An absolutely beautiful statement from our friends at the Political Cesspool.

You’re going to love this. And pay close attention, all you Judeochristians out there who despise us “racists.” I hope you don’t have a Paypal account for your business if you are publicly opposed to faggotry. Listen to the message Paypal left for James Edwards. The offending line in the Political Cesspool’s Statement of Principles is “We are against homosexuality, vulgarity, lovelessness, and masochism.” Russ, from the executive escalations office, says this clearly violates section 6 of Paypal’s Acceptable Use Policy. So Paypal is defending perverts and denying business to “homophobes.” Good is evil and evil is good. And I wonder when this story will show up in one of the big Jew newspapers.

In our time, the only difference between “conservatives” and liberals is abortion.

I wish Reverend James Manning would just say what is really on his mind rather than beating around the bush all the time. We love him! Tell your pastor to start preaching like this and we might respect him too.

Alright, forget everything I’ve ever said. I’m about to go join a black church.

Bristol Palin is pregnant by a man named Levi? Sounds like the whoring after Israel has found fertile ground.

This is a great article from Pat Buchanan on Sarah Palin, who is being groomed as a Zionist-racist, even going so far as to hint at war with Russia, all in the name of protecting the Jew regime in Georgia, which has close ties to Israel and has even hired McCain’s foreign policy guru. Palin is in over her head, but she takes to the faith of the anti-Christs very easily because of her dispensationalist, Jew-worshiping theology. Wickedness festers in the “conservative” churches these days. When the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on the earth?

Many thanks to Elizabeth Wright, a fantastic black writer, for pointing out that Sarah Palin calling her daughter’s bastard pregnancy a “beautiful” event does nothing for the pro-life cause. If anything, it’s pro-death.

Here are parents of every race, class and background valiantly trying to offset an intrusive media’s corrosive impact in the lives of their children, as they cope with a public school system that reinforces the media’s socially destructive messages. As though in partnership with these negative forces, along come the pro-lifers, who validate youthful sexually promiscuous behavior, by celebrating its inevitable outcome and consequences. They have not only helped to normalize illegitimate childbirth, but have raised it to the status of saintliness. Instead of a Scarlet Letter, Hester gets a heads up and encouragement to repeat her folly.

And now we’re confronted with a major politician expressing no regrets for the mistake made by her underage daughter, but actually celebrating it as a “beautiful” event. Why should not Palin’s two younger daughters crave the attention and spotlight now being lavished on the older one, and look forward to repeating her example – along with the many girls around the country who are awed by the spectacle of an unwed teenager being feted at a prominent political convention?

A filthy Jew offers greetings from New York to Sarah Palin. And notice the other Jew’s assurance that “there’s too much beauty, variety, vitality, and intelligence to label the entire show as ‘disgusting.’” I think it has to involve live bestiality for a Jew to consider it disgusting, and even then I’m not sure. It’s just like Berlin of the 1930s.

With all the talk of Sarah Palin lately, and feminism being our Last Great Hope, I was reminded of this humorous poem by John William Yope about a reformer of quite a different kind who believed that women would be led to the devil if allowed to ride bicycles.

The wheels go round without a sound—
The maidens hold high revel;
In sinful mood, insanely gay,
True spinsters spin adown the way
From duty to the devil!
They laugh, they sing, and—ting-a-ling!
Their bells go all the morning;
Their lanterns bright bestar the night
Pedestrians a-warning.
With lifted hands Miss Charlotte stands,
Good-Lording and O-mying,
Her rheumatism forgotten quite,
Her fat with anger frying.
She blocks the path that leads to wrath,
Jack Satan’s power defying.
The wheels go round without a sound
The lights burn red and blue and green.
What’s this that’s found upon the ground?
Poor Charlotte Smith’s a smithareen!

Progress rolls on! Try to get your hands on a movie called The Bostonians. It’s adapted from a book by Henry James, the brother of William James. (William James was the philosopher of pragmatism, and really the only American philosopher of renown.) In the movie, the suffragette feminists of Boston are all lesbians, shrews, and nutjobs. They have their designs on an idealistic young girl who is swept away from them by the Southern hero, played by Christopher Reeve. He marries her, takes her South, and they have lots of babies. The feminists must continue their war against biology without her, more’s the pity.

The presidential election in black and white. It’s funny how race doesn’t matter so much. Some social constructs never know when to get lost.

I think Thomas Sowell makes a good point here about blind tribalism tending towards the lowest common denominator, which is skin color, and being inclusive in all other respects. As Sam Francis said in 1994, the White race is an indispensable but not a sufficient condition of our civilization. This is why we insist upon Kinism, which incorporates biblical fidelity. There is no hope without Christ. The error of neo-Babelists is in claiming allegiance only with our covenantal brothers and not with our blood brothers. It’s like focusing on the invisible church of the elect, which is a theoretical abstraction, rather than the real, visible church on earth where God has actually placed us. While we ought not fall victim to a blind tribalism, our love, trust, and devotion for our blood brothers and sisters should be like that of the brothers in Song of Solomon 8 to their sister:

We have a little sister,
And she has no breasts.
What shall we do for our sister
In the day when she is spoken for?
If she is a wall,
We will build upon her
A battlement of silver;
And if she is a door,
We will enclose her
With boards of cedar.

We will close ranks, in other words, and she will lack nothing until the end of her days. Our devotion to kin is inseparable from our devotion to God.

In this clip, Ravi Zacharias, who is quite an engaging speaker, says race and ethnicity are sacred, just as sexuality is sacred. But he favored mixing races in his own marriage, so I’m not sure what that has to do with race being sacred. It sounds more like he views it as a typical liberal: either nonexistent or an obsolete social construct. Either way, it doesn’t stop him from inconsistently condemning faggotry on the basis of the sanctity of sexuality. Decide for yourself whether the answer he gives is more logically consistent than the answer any Kinist would give. God created the races just as he created the sexes. Don’t tamper with His designs.

We’ve been discussing application of God’s law lately. Does it bode well for Christians in America when anti-Christ Jews, who are 2% of the population, comprise 60% of the faculty at UCLA Law School? What does your pastor have to say about this? If he doesn’t care about the future of legal jurisprudence, does he care that our food is being taxed by anti-Christs, despite their insistence that church and state be separated? Does he care about anything other than ending abortion?

The comments in the previous post about Chris Strevel’s essay brought to mind R.J. Rushdoony’s pamphlet called The United States: A Christian Republic. (It’s available for purchase through Chalcedon.) The section you are about to read will sound completely foreign to any child “educated” by the pagan state:

The American colonies were all Christian republics. They were, first of all, free and independent states, self-governing republics. They were never a part of England, whatever the school textbooks may say. Each colony began its existence with a charter or constitution, created its own governmental bodies, and had no relationship to the mother country, England, except that they shared a king in common, and the king was a feudal, contractual monarch over the colonies.

There were mutual obligations between king and people. The royal governor represented the king, the freely elected legislators represented the people. Each colony could issue its own money, an obvious sign of an independent country. The trouble between king and people came in two ways. First, the English kings claimed divine rights and the absolute power of rule, and, after 1688, the English Parliament claimed this right for itself. After the French and Indian War, Parliament, a foreign government, took over the king’s power in America, and then it tried to usurp the powers of the American legislatures and the American peoples. Parliament had no legal relationship to the Colonies except in imperial matters, none with respect to the internal affairs of these American states.

Parliament invaded the American colonies in three ways: first, it tried to take over their internal affairs by taxing and governing them; second, it quartered troops on them when they resisted this invasion; third, it declared war on them and a full-scale invasion of America. The American states then declared their independence of King George III for violating his contractual kingship. They did not declare their independence of Parliament because they had never been subjects of the English Parliament or of England. The Declaration of Independence was directed against King George III and cited the reasons why his relationship to America had been rendered null and void by his own actions. The Declaration plainly stated: “these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be FREE and INDEPENDENT STATES.” Thus, the American states asserted that their independence dated from their first settlement: they had never been subjects of England; they had been his majesty’s loyal subjects until King George himself destroyed the constitution and rendered it null and void.

All of the American colonies being Christian republics bring us to the other great reason for the War of Independence, a war to maintain independence against invasion. John Adams declared that, “as much as any other cause,” the American resistance to Parliament was aroused by the projected attempt of Parliament to force bishops onto the colonies. Adams wrote in a letter to Dr. Jedediah Morse, December 2, 1815, that, “The objection was not merely to the office of a bishop, though even that was dreaded, but to the authority of Parliament, on which it must be founded” ( John Adams, Works, vol. 10, 1865 edition, 185). Each American state had its own religious settlement; none of them wanted an outside government to force a religious establishment on them. They wanted the freedom to be Christian republics according to their own Biblical beliefs. Every state, when the Constitution was adopted, was a Christian republic. Nine of the thirteen had one or more established churches. Christianity as a religion, rather than a particular church, was the established faith of the other states.

It’s time to admit the truth: “The United States is not a nation. The people of the U.S. are not bound by a common religion, a common heritage, or a common race. In the absence of authentic ties that bind, the satanic tribes within the U.S. prey on each other and unite only when the common enemy, the white European, seems to threaten the continuance of their tribal celebrations and rituals.” For one exhibit of many, see this Washington Post article on the recent Republicrat convention. Blacks are “frustrated” by the “lack of diversity.” The honkies even want to dress alike! (See the link below on racist socks.) The point of the article is that Whiteness is downright un-American.

Have a look at the largest Confederate flag in the world:

You have to see the table near the bottom of JPC’s post here. It’s just perfect. Sound doctrine is like cool water on the tongue. Listen to his podcast on the Jew and the Turk here [Play]
.

You have to feel sorry for this guy. Trying to match wits with Jared Taylor was a losing game even before it began. He hoped that shouting and name-calling would save the day.

Waffles and socks are racist.

Owning a golliwog doll will get you arrested in Europe.

What the hell?

Homeschooled children are not being socialized!

Russia is providing us with a wonderful example, and the government is encouraging the baby boom.

From Magna Carta to Sharia. And there will be no going back without bloodshed on an unfathomable scale.

A very good interview with Dr. Kevin MacDonald on our favorite radio show.