At least he has the honesty to cast his race-mixing eschatologically. It seems like most race-mix-advocating pastors balk at admitting that the logical consequence of their view is a coffee-colored eschaton.

In addition, why would it even occur to an American to seek to adopt from Africa or China, unless there is a Soteriology of racial salvation that they, the enlightened white, hope to spread to the dark masses.

In the long term, Sproul and his fellow-travelers will be regarded by a saner generation not only as traitors to their own tribe, but deep heretics who have reworked the rubrics of theology in a racial manner, despite their protestation that they are doing the exact opposite.

I guess I don’t see the problem with any of this. If latter part trades on the ambiguity of the word “inherent” perhaps we can clarify. We aren’t concerened with ontologial or metaphysical equality, as that is setteled by scripture, and rather uninteresting and irrelevant.

We’re talking about superiority, which is always relevant. Negroes are superior runners; White’s are superior civlization builders and inventors; Jews are superior cheaters. There is no racial olympics in which we can count metals and delcare the undisputed superior race. But if there were, I’d say we’d be the favorite. Yes, we have drunks, but so do the other races…and the gap remains the same.

I think we racial realists (true conservatives) need to bite the bullet on that one. What’s the diffenence (in the mind of a philo-semite) between saying “we whites don’t want to mix with non-whites,” and “we whites are superior to non-whites”?

Keeping a word like “superior” out of racial discussion plays into the hand of egalitarian God-haters.