wrote here. Miscegenation is an ugly thing. The critical response to the article comes from Cheryl Lindsey Seelhoff who, according to this court document, is “involved in an interracial marriage” herself.
Aristotle wrote in 350 BC that a man’s rule over his children is royal but his rule over his wife is constitutional. I think that’s what the “complementarians” are trying to say. Aristotle wrote for White folks, of course, because this has never been the state of affairs for anyone else. And Aristotle explains why: the “idea of a constitutional state implies that the natures of the citizens are equal, and do not differ at all.” But there is natural inequality under royal rule, and this is why “a king is the natural superior of his subjects, but he should be of the same kin or kind with them…” Just as the Bible requires of us. We’ve heard stories from friends of lunatic preachers telling their sheeple that to vote against Obama because of his skin color is sinful. It shows how little they understand of Scripture. Even pagan Aristotle, who never read the book, understands it better. Aristotle knew that the man “who by nature and not by mere accident is without a state…is like the ‘Tribeless, lawless, hearthless one,’ whom Homer denounces,” and “is forthwith a lover of war.”
“The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” ~ Aristotle
“Wherever God appointed a king he never appointed him absolute, and a sole independent angel, but joined always with him judges, who were no less to judge according to the law of God than the king. And in a moral obligation of judging righteously, the conscience of the monarch and the conscience of the inferior judges are equally under immediate subjection to the King of kings.” ~ Samuel Rutherford, Lex Rex (The Law and the Prince)
The Amish abhor contraception, and they continue to double in population every 20 years, showing that they are blessed of God.
An endless supply of new Roman Catholics:
In 2002, when it was revealed that Cardinal Law had harbored dozens of sex predator priests in greater Boston, his residence was hounded around the clock by protestors holding signs that read “Honk if you want Law to Resign!” Law apparently lay awake at night listening to the endless blare of passing motorists honking in derision.
During this very dark time, do you want to guess who Cardinal Law’s bigger supporters were?
Yup, Hispanic immigrants, who formed small, but very dedicated, counter-protests at most every anti-Law demonstration.
Cardinal Law had spent years courting Boston’s immigrants, often boasting in Spanish of having been born in Mexico. He even claimed that he was an immigrant too—just like them…
If my hunch is accurate, then the bishops are advocating for Open Borders simply because they desperately need more constituents who will forgive them anything, especially if the sex abuse scandal gets even worse.
Immigration raids are “un-American” and “inhumane,” say these feminists.
Saints are hateful and offensive.
How is this flyer “racist”? (I confess to having no idea what racism is supposed to mean.)
Ice cream is racist. This is a great line from James: “Of course, it’s well known that when it comes to talking about ice cream, Russia has long been a nation of cowards.”
Double standards can go to hell.
Does it mean anything to ban the word “nigger” as racist or “faggot” as homophobic when the European Union considers the words “Miss” and “Mrs.” to be sexist? And wetbacks are now “undocumented immigrants,” and terrorist acts are now “man-caused disasters.” Unless you’re a Ron Paul supporter or opposed to the North American Union; then you’re a terrorist. Anyway, I like the shorter words that our ancestors used. Time is money.
“This is apparently the first time a President has graced us with his March Madness predictions.” And the first time a real basketball court has been built at the White House. And then there are the Stevie Wonder and Earth Wind & Fire concerts. Some are wondering whether Obama is working very hard. It’s not likely, if history is a guide.
In the year 1841, Punch Magazine wrote of “Nigger Peculiarities.” (Malcolm Muggeridge was later the editor of this magazine.) It’s interesting to read, and to realize that little has changed. Blacks are still “out-heroding Herod in their monstrous attempts of imitating and exceeding the fashions of the whites…dressed in fashions carried to the very sublime of the ridiculous.” And in their dress and mannerisms, we have a hint as to why the Latin word “nigger” was adopted by them, first as an epithet and then as a term of endearment. It begins with the vanity of imitation, followed by the quest for uniqueness, and ends with familiarity. “Their dissensions among themselves are irresistibly comic. Threatening each other in the most outrageous manner; pouring out invectives, anathemas, and denunciations of the most deadly nature; but nine times in ten letting the strife end without a blow; affording in their quarrels an apt illustration of ‘a tale full of sound and fury, told by an idiot, signifying nothing.’” All the while, “their laziness and unequivocal antipathy to work is as true as proverbial.” That’s the thing about stereotypes that hyper-sensitive minorities hate: they’re stereotypes, meaning they’re usually true.
Minorities will never be conservatives, writes Shelby Steele in the Wall Street Journal, because minorities have “grievance-focused identities. The idea of grievance will seem to define them in some eternal way, and it will link them atavistically to a community of loved ones.” They find moral authority in redemptive liberalism whereas conservatism advocates discipline, a foreign concept to them. But the choice is not between human dignity and racial dignity, as Steele suggests. The choice is between both human and racial dignity, or neither. The very fact that only grievance links Blacks to their kin proves that they have neither kin nor heritage in any real sense. This is not true of Whites and has never been true of Whites.
For those who don’t know, “environmental justice” means making Greens more Black. “Environmentalism doesn’t appeal to minorities,” says Steven Milloy, the publisher of JunkScience.com, because “it doesn’t bring them anything.” This sounds just like Michael Steele, who believes the Republican Party will attract minorities once it offers them something, which is what Mark Knopfler calls “money for nothing.” Yes, it sure is a more aromatic world with non-Whites around.
Now the Federal Jew Reserve is buying $300 billion in Treasury notes, and $750 billion more in mortgage bonds. The very day after this announcement, the dollar fell by more than it has in one day since 1971. The Jewish printing press is overheating. When small-time chiselers do this it’s called counterfeiting, but when Jews do it it’s called “economic stimulus.” I suppose it’s fitting that we have a president who looks like Robert Mugabe, because we’re on our way to Zimbabwe-style hyperinflation.
Peter Schiff on why money doesn’t appear magically out of thin air.
The heaviest element known to science.
Gold traded for bread in Zimbabwe. No need to wait for the Apocalypse! They killed the White farmers, who turned this fair country into the bread basket of Africa, and now they eat rats and starve to death. They’re not in a drought, mind you; the soil of Africa is rich beyond belief. Look at the guy standing in front of an untilled field complaining that the government isn’t feeding him. Now, this is what Black people do, as you read in Punch, and it’s no surprise. In Haiti right now, they’re actually eating clay. But we won’t be any better off with our own currency that has been made worthless in less than a hundred years through usury and calculated, state-sponsored theft, because our property will be taken from us, regardless of our willingness to work.
Mississippi is already getting a taste of South Africa. But maybe if we preach the gospel there for another 500 years we can convince Blacks that all people are equal.
Filipino teachers discover that negrified America is not like what they saw on Jew-TV.
Favoritism for none, and no favor at all if White.
“Anyone who thinks California will once again be a huge market for local conservative radio doesn’t have the first clue as to what’s going on, or why their shows are dying. And in their ignorance or mendacity that makes them refuse to acknowledge that this all boils down to race, they reveal exactly why conservatism is dying.”
Languages going extinct in Babel.
The Columbine killers had this in common with your impostor-pastor (impastor?): They hated racism and anti-Semitism. Sure, they were atheistic nihilists, but you can’t hold that against your impastor. It’s not his fault that Klebold and Harris understood only part of the Bible.
Mark Potok, the Snidely Whiplash of the Left, looks debonaire with this petroleum jelly in his hair. He drives the hairy-legged interns wild every time he bends over and squeezes out another report.
Web censorship in Australia. I assure you this has nothing to do with porn, which is a lucrative Jewish industry, and everything to do with criticism of Jews.
“Crosses are a symbol that hurt Jewish feelings,” says a satanic rabbi.
Now, you listen to me, you anti-Semites. This sweet old lady is telling the truth! One time my car broke down and I couldn’t get to the store. I had to survive for a whole week on one box of stale Lucky Charms. So don’t tell me about your problems.
Wild speculation and paranoia about concentration camps on American soil.
Victor Hugo once said, “Emergencies have always been necessary to progress. It was darkness which produced the lamp. It was fog that produced the compass. It was hunger that drove us to exploration. And it took a depression to teach us the real value of a job.” Put simply, it is always darkest before the dawn. Put even more simply, it is always negroid before the renaissance. Consider what we were saying about Europe being almost annihilated during the Black Death and then rebounding in a couple of centuries to sit astride the world like a colossus.
We are beset on every side today, but as Samuel Eliot Morison writes in the prologue of his biography on Christopher Columbus, conditions were very similar in 1492:
At the end of the year 1492 most men in Western Europe felt exceedingly gloomy about the future. Christian civilization appeared to be shrinking in area and dividing into hostile units as its sphere contracted. For over a century there had been no important advance in natural science, and registration in the universities dwindled as the instruction they offered became increasingly jejune and lifeless. Institutions were decaying, well-meaning people were growing cynical or desperate, and many intelligent men, for want of something better to do, were endeavoring to escape the present through the study of the pagan past.
Islam was now expanding at the expense of Christendom… The Ottoman Turks, after snuffing out all that remained of the Byzantine Empire, had overrun most of Greece, Albania and Serbia; presently they would be hammering at the gates of Vienna…
Belief in the institutions of their ancestors was wavering… Throughout Western Europe the general feeling was one of profound disillusion, cynical pessimism and black despair.
And then Columbus, whose name meant “messenger of Christ and of the Holy Spirit” (Colombo = “dove”), set sail on a boat named after the mother of Christ. Our people will rebound once again, and to understand why, look no further than Jeremiah 31:35-36:
Thus says the LORD,
Who gives the sun for a light by day,
The ordinances of the moon and the stars for a light by night,
Who disturbs the sea,
And its waves roar
(The LORD of hosts is His name):
“If those ordinances depart
From before Me,” says the LORD,
“Then the seed of Israel shall also cease
From being a nation before Me forever.”
You guys continue to amaze me. (That, and when do you find the time for all this research, unless you (unlike myself) are full-time independently wealthy individuals, who CAN spend hours at this!?)
When you come up with an insight on your own, you really come up with an insight!
Anyway, a simple Scroogle look at ‘witches and abortion’ came up with these links.
http://www.forerunner.com/champion/X0041_Statements_of_a_prac.html
http://www.forerunner.com/champion/X0038.html
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Abortion%20is%20Murder/abortion_is_witchcraft.htm
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/child_sacrifices.htm
http://www.halfthekingdom.org/old%20lies.html
Thanks. It all starts to fit together. And, of course, what saith Scripture?
‘Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.’
Not that Benedict [Arnold] would actually USE his Papal office for good, now that he is a ‘Hollowhoaxian,’ instead of a ‘Christian’….have to be ‘diverse’ you know…
ugh.
P.S. Bravo on the Jeremiah quote- Columbus’ mission really WAS that which we once were taught in Elementary School. The sad finale to that ideal Vision, is now found over at Cambria’s site, however.
http://cambriawillnotyield.blogspot.com/2009/03/at-last-trump.html
And yet… even here, hope springs eternal.”“But you are now looking at the England within England, the real England just as this is the real Narnia. And in that inner England no good thing is destroyed.”
For that one quote, I cried tears of joy. ‘Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, who forgets NOT his inheritance!’
Thanks for the link to Aristotle. One can draw new profit every time he reads such inspired simplicity. There were some additional lines in that section which you may have wanted to highlight:
“But is there any one thus intended by nature to be a slave, and for whom such a condition is expedient and right, or rather is not all slavery a violation of nature?
There is no difficulty in answering this question, on grounds both of reason and of fact. For that some should rule and others be ruled is a thing not only necessary, but expedient; from the hour of their birth, some are marked out for subjection, others for rule…
It is clear, then, that some men are by nature free, and others slaves, and that for these latter slavery is both expedient and right… We see then that there is some foundation for this difference of opinion, and that all are not either slaves by nature or freemen by nature, and also that there is in some cases a marked distinction between the two classes, rendering it expedient and right for the one to be slaves and the others to be masters: the one practicing obedience, the others exercising the authority and lordship which nature intended them to have. “
“For as long as anyone can remember, witches were put to death for spreading the knowledge and practice of birth control and abortion. This became a major issue in the 14th century after the Black Death killed one-third of Europe.”
It is the White Death now, that various witches and witch organisations conjure up.
God save the White Race!
John, it’s remarkable that Aristotle, the pre-Christian, had so much in common with our Christian ancestors, up until recently. I guess White men think alike.
Have you seen this site?
http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/2009/03/oath-keepers-declaration-of-orders-we.html
FYI.
We can only speculate, but I think there may be a sense in which biblical religion has always been the ONLY game in Earthville, so that the non-Christian ancients were often building on the Bible without realizing their indebtedness too it, or perhaps in some cases deliberately supressing that fact. Most anything worth appreciating in ancient Oriental thought seems to point back to some sort of contact with the biblical faith at some point, and I expect that would be even more so as one goes further west. There are some places where this seems to be fairly easily demonstrated and other places where it has to be inferred, but for the Christian it is an easy and natural inference to make. Of course that can have its downside too, if it causes us to uncritically import unbiblical thinking into the Christian faith, as has happened in our own European past with Aristotle and Plato.
In response to Mr. Witmer.
You seem to regard “Sola Scriptura” as the primal basis of Western Culture and that you want to protect from “importing inbiblical thinking into the Christian faith”.
Jerry Dell Ehrlich has written a fabulous book called, “Plato’s Gift to Christianity”. Christianity is not a Jewish faith, but Greek. Transcendence and Metaphysical thinking is European. Aristotle was a student of Plato for over 20 years. Christianity was formed by the Hellenistic culture that Socrates/Plato forged. Truth is Truth. Christianity is based on Truth, not on “sola scriptura”.
Mr Wheeler — just the opposite. Christianity is not “jewish” in that that term is now loaded with rabbinic and Khazaric nonsense — but it is the same religion given to Adam, Seth, Abraham, and the Hebrews.
And thus (Mr Witmer) I am tracking with you. Dr Poythress is helpful here. Since there is only one truth, the Orientals have tapped into that one truth at many points. I look forward to the day that van Til is translated into Japanese and those wonderful people grasp it.
Mr. Harris- I understand your POV, but what Mr. Wheeler is saying (as I have read his comments on other fora) goes WAY beyond just ‘finding the Hebraic mindset in Scripture,’ but finding out WHO the Hebrews were (hint- they aren’t “Semites” as we understand it today) is important, if one is to understand what is ‘behind the curtain’ of History. That Christianity is the same religion as given to Adam, Seth, Abraham and our forefathers (as Simeon notes in the Canticle, “Nunc Dimittis” in the N.T.) is clear.
But where were of ‘Adam’s seed and David’s line’? In other words, why is it that the LXX is in GREEK? Why is it that the NT is in GREEK, and not Hebrew? Why is it that GREEKS, who in their mythology have the Gods, demigods, and heroes, all partaking of blue eyes, red/blond hair, and noble Caucasoid features in their OLDER incarnations? Why is it that the Mountain Range that we Europeans bear as our ETHNIC moniker, is the same from which the Captive Hebraic Tribes ‘disappear’ from the written record of History, when even Ezra and Nehemiah note that it was just two tribes (more or less- I Kings 11: 31-32, 35-36) that returned to Palestine after the Babylonian/Assyrian Captivity?
Why is it the pass- the ONLY pass that leads from the South Caucasus to the steppes of the Russian plain, which leads overland to Europe, is often called
Why is it that the Jews use the word ‘Gentile’ to mean “non-Jew.” But the Latin word ‘gentilis’ means “kinsman,” which is the exact opposite of the sense in which the Jews use it? What matters is how the Hebrew prophets and the Israelite writers of the New Testament used the words ‘goy’ and ‘ethnos.’ These are the words which have been erroneously translated into the word “Gentiles,” which has no proper place in Scripture.
Lastly, for a different take on this, here’s a quote I have yet to corroborate: “A ‘Daryal Pass’ valley route sometimes called, “the Pass of Israel,” is clearly marked out in red in the Cambridge History Of Iran, (vol. 3:1:522); it was a favourite passage-way to Europe from the Mid-East.” found here, of all places! – http://19.org/forum/index.php/m/49616/0/ (NOte to whom THEY link it!) LOL
Some URLS for further research/thought on that score.
“Hebrew is Greek”
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=209&topic_id=747&mesg_id=747
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2409454/Pages-from-Joseph-Yahuda-Hebrew-is-Greek-part1
“The Baltic Homer”
http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep2vinc2.htm
Here’s a video some of us have worked on about false Christian teaching.Turn over a rock what do you find.
http://www.vimeo.com/2790729
Well, though I’m no longer a Christian and can’t agree with the assessment of the horrible and horrific persecution of witches, heretics, etc., or get terribly worked up about preventative birth-control (abortion’s different), I still largely concur with the observations made here on race and Jewish mischief, and you make a good point about Sarah Palin. I found it astonishing that among the putatively super-conservative Christian base of the party there was so little furor over the idea of this “mother” of young (and special-needs) children running for various political offices when she obviously should’ve been home taking care of her family, not biting and clawing her way, like a rabid dog, to the top of the political power-structure. Such shameful hypocrisy. Idiots deserved what they got.
“The “Christians” of Africa have become the witches, sacrificing their own children in an act of worship to their devil-gods.”
It’s OK for you guys to criticize the syncretism of shallow African semi-Christians.
But here you make a so generalizing claim that one might well suppose that you are calling ALL new African converts to Christianity (who are indeed very numerous) to be phonies, idolatrous devil-worshippers.
That would well qualify as a slanderous accusation, and a heavy one at that. And in the Bible, being a “false accuser of brethren” is not an enviable position.
Settle down, Petr. We’ve done no such thing. If that’s what we had intended to say, we would have said it, without hesitation.
Whites have more than their fair share of phonies, and always have. The difference is that we used to be able to put a sufficient clamp on them. Now, as the population of the superstitious grows exponentially, and hucksters of all races discover the depth of the market, we won’t be able to return to that White paradigm when education and orthodoxy and liberty were prized. These are White concepts, and we have little hope that they will be cast on anything but stony ground in Africa. I wish that weren’t the case, but if wishes were horses then beggars would ride.
The historically insurmountable problem that Blacks face is that there are too few leaders to reign in the mass of niggers. I see in Reverend James Manning just such a leader, and the niggers are calling for his head for opposing Obama, the Great Mulatto Hope. Manning knows that Blacks will never get anywhere while their men are completely worthless and the focus of their greatest admiration is the product of a sinful union between a rapist and a whore. This problem they face is as true in religion as in every other area of life.
At first, SWB was a guilty pleasure indulged reluctantly and seldom. Now, it’s just a pleasure. I am recovering from my long, multicultural coma, and I have you guys to thank for it. So thank you.
Nevertheless, I have a question concerning one of your contributors, specifically the fellow who wrote the reply to Rev. O’Kobian’s nonsense located on the side-bar. Do you guys subscribe to grail-church theology? Thanks again for all your labors.
Thanks, Randall. No, I’m not sure what grail-church theology is. The familism piece was written by our friend Jezekiah, and it’s intended to be farcical. “Jack O’Kobian” is intended to resemble the word “Jacobin,” which was Rev. Dr. Dabney’s favorite word for the proto-Communists and impastors who taught such vile doctrines in his own time.
Just when you thought things could not get worse; Lo! they did get worse.
The baby factory boom in India. Hold onto your blue pill ladies and gentlemen.
These baby factories are one stop shops. If you are a man; you shop online for your Ova donor from the available profiles made available to you on the client intranet. You pick your Ova donor. She attends one of these factories for the ‘ova harvest’. The prospective father can mail his vital ingredients to the baby factory through a clinic or hospital in his neighbourhood that has a reciprocal with the factory in India. A surrogate is paid by the hospital to carry the child. The prospective father or mother or couple goes to India to pick-up the child 9 mos later. For the factory, it is COD and the social workers will arrange papers and visas for the return journey.
“Couple Buy Child From India Baby Factory. May 6, 09. The London Evening Standard.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23686256-details/Couple+buy+child+from+India+baby+factory/article.do.
Or just Google Baby Factory because that is the term they use in India for this type of clinic.
To the liberal mind all of this appears a totally equitable and happy transaction. Cherries. Cherries. Cherries.
But here in Australia, Peter and Trevor have just returned from a baby factory in Mumbai with their twin girls. Big luv-fest tonight on the news about how ‘natural family’ is becoming so inclusive.
Now there is a problem at Baby Factory Inc. Peter and Trevor have returned on the wings of a storm that has been brewing for sometime.
In the liberal scenario, the surrogates should technically just be paid their money and ‘therapized’ by the hospital with feel good “helping infertile Western couples to have their own children” line. But wouldn’t you know it, the surrogates are now wanting the draw their own line at the faggots. (You go girls! and keep going) The surrogates are not just going to take the money and incubate the egg. They want exclusionary clauses for faggots on religious grounds: Hindu, Sikh, Muslim. Bottom line, the surrogates are not happy with the idea of incubating the egg for the homos.
This is going to be very bad for business and the Factories are reading the ‘all families are equal’ riot act to the surrogates. The liberals are wringing their hands because the surrogates usually hail from anointed victim minorities. Worse luck for the liberals, the surrogates are playing the race card, the religious minority card and wanting to assert themselves outside of anointed victim contractual obligations.
Between East and West, the liberals are in the type of mess that only the liberals could get into. Angry surrogates, eggs on strike, embryos that turn out not to be suit-proof afterall, thousands and thousands of dollars worth of baby contracts which could disappear down the (uh) loophole of India’s anti homosexual laws, furious faggots arguing with religious minorities over who has superior anointed victim rights. This huge wa-wa is heading straight for the Indian courts.
But who is going to get prosecuted in Britain over this insanity? Yes. Of course, the Catholic Church – which is only trying to stay out of reciprocal arrangements with baby factories, help prospective adoptive couples (you know, like a married man and woman) and is in breach of pro-sodomite laws in that country because it uses words like ‘natural family’ (a recognized hate term invoking international jurisdiction under the ICC in the Hague).
Is there anything we can add to this picture?
And Lo! they did get worse. This from the Beeb. BBC News “Gay Penguins Adopt Chick” Wed June 3, 09. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8081829.stm.
The Humboldt Penguin is in trouble. As a species, it is cracking up and its numbers are dwindling. Male penguins attempt to mate with each other and hatch offspring from stones are among the symptoms of the crack-up.
The Bremerhaven Zoo is only trying to help (as goofy white people do). In 2005, they tested the sexual orientation of the beleaguered Humboldts and decided to assist their gay penguins by bringing 4 females to the zoo in an attempt to get the dysfunctionals sorted out and hopefully to reproduce.
The German Gay ‘community’ was outraged. They took to the airwaves and the streets. The zoo was interfering with the penguins, interfering with natural animal behaviour, insulting the gay community, denying the holocaust, immplying the penguins were neurotic. [duh]
Now, I know you think I am making this up – which is why I have provided the above ref and link.
The zoo (which only wants to save the ridiculous Humboldt) finally capitulated by giving a rejected egg (another dire symptom of species crack-up) to two of its least dysfunctional males: Z and Vielpunkt. They are now happily rearing a chick.
What of the chick? No answers at the back of the book. This is uncharted zoological space.