So, as an antipodean inkling, if I may – I will leave some comments here on these back posts in response to essays that I think deserve comment.

The “fiery cross”. In its ancient origin this sign of the Scottish Highland means that the Clans must gather to the Holy Rood. The pipes calling from glen to glen say that the usual raiding and reeving and feuding across the borders (always in dispute) must stop and the Clans must unite and they must fight for the greater polity. That polity was once the Christendom.

As usual the nail is here being hit square upon the head, recognizing the countersigns of an anti-nation and its disorders: “Creed over blood, religious diversity over Christianity, freedom over virtue and the power of government over the hearth.” ref to CWNY (April 22, 07) in the above post. Indeed the entire miscegenation and meshugganah of Synagogue / State and its dictate of Regnare Christum Nolumus – We Will Not Have This Christ to Reign.

But in the Christendom of the Holy Western Empire – that unique polity of federated nations: creed and blood were one; Christian rule did permit race/creeds/ law of other national communities to dwell within in its borders – it did not permit them office or access to the economy of the Christian polity; but it did permit them designated means of livlihood and tolerance. It made strict Inquisition into those whose conversions were suspected of being a mere ‘dampening’ for the purposes of infiltration and subversion.

The Christendom officially entertained no concept of freedom or liberty apart from Christian morals. And yes, it did ‘legislate morality’ through jurisprudence that would not only restrain crime and vice but elevate the virtue of the Christian populace. It forbade usury, for example. This was because the Church forbade it.

In terms of the ancient Common Law of European peoples, a Law upheld by the Church, there were sanctuaries where the King’s writ did not run, where the temporal power could not trespass: the hearth, the holy wells, the highways, the byeways, the tidal strands of ocean, the rivers running and the river meadows, the forest sanctuaries, the religious shrines, the cathedrals, parish churches and monastic foundations. And in England, right up until the Bank of England took over – the Commons.

But the key to all of this is Christian rule. This was not a democracy; it was an order. There were no competing equalities; there were duties of state. Yet the ordained monarch and his nobility knelt as penitants in equality with the humblest yeoman to receive what was greater than all put together – the Corpus Christi.

The monarchies of the Christian nations of Europe (when Europe was the Christendom of the Holy Western Empire) were mandated by the conversion and baptism of those nations as nations. With baptism, the population had abjured heathen laws and practices. They had turned to Christ and placed themselves under Apostolic Law – the government of the Apostles and their Successors, the bishops: “whatsoever ye bind on earth is bound in heaven”. This is faith and morals. From the communion in the Royal body and blood, soul and Divinity of the God man, the bishops of the Successors to the Apostles could anoint for those nations a monarchy to govern their temporal affairs. Whatever the pedigree of the blood royal of the nation in its pagan state, the anointed Christian monarch superceded them in kind – especially so called ‘angelic’ lineages of the pagan nobility claiming descent from the gods through sex magic and human sacrifices, etc.

Behind the temporal government stood the Apostolic Law of the Church. The monarch did not have the authority to ordain whatever laws he pleased. He had a mandate to govern on the basis of the Evangel, the Apostolic faith, teaching (the Didache) and morals of the Sacred Deposit as interpreted by the living source of authority from the Apostles in the holy liturgy, in the Fathers, the Successors and the Councils.

The only workable and democratic (in a self-limiting sense) institutions that have ever flourished were created, founded and developed under the monarchies of the Christendom and no other – the House of Lords under Magna Carta, Scotland’s Treaty of Arbroath – still (in my humble opinion) the best consitution for a Christian monarchy in the world, the Betton Parliament which gave self government to the Bretton peoples of Norman France under the authority of the French monarch right up until the Masonic Revolution (1789)for the republic – overthrowing both throne and altar on the tomb of Jacques de Molay.

The issue here is the conversion of a nation (ethne) to the Evangel of Christ, baptism into the faith of the Apostles, Christian order by way of submission to the living source of authority for Apostolic law and government. In the multicultural, multiracial chaos that is 21st century America, what will emerge in the ordinary course of events is the ordo of NWO dictatorship. Alternatively one nation will win through and attain the majority of One in the same way the Angles or the Scots or the Franks obtained a majority of One. Rule and government is the issue of that majority of one faith, one Lord, one baptism.

In America, that majority of One could be the Caucasian American nation of European heritage – if they professed the faith of the European heritage. But, if you look at the photographs of the highways of priests and religous nailed to the telephone pole crosses during the Masonic revolution (led by Trotsky) that saw the refounding of Mexico as a republic – it could be the Latin Americans. The actual numbers of the majority of One are irrelevant. It is a myth of those who would destroy us that ‘power comes from the people’.

“…there is no difference in the sight of the God of Heaven to deliver with a great multitude or with a small company; for success in battle is not in the multitude of the army, but in the strength coming from Heaven.” 1 Maccabees III:17 – 19.