Since Jews are pretty much like Christians and are only interested in following the law of Moses, we have trouble believing that Jew Nicolas Sarkozy of France has “announced plans to pursue a vigorous policy of diversity and métissage. Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt.” Who could have seen this coming? I mean, except for the racists and anti-Semites, who always predict these things, are always correct, and are always ignored. It’s even more outrageous than it appears:

In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don’t, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.

Jew Sarkozy’s “commissioner on diversity and equal opportunity,” Yazid Sabeg, is having businesses send photographs of their employees to him so he can determine, by skin color, whether minority quotas are being met! Mark my words, the true men of the West will not accept this. We’re all heading ineluctably for war.

MLK would have applauded Sarkozy’s actions.

James Manning is the most honest Black man we’ve seen. I think the difference, as you can tell from this video, is that he tries to honor his father in everything he does. This is almost unheard of, and it shows the kind of leadership Blacks could have if they were not so promiscuous. The only basic point we try to make is that we have no responsibility to subsidize these people, not that we hate them. If we hated Blacks, we would want for them to hear less of this, not more of it. Manning calls Obama an “emissary of the devil, a closet homosexual, and the product of a white-trashy mother.” He says he would rather be dead than call himself a spineless Black man. Bravo!

MLK’s speeches were “laced with hate,” says Rev. Manning, “Obama should be given the Nobel prize for hate,” and Black rioting is a form of hatred for America.

The person in this picture is:
a) a Cuban drug smuggler
b) a Detroit pimp
c) Rahm Emanuel’s shabbos goy

I think this Skittles commercial has something to do with White people reflecting the rainbow of diversity, or some such nonsense.

In a bold new stride for Equality, Massachusetts is allowing drivers to choose their own sex for their licenses. This fits quite well with the Babelist interpretation of Galatians 3:28. If race has been nailed to the cross along with Christ Jesus then so has sex.

Environmentalists who want to conserve duck species against “alien invaders” are racists! They like to talk about “endangered genetic integrity,” which must mean that they also attend David Duke conferences. Your pastor needs to call these people and tell them they’re in sin. And do not ask him which came first, the duck or the egg.

All but four states could soon file for bankruptcy, and those four comprise less than 1.3% of the American population.

According to the FBI, 80% of all crime is committed by gangs, and these gangs “follow the migration paths of immigrant laborers.” Here is what the gangs look like. But I’m sure the racial factor is purely coincidental, kind of like the hilarious news that boys with unpopular (i.e. unique) names are more likely to break the law. So, how is diversity and immigration working out for you?

Speaking of disproportionate representation, Jews are 1.7% of the population and 8.4% of the 111th Congress.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Judeochristianity, the creation of the International Trade Cartel.

Photos of the Night of Long Knives in Gaza.

A Jewish headmistress sends two Aryan teens home for being “too blonde.”

Having bad manners is a hate crime!

What do biblical, common, and constitutional law have to do with the Talmud? You would have to ask the great “conservative,” Antonin Scalia.

But he actually did defend Christianity to some degree. He argued with satanic-rabbi Michael Broyde, a law professor at Emory University and a member of Beth Din of America, the country’s largest Jewish court. “American common law,” said Broyde, “protects freedom of speech,” which puts it and Jewish law “at two completely different places.” There you have it, folks, straight from the red heifer’s mouth. When we say repeatedly that anti-Christs hate the First Amendment, I’m sure some people think we’re lying.

We’re very pleased to hear that Michael Hoffman’s masterpiece, Judaism Discovered, is selling well, despite a worldwide gag order that even Ted Pike is following, and in spite of Amazon’s censorship of the book. What caused it to be censored, you ask? As I’m sure you know, Jews have a constitutional right to not be offended. In this case, a rabbi contacted Amazon and accused Hoffman of – are you ready for this? – quoting him.

You know about heroic Bishop Williamson, who is the Mel Gibson of 2009. German bishops have actually banned him from entering “their” churches. Hoffman writes that this ban has been “placed on no other category of person, not even active sodomites or Satanists; only on the bishop who called into question certain claims about the secular history of World War II… These bishops are crypto-rabbis, not Christians.”

Another Catholic priest, of Jewish descent, Floriano Abrahamowicz, says: “I know that gas chambers existed as a means to disinfect. But I cannot say for sure if they killed anyone, because I really haven’t looked into it.”

And here is another great Catholic. You’ve gotta love Chris Ortiz. I guarantee you that no other major ministry is posting clips of Father Coughlin denouncing the Jews of the Imperial Usury Reserve.

“Scaredy cat ‘Christians’ are rife in the pews and the pulpits and the seminaries. They have very few firm convictions that would match the convictions of their ancestors. They are weaklings and liars.”

What fresh hell is this? It’s like a White voodoo ritual, complete with bongo drums. I don’t think there was a human sacrifice at the end, but she does say, “I need your hearts!” That worried me. You know, Blacks are much better at this shakin’ and bakin’. Whites only look stupid, but equally demon-possessed, when they do it.

“Satan is a very clever fellow. He does not make societies decadent by attacking God directly; instead he attacks the connecting links God has to His creatures. And one of the primary links is the divinely ordained, differentiated sex roles… It is positively ludicrous to mildly chide the feminists for their stand on abortion and then go on to praise feminism to the skies, as if abortion is just an inconsequential part of the feminists’ agenda. Abortion is the feminist agenda! How can they obtain equality with God if they do not control life in the womb?… The triumph of feminism in society and church has left society and church without any moral authority, because there can be no authority without masculinity.” No society, having achieved decadence, is able to identify decadence. “To the decadent, health is sickness and sickness is health.”

Nancy Pelosi says contraception is the best economic stimulus. According to whiter-people like her, areas with almost no children are “vibrant,” at least until the sterile hippies die off, in one final self-sacrifice to their earth-god. First paper over plastic, then suicide. And then, Burlington, Vermont, doesn’t seem quite so “vibrant.” Whiter-people, who love feminism, abortion, and Obama, know it is their duty to kill themselves in one big Jim Jones-style Kool-Aid party. But until they actually get to Guyana, they really like being around White people.

I love the music on Prairie Home Companion, but it’s definitely a whiter-people show. Last Sunday, a woman who marched across the country for campaign finance reform was given an ovation. “Campaign finance reform?” I thought. My kind of people march against abortion, immigration, and faggotry. Then the ensemble broke into a heartfelt rendition of the Battle Hymn of the Republic in honor of Obama, and suddenly I lost interest in the music. That song is about the murder of my forefathers and rape of my foremothers and arson of my country, and let’s just say that it doesn’t make for a family moment around the old Marconi.

Speaking of Jim Jones, don’t forget that he was Indiana’s first big race-mixer. Now your pastor sounds just like him, but your pastor doesn’t have the guts to practice what he preaches and recruit new members over on the colored side of town.

Hawaii “first applied for statehood in 1903, but was rejected, because Congress did not want a majority non-white state. Over the years, Congress repeatedly rejected its applications for the same reason. Lyndon Johnson, who became Senate majority leader in 1954, blocked admission because he was afraid Hawaiian congressmen would vote to end segregation.”

Here’s a billboard from the John Birch Society at the time:

The decline of sportsmanship after integration. Ask yourself whether there would be only a one-game suspension if the racial roles had been reversed.

“The Brit who said that the Battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton was correct. Sport is part of the serious play that defines and forms the soul of a nation. Thomas Hughes vividly depicts, in Tom Brown’s Schooldays, the inspirational potential of sport when it is superintended by Christian men such as Arnold of Rugby. The young men of Britain during the time of Thomas Hughes learned the code of chivalry in their athletic contests. That type of serious play produced heroes such as Henry Havelock, the liberator of Lucknow. Duty, Honor, Faith; such was the code. But such heroes are no longer honored today because our serious sporting-type play encourages different values. We honor racial diversity, androgyny, capitalism, and barbarism in our sport.” ~ CWNY

The old White baseball players rarely even tipped their hats to their fans because they didn’t want to appear to be showboating. Now Negroes have taught everyone to do it. There is mass celebration at football games even when there is time still on the clock. Even the White announcers have started to dress like pimps, in the fashion of the Negroes they’ve invited to join them in the booth. I’m talking about the ostentacious, double-breasted eyesores with bold pinstripes and yellow handkerchiefs that you would never have seen on a self-respecting White man’s body before sports were niggerized. Blacks have been showboating like this since before the zoot suit.

This article by Gilbert Caldwell is a fascinating peek into how sports teams were integrated. Public opinion began to change during WWII when a few Blacks were admitted into the military. As late as 1955, Southern teams refused to play integrated teams from the North. The capitulation on Southern ground occurred at the Sugar Bowl (Georgia Tech versus Pittsburgh), January 2, 1956. The Atlanta Constitution newspaper editorialized that “a football game [is not] a social event. No tea will be served. As further assurance for the extremist group, there are no females on either team and there is absolutely no danger of intermarriage as a result.” Fifty years later, we see that this was dead wrong, and the “extremists” were precisely correct. Georgia state senator Leon Butts predicted it those many years ago, saying that “when whites and Negroes meet on the athletic fields on a basis of complete equality it is only natural that this sense of equality carry over into the daily living of the people.” Caldwell concludes:

Furthermore, the entry of large numbers of blacks into sports changes their very character. Black behavior is the precise opposite of the standards of graciousness, humility, and sportsmanship whites developed over a period of centuries. In black-dominated sports it is now a matter of course to insult and humiliate one’s opponents, to swagger in victory and sulk in defeat. At the same time, the emergence of black “super-stars” has accelerated the general acceptance of non-whites in all areas of society.

The American South is, of course, not alone in suffering the consequences of letting athletics become the first concession against racial integrity. It was under the National Party that sports-mad South Africa opened the first breach in apartheid by letting a racially-mixed New Zealand rugby team tour the country in the late 1960s. Three decades later, it was the same National Party that surrendered the entire country to black rule and the savagery that has followed. White Rhodesians wanted to play international cricket—and got the nightmare of rule by Robert Mugabe.

As for the students of Georgia Tech, all they wanted was to play in the Sugar Bowl. They have lived to see their grandchildren come of age in a multi-racial South, in which whites have no more racial pride than New Yorkers or Californians.

If it was not entirely clear in 1957, it is certainly clear today. Whites everywhere are under siege; and for a people under siege there can be no compromise.

Welcome to the jungle.

Descendants of Confederates put up plaques like this to indicate that the South did not secede because of slavery. They did this because they wanted to fit in to Lincoln’s empire and not be called racists because of their Old American loyalties. The only trouble is that it’s not true. Anyone can plainly see this by reading the declarations of secession from the Southern states. Slavery is condoned throughout Scripture; it’s taken for granted in one-fifth of the Ten Commandments and by Jesus Himself (Luke 17:7-10).

A very solid case can be made that the real issue at hand was foreign hostility and the preservation of constitutional rights, but slavery was undoubtedly the occasion for secession and the reason given for it. Such half-truths as seen in the plaque are easily exposed by despicable characters like David Barton of Wallbuilders. Then it’s the same old song and dance, as the Kennedy brothers call reporters to say, “Sure, Southerners are racists, but they’re even worse up North!” It gives me a headache to even think about these people.

Steve Wilkins and Doug Wilson are an interesting case study in such double-mindedness. In their 1996 book called Southern Slavery, As It Was, they directly and specifically support slavery. On page 17: “The Bible teaches that a man may be a faithful Christian and a slave-owner.” On page 21: “Owning slaves is not an abomination. The Bible does not condemn it, and those who believe the Bible are bound to refrain in the same ways.” But when this attracted too much attention, Wilson wrote in his local paper that “slavery has always been an evil needing to be abolished.” On page 10 of his book: “[N]othing is clearer—the New Testament opposes anything like the abolitionism of our country prior to the War Between the States.” But in the newspaper: “[W]e side with nonviolent abolitionism.” Wilson and Wilkins were ultimately accused of plagiarizing portions of their Southern Slavery booklet, no longer in print. And then it was said that Wilkins plagiarized his book on Robert E. Lee.

When we’ve had about all we can stand of double-minded men who are unstable in all their ways, we turn to the great Michael Andrew Grissom:

What one thinks of as “the South” of that time was a white population drawn from English, Dutch, French, Scotch, Welsh, and Irish stock. A new but genuine landed aristocracy had arisen among them, around whom was based a culture and way of life that was “a fair imitation of European feudalism.” There was magnificence, fashionable gaiety, dignity and formality, religious sensibility, chivalry, and a noblesse oblige that led to a fundamental paternalism toward the slaves whom, since Harriet Beecher Stowe, we have been accustomed to picturing as having been much abused… Grissom quotes Carleton Putnam to the effect that “the South, after generations of experience, had developed customs and a way of life with the Negro that took his limitations into consideration with a minimum of friction and a maximum of kindness.

It’s tragic that friction has increased and kindness has decreased, but we don’t turn the tide by telling lies. Leave that to Barton, Wilson, and Wilkins.

Meditate on these words from Robert Salyer, who, like Grissom, will be remembered as one of our great men.

Who Are We?

We are Southerners – formed by History, born in Hardship, molded through Tradition, and armed by the Trinity. We are made invincible by Justice. We are tribes of the city and of the field, of the mountains, forests, farms, and of all those dark and bloody grounds. We are a people whose sons and daughters will endure as long as the spirit of our God quickens our hearts.

Who Are We?

We are Southerners. To be a Southerner is to throw off the shackles of damnable occupation, and to let our minds run free. To be a Southerner is to stand as one with the soul of the West against ever present heathen hordes and clouds of dark gods, and to know you will never let a day pass without resisting. To be a Southerner is to live life to its fullest, in absolute defiance of the night.

Who Are We?

We are Southerners. We were conceived at Culloden, tempered by a New World, perfected by the plough and axe, and emancipated at Fortress Sumter. We are a proud people, descendants of Abraham and the prophets, slaves of our Lord, brothers to Peter, Paul, and all the saints. We make mistakes. We compromise. We are proud and haughty. But we will repent. And we will never, ever give up.

Who Are We?

We are Southerners. We are leaders and followers, teachers and students, brewers and bakers, planters and free men, from the lowest to the highest. We seek knowledge, wisdom, generosity, honour, courage, and above all, Charity. We live by the strength of our wits and our arms in a sea of hostility, and succeed by the blessings given our families and nation.

Who Are We?

We are Southerners. We are clothed naked at birth and follow our fate as the winds of the Highlands blow, whether it be the doom of philosopher and king, or yeoman and soldier. For all have mud between the toes, and even a king must sweat and groan before the plough.

Who Are We?

We are Southerners. And we will endure.

Barack Obama, giving new hope to feminists and their bastards. That’s what the American Dream is all about, Charlie Brown.

Michelle Obama is guilty of choosing fashion designers based on the content of their character (or at least their textile skills). Negroes are unhappy about this, because as the Reverend Doctor King said so eloquently, “I have a dreeeam that someday, interposition and nullification, etc., etc.”

Hair care products are racist.

Connecticut’s first Black female judge gets uppity:

“Well, they got the head nigger in charge… That’s H-N-I-G… I’m sick of being treated like a freaking Negro from the ‘hood”… Asked what her illness was, Cofield said: “Negro-itis.” “Do you need to take any medication now?” Washington asked. “Yeah, I need to take anti-Negro, ummm…”

What’s the problem? This sounds like dinner table conversation at one of my family reunions. As James says, it is merely vulgar when Blacks talk like this but a hate crime when Whites do. It is also a prime example of what we’ll call The Edwards Law: Diversity can never work, because when different races live together, every incident, no matter how small, turns into a racial incident. Curiously, the ones who point this out are called racists.

Kirsten was murdered by an ideology. Joanne was beaten in the face by one of her props.

Massive racial discrimination.

VDare encouraging miscegenation. With friends like these, who needs witch doctors?

As has been true throughout history, the invaded are absorbed into the empire. This is why you now have to feed 42,000 Iraqi women with children, who are moving to your town. I hope your children don’t want an inheritance or anything like that. Don’t ever think that the cost of Bush’s War is only what you’ve seen on the news.

Here is one Iraqi woman who immigrated to the American Empire, and one hospital expects to spend $3.2 million caring for her eight illegitimate babies. Of course, this doesn’t include the welfare that will follow for all 14 of her inseminated bastards. You can thank Bush for your skyrocketing health care costs.

Mike Tuggle asks:

Has anyone ever wondered how America remained a Christian, Western nation for so long without border fences? What preserved us was our shared sense of who we are, an identity based on a long, common history. More important, we were proud of that identity, and were determined to preserve it. But today, the ruling elites wage perpetual war against that identity. America, they constantly lecture, must transform itself into a globalist democracy, thereby fulfilling the glorious ideal of a proposition nation. That means we must not only permit, but embrace, floodtide immigration. Those who object to this recipe for cultural suicide are demonized as racist.

And if you’re a radio talk show host, let’s say, and you want to tap into this “racist” resentment for a commercial base but want to remain “respectable,” then your name is Glenn Beck. It seems that every day I hear callers to his show who sound just like those people marching for gun rights in Britain in the video we posted. They see their world slipping away from them, and they’re trying desperately to hold on to it, but they don’t know how. So they call a tool like Beck, and he gives them the weepy, feel-good Americanism that makes them want to drive to Lowe’s and buy a flagpole. They don’t realize that they’ve been had. They should be grasping the arms of their own, but are told that this is racist. They are told instead that the solution is more ideology and more propositionalism. Even “the god of our many understandings,” as Bishop Faggot Robinson puts it, is useful for lending credence to this evil enterprise. But the true God places us in families, clans, tribes, and nations, all of which are based on blood, not the “American Dream,” and He tells us that we are worse than infidels if we abandon our duty to protect and sustain our kin.

Meditate on these words from Johann Gottlieb Fichte in To the German Nation (1807):

Love that is truly love, and not a mere transitory lust, never clings to what is transient; only in the eternal does it awaken and become kindled, and there alone does it rest. Man is not able to love even himself unless he conceives himself as eternal; apart from that he cannot even respect, much less approve, of himself. Still less can he love anything outside himself without taking it up into the eternity of his faith and of his soul and binding it thereto.

He who does not first regard himself as eternal has in him no love of any kind, and, moreover, cannot love a fatherland, a thing which for him does not exist. He who regards his invisible life as eternal, but not his visible life as similarly eternal, may perhaps have a heaven and therein a fatherland, but here below he has no fatherland, for this, too, is regarded only in the image of eternity—eternity visible and made sensuous, and for this reason also he is unable to love his fatherland. If none has been handed down to such a man, he is to be pitied. But he to whom a fatherland has been handed down, and in whose soul heaven and earth, visible and invisible meet and mingle, and thus, and only thus, create a true and enduring heaven—such a man fights to the last drop of his blood to hand on the precious possession unimpaired to his posterity…

Freedom to [Germans in the Roman era] meant just this: remaining Germans and continuing to settle their own affairs, independently and in accordance with the original spirit of their race, going on with their development in accordance with the same spirit, and propagating this independence in their posterity. All those blessings which the Romans offered them meant slavery to them because then they would have to become something that was not German, they would have to become half-Roman. They assumed as a matter of course that every man would rather die than become half a Roman, and that a true German could only want to live in order to be, and to remain, just a German and to bring up his children as Germans.

They did not all die; they did not see slavery; they bequeathed freedom to their children. It is their unyielding resistance which the whole modern world has to thank for being what it now is. Had the Romans succeeded in bringing them also under the yoke and in destroying them as a nation, which the Romans did in every case, the whole development of the human race would have taken a different course, a course that one cannot think would have been more satisfactory.

It is they whom we must thank—we, the immediate heirs of their soil, their language, and their way of thinking—for being Germans still, for being still borne along on the stream of original and independent life. It is they whom we must thank for everything that we have been as a nation since those days, and to them we shall be indebted for everything that we shall be in the future, unless things come to an end with us now and the last drop of blood inherited from them has dried up in our veins. To them the other branches of the race, whom we now look upon as foreigners, but who by descent from them are our brothers, are indebted for their very existence. When our ancestors triumphed over Roma the eternal, not one of all these peoples was in existence, but the possibility of their existence in the future was won for them in the same fight.

This is not accursed propositional Americanism, my friends. This is Kinism. Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him.

Someday this evil state will die, and we’ll stand on the grave to make damn sure.

Pat Buchanan writes: “Worldwide, the mightiest force of the 20th century, ethnonationalism—that creator and destroyer of nations and empires; that enduring drive of peoples for a nation-state where their faith and culture is dominant and their race or tribe is supreme—seems more manifest than ever.” It’s true that ethnonationalism has given rise to empires and nation-states, but only in response to threats, real or perceived. The Kinism to which Mr. Buchanan refers, of kinship and polity deriving from faith and tribe, was best exemplified by our “racist” Anglo-Saxon Christian forefathers who gave us federalism, republicanism, common law, the Bill of Rights, etc. Ethnonationalism leads to distinct states of human scale and shared interests, as was true of ancient Israel and the old American republic. It is a natural outgrowth of our trinitarian faith, though it is always in conflict with our carnal, Babelist tendencies. Therefore, we have no pact with unitarians (Jews, Muslims, heretics, Eastern monists).

States of human scale are vital, as we can see with the drunken spending orgy by Bush and Obama. Most of us know how to deal with thousands of dollars. Some know how to deal with millions. No one, and I mean no one, can deal with trillions of dollars. No one can even conceptualize that sum of money in terms of one’s daily life, and yet we expect a scant few “representatives” of hundreds of millions of people and the fourth largest land mass on earth, all of whom are bought off, except for Ron Paul, to handle our wealth responsibly. It simply can’t be done, and certainly not by those who are thousands of miles away from the people they pretend to represent. Give us a government of human scale, close to home, with very limited powers. Our “racist” forefathers demanded it.

What does Lincoln’s America mean to you? To us it’s like a Chinese swimming pool, but without all the similar faces.

Filth pretending to be art:

People that create sewage like this, that at once blasphemes God and degrades humanity, are worthy only of nooses and gas chambers. But in our society, they become wealthy.

The anti-theonomists used to taunt that we would re-establish execution for blasphemy. That was supposed to be a prima facie reductio of the theonomic position, as if the mere concept is self-refuting. And many theonomists showed their deep capitulation to the current age by rushing to argue that theonomy does not mean executing blasphemers. But a film like this makes it intuitively clear that if there is one crime that should be punished by the sword of the state, just one, it is blasphemy. That is the fulcrum upon which the entire safety of the nation pivots… Let the petty ax-murderers go free, in comparison…

The kikenblasphemy will end when full-metal jacket meets skull, when the word goes out, “Spread your blasphemy and sleep with the fishes.”

The antinomian conservatives are commonly flag-waving hawks when it comes to meeting physical enemies by force. There was no talk of “loving the Japanese” into submission, nor any other real or imagined physical foe since then. But for some reason, they think the termites that will wreck the spirit of their nation from inside the borders can be loved into the kingdom.

Execution for blasphemy is actually an inescapable concept. The fact that these destroyers mock our Savior’s name with impunity while Ernst Zundel is seized by US agents and exported to prison for blasphemy against the Holy Myth of the Chosen People indicates what is happening. Soon, Bible-faithful preachers will also be thrown into prison, and those that kill them not prosecuted. (But many that think they are faithful are actually fully reprocessed and platonically reconstructed dupes of the new kikentheocracy. I know this by bitter personal experience.)

As Steve Schlissel pointed out with brilliant insight, the name and honor of a society’s god is always unmockable. Our deposed God, the only God that is, is mocked, and professing Christians chuckle right along.

This video is simply stunning:

It’s a blessing to watch the wicked self-destruct.