A Very Important Announcement
November 28, 2008 
14 Comments
This is a national invitation (we use the word “national” in the biblical sense) for all Kinists to meet for the festivities on Saturday, January 17, 2009, at the grave of our savior, Stonewall Jackson, in Lexington, Virginia. There will be an excellent speaker at the 10 a.m. graveside ceremony and then we will march through the old town of Lexington to Robert E. Lee’s Chapel for a memorial service. The once-great VMI is also in Lexington, and there is history at every turn. We will join together at this event with other patriots to honor our fathers and say No to their father (Michael King, whose birthday is two days later), their son (Obama, whose inauguration is three days later), and unholy spirits everywhere. As millions of unarische drive to D.C. for the iniggeration, crime will suddenly plummet throughout the country. The only news to cover that week will be of high school drama clubs and Mr. Hendrick’s cattle who will break through the fence and make a mess on County Road 42. And if we hear any excuses about how you can’t make it, well then, now you’ve gone and done it. At least come for the Irish pub.
Some holidays are more equal than others.
When a land rejects her legends,
Sees but falsehoods in the past,
And its people view their sires
In the light of fools, or liars,
‘Tis a sign of its decline,
And its splendor cannot last.
Branches that but blight their roots
Yield no sap for lasting fruits.
~ Martin F. Tupper
John Lofton flops for a few minutes near the end of this otherwise very good show. He calls Lincoln a racist for wanting the West to remain White and for enjoying minstrel shows and jokes. And even in this very show, Lofton uses language that probably would have appealed to Lincoln. He says there is “a view which makes you an American,” the Christian view. “If you do not have that view you are not an American.” Rubbish. For some reason, some Christians feel the need to make idealistic statements that have never had any basis in reality at any time in history.
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.” ~ Abraham Lincoln, fourth debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois, September 18, 1858
“To make secure the purity and integrity of both the white man’s blood and the Negro’s blood, every congregation whether white or colored in this broad land should promptly and unhesitatingly unfrock the pastors in the pulpits who desecrate their sacred calling by preachments which through direction or indirection seek to destroy and mongrelize both races by advocating or even tolerating social equality in the name of the Christian religion.” ~ Senator Theodore Bilbo
American Indian tribes consider their heritage to be too important to squander. Race-mixing pastors would accuse them of viewing all other tribes as not having been created in the image of God.
This movie looks excellent and will be released on Netflix next February:
If I may quote Bob Marley, “Won’t you help to sing these songs of freedom?” Our enemies are scared to death that White men and women will lock arms and sing together. Like Julius Caesar and the devil, our enemies divide and conquer. But those who are able to sing songs of defiance into the barrel of a gun have chosen life. I wonder if our people have it in them. How I wish we could be like the Estonians.
“The Jews, I find are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated…as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power (physical, financial or political), neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the under dog.” ~ President Harry Truman, 1947
“From 1945 to 1989, the percentage of native Estonians dropped from 97% to 61.5% due to the massive Russian migration. These Russians still considered themselves Russian after three-quarter million of them moved into the tiny nation of 2.5 million. The native Latvians slowly responded with even greater awareness of their distinctive culture as a result. Yet, when Estonians seceeded from the Soviet Union in 1991, though barely a majority, they were still able to preserve their ethnic identity and sovereignty. Being exposed to greater numbers of Russians made the native Estonians realize how different they were, which enhanced their awareness of their cultural uniqueness.” ~ Mike Tuggle
From 1985, a very interesting analysis of psychological warfare which will help you to understand how Whites have been trained to betray their own people:
It’s important to understand that, far from being White Supremacists, we recognize certain flaws inherent to our race that can be easily exploited by parasites. Foremost among these is the lust to score points against other Whites and thereby feel superior to them. Whites are able to cooperate with each other better than anyone else in the world when the rule of law has been established. But when there is money to be made through betrayal, Whites will betray their own. In the 20th century this flaw was exploited to such an extent that Whites very likely hold the record as being the world’s most violent criminals. Whites have been responsible for far more mayhem than Blacks could ever bring about.
“Through trial and error, the revolutionaries have learned that a revolution wrought by law takes longer but is more long-lasting because there is never any counter-revolutionary reaction. In fact, the most passive element of the populace will be the very people who would have opposed the revolution had the revolution been an old-fashioned, violent one… In his book, White Man Think Again, Anthony Jacob points out that the white man has not been defeated by an outside force, he has not been overwhelmed by the barbarians; he is in decline because of white liberalism. His destiny is in his own hands, or to be more precise, in his own soul. If he returns, in his heart, to the faith that transcends all constitutions and the historical process, he will once again be what he was meant to be, the Christ-Bearer. And then his children and his children’s children will know what it means to live in a segregated culture consecrated to God, instead of in an integrated sewer that empties into hell.”
The racist world of the past. We especially like the part where he says he doesn’t have to worry about being arrested for a “hate crime” when he hears a knock at the door.
“Where God’s law and grace are rejected, the systems of government devised by man rest on sin, guilt, and injustice. The power of guilt to cripple and limit man is very great. We see it widely used today to make men feel guilty because they are successful, or white, or almost anything. We are held to be polluters of the air and earth and an accursed race of exploiters. The effects of this on millions is very severe. People are afraid to state obvious facts lest they be accused of racism, cultural imperialism, ideological oppression, and so on and on. Guilt is a very powerful means of controlling and castrating peoples. The guilt is created by manufacturing sins which have no place in God’s sight but are very important in man’s plans to govern over men and nations, and the earth as well. If we are held to be guilty because of our race and national past, there is no way of removing that ostensible sin and its guilt.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony on Deuteronomy
Do you think Amazon would ever halt the sale of a book when a Christian complains? Silly rabbit, tricks are for yids!
Texe Marrs uncensored. Excellent interview.
Germany has banned another Christian cross. The Jews who are responsible for this have also convinced Catholics to stop using the word “Yahweh.”
A Christmas gift idea for the kids.
How about this lineup on the Cesspool show? Looks like the campaign of intimidation isn’t working out too well for the Christ-haters and White-haters. I think I’ll send them gefilte fish wrapped in newspaper (Godfather-style) to buoy their spirits.
The socialist Pledge of Allegiance is being recited with gusto by liberals these days, particularly the crackwhore constituency. Every church and Christian school in our area forces children to recite pledges to the Yankee flag, the Christian flag, and the Bible. I’m not kidding at all.
When Obama campaigned on “change,” he referred only to his race. Every one of his appointees is more of the same, especially the Jews in key slots, such as Treasury.
This is a fascinating article about Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury. We know that Jefferson rescued the republic from this man and was successful in thwarting Hamilton’s attempts to establish the First Bank of the United States. Hamilton pushed a form of mercantilism that he called “The American System,” which was based on central banking and a large public debt, which he called “a public blessing” – all the things that Ron Paul hates. He wanted a powerful standing army to crush dissent. He set the stage for this when he tried to hang tax protesters during the Whiskey Rebellion. (The protesters were pardoned by George Washington.) The Jew Federal Reserve calls him their founding father.
Here’s the twist: Hamilton was born on the Caribbean island of Nevis, which was a haven for Jews and therefore a hub for the slave trade. The Jews there even had their own cemetery, synagogue, and school. We know of this only through the biographies of Hamilton, and this is because his mother, Rachel Faucett, was married to a Danish Jew, John Michal Lavien. The story goes that she separated from the Jew and cohabited with a Scot, James Hamilton, and gave birth to Alexander. Since Alexander was a bastard, the Anglican Church refused to grant him membership or education in the local church school. “He was enrolled in a private school on Nevis taught by a Jewish head mistress and…soon was fluent in Hebrew and French… Perhaps from this exposure at an impressionable age, Hamilton harbored a lifelong reverence for Jews… Later on, in the heat of a renowned legal case, Hamilton challenged the opposing counsel: ‘Why distrust the evidence of the Jews? Discredit them and you destroy the Christian religion.’”
It’s just a theory of mine, but it sounds very much like Hamilton knew he was Lavien’s son, and the history of his youth was purposely muddled.
Now read this even more fascinating article. “Documents in the British Museum prove that Alexander Hamilton received payment from the Rothschilds for his deed in binding the US government and the States to the international Jewish bankers.”
The First Bank creates 72% inflation in its first five years of operation, according to Murray Rothbard. Congress shuts it down. It is said that Nathan the Jew Rothschild is enraged, loses millions when the bank is closed, and the next year forces crippled Britain (in the same way that Jews always force war) to fight the War of 1812.
Madison proposes the Second Bank of the United States three years later, and it is established two years after that. Rothschild prodigy Nicholas Biddle becomes the president of the bank. Six years later, Andrew Jackson, the hero of 1812, is elected president of the United States and determines to crush the bank. He recognizes the Jewish threat, saying, “More than 8,000,000 of the stock of the bank is held by foreigners who are more dangerous than the military power of an enemy.” He then writes to the bankers these famous and soul-stirring words:
Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out.
He routs them. Jews pour $3 million into Henry Clay’s campaign to defeat him, to no avail. Three years later, Jackson sees to it that the national debt is paid off. Someone tries to assassinate him that year (surprise, surprise). He pulls all government deposits from the Second Bank and it collapses.
At this point, a good place to pick up the story is in a book called The Southern Essays of Richard M. Weaver. Weaver has an absolutely engrossing chapter on what is very possibly the most significant Senate debate in our history. It was between Robert Hayne of South Carolina, who defended Jackson, and the great orator Daniel Webster, hand-picked by Henry Clay, who was the most well-known proponent of Hamilton’s “American System” and the primary influence on the empire’s first dictator, Abe Lincoln. Presiding over the debate was the great John C. Calhoun, our very last founding father. Thirty years prior to Lincoln’s war of genocide, the old and new Americas, which had always uncomfortably coexisted, grappled on the floor of the Senate in an unplanned debate, each one trying to wrest the future of the country from the other. This was when the South proposed Calhoun’s doctrines of interposition and nullification against the Whigs, which doctrines Marren Loofer Keen railed against in his famous “I Have a Dream” speech as being unrepresentative of the god of Equality. If anyone is interested, we can do a review of this chapter from Weaver’s book, but get the book, in any case.
Now even polite Icelanders are rioting after the realization of what Jews have done to their country slowly dawns on them. “On the day the grocery stores in America are as bare as they are in Iceland, the ensuing riots will be anything but polite.” But then, knowing Americans, they’ll call for the election of new Jews.
The empire has outlawed the use of gold and silver as legal tender even though the Constitution specifically allows it. But of course, the Constitution is dead, and while men like Ron Paul are admirable for fantasizing otherwise, fantasies are fantasies, and what we need now is a hard shot of realism. We need a new American Revolution. (This also is illegal, according to our impostor government, and widely frowned upon by conservatives who have never conserved anything.)
SWB, speaking of gold and silver as currency, there’s a new bank, run by the Lakota Indian Nation, that supposedly is”…the world’s first non-reserve, non-fractional bank that issues, accepts for deposit, and circulates REAL money…silver and gold. All of our deposits are liquid, meaning they can be withdrawn at any time in minted rounds.”
Wonder how long the wonderful finance guys in our government will let this one run?
http://press.freelakotabank.com/index.php
Note: I don’t necessarily endorse this, it’s just an interesting development.
God bless,
Laurel
Franklin Sanders was sent to prison for simply using precious metals as currency in a small group, but apparently Injuns are governed by a higher law. I know they’re free to build casinos on their reservations because they’re not subject to some state laws, but I didn’t think they could get around the real rulers of the country by doing this. There has to be a catch.
You guys are killin me! This is one of the best posts ever, and that is saying a lot. If I am a typical reader, the points scored in this post square with what we have learned (after literally decades of toil) and yet advance the horizon of that knowledge considerably.
Lofton is appealing because of his honesty and manly courage. Yet, he is still an internationalist and propositionalist, as you observe. We should pray that he will move that extra step that marks not a razor’s edge but a chasm, to use John Murray’s phrase.
re Lincoln: exactly. The very sentiments that the jew-perverted public rejects about the War Criminal are the one place that he was right.
The Estonian picture is stirring, but even here there is slip in refering to being “brutalized by two Empires.” The revenge against the jewish tyrants shown was, if I am not mistaken, made possible by the liberation by the Germans — unless I am confusing it with a similar scene in Lithuania. The role of song is certainly a key one, however. The Sound of Music turned the reality upside down. The National Socialists were filled with song. This is why the jews had to outlaw the Horst Wessel Song as well as two verses of the national anthem after the genocidal fire-bombing of every German city finally took its toll in defeat.
Think about it: certain songs are illegal to sing in that land of song to this very day!
I think there are very strong reasons for retaining the old usage “Jehovah” rather than the modernist “Yahweh” — but that can wait for another day.
Interesting hints to pursue re Hamilton.
The Indian casinos out here are everywhere. Didn’t know they had so many reservations!
Wonder how the Free Lakota Bank is going to be able to survive the friendly ministrations of our nice government men…
God bless,
Laurel
Thank you, Tim. It’s interesting that songs and flags are being outlawed throughout the West, and this trains people to be ashamed of any expression of pride in their people. Speaking the words “I’m proud to be a German” will have the same effect in Germany as waving a White Pride Worldwide flag here, or a Confederate flag. In Britain, they are being told to put away St. George and Welsh flags for fear that invading minorities will be offended. I say to hell with them.
“But those who are able to sing songs of defiance into the barrel of a gun have chosen life.”
What songs do you recommend?
Your “rubbish” remark is not a very compelling refutation of the fact that America WAS founded as a Christian nation. We are, of course, no longer a Christian nation having turned our backs on God generations ago which is why, among other things: Airplanes are flying into buildings; large portions of our Gulf Coast were destroyed by Katrina; half of California has burned down; and our economy is collapsing. Sheer coincidence, right? I think not. Read (and believe) the Bible.
The realization that our country was indeed founded as a Christian nation must begin with the understanding that our founding began 150 or so years before the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution. And a superb, well-documented argument for our Christian origins is a little book I have only recently acquired by a former Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, David J. Brewer, titled “the United States As A Christian Nation” (John C. Winston Co.,, 1905). As Brewer notes:
The first colonial grant, made to Sir Walter Raleigh in 1584 authorized him to enact statutes for the government of the proposed colony provided that “they not be against the true Christian faith now professed by in the Church of England.” The first charter of Virginia, granted by King James I in 1606, commenced this grant invoked “the providence of Almighty God…in propagating the Christian religion to such people as yet live in darkness and miserable ignorance of the true knowledge and worship of God.” The Mayflower Compact of 1620 says that they the Pilgrims did what they did “for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith.” And the charter of New England, granted by James I in 1620, expressed the “hope thereby to advance the enlargement of Christian religion, to the glory of God Almighty.”
The Massachusetts Bay charter, granted in 1629 by Charles I, vows to “win and incite the natives of the country to their knowledge and obedience of the only true God and Savior of mankind, the Christian faith…[which] is the principle end of this plantation.” This declaration was substantially repeated in the 1991 Massachusetts Bay charter granted by William and Mary. The fundamental orders of Connecticut, under a provisional government instituted in 1638, stated that its purpose was “to maintain and preserve the liberty and purity of the gospel of our Lord Jesus which we now profess, also the discipline of the churches, which, according to the truth of the said gospel, is now practiced amongst us.” And the preamble of the Constitution of 1776 specifically says that among the things due to ever man in his place and proportion are “civility and Christianity.”
In 1638 the first Rhode Island settlers organized a local government and agreed to “submit our persons, lives and estates to our Lord Jesus Christ, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords and to all those perfect and most absolute laws of his holy word of truth, to be guided and judged thereby. Exod. 24:3,4; II Chron. 11:3; II Kings 11:17.” The 1663 Rhode Island charter speaks of its petitioners as “godly edifying themselves and one another in the holy Christian faith and worship as they were persuaded.” The charter of Carolina granted this same year by Charles II says its petitioners are “excited with a laudable and pious zeal for the propagation of the Christian faith.” In the preface of the frame of government prepared by William Penn in 1682 “the Lord from heaven” is mentioned as the “highest attainment” at which men on earth may arrive. And the laws prepared to go with this frame of government called for the keeping of the Sabbath Day as did “the primitive Christians…to worship God according to their understandings.”
In the charter of privileges granted in 1701 by Penn to the province of Pennsylvania and its territories (later including Delaware) “Almighty God” is said to be “the only Lord of Conscience, Father of Lights and Spirits, and the author as well as object of all divine knowledge, faith and worship, who doth enlighten the minds and persuade and convince the understandings of the people.” Vermont’s 1777 Constitution also called for observance of the Sabbath and for “some sort of religious worship, which to them shall seem most agreeable to the revealed will of God.” The 1788 Constitution of South Carolina declared that “the Christian Protestant religion shall be deemed and is hereby constituted and declared to be the established religion of this state: and “that the Christian religion is the only true religion; that the holy scriptures of the Old and New Testament are of divine inspiration, and are the rule of faith and practice.”
Within 100 years of the landing at Jamestown Christians established three colleges: Harvard, William and Mary and Yale. The first seal used by Harvard read “In Christi Gloriam,” its charter saying that among its purposes was “through the good hand of God” to educate the English and Indian youth “in Knowledge latter observing: “But it would scarcely be asked of a court, in what professes to be a Christian land, to declare a law unconstitutional because it requires rest from bodily labor on Sunday (except works of mercy and necessity) and thereby promotes the cause of Christianity.”
Commenting on all of this, Associate Justice Brewer says: “You will have noticed I have presented no doubtful facts. Nothing has been stated which is debatable. The quotations from charters are in the archives of the several States; the laws are on the statute books; judicial opinions are taken from the official reports; statistics from the census publications…I have said enough to show that Christianity came to this country with the first colonists; has been powerfully identified with its rapid development, colonial and national, and today (as of 1905 – J.L.) exists as a mighty factor in the life of the republic. This is a Christian nation, and we can all rejoice as truthfully we repeat the words of Leonard Bacon:
O God, beneath Thy guiding hand
Our exiled fathers crossed the sea,
And when they trod the wintry strand,
With prayer and psalm they worshiped Thee.
Thou heardst, well pleased, the song, the prayer –
Thy blessing came; and still has power
Shall onward through all ages bear
The memory of that holy hour
Laws, freedom, truth, and faith in God
Came with those exiles o’er the waves,
And where their pilgrim feet have trod,
The God they trusted guards their graves.
And here Thy name, O God of love,
Their children’s children shall adore,
Till these eternal hills remove,
And spring adorns the earth no more.
John Lofton / JLof@aol.com
Wow, a comment from John Lofton himself. We’re very honored, and also fans of yours, sir, going back decades to those wonderful “easy chair” recordings you made with Rushdoony and Scott.
We agree with you that America was founded as a Christian nation and should still be formally designated as a Christian nation. We also agree with you that, if anything, our founding fathers did not go far enough in making this explicit, although Thornwell tried to fix that problem with an amendment to the Confederate Constitution. We also agree that we should not be surprised when covenantal disobedience brings punishment.
The only part of your show that we considered rubbish is the idea that Christians are Americans but other members of our tribe are not. We are bound by blood to the descendants of the White men whose great deeds you have listed in your comment above. We have the same obligation to them as the Apostle Paul had to his “kinsmen according to the flesh” – Romans 9:3. And while we are certainly bound in a covenant of faith to fellow Christians, we are called worse than infidels if we neglect the duties to our own by blood. Therefore, it is simply false that only Christians are true Americans, just as it is not true that only Christians are true Lithuanians.
We also agree 100% with Tim Harris that Lincoln’s so-called “racism” was the only good thing about him. Would that we all could be as “racist” as Abraham Lincoln. In his quote above, he sought to endear himself to the audience by moving close to Douglas on the issue, and the ideas he expressed, especially on miscegenation, found nearly unanimous agreement in both the North and the South, because both sections were still almost entirely Christian in those days.
My soul! This posting and the ensuing comments remind me of old times in a certain “little” Swiss-named internet place that will not be forgotten!
not to change the topic, but here is a site I think many of your readers might appreciate.
http://www.survivalblog.com/
I know I learned quite a bit from a hasty half hour skimming through the various pages.
“Christian” and “American” and “White” are merely circles on a Venn Diagram that overlap w/o being equivalent. I reject the hypothesis that being in a circle labeled “non-White,” is unrelated to the ability to be included in either of the other two.
That has certainly been made true by time and genocidal circumstances, but it doesn’t change the fact that we have a higher duty to our fellow Whites, who descended in common lineage from our fathers, who created this country for their own posterity, and no one else. When the country completes the transformation it is now undergoing, there will be nothing recognizably “Christian” or “American” or “White” about it, and then you will hear people say that “Santerian” and “World-State” and “Mocha” are merely circles on a Venn Diagram. But enough about Brazil – I thought we were talking about America.
My quick posting may be hard to analyze…I’m agreeing with you. White and non-white are mutually exclusive. American and non-American…Christian and non-Christian are, as well. But being in the “White” circle does not automatically put you in the Christian or American circle (though it makes the former more likely than if you started in the “non-White” circle). If the requirements for being in the “American” circle are merely legal and pragmatic (unfortunately the current popular opinion), White vs. non-White has no bearing. If, however, the definition of “American” is philosophical, then once again, “White” has a greater affinity for that group than “non-White.”