What is seen in white women, racially, is an image and reflection of the one whom the Fathers call ‘the new Eve’ and the saints. I refer to the Blessed Virgin Mother of Our Lord. As I have said in other statements, the European race is unique because as a race, the nations of the Caucasian race responded to the Evangel. The entire race has communed in the body and blood of the Lord for millenia. So as a race we have many graces and natural gifts. But it is not of us, lest anyone should boast.

Yet all of these graces and favours pale (and I use this metaphor advisedly) beside the beauty and reality of the saints (living and reigning with Christ in heaven), the angels and the Blessed Mother of Our Lord. What is seen by non European peoples in the European race is a reflection and an image of the heavenly court. They should get over their ‘white hang ups’ and work upon beautifying their souls – more importantly, so should the post Christian Europeans.

Take, for example, St Germaine Cousin (born in Pibrac near Toulouse France 1579). To find a sad, useless and miserable existence, one need look no further than the life of St Germaine. She was deformed and sufferred a rartially paralyzed hand and wretched health. She lacked any education and had only a spinning wheel to spin wool and a crook to lead her sheep. She passed her life under the authority of a stepmother who detested her and her father – a weak, venal man under the authority of his wife who was ashamed of her. He kept his daughter apart from his second family, having no special affection for his Germaine. He ignored her and gave her a small five foot spot under the stairway of the barn as a place to sleep. During the day she watched the flock of her father’s sheep and had an allotment of wool to spin. If she did not meet the family quota she was severely punished. And she died at age 22.

HOWEVER. She was in love with Our Lord, the King of Angels. She spent the time of her earthly sojourn in prayer. The people of the village laughed at her simple devotions and mocked her misery. “If you are so pious, they mocked, why don’t you pray him to heal your withered hannd. Then you would be good for something. You could help your family.” She declined to answer this type of statement and dwelt in silence. Of her meagre ration of food from her family, she gave to the poor.

Yet it pleased the Lord to work miracle after miracle through her, of which many multiple and corroborating witnesses testified after her death. Which was on this wise:

One night,two brothers from a nearby Abbey were traveling to Pibrac. They took refuge in the forest near the village. They were sleeping when suddenly they were awakened by the sound of singing. No one was there. But as they listened, the rejoicing voices, raised in song came nearer. As they looked, they saw a group of young women amidst a beautiful light that fell all around them and before them. The young women moved as though in procession through the woods of Pibrac. As the brothers watched astounded, they passed by and were lost to view. The brothers, feeling that perhaps they had seen a vision from heaven began to pray and give thanks to God. But, as they prayed, they began to hear the song again. This time the procession came from Pibrac, but another – more beautiful and joyful than all her companions and crowned with garlands of flowers (never seen before) had joined them.

The next morning, as Germaine had not appeared to gather the sheep and lead them out, her father went to seek her under the stairway of the barn which was the earthly repose he had assigned her. She had died in her sleep the night before.

But after her death, many in the most dire of straights have begged her to pray with them and for them to our Lord for his mercies and received the answer to their prayers. Not least Pope Pius IX who fled Rome in fear of his life when the Masonic Revolution under Garibaldi turned Italy into a blodbath. Later he would say that disguised as a beggar and in fear of his life, his enemies in pursuit he knelt down and prayed to the Lord, “I begged the Virgin of Pibrac to pray to the Lord for me.”

Today the Church hails St Germaine Cousin on the day of her Heavenly birth in praise of Our Lord: “Thine be the dominion in the day of thy power amid the brightness of the saints, from the womb before the day star have I begotten thee.” Ps 109:4

And. “I slept but my heart was awake, It is my beloved who knocks: ‘Open to me my sister, my beloved, my dove, my undefiled’.” Song of Songs

Sadly and most regretably, this is the type of story that a modern person would find incredible or stupid. This is just a fairytale, they would scoff. To that, I would say – yes, it is a fairytale. It is a true fairytale, because it is only the true faith that makes true fairytales possible. It is God who “by the power at work within us is able to do far more abundantly than all that we ask or think, and to him be glory in the Church and in Christ Jesus to all generations.” Eph 3:20.

Europe believed this once. They can believe it again.

DO we have this false religion because we are all at base, antinomian to a man in Christendom today?
http://www.gracevalley.org/radio_trans/antinomianism.html

Isn’t what we need, is something like a fresh appraisal of the Truths of the Gospel and Grace? SOmething like this?

http://www.lutheranpress.com/dtmt.htm
http://www.lutheranpress.com/sdea.htm

What thinkest thou, Geneva?

I believe in one Holocaust®, conceived in Hollywood, born of the New York media: and in Six Million Judaics, who suffered under Adolf Hitler and were gassed, made into lampshades and cremated. In the 21st century they arose again, to haunt the living and the dead. I believe in Elie Wiesel and the geysers of blood, and Arnold Friedman and the color-coded crematory smoke, the holy Shoah biz Church, the communist saints, no forgiveness of German sins, the resurrection of lies, and the shelf-life everlasting of the Auschwitz gas chamber stories. Amen.

‘Tis absolutely true. It costs us nothing to rant and rave here, in cyberspace. True, it may be construed as hate speech in many western countries, but we can all profess our denial of the good Bishop when he is crucified by the Jews. Maybe we will be allowed to deny him twice, for historical purposes, if the laws are made retroactive. What cannot be denied, however, is that the good Bishop walks the walk and talks the talk, in the real world of raw Jewish political power. He sees it up close and personal. This man of God could be plucked, tomorrow, from the sanctuary of whatever Catholic retreat he currently resides in, and dumped into the dankest prison cell, with killers as bunk mates. Think about that, next time you call him a coward.

“Though Bishop Williamson’s second apology was in my view a setback, it was not a recantation or a betrayal of the truth he spoke about the Auschwitz execution gas chamber hoax. It was, rather, a diplomatic and charitable move and by that I do not suggest mental reservation or equivocation, or any other stratagem, but an attempt by Bishop Williamson to declare to persons of good will inside the Vatican, that he is not a stubborn or proud man. But that in so far as no man can be commanded to tell a lie in the name of Jesus Christ, Bishop Williamson will do all he can, short of lying, to assist the pope in getting the Zionists and rabbis off his back.

This is quite a vote of confidence in the pope and the people around him, which has thus far not been reciprocated, at least not publicly. What is transpiring through diplomatic channels behinds the scenes is another matter.

Due to my own grave doubts about the morality and ethics of the Vatican and this pope, if I were in the bishop’s shoes, I would not have apologized the second time. However, it would be good if we all had a little humility and realized that we are not in Bishop Williamson’s shoes. Some of those who are crying to the housetops in anonymous e-mail about how loathsome his apology is, might very well be the first to capitulate if the shoe were on the other foot.”

I agree with Hoffman that the keyboard warriors who pretend that they would be braver than Williamson if they were in his shoes are not worthy of attention.

I think the news since yesterday has been that the Vatican does not accept Williamson’s apology, and the accursed Jews are gloating over it. So it’ll be interesting to see what happens next.

I think John is correct that the SSPX is honest about Jews, or is trying to be, but the pope is going to enforce Vatican II, which essentially pretends that Jews are still in covenant with God. I don’t see any way out of this for the SSPX without continuing to be a renegade organization.

Questioning the Vatican and the Pope — absolutely. They have caved “for fear of the Jews.” Like you, I question whether they can be called Christian at all.

But if you watched the original Swedish documentary that started all the brouhaha, you’ll see that the hour-long piece was entirely an attack on the SSPX for being anti-semitic and anti-Muslim. The quotes from Bishop Williamson were only a small segment of the overall attack on the SSPX. The TV program showed video from the seventies of the founder of the SSPX, Archbishop Lefebvre, saying on French television that the Islamic invasion of France must be stopped or else our white wives and daughters will end up sold into slavery.

http://svtplay.se/v/1426080/uppdrag_granskning/sspx_-_english_version

Then after the controversy broke, the many excellent articles on the SSPX website decrying the role played by Jews as anti-Christs were brought to light. So this is not the effort of a day or a week. The SSPX has been honest about the Jews for decades.

On the other hand, they haven’t faced this kind of scrutiny before. How will they stand up? It’s too early to tell, but as you said, we must continue to hope. Great things could happen, and this could be the ice breakup on the river if Bishop Williamson stands strong.

The current head of the SSPX, Bishop Fellay, is not looking very good right now, it’s true. But like Bishop Williamson, he must be incredibly disappointed to have seen all his hopes and dreams within his grasp when suddenly they are snatched right from under his nose. He is focused on this and not on the question of the truth or falsehood of Bishop Wiliamson’s statements. We might consider this unfortunate, but it’s easy to understand why he feels that way right now.

Imagine that you had worked for decades to put the rightful king back on the throne in order to maintain the fight against your traditional enemy. And then just when the crown is about to be placed on his head, the enemy sabotage the proceedings. No matter how desperately you wanted to fight the enemy, you wanted to get the rightful king back on the throne first. Fellay wants to see a pope on the throne who is a Catholic and not a puppet of the Judaizers. Someone like Pope Saint Pius X who told Theodore Herzl, “The Jews have not recognised our Lord, therefore we cannot recognise the Jewish people.”