From what we can tell in the polls, it appears that White evangelicals voted 3 to 1 for McCain and Jews voted even higher than 3 to 1 for Obama (85%). Only about 40% of Whites voted for Obama. That number is a lot higher than it should be (and probably includes Hispanics and Jews, though it should not), but it drops precipitously if men and landowners are factored in, according to old-fashioned voting rights. For instance, Steve Sailer has found that McCain carried 19 of the top 20 states among those who are married during childbearing years; Obama carried 18 of the 19 lowest states. In other words, very few families with children voted for Obama, almost no White families with children voted for him, and most certainly not happily-married White men with children.

Exactly what is so hateful or bigoted about our people making their own way in the world? Our liberties were inherited not from Blacks, who voted over 95% for Obama, or from Mestizos, who voted over 70% for Obama, or from Orientals, who voted 2 to 1 for Obama, but from our own flesh and blood. We will continue to decline until the hearts of the children return to their fathers. (I sincerely hope that came across as racist. If not, I’m losing my touch.)

David Duke and James Edwards are hosting an important conference in Memphrica this weekend. “Anti-racist” terrorists got wind of it and made death threats against the hotel manager. (It was their duty, really, as the guardians of civil liberties.) This caused the county sheriff to declare a state of emergency and remove Dr. Duke at the request of the hotel, which considers it appropriate to break a legal contract with a man who has done nothing wrong. When you don’t have the right to assemble, to have your legally binding contracts be honored, or to even book a hotel room, you have no rights at all. Almost no Whites will speak in Dr. Duke’s defense, partly because they don’t care, and partly because they will never hear about it. But if this were happening to Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson, it would be covered by every news outlet in the country for days on end, and their race would unanimously support them. We have arrived at a point where we are unwelcome strangers in the country we inherited from our own ancestors. Blacks are allowed to have ACORN and Jews are allowed to have AIPAC, but Whites are not allowed to organize under EURO. This is the very double standard that Dr. Duke continually protests, and despite his well-reasoned arguments, he is falsely called a “supremacist” and a “KKK leader.”

We seek an amicable divorce, a secession, from the people of this land, whom we no longer recognize. This has nothing to do with hatred. A wife who files for an unfortunate but necessary divorce is not a female supremacist; nor are we White supremacists. It is love, not hatred, that motivates us. We despise the filthy flag of this country that is drenched in the blood of our fathers, and we teach our children to despise it as well. Mr. Obama, who correctly calls himself a “mutt,” though he wants a pure-bred dog for his daughters, is not our president. Virginia Governor Tim Kaine said it well the other day in the former capital of the Confederacy when he gloated that “Old Virginny is dead.” We are truly strangers in a strange land. But like our fathers, with night falling around us, we will conduct ourselves as though day is breaking, and by God’s grace it will.

One advantage to an election like this is seeing where the Mighty-Whities live. Look at the image below from the New York Times and take special note of Tennessee and Arkansas. Though there are like-minded Whites throughout the South, these are the areas that diversities have not infiltrated. It is not only prime real estate for budding politicians but for families looking to raise their children among their own kind. From the Ozarks to the Appalachians, it fairly well demarcates the area that our friend Stan calls “Confederate Switzerland”; fertile ground for the Second Reformation.

Very interesting election maps here and here that reveal the close correlation between race and party affiliation. Since “racists” are almost always right, we can predict that the years ahead will bring further polarization, as in the image above, and it will come as a shock to those who deny the reality and the beauty of kinship.

You can also see where the faggots, traitors, and anti-Christs are thick in this map of California. As is true of everywhere else, the higher concentration of Whites in rural areas makes it quite difficult to enact a liberal agenda.

The lesson to learn is that, despite very loud demonstrations in the Jew-media that the election was “atonement for our national sins,” as one reporter put it, there is no evidence at all that the rape of a whore and the abomination that issued from her yawning chasm have inspired us to “transcend race.” On the contrary, as bad as McCain was, and in spite of Obama’s numerous advantages, the single most important factor that contributed to a victory for the Democrats was that Whites were only 74% of the electorate, down from 90% in 1976. If McCain had worked for just a few percent more of the White vote he would have won. This could easily have been achieved by a tough stance on immigration instead of amnesty, and a few words about Jeremiah Wright would not have hurt either. This would not have won over the many voters whose retirement accounts have disappeared, but the point is that, as awful as McCain was, he only needed a few percent more from the mad-as-hell throng of Whites who are being overtaxed to pay for services to invaders. Sam Francis is in heaven right now shaking his head in disgust at the stupidity of the Stupid Party. A stake cannot be driven into the heart of that beast fast enough, as far as we’re concerned.

I think this Obama family portrait is a fitting image to replace Uncle Sam as the symbol of this bastard-nation. Instead of “I Want You for the U.S. Army” it could be captioned “I Want You, Bitch!”

Here’s a picture of Obama’s grandmother. She bears a striking resemblance to Abigail Adams, no? I think she’s doing a voodoo dance in this shot just before sacrificing a bull to the Great Spirit of Equality.

Take up your welfare check and follow him.

Obama’s “change” involves continuing to bleed ourselves for the interests of a foreign nation, and he has hired the son of one of their terrorists to help him. It’s kind of like hope for the change that brings more hope for change. Many Democrats are surprised that this has happened, even though, ever since the NAACP was founded, Black organization is really Jewish organization.

And since good is called evil and evil good, we have anguish in Florida over the name of one of the greatest of all American heroes who is now regarded by Phony-Americans as a terrorist. “I’d climb my horse and follow Marse to hell come any day.”

Let us pray that Obama’s “New Birth of Freedom” is not like the last one, which “killed over 600,000 Americans, waged war against civilians, wrecked the South’s economy, closed down hundreds of opposition newspapers, and imprisoned hundreds of political dissidents.”

Two things happen when a man says publicly that blacks are not “politically civilized“: everyone tries to fire him, and no one even attempts to prove him wrong.

Fox Noise is outraged that Ralph Nader likes to drown puppies. If the term “Uncle Tom” elicits a reaction like this from sham conservatives I’m going to start using it more often. A “career-ending” term, even! Nader shows unusual bravery here.

Public “education” is child abuse. And yes, you’re being taxed for what you just saw. More insanity.

The daughter of George Wallace dishonors him.

Statistics are racist.

Clytemnestra Wilson and Uncle Tom Fleming are “the granddaddy of the Rainbow Confederates” and “the pompous pseudo-intellectual who runs the show” at Chronicles, respectively. This is an excellent post from James on how these two gasbags dance gingerly around miscegenation, which is the most effective tool of the Left in the war against Christendom.

Now the pope says a black replacement for his ostentatious office would “send a splendid signal to the world” about the universal church. Likewise, many Europeans supported Obama because a black man has a more “universal” and international outlook. As Serge writes:

Western Europe’s political leaders and bien-pensants can identify with Obama and especially the color of his skin because they are ashamed of their whiteness. They share his hostility to any form of European or, in America’s case, Euro-derived ethnic or cultural coherence, which is flatly equated with “racism.” Even the Economist of London subscribes to this view. Obama’s victory, it opined, “would salve, if not close, the ugly wound left by America’s history.”

For the same reason, they clamored for a black man to lead the United Nations. And it makes perfect sense. As our friend from Cambria observes, the White, post-Christian rationalist has lost his faith but is still White. While the faith expressed by non-White races is openly selfish, “a white man needs some faith that transcends, at least in the articulation, mere self-interest.” (See our recent post, To Grope for Him and Find Him.) As it says in Proverbs 8, all who hate God love death, and their self-imposed genocide will bring to them the desires of their black hearts. We Kinists believe universal advocacy to be evil, and if a “universal church” adopts the same universal advocacy, we reject it entirely. We will have no man rule over us but one of our own, as the Bible prescribes, and he will serve our interests and no others.

The great Charles Martel was a man of this sort, and he did no less than save Christianity and the white race in western Europe. At the Battle of Tours in 732 AD his well-trained infantry defeated a much greater number of mailed, bow-wielding, and lance-wielding cavalry. It was a feat of war almost unheard of in medieval history. Not even Rome could match a similar challenge against the Parthians. Martel trained his Frankish (proto-Confederate) army to move swiftly, feign retreat, and attack where least expected, and most importantly, to fight in a phalanx, like the ancient Greeks. Bishop Isidore of Beja described the victory: “And in the shock of the battle the men of the North seemed like a sea that cannot be moved. Firmly they stood, one close to another, forming as it were a bulwark of ice; and with great blows of their swords they hewed down the Arabs.” Stand, Men of the West! Edward Gibbon called The Hammer “the hero of the age” and declared “Christendom…delivered…by the genius and good fortune of one man, Charles Martel.” Contained in those eight days in the year 732, Gibbon said, were “the events that rescued our ancestors of Britain, and our neighbors of Gaul [France], from the civil and religious yoke of the Koran… [T]he Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Koran would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, and her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the revelation of Mahomet.” Yet how many pastors do you know who call for us to bow our heads for a word of thanks for this heroic German who saved your children and mine by plunging cold steel into the heart of the infidel? May the names of his brave soldiers be revered throughout eternity, and may God save us from the patricidal “Christians” of our own dark age.

Wilmot Robertson prophesied in The Dispossessed Majority that if churches continued on the course they had charted in the middle of the 20th century, they would become:

1. Psychiatric clinics
2. Marxist seminaries
3. Miscegenation laboratories
4. Headquarters for the local kibbutz

When salt loses its savor, it is only good for one thing.