Thy Heaven Doors are My Hell Gates
Although graphic, this post from James Edwards is an absolute must-see. I don’t know who makes me angrier, the sub-human monsters who did this or the damned lying preachers who make excuses for the slaughter.

“Depend upon it, there is no difference between Consolidation and Empire; no difference between Centralism and Imperialism. The consummation of either must necessarily end in the overthrow of Liberty and the establishment of Despotism.” ~ Alexander H. Stephens
Leave it to Ron Paul to make some excellent points about the Gaza War that no one else is making, least of all our lying preachers. He says the fault of antagonism belongs to America, Inc., and it is plain that the world has accepted the evil Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war. (It is even more evil than the “unconditional surrender” forced upon the Nazis in WWII.) He says the Palestinians are in a “concentration camp.” He says no one is serious about reigning in the American Empire (least of all Christians, whose job is to go along with whatever makes Jews happy).
It’s just “irrational, blind hatred” that causes so many people, who are so different from each other, scattered all over the world, in every age of history, to oppose Jews.
“Israeli missiles tore at least fifteen Palestinian police cadets to shreds at a graduation ceremony, blew twelve worshippers to pieces (including six children) while they left evening prayers at a mosque, flattened the elite American International School, killed five sisters while they slept in their beds, and liquidated 9 women and children in order to kill a single Hamas leader. So far, Israeli forces have killed at least 500 Gazans and wounded some two thousand, including hundreds of children. Yesterday, the IDF blanketed parts of Gaza with white phosphorus, a chemical weapon Saddam Hussein once deployed against Kurdish rebels.” Glory, glory, hallelujah! His truth is marching on! Right, Yankees?
Jews are exempt from the Geneva Conventions.
Even Jews – even in an Israeli paper – are writing that “Israel’s violent responses, even if there is justification for them, exceed all proportion and cross every red line of humaneness, morality, international law and wisdom.” But your pastor has nothing bad to say about them. Trust me, I know. Karl Marx, another Jew, “declared morality to be merely a mask for vested interests.” And pay close to attention to what Roberts writes about how Jews operate. The president of Columbia University, which “is dependent on Jewish money, faculty and students,” is not about to speak out against Jewish atrocities. “An American newspaper or TV network that took a stand against Israel’s abuse of Palestinians would be confronted with an advertising boycott organized by AIPAC. American politicians who criticize Israel go down to defeat by Israel Lobby money.” But understanding why is absolutely crucial. It is because even terrorist Jews are protecting the interests of Jews on the whole. Compare this to Christians, who will gladly throw their own “black sheep” (who merely have politically incorrect opinions) to the wolves if their reputation could be adversely affected. As Whittaker Chambers put it so well, “the Right does not retrieve its wounded.”

Not even counting Afghanistan, where they “don’t do body counts,” Bush leaves office after his invasion and occupation of Iraq has resulted in 1,297,997 dead Iraqis. This does not count the millions who have been wounded or displaced. He made war on “weddings, funerals, kid’s soccer games, hospitals, and mosques.” And now the terrorist state of Israel is picking up where he left off. In case you were wondering, there won’t be any Iraqi holocaust memorial museums built on the Mall in Washington. You’re also free to question the number posted above, and will not be imprisoned if you do.
Ernst Zundel will be released from his Jew-forged manacles on March 1, 2010, and we’re going to have a big party. He will have served seven years and one month in six prisons in three countries on two continents, all for teaching what he believes to be true. We will meet his kidnappers again in the Day of Judgment, and we will be heard by our Righteous Judge.
From The Atlantic, written by an invader named Hua Hsu: “The Election of Barack Obama is just the most startling manifestation of a larger trend: the gradual erosion of ‘whiteness’ as the touchstone of what it means to be American.” This comes only about 40 years after the Kennedys assured us that their Immigration Act would not change the ethnic composition of the country. The question is asked: “If the end of white America is a cultural and demographic inevitability, what will the new mainstream look like – and how will white Americans fit into it?” The logical answer is that Whites will be a minority, but no one really believes that they will be granted minority privileges. Instead, they will be easier to annihilate. It is asked: “Will anyone mourn the end of white America? Will anyone try to preserve it?” We’ve answered this many times, and no one really doubts it. Only the White descendants of the White American forefathers are going to save the nation and government they inherited. No one else will shed a tear to see it disappear. In the end, it all comes down to blood. We will obey the Fifth Commandment or perish. To obey is to love, to disobey is to hate.
“Inclusiveness” is anti-White.
What good are “African roots” if they don’t result in a paycheck?
Wall Street has paid dearly, as have the rest of us by consequence, for not being racist. “Bell curves work best when individuals are of fairly equal importance. That’s definitely not true on Wall Street… The financial industry assumed that the performance of financial instruments is distributed according to a bell curve, with few outliers. They assumed that mortgage defaults happen randomly due to miscellaneous human tragedies (illness, death, divorce, and job loss), so bundling a lot of mortgages together would virtually eliminate the risk of the entire package. But instead, of course, the new populations of California, Nevada, Arizona, and Florida proved unable to earn enough money to afford their mortgages.” For being racially ignorant, they get a grade of F in risk management. We Kinists are the risk managers of our civilization, and we give all lying preachers an F.
We are literally witnessing the end of the American Empire. During 2008, $6.9 trillion was lost on Wall Street. I’ve heard many people, such as Jew Mort Zuckerman, who was burned by Jew Bernard Madoff, urge everyone to convert assets into the only thing now considered “safe” – Treasury bills. It seems that everyone is doing this now, and about 40% of these investments will come due in a year or less. Unless there is some new explosion of inventiveness and productivity in Obama’s mutt-nation, the only way to repay these investors will be to borrow more money from Asians. But at the same time, in order to jump-start the economy (i.e., to encourage more spending, not saving), Obamination will try to borrow another $2 trillion. He may not get it because the credit of our pseudo-nation is so poor. Foreigners are already holding $3 trillion of our $10.7 trillion of debt. If another $2 trillion is borrowed, servicing it will consume more than half of gross product. Forget about raising taxes. People are being bled dry and can’t even pay their health bills. We’ve heard a lot of stories lately about families we know having to come up with another hundred bucks every month which they don’t have in order to pay for prescriptions that are no longer covered by their insurance. It’s so tight for them that they would be bankrupt if gasoline prices were as high as they were earlier in the year.

This is why we have warned for years that Christians need to be ready for new constitutions and new states of a more human scale. There will be many hardships ahead, beginning with the collapse of the currency, but it will end with a new dawn of freedom, just as when Rome fell. God always thwarts the grand schemes of the race-mixers, neo-Babelists, one-worlders, and Christ-haters. Let not your hearts be troubled.
But hang on! Pat Robertson’s god is telling him that the economy will recover. I love the way holy rollers say, “If I’m hearing Him right…” In other words, “Don’t put me to death as a false prophet if I’m wrong. I just have a hearing problem.” Robertson also says that Obama “has the makings of a great president.” Falwell’s associate, Ed Dobson, who started the whole seeker-friendly church insanity, just announced that he voted for Obama.
Oy, oy, oy! This guy can teleport from Georgia to Ireland!
He has the spirit of the Fruit.
Whoa, whoa, whoa!
Nothing says “Jesus Loves You” like demon possession.
What can one add to this statement on economics from G.W. Bush? “The fact that they purchased the machine meant somebody had to make the machine. And when somebody makes a machine, it means there’s jobs at the machine-making place.” In the words of Caroline Kennedy, “Little did we, you know, know.”
Get a pro-White homeschool curriculum from our good friends at EAU.
The most embarrassing thing I can imagine.
The terrifying spread of the Wal-Mart virus.
The world’s largest liger. This animal is a miscegenated abomination and a very good example of what Lev. 19:19 warns us not to do. It should be killed.
Go back and read what we wrote earlier about college sports teams being supported by White alumni, and then read this. Florida’s defensive coordinator is such a racist that he thinks Black women are inferior. Now he is blaming his failure to secure a head coaching position on his mudshark, and I’m sure he’s partially correct. Everyone in the comments section calls each other a racist, and it feels like a Thursday evening fellowship dinner down at the church. I like this comment especially: “Wow, Ms. Barrie. You are strongly against interracial marriage, huh? That is a pretty archaic view to have in 2009. Do you have any desire to explain on your 1955 values? Because as a rational human being, I have a hard time believing anyone can justify that.” Ah yes, the devastating “old ideas are irrational” argument. The Force is strong with this one!

Even in an article about the potency of sperm, this typical White man prides himself on being emasculated.
Statutory rape is assumed behavior for minorities. Whites, of course, are held to a higher standard, even by “non-racists.”
More good stuff on double standards from our favorite Black pastor, the Honorable James David Manning. He confirms that Black criminality is excused because it is assumed that Blacks and Whites are unequal. So which is worse, openly denying that all races have equal capacities or pretending that they do, when you know they don’t, and turning a blind eye to lawbreaking? Put more simply, is it worse to be a racist or a hypocrite?
“You can have Diversity. Or you can have law and order. But you can’t have both.” On a similar note, you can have your inheritance or you can have bedbugs.
Remember Channon and Chris! The infamous house where they were murdered has been demolished.
“Black gun crime in Cincinnati is so bad that the US Air Force uses the city hospitals to train doctors who are headed to Iraq and Afghanistan on how to treat injuries in combat zones.” Your pastor realizes that this is a problem, but he says the only thing we can do is live with it for about another 500 years, give or take a thousand, until the gospel finally convinces Blacks to act civilized and turns Africa into a “glittering civilization,” as Doug Wilson expects. Assuming that we are not destroyed before then. And the reason we can’t do anything about it is because we’re all created in God’s image, and perhaps we can shorten that timeframe if we all intermarry with Nappy-Americans and make orange-skinned babies. It sounds too ridiculous to believe, but they actually teach this.
In France, 118 cars are torched every single day. So at least the automobile industry benefits from multiracial immigration.
Big surprise: Jews were behind the undoing of South African apartheid.
“Try to imagine a website devoted to the history of automobile manufacturing that never mentions Henry Ford. Try to imagine a website devoted to Europe during the 1940s that never mentions World War II. Try to imagine a website devoted to the tourism industry in Lancaster County, PA that never mentions the Amish. Try to imagine a website devoted to opposing terrorism that never mentions Muslims. Would anyone take those websites seriously? No, they’d be laughingstocks.” But a “conservative” website dedicated to cleaning up Hollywood, but which never mentions Jews, is totally believable. Rush Limbaugh loves it, which is proof of its worthlessness. “Note to Limbaugh: ‘Liberals’ don’t run Hollywood. Jews run Hollywood, and Jews are to culture what Muslims are to tall buildings. Jews promote conservatism and traditional moral values the same way Muslims promote wearing bikinis.”

Gary DeMar is a mixed bag. He fires on all cylinders when teaching eschatology and runs on fumes the rest of the time. Consider this paragraph (grammatical errors in the original):
John Sack’s An Eye for an Eye is a disheartening book. It tells the story of Jewish revenge against their German oppressors in 1945. The book describes how the Russian liberators of the death camps in Poland recruited holocaust survivors to carry out a policy of de-Nazification of the war-torn area. What began as a desire to find, incarcerate, and try their Nazi antagonists, the Jewish survivors became like their tormentors in that they went after noncombatants. The Russians established the Office of State Security and put Jews in charge of the interrogations. “The Office entered German homes and rounded up German men, women, and children—99 percent of them noncombatant, innocent civilians—and took them to cellars, prisons, and 1,255 concentration camps, where inmates subsisted on starvation rations, where typhus ran rampant, and where torture was commonplace. In this brief period, between 60,000 and 80,000 Germans died in the Office’s custody.”
So we’re supposed to believe every inch of Russian footage of the “death” camps taken in Poland after the war – take them as gospel truth, in fact – even when the Russians had every reason to bear false witness, and assume that only after this the Soviet Union became the evil, Stalinist empire? Sometimes I think Christians pride themselves on their inability to think.
It gets worse. Here is DeMar’s trenchant economic analysis of the period:
The Jews, a despised people historically, were seen as the source of Germany’s economic and social troubles after World War I. Jews who were successful in business were prime targets. Their success meant that someone else was less successful. (A similar argument is used today for calls to “tax the rich” under the false premise that economics is a zero sum game whereby one person’s gains is the result of someone else’s losses.) Here’s a section from the 1934 German National Catechism to demonstrate the tactic:
How has the Jew subjugated the peoples?: “With money. He lent them money and made them pay interest. Thousands and thousands of Germans have been made wretched by the Jews and been reduced to poverty. Farmers whose land had been in the family for more than 100 years were driven from their land because they could not pay the interest.”
The Nazis used envy against the Jews, and as we’ll see not only took their property and sent them off to concentration camps but made it nearly impossible for them to make a living.
No, the Jews had literally declared war on Germany and were determined to sink it through usury, which Christians used to oppose back when they were “racists.” Germans were losing their homes and land to Christ-hating bloodsuckers through punative rates that would make even credit card companies blush today. And DeMar calls this being “successful in business,” and says it filled the Germans with “envy.” I have to tell you, I wish I could tell you. DeMar has a personal library of 40,000 volumes and this is the best he could do?
The vision of Christ that thou dost see
Is my vision’s greatest enemy.
Thine has a great hook nose like thine;
Mine has a snub nose like to mine.
Thine is the Friend of all Mankind;
Mine speaks in parables to the blind.
Thine loves the same world that mine hates;
Thy heaven doors are my hell gates.
~ William Blake
When the white man believed his God was the true God, he was a racial segregationist. He sought to preserve the integrity of his race because in doing so he was preserving the integrity of his faith. When he ceased to believe that his God was the one true god, he sought to blend with the colored races in order to be part of a natural religion that appeared so much easier than Christianity.
It will not be tragic if the white man discovers that he can never really be happy in the natural, polytheistic world of the non-white races. The real tragedy would be if he was comfortable in their world, because if that becomes the case the white man will have lost his soul.

We wrote earlier that the first miscegenistic motion picture was Duel in the Sun (or Lust in the Dust, as Christians called it). This is mostly true, although D.W. Griffith, the first great filmmaker, still stinging from the popularity of his “racist” masterpiece, The Birth of a Nation, tried to make amends with Intolerance and Broken Blossoms. Intolerance pled for an end to prejudice, and is a marvelous epic, but had nothing to do with miscegenation per se. The dictionary defines prejudice as: “An adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand or without knowledge or examination of the facts.” This means that Southerners have never been racially prejudiced. Yankees have most certainly been prejudiced. Uncle Tom’s Cabin could not have been written without prejudice. But we digress. Broken Blossoms has interracial implications but is idealistic and without any physical contact, as was necessary during a time when sexual perversion was still illegal. The angelic Lillian Gish, who starred in an unbelievable 64 silent films by the time she was 23 in 1919 (and continued acting until 1987), plays a character who falls in love with a Buddhist, known as the “Chink storekeeper,” who has journeyed from China to bring “a message of peace to the barbarous Anglo-Saxons,” only to become addicted to opium. Sounds like a comedy! When he first arrives on the shores of the barbarous, two men are fighting, and he quotes from the King James Version of a Buddha Hallmark card: “What thou dost not want others to do to thee, do thou not unto others.” He calls the girl his “White Blossom,” and the two of them go on tour with the Grateful Dead. Well, actually, the girl is brutally murdered by her custodian for mudsharking, and the “Yellow Man” renounces fidelity to his Buddha lawn ornament, kills the murderer, and then kills himself before the lynch mob breaks down his door. It’s a chick flick, in other words. Needless to say, even what was implied in languid glances was quite shocking for the time. It is even called “sin” during the course of the film. Ninety years later, the only sexual perversion that can shock audiences is bestiality. In fact, one could argue that the film had the opposite of the intended effect because, though the “Yellow Man” fantasizes about being with a White woman, he pays for it with his life. Tragedy or recompense?

January 8, 2009 






Whoa dude! Can you get me a date with the Anointed one?
On another front, one closer to home. Have you heard of this book?
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0874850851/theamericanre-20
It was mentioned over at http://www.dixienet.org/rebellion/2009/01/naacp-copes-with-myth-of-emancipation.html
And it clearly vindicates the reasons the South has CONSISTENTLY given for the Civil War.
Which means the North was LYING, just as LINCOLN was lying throughout his entire career. Not that this is news to those of us who read, think, and really KNOW history…. but for the vast Public Indoctrinated masses, this is coming as a great shock… read the first review of the above-named book, in which the reviewer states: “This book is so “outside the box”, it will probably be censured by the mainstream media.” – Clay Sigg
But also note that he is so duped (or is he ‘Afreakin’- Amurrican’?) that he actually believes “The pursuit of the war and reconstruction only exascerbated racist feelings that whites felt toward blacks and necessitated the Civil Rights marches led by leaders such as Martin Luther King, Jr. almost a century after this sad period in American history. ”
What a joke! Godless minds will NOT hear the truth. Truly, the realities of total depravity smack one in the face daily….
More horrific images from Gaza:
http://portail.islamboutique.fr/gaza2008/
Doug Wilson and other lying preachers would like to know why these anti-Semites keep pounding their faces into the fists of the Jews.
out of curiosity, and i’m just a random passer-by, not really a kinist or anything like that, but do you guys consider the Palestinians and the arabs to be white? I’m just wondering, since I oppose Israeli action in Gaza as well, but I’m kind of surprised at how white nationalists such as yourselves don’t like it either. From your perspective, aren’t the Palestinians nothing but foreigners at best, and wouldn’t some call them inferior or ‘mud people’ or something like that? Or are they white European/Aryan and thus worthy of support?
I’m just curious, I sincerely mean no offense. Friends of the Palestinians ought to take whatever support they can get, after all. Sorry for my intrusiveness.
Good question. It’s not intrusive at all. That’s why the comment section is active.
They’re all fairly well mixed, but generally speaking, the Arabs are Shemites and the Iranians and some other Persian tribes are of Aryan extraction, just like East Indians were Caucasian going way back and then mixed with the swarthy peoples to the south. But whatever they are, we don’t wish anything but happiness upon them. We want their people to have a future just as we want our people to have a future. And just because we are White nationalists, and therefore hope to see our people claim a name and place among the other nations of the world, does not mean that we wish to cause harm to anyone else, be they superior or inferior in any way. It doesn’t follow that we can’t support others just because they are not like us. In fact, there is no concept of Christian charity if all peoples on earth are not able to treat each other as the Commandments require. We do have a greater loyalty to our own people, just as you have a greater loyalty to your own family than to my family.
The only real difference between Kinists and other Christians is that we recognize loyalty among the broad extended family. Non-Kinists commonly uphold immediate family duties, and then say that all human beings, if they are Christians, are of the same “family.” They skip over everything in between. In fact, it is common these days to hear pastors teach that heritage and nationhood are irrelevant. Thank God the Bible doesn’t read this way.
I see. Well, as I said, I’m not a kinist, but if that is the essence of kinism, I certainly won’t argue against it. People have said far worse things to me than “live and let live.”
Thanks very much for your time, sir.