This shows how completely out of touch you are with the faith once delivered to the saints. How many Christians of the past can you name, or church pronouncements, etc., that confirm your liberal interpretation of Galatians 3:28; that distinctions, whether racial, sexual, or otherwise, were erased after the cross? Your liberal ideology is what has led to the idea that national borders are obsolete, heritage is insignificant, and the family is the final frontier of integration. You’re not getting the idea that spiritual communion necessitates physical amalgamation from the Bible. You’re getting it from Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, Franz Boas, Gunnar Myrdal, and many others who hate your God, hate your Bible, and hate you.

Your asinine comments only prove that Ehud is correct, which we knew already.

SOB, they are only as absurd as your premises (“it is proper to unite in marriage what God has united in Christ”) which imply them. In offering a reductio, we are certainly engaging you and not some strawman. You are responsible for the premises that you present; we are merely saying that they prove too much.

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2009/01/campaigns_to_pr.php

It seems so Leviticus 19:19, right?

And I have to ask: Is your family dog a mutt so that he’ll feel more at home?

As for my bride, I yoked myself with a Christian wife as God commands. What God has joined let no man separate. God has joined me to my Christian wife. I have fulfilled the command to not be unequally yoked with non-Christians. God has blessed me with three wonderful children. Lord willing my children will grow up in a good Christian community and be God fearing Christian men and women. I find it sad that you think my marriage to a Christian woman adultery. God has blessed me greatly, yet your bias leaves you blind to the gifts God has given me.

Just because God gives instructions to those who are unequally yoked in marriage, doesn’t mean his command to not be unequally yoked is negated.

There are a lot of abusurd comments (father should marry thier daughters and such) to which I say, if you wish to beat up a straw man, go ahead. You are not addressing my Biblical Position and I’m not going to respond to it. To those here who wish to actually engage me, thank you for the honest discussion. To those here who wish to poke jabs at positions I don’t hold and have never claimed to hold, enjoy arguing with yourself.

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/01/26/canon.babies/index.html

If they need a bigger tax base, there are millions of Koreans who want to live there. Are the Japanese guilty of excessive breeding (i.e., giving their people a future), or is that only a White crime?

Will you be sending any complaints to Canon like the first two comments on that page?

is that liken to the “If we can’t get them out, we’ll breed them out” line of thought?

Thanks for the recommendation.