The Lord Didn’t Say “Nuke-Yuller”
January 7, 2007 
14 Comments
The Imperial Presidency. I keep hoping for King George III to come back and ease our suffering.
"You know, President Bush is expected to announce that he is now sending more troops to Iraq, despite the fact that his generals, the military analysts, members of Congress and most of the American people are against the idea. The reason he’s doing this? To give Iraq a government that responds to the will of the people." ~ Jay Leno
"If it came to fighting I’d fight for Mississippi against the United States even if it meant going out into the street and shooting Negroes. After all, I’m not going to shoot Mississippians." ~ William Faulkner
"The Pharaohs of old dispatched their gravediggers so that secrets would not be divulged. The American pharaohs continue the tradition as witnessed by that heavy rope around the neck of the man who implemented Reagan’s orders to wipe out Iran. But Iran still stands and its formidable nemesis, the Sunni segment of Iraq, is nearly prostrate." ~ Michael Hoffman
What a relief. The Lord didn’t say "nuke-yuller." But the Jews did. "Israel has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons, Britain’s Sunday Times newspaper said."
Southern White boys are fodder for Christ-hating Jews.
Neo-Christians try not to mention John 14:6 in public.
I thought CNN was supposed to be liberal and Faux News was supposed to be conservative. Watch this:
Kevin Strom has been arrested, and he could very likely have been slandered by a malicious ex-wife, but a couple of lines from National Vanguard’s statement caught my eye. "ANY sexual abuse of children is antithetical to the very foundations of the worldview we stand for as a website and as an organization. In a pro-White nation any person found guilty after due process of such a crime would be executed." This is the problem with being merely a White nationalist rather than a Christian. The "worldview" of such a person is "pro-White" rather than biblical. The carnal mind is enmity against God, it says in Romans 8:7, and God is light. There is no darkness in Him at all. Charles Spurgeon pointed out that the carnal mind is not merely opposed to God but is "positive enmity. It is not black, but blackness; it is not at enmity, but enmity itself; it is not corrupt, but corruption; it is not rebellious, it is rebellion; it is not wicked, it is wickedness itself. The heart, though it be deceitful, is positively deceit; it is evil in the concrete, sin in the essence; it is the distillation, the quintessence of all things that are vile; it is not envious against God, it is envy; it is not at enmity, it is actual enmity." Therefore, the "free will" of the unregenerate mind is in bondage and is incapable of rendering proper judgment because abstractions like "right" and "wrong" become purely subjective. Who says that raping children is wrong? Why is your opinion any better than your neighbor’s? This is why democracy is a sham – because it has no standard of measurement. Forming White nations free of God’s law will be a fruitless exercise, and I’m too busy to waste time. These folks would benefit greatly from reading Van Til and Rushdoony.
Bill Regnery writes: "In 1940 whites constituted 30% of the world’s population. This number now stands at 15%. If this trend continues our fraction will plummet to 8% at mid-century." But you can go down to the movie theater right now and watch a Jew film about "Our Future" being in the hands of a Negro bastard. I hear the Juju beans are especially ripe this time of year.
From a small booklet called Precious Years in Mt. Airy, North Carolina, by Dick Carswell: "One early morning we came upon a cross burning in someone’s front yard. It was shocking to see a cross burning. The man I worked for told me that he knew the family and they were white. The reason for the cross burning was to let the husband know that he had better shape up and quit drinking, and start taking care of his family or we will be back. It was the KKK."
Be sure to ask Marvin Olasky the Jew what he sees in this clown. I wonder, do Black churches ever preach against sexual deviancy, or is it accepted as a vital part of "the Black Experience" that I hear so much about? One more time, here’s Bradley’s slander against Duke University athletes.
Great day in the morning! Someone has reported us to Cobb. When I find out who did this, there’s gonna be a reckoning.
Meet Winston McCuen, who has far more courage and integrity than most White men alive. If the world were not presently upside down, he would be a prince or a magistrate. "Liberty is the reward for virtue… A people can’t be free unless they can be responsible." This line from the reporter is pretty funny: "You call it an open debate, but there will be those who call you racist!" Oh, no! The R Word!
The difference between White people and Black people – and so it shall ever be.
Bringing it all down to the lowest common denominator. Everyone with a pulse gets a trophy.
Here’s an excellent essay by our old friend George McDaniel. Did you know that the first woman in the U.S. Senate, Rebecca Latimer Felton, said that lynchings were preferable by far to allowing rapes to go unpunished? Here’s a quote:
I warned those representative men of the terrible effects that were already seen in the corruption of the Negro vote… That week there were seven lynchings in Georgia from the fearful crime of rape. I told them that these…would grow and increase with every election where white men equalized themselves at the polls with an inferior race and controlled their votes by bribery and whiskey. A crime nearly unknown before and during the war had become an almost daily [occurrence]… [I]f it takes lynching to protect woman’s dearest possession from drunken, ravening human beasts, then I say lynch a thousand a week.
George writes: "It was a horrible, brutal crime brought about by a terrible necessity. All of them were adamant, however, that if vigilantism was the only way to protect white womanhood, then so be it."
"The South fought for the race which has made the world what it is, for the agricultural organization of life, for political conservatism, for social order… Between two groups of Nordics fighting a mighty fight was this difference—that one fought for the Nordic race, the other against it… The chief result of the Civil War was the ruin it brought on the Nordic race in America… In the more than half century since the great struggle, immigration has swamped [us]. The New England of today…contains a thin Nordic upper class and a mass of factory workers of almost wholly non-Nordic stock… [T]he South [too] is changing, and the time must come when it, like the rest of the country, will be largely non-Nordic. But what has Jefferson Davis to do with all this? Much. The Southern Confederacy was, essentially, a protest against modernity. It was…the effort of the Nordic race to save itself. If it had succeeded, there would have been a new chapter in history… Success depended…on Jefferson Davis. He failed…and with him faded the last hope of the Nordic race." ~ Hamilton J. Eckenrode, the official historian of the state of Virginia, in Jefferson Davis: President of the South, 1923
"A naturalized citizen of the United States, Professor Boas did everything in his power to destroy the racial ideals of the Nation which he took for his own. When he arrived on these shores, from the heart of Germany at the age of twenty-one, he saw what the white race had accomplished in the new world… [F]or some reason which has never been publicized, this German Jew, a newly-arrived immigrant, wanted to destroy the racial stock which had carved this mighty Nation out of a wilderness." ~ Senator Theodore Bilbo on the Dirty Jew Franz Boas
Steve Sailer calls Barack Obama a wigger. Must be a typo. But he nails it here: "Supporting Obama for President, like supporting Powell a decade ago, is seen by many whites as the ultimate in White Guilt Repellent… White Guilt is just another ploy in the Great American White Status Struggle, in which minorities are merely props for asserting moral superiority over other whites." This is something we’ve pointed out previously. The last thing that White multiracialists will ever do is treat non-Whites as their equals. As Sailer says, non-Whites are merely props to score points for paternalism. This is why the overwhelming majority of Whites support reverse discrimination. Most of them aren’t hurt by it, and it makes them feel good about themselves. We’ve come a long way from vigilantism in the service of women’s chastity. We’ve come a long way from the days when men’s hearts were filled with stern love. True love for the Negro would entail separating them from their White benefactors and encouraging them to make it on their own. But this is totally unacceptable to the Mrs. Jellybys of the White race because it would rob them of their cause and personal importance.
Elizabeth Wright, our favorite Black woman, agrees with Sailer. She says Whites are always desperate to find the "Good Black," or what is termed the "Magic Negro" in cinema, to assuage the guilt they feel for despising the vast majority of Blacks. Whites "periodically ‘discover’ or invent a Colin Powell out of a determined desire to elevate or enhance the profile of blacks. In this way, they are assured of a reputable black person worthy of their acclaim. Obama is, indeed, this year’s Colin Powell."
Breaking news: White people enjoy being White.
"’For the South being a pure race is wise,’ wrote John Trotwood Moore in endorsement of Ben Tillman’s position on the Negro issue, ‘and it knows that black and White may be mixed to the end of time and never produce anything but yellow. And yellow is now and will be forever the flag of the mongrel.’" ~ Richard Weaver, The Southern Tradition at Bay (HT: Southern Thunder)
Sean Lucas, who did a hack job on R.L. Dabney for his doctoral thesis, and who is an associate of Magic Negro Anthony Bradley, writes: "Presbyterian historiography in the post-World War II era sought to reinforce the denomination’s self-image as a centrist, ‘mainline’ force upholding the best American values, especially moderation, cooperation, and religious liberty. Also key was the way Presbyterian historians reflected the changing ways Americans thought about cultural and ethnic assimilation. Drawing upon sociological analyses that were beginning to question assumptions of anglo-conformity, Presbyterian historians would shift how they talked about assimilation into the church and American culture. In place of older stories of a Presbyterian-Puritan inheritance that would give the Presbyterian church a decidedly Anglo-hue, Presbyterian historians groped toward stories that would emphasize the differences in the way minorities of race, class, and gender experienced the Presbyterian way of faith. The struggle for Presbyterian historiography was to honor the developing pluralistic model for understanding modern American life while still holding on to a center for religious identity and demonstrating Presbyterianism’s value and relevance for Americans." Except that presbyterians are more irrelevant than ever, and the "center" is unable to hold. The liberal churches have gone the way of all flesh. It is they who are schismatic, not we. Andrew Murray, author of Presbyterians and the Negro (1966) predicted that "the role of white denominations, like the Presbyterians, will probably be to identify themselves with the Negro’s struggle for full equality and help him secure full participation in housing, jobs, and education." Here Lucas calls Dabney "controversial," "angry," and a "rank racis[t]." That only tells us that Dabney had far more to say than the pantywaists who have hijacked his church.
Here’s some interesting criticism of Federal Vision theology: "In this religion you become one of God’s people through baptism performed by a priest, and you remain one of God’s people by the participation of weekly sacramental rites offered by a priest. In addition, it is important to have covenant renewal services in which a priest mediates for you, praying on behalf of the congregation to God. You depend on the priests to become saved and you stay saved through their rituals. If they withhold the rituals you are cut off. Thus, sanctification, at its core, is sucking up to the clergy so you can keep getting the sacraments… The operative meaning of ‘good’ seems to be submission to clergy." Kinists are terrible at sucking-up.
By the way, all debates over postmillennialism, Federal Vision theology, postmodernism, supralapsarianism, etc., will only last about 40 more years. After that, the White race will be nearly extinct, and Whites are the only ones who care to debate such things. I’m pretty sure T.D. Jakes has no intention of reading Norman Shepherd or allowing N.T. Wright to speak at his "church." So, you see? Problem solved.
Brian Abshire wrote a good article called "The Christian Mafia," which is must-reading for anyone interested in the "Hell’s Angels" view of submission to clergy. Unfortunately, Abshire also said that the "only cultural difference…between white Europeans and black Africans is 1500 years of Christian history. Two thousand years ago, the English were naked savages, living in mud huts, painting their buttocks blue and eating one another. It was Christianity that made the difference, not skin pigment or eye color." Is Abshire correct? Let’s hear from the Roman historian Tacitus on the Germanic tribes. Keep in mind that he is a White pagan writing about White pagans. When you finish reading, ask yourself if your lying pastor is correct when he says that Whites would act just like Negroes if not for Christianity.
I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion… [The woman] is reminded by the ceremony which inaugurates marriage that she is her husband’s partner in toil and danger, destined to suffer and to dare with him alike both in peace and in war… They even believe that the [female] has a certain sanctity and prescience, and they do not despise their counsels, or make light of their answers… The young men marry late, and their vigor is thus unimpaired. Nor are the maidens hurried into marriage; the same age and a similar stature is required… Their marriage code, however, is strict, and indeed no part of their manners is more praiseworthy. Almost alone among barbarians they are content with one wife… About minor matters the chiefs deliberate, about the more important the whole tribe. Yet even when the final decision rests with the people, the affair is always thoroughly discussed by the chiefs. They assemble…when the multitude think proper, they sit down armed. Silence is proclaimed by the priests, who have on these occasions the right of keeping order. Then the king or the chief…is heard, more because he has influence to persuade than because he has power to command. If his sentiments displease them, they reject them with murmurs; if they are satisfied, they brandish their spears… They choose their kings by birth, their generals for merit. These kings have not unlimited or arbitrary power, and the generals do more by example than by authority. If they are energetic, if they are conspicuous, if they fight in the front, they lead because they are admired… Every mother suckles her own offspring and never entrusts it to servants and nurses. The master is not distinguished from the slave by being brought up with greater delicacy. Both live amid the same flocks and lie on the same ground till the freeborn are distinguished by age and recognized by merit."
Rejecting feminism and spurning contraception go hand in hand. Unless men once again learn how to be men and women learn how to be women, our people are doomed. Read more. Matt Colvin asks, When did college became such an indispensable rite of passage for children "that having too many kids to afford it for each of them is probably a dereliction of parental duty"? "When sex is dissociated from children, it becomes commoditized in the ways that Wendell Berry discusses in his excellent essay, ‘Sex, Economy, Freedom, and Community.’ (To take but one example of this: Go to the supermarket. Pause at the checkout magazine rack. You will see that women’s breasts are primarily construed as ornamental/sexual, to the exclusion of nursing.)"
When will the abuse of children end? And let’s not forget the child abuse of sperm donation. "That was when the emptiness came over me. I realized that I am, in a sense, a freak. I really, truly would never have a dad. I finally understood what it meant to be donor-conceived, and I hated it."
Fathers, you no longer hold legal rights over your families. Just wanted to let you know.
And now for a bit of gratuitous manliness for those of you who have sworn off soy injections:
"This book is dedicated to you." ~ on page 5 of The Purpose Driven Life by Rick Warren
"It’s not about you." ~ on page 17
"Religion always sells, provided it’s soppy enough." ~ George Orwell, Keep the Aspidistra Flying
Wonderful news for homeschoolers!
Ingrid writes: "I have observed that parody sites only come if you are having an impact in some area. In the blog world, when you are parodied, you have arrived." Ain’t that the truth?
NPI’s analysis of the Southern Puberty Lechery Center.
I pulled into a McDonald’s the other day because I had a hankerin’ for a cold slab of fat held together by sodium. At the first window, the woman who took my federal reserve notes called me "honey." At the second window, the woman who gave me my food (and I use that term loosely) called me "sweetie." Do I live in the North, the West, or the South?
And BOOM goes the dynamite!
Thanks for posting the quote from Tacitus…inspiring.
Harry-
Re: the KKK activities in Mt. Airy.
My father has told me stories about how he snuck
down to the big barn on the next farm over one
night, following my grandfather to an emergency
Klan meeting. He hid up in the rafters and
listened to the men plan their night’s action,
which was aimed at a local woman and her
boyfriend who had decided to shack up. This of
course wasn’t setting well with anyone,
especially parents in the community. So they
delivered a message, along with the same warning
Carswell describes: “We’ll be back.”
The boyfriend left town the next day and the
young lady went back to waitressing at the diner.
Wonder if RC Sproul knows about all the good
things the Klan used to do right in his own newly
adopted community? Myself, I wonder how long my
grandfather and his friends would have put up
with any of Sproul’s many shenanigans. I do
believe that the fine men of Bristol would have
had that sawed-off little tyrant on a rail headed
out of town in short order.
That’s fascinating, Weisbrot. I had no idea that the Klan acted as such a stabilizing influence in their communities, which is why I posted that quote. Now fathers have abdicated responsibility over their families, and it doesn’t help to see the link above showing that fathers have been robbed of their legal authority too. So it’s not surprising that there is nothing to prevent White communities from being destroyed. I guess you could say the KKK was the original Promise Keepers – holding their fellow men accountable.
I don’t endorse the Klan, for several reasons, but I’ll take them any day over the spineless, worthless, emasculated fairies who fill the churches these days.
“”Must be a typo.”"!!!–Stop, Harry, you’re killin’ me. Classic!!! More later, I’m still readin’ thru all the good links…
Though my grandma never asked her older brothers about those sheets of theirs in the washer when she was a girl, she did know the local KKK ran a preacher who was “shackin’ up” out of town. (Louisiana, 1920′s)
Well Harry, the first lesson I always have to give people is to distinguish between the first klan (under Forrest) and the current one (which is, I believe, the 5th or 6th one).
The first klan was a most necessary citizen resistance movement to the depradations of the Republicans. We must vigorously defend it.
BTW many people probably don’t know that when in the movie version of Gone with the Wind the men go out to clean up the crime in the shantytown, it is (in Michell’s book) a klan action.
HLS: “I don’t endorse the Klan, for several reasons”
The only thing I can possibly see as a reason not to support the Ku Klux Klan is the high percentage of adherents to the Christian Identity movement. Their platform and their goals are decidedly in favour of supporting European/Christian ideals. Even after perusing their website, I find precious little to which one could object.
My grandmother told me a story about how the local klan gave a man a lesson who was beating his wife by taking him out in the woods one night and tied him to a tree and bullwhipped him. He didn’t hit his wife again. I did not get a time when it happened but I would guess it was in the 1920′s.
These stories are very interesting. I’m sure the old folks could tell a lot of good stories, but they don’t because it’s taboo now.
Thanks for pointing that out, Vittgen. GWTW is the greatest movie ever made, but that is its one flaw. The men who attack Scarlett are White, because even in 1939 it was too politically incorrect to be truthful on that point.
The original Klan was, in some places in the South – especially Tennessee – the only government that existed. I would expect history to repeat itself as the imperial government becomes increasingly unresponsive. Even now, police only show up to do paperwork after crimes have been committed. There is no real crime prevention.
Even in the late 1860s, the Klan’s job was primarily to frighten Blacks into thinking that the Confederate dead had risen from their graves. I wrote about that here:
http://littlegeneva.com/birth.html
There was actually very little bloodshed required because Blacks were especially superstitious then, being so recently removed from Africa. It was known that only fear of retaliation by the spirits could persuade Blacks to be virtuous. Among Blacks, there was no love of virtue itself or hunger to obey the law. They were far closer to voodoo than Christianity, and Whites found nothing else to be so effective as playing off their superstition.
But the reorganized Klan (after Birth of a Nation was released) was sentimental for the Compulsory Union. You can see the flags at the link above. That’s another reason why I don’t like them, but the main reason is that I think their theology is all out of whack.
Plus, the feds have planted at least one mole in every chapter. It’s really nothing more than a men’s club, and a very small one at that, yet an enormous amount of your tax money is spent to watch every move it makes. This is plainly ridiculous. Prosecutors salivate over the thought of imprisoning anyone who belongs to a “hate group,” while they let the true haters and murderers roam the streets. You could add up every crime committed in the last 50 years by every “hate group” in existence, and it wouldn’t be a drop in the ocean compared to what minorities have done.
People get locked into their pet causes, and Morris Disease knows how to profit from it. It’s like Badonicus says. For the last five years, an enormous amount of time and energy and money has been devoted to studying every aspect of 9/11 and its aftermath. About 3,000 people died that day. And since then, many, many times more have been killed by savages, but very few even care.
By the way, speaking of Mt. Airy, NC, that’s where the Andy Griffith show was filmed. If you go there today, you’ll see that Floyd is still cutting hair at the barber shop. He’s about 90 years old. A friend of mine took a picture with him recently.
Bush and Cheney, working on their famous fantastic new Iraq plan:
http://www.raw.at/sub/galerie/images/comix/pinky_and_brain.gif
Yall ever hear of “gettin’ the sticks?” Around here, (in upper Mississippi and over into the Delta), if a feller had been beating his wife, laying out drinking too much, refusing to work and provide for his family or any number of other dishonorable things, the Klan would go by at night and toss a bundle of sticks tied up with twine onto the front porch of his house. However many sticks were in the bundle was exactly how many days the sorry rascal had to quit doing what he’d been doing and commence to doing whatever it was that he had been neglecting to do.
After that alloted period of days had expired, the Klan would come visit again and lay into the feller like hell if he’d not taken the warning to heart and changed his unchristianlike ways.
Working with the dregs of society on a daily basis as I do, I know for a fact that the only way to get a reprobate to develop any semblance of a conscience is through the fear of severely unpleasant consequences. Unfortunately, the consequences threatened by the State arent nearly unpleasant enough these days, and there aint no Klan around here that’s interested in doing more than drinking beer, selling dope, and talking about how much they hate niggers. (If I’m wrong about that I’ll gladly stand corrected, by the way.)
I personally believe that the Klan and all the imagery associated with it is just about as counter-productive for our goal of a unified White Christian nation as is some JBT marching down the street in a Nazi costume, though. I’ll never slight the “Klan gone by” what we have to thank them for, nor will I ever stop looking for and implementing the most effective means that we can use to secure a future for our People. Amen?
I feel the same way, MBR, but it sure would be nice to have men hold each other accountable. This still happens somewhat in churches and other local settings, but the general feeling is that it doesn’t extend beyond that. That’s a result of the pluralism and multiracialism that has overtaken the country. Everyone groups into small cells, and no one any longer feels that there is any way to reclaim the entire (misnamed) community. The difference is that people are now willing to turn a blind eye to injustice, as long as it doesn’t affect them personally. It’s an understandable reaction to fragmentation, but there’s no way for a nation to exist under such conditions.
I’d like to live in a world where criminals (including preachers who preside over interracial marriages) are fearful of the consequences that await them if the police don’t get to them first.
The vengefulness of the post-WWII Jew (no “vengeance is mine, saith the Lord” for him), versus the Christian compassion of a post-WWII Belgian, as noticed by socialist English writer George Orwell:
http://www.george-orwell.org/Revenge_is_Sour/0.html