Focus on the Frankenfamily
Excellent work by our friend James here in noticing that, though Google hates Jesus Christ, it loves fecal weddings. I’m sure it has nothing to do with the company being created by two Jews, because that would be anti-Semitic.
Father’s Day cards are now banned in Scottish schools so that these pretty ladies will not be offended. It’s another case of killing all that was good about the West so that strangers and perverts won’t be excluded. One might think that to the unhinged White person, minorities always supercede the majority, but this is only true when the majority is White and Christian. When the majority is bastardized, which is what led to the Father’s Day card witch hunt, we must attend to their every desire. "Only about 12 out of 100 children are born today to a couple who are legally married and remain so until their children reach majority." That’s an average, so it is far down in the single digits for non-Whites.
The other day, when the dykes got "married" in California, I heard Bill O’Reilly announce that we’ll all lose credibility if we say that God hates sodomy. We need a secular answer instead, because the Constitution is clear that this country and its government are not founded on religion. He went on to say, quite consistent with his twisted view of history, that there were no marriages in the time of the pioneers because no government had yet been established. I’m not exaggerating. His show was about finding a reason why sodomy should be outlawed. Having disregarded God’s law, he had trouble explaining why childless heteros should be given rights that homos do not possess. But by the same token, there is no explanation for why sodomy should be legalized but not polygamy. Some people think theology is hard to grasp, but it’s not nearly as dense as the fog of autonomous man’s illogical rules.
"California Chief Justice Ronald George is prepared for the voters’ verdict on his ruling legalizing same-sex marriages - but whatever comes this autumn, he says it won’t be long before most Californians accept equal rights for gays and lesbians as a matter of course… George drew comparisons to another historic 4-3 ruling 60 years earlier that struck down California’s ban on interracial marriage… ‘I suspect it will not take as long for the public to adjust to the idea of gay marriage as it did to racial equality,’ George said. One reason, he said, is California’s increasing diversity." And he’s right.
We are gathered here today in the sight of Cod to join together this man and beast in a state of Holy Mackerel.
Judeochristian "conservatism" is indeed a death cult.
The faith once delivered to the saints.
Benjamin Franklin, in his "Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind," makes some points that would brand him a Hater and a Racist today, not least for his distinctions between Anglo-Saxons, who he calls "white," and other Europeans, who he calls "tawny." He says language and manners and customs are important to maintain, and so thought must be given to preventing excessive mixture of even ethnic groups. He says the number of white people in the world is proportionally very small (in the 18th century!), and we have a duty to seek the survival and prosperity of our people. "I could wish their Numbers were increased," says the anti-Semite. And in order to increase their numbers, we need what our friend at "Lee in the Mountains" calls "primary social space." Franklin asks why we should darken the people of our country. "[W]hy increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America...?" He concludes with this hate speech which would prevent him from being elected dog catcher today: "But perhaps I am partial to the Complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind." Why do racists always talk about what is natural?
"If all you have to say about the meaning of your country is that it stands for the rule of law, then your country consists of nothing substantive, and you are in despair." Francis Schaeffer said that despair is the defining characteristic of the modern age.
More silliness from the paleocons here, who will write until the cows come home to parse the fine meaning of words. Throughout this piece, Fleming tries to score points against his benighted brethren by calling them bigots, racists, xenophobes, and anti-Semites. Hey, I resemble that remark! At comment 62, he writes, "When I hear young ‘conservatives’ prating about their race or nation, I have to remind myself they are young, marginalized, emasculate young males who will never grow into manhood. It is our greatest national tragedy. Nonetheless, as much as one might pity them – and I do – they have to be prevented from infecting our discourse." Yes, our people would be groveling before their conquerors if not for the high-falutin’ discourse of egghead professors. Fleming’s charm is matched only by the incoherence of Clyde Wilson, who chimes in with this: "’White separatism’ is not separatism at all, or even a form of nationalism. but merely an imaginary, substitute form of militant American nationalism." Fleming adds: "But to a true nationalist or racialist, a son who marries a girl from the wrong race or nation becomes an outcast and his children not members of the family. That is what it means to put ideology above life. Naturally, a sane man wants his grandchildren to look like, act like, and think like his grandparents, but we do not always get everything we want. The question is: What are our priorities. To someone who truly believes in kinship, that is a higher priority than race or nationalism." He goes on to say that racialism is "stupid materialist reductionism" on the order of "the cowardly liberal fusionists of National Review." After someone named Frank tries to inject some common sense into the debate, Fleming retorts (in comment 94) that "a priori racialist assumptions" are irrational and objectionable, "just as I object to communist or premillenialist assumptions being put on the table as truths." He then says that "white racial consciousness" is insane. Frank replies, "It’s perplexing that you continue to identify racial identity with hate." Then Fleming ends by saying that his friend Sam Francis was wrong to be a racial nationalist, for pessimism is our only hope. I’m trying to remember why I no longer subscribe to Chronicles.
"There is some who say that perhaps freedom is not universal. Maybe it’s only Western people that can self-govern. Maybe it’s only, you know, white-guy Methodists who are capable of self-government. I reject that notion." ~ George W. Bush
"[I]t must be acknowledged that the American doctrine of generic ‘White’ identity over against any particular European ethnicity was uniquely crafted by those who by providence were Englishmen. As such, they had in their mother country the unique distinction of being the signal composite nation of Europe: England was originally peopled by the Bretons, a Celtic folk, but it sustained successive invasions by Angles from Denmark, Saxons from Germany and Romans from Italy. Thus comes the term Anglo-Saxon. Though they acknowledged themselves as contiguous with Roman civilization to some degree, and they honored their Celtic heritage, they expressed their identity by its foremost components—Angles and Saxons. But G.K. Chesterton and Abraham Kuyper have both said that Europe really has only three tribes: The Germanic, the Celtic and the Romanic (Italic) in their various communities. (C.S. Lewis agreed with this as well.)… Despite the assertions of modern Liberals, America always knew what, or more precisely, who it intended to be. Our forefathers purposefully controlled immigration in favor of Europeans, especially of the north and the west of the continent and they always regarded it as an impossibility for non-whites to be American citizens. They found this position in keeping with their own ethnic and historic identity in England and they found the scriptures in support of such nationalism, as had the Church from the first century forward. This was so taken for granted that the alternative to it would have struck them as unabashed godlessness."
And then preachers helped to rewrite the history books, which is why this blog by Focus on the Family (soon to be renamed Focus on the Frankenfamily) is promoting the "Miscegenation Mandate" - that any wedding of any kind should be encouraged, except for fecal weddings. It’s un-Christian, and as Ehud shows, it’s un-American, and it will only succeed in destroying the family. But at least Dobson is "focusing" on that which he is destroying.
I’m confused. Is there no such thing as race or is it something to be celebrated? And if it is only to be celebrated for the purpose of "closing the racial gaps" (amalgamation), doesn’t it mean that the goal is to eradicate race? And if something doesn’t exist, how can it be celebrated? Just ask a few questions, and it’s easy to see that a magazine like this is nothing but propaganda, and not very clever propaganda at that. We prefer the Christian route of placing a high value on what God has created.
Many Christians, such as Doug Phillips of the Ministry Mafia, put the word "race" in square quotes because they don’t believe it exists, since everyone came from Adam. More often, they refer to melanin in the epidermis, or some other silly way of referring to race as merely skin color. But their Commie theories never quite add up. For instance, why was there "no looting, no shooting at helicopters, no rapes, and no blame thrown around" in Waverly, Iowa, as there was in New Orleans? "Where are the buses lined up to evacuate people, the relief checks, the FEMA emergency, the around the clock news coverage and the national outcry?" There was so little horror to report (except for natural horror) that even this New York Times article about Iowa is all about New Orleans. Correction: there were a couple of teenagers who broke into an apartment; that’s called an Iowa crime wave. It’s not hard to figure out where your Christian children should be raised, but the point is that the good places are losing to the bad, and the bad places are not bad because of the weather. And Christians are directly responsible for the loss of their own inheritance. It wasn’t stolen from them. (No blaming of Jews here, contrary to what you might think.)
Our own girls, sex slaves, right here in American cities. Christians could have prevented all of this, and this too, but they decided to worship a false god named Equality.
Thirteen percent of the population. (Here’s a visual for you.) Fifty percent of AIDS cases. Sixty-nine percent of gonorrhea cases. Forty-six percent of chlamydia cases. Forty-three percent of syphilis cases. Here’s one who has found some new girlfriends.
From the Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1993, p.290, Table 351: "Each year, some 1.2 million violent crimes involving blacks and whites occur nationwide. In fully 90 percent of those cases, according to U.S. Justice Department figures, the perpetrators are black and the victims are white. Violent white felons choose black victims for fewer than 3 percent of their attacks, whereas violent black felons choose white victims about 56 percent of the time. Statistically, the ‘average’ African American is an astonishing 56 times more likely to attack a white than vice versa. In 1988 there were nine reported incidents of black women being raped by white men. In the same year there were 9,400 reported cases of white women being raped by black men. In 1991 there were 94 reported cases of white on black rape, but 20,016 reported cases of white women being raped by black men." And now rapes of White women have grown to about 40,000 per year. Gang rape is another interesting category because there are statistically zero White-on-black gang rapes. If you point out these statistics to Christians, they will invariably ask why you are not distressed about rape in general. They have been trained to excise their racial loyalty completely and will eventually get to the point where they are no more anguished about the rape of their own daughters than of the women in Darfur, where rape is a way of life.
More things that you racists are guilty of inflicting on the poor.
Julius Caesar Watts, who was once the Great Black Hope of colorblind conservatives, is hard at work building a discriminatory TV network.
In Obama’s book, Dreams of My Sperm Donor, he writes: "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race… I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites." And now he’s advertising it full tilt in his commercials about having "values" straight from the Kansas heartland.
Obamination is playing up his Kansas roots even though his whore-mother "angrily refused to attend her Indonesian second husband’s business dinners with Americans because, as she shouted, ’They are not my people.’"
A G.I. Buddha action figure to go along with a locket from the monkey god.
"When asked in an interview what sin is, Obama defined it as ‘Being out of alignment with my values.’ Apparently, the editor failed to capitalize the ‘M’ in ‘my.’"
Funny how race matters so much to black "conservatives" that they’ll vote for liberal Obama.
This is the ultimate whiter-people story: they’ve all adopted "Hussein" as their middle names. But this is especially disturbing: "Dan O’Maley of Washington, D.C., jiggered his e-mail account so his name would appear as ‘D. Hussein O’Maley.’" There should be no respect given to hate speech and slurs like "jiggered" in the year 2008!
And now, Judy Garland in blackface, looking like a character in a Warner Brothers cartoon who had a bomb blow up in his face.
New slurs for White people. I’m partial to "Altoids." Maybe we can stage a funeral later for each of these words and get violent when we hear them uttered. I’ll say that my dignity as a human being has been robbed by being called a Saltine, and you can make some signs with big letters for us to carry around the new MLK memorial in Washington. It’ll be fabulous.
Thomas Sowell argues that White liberals seek black "mascots" solely for purposes of self-aggrandizement. We’ve observed this many times ourselves. And Auster makes a good point about our post-Christian leaders, like Jorge Bush, always assuming that liberals and Islamists use their respective religions to cover for their own crass self-interest. This failure in judgment leads to numerous policy failures, because in fact religious people really do believe in their religions!
Things that will destroy us: Politics without principle; pleasure without conscience; wealth without work; knowledge without character; business without morality; science without humanity; and worship without sacrifice.
We Kinists desire not only dignity for Whites but dignity for all races. This quote from Booker T. Washington, found at Kinism.net, is very much to the point: "Friction between the races will pass away in proportion as the black man, by reason of his skill, intelligence, and character, can produce something that the white man wants or respects in the commercial world." This has never happened, but it would be a very good thing if it did.
"To desire the construction of something is to desire the destruction of whatever prevents its construction," said G.K. Chesterton. An interesting thought in light of the discrimination against Whites that is always intended to redress what is perceived as discrimination against blacks.
"Human beings have a knack for hating. Tamils and Sinhalese slit each others’ throats in Sri Lanka; Shiites and Sunnis blow each other up in Iraq. Yes, they would probably tell you their enemies are stupid. But they have a hundred other primitive, tribal, and far more visceral reasons for killing each other. People do not hate each other because of overlapping Bell Curves… For all of us, a basic stage in growing up is the realization that if we lose a race, it is because we ran slower, not because someone cheated. Sooner or later, all of us come to terms with the fact that we are not the smartest, best-looking, most musical person on earth (Bill Clinton may be an exception). We accept our limitations, and make the best of them. But according to the ‘noble fiction,’ blacks are never allowed to grow up. If they lost the race it was only because they were cheated. We tell them that if they are behind as a group, it is never their responsibility. It is because—and only because—whitey hates them and holds them down. If our goal were to teach blacks to hate white people, it would be hard to think of a better way to do it (along, of course, with constant reminders of slavery, lynching, and Jim Crow). According to the ‘noble fiction,’ the measure of black failure is the precise measure of white viciousness, and that gives blacks an inexhaustible reservoir of bitterness."
The world is united in one thing - opposition to immigration.
Suddenly the conquistadors are good and noble?
Why hospitals are going bankrupt.
The motto of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference is "Empowering the Hispanic Church, Engaging the Hispanic Vision and Enriching the Hispanic Dream." Notice, in this article, how "Christian" ministries are eager to cozy up to this, and notice further that liberal ideological buzzwords like "vision" and "dream" are used for what is clearly a defense of blood. White Americans don’t know how to process this because they’ve been indoctrinated to deny their own self-interests for well over a generation. Having been stripped of their humanity, they wonder why the foreigners they’ve invited to take their inheritance are not similarly enthused with being inhuman. But some Whites are catching on to what is happening, and the writer of this article foresees a day rapidly approaching when "no one will be illegal anymore, when the United States, Mexico, and Canada are merged into a broader hemispheric union where Mexican corruption will pervade, Canadian anti-hate speech tribunals will reign supreme, and America’s constitutional liberties will have been flushed down the sewer pipe like last night’s half-digested refried beans." That’s equality for you.
According to the State Department’s "Office of Global Anti-Semitism," even if you unintentionally offend a Chosenite, you’re still an anti-Semite. As Martin Luther once said, God and all the angels must dance even when a Jew farts. "To avoid assisting Israel’s enemies, the state department recommends that every comment about Israel (including its leaders and military) first be scrutinized for whether it could put Israel in a bad light… What if you defy the government and go ahead and speak truthful criticisms of Israel, knowing that Israel’s detractors will probably use it against her? According the Office of Global Anti-Semitism, one who assists anti-Semites is an anti-Semite… The State Department says that if Christians believe the New Testament account that Jewish leaders had Christ crucified they are the very worst kind of anti-Semites: ‘classical’ anti-Semites. That’s what Hitler was (see Contemporary Global Anti-Semitism: A Report Provided to the United States Congress, page 5). To please both Jews and the government, evangelicals must now fulfill two criteria: Never say true but unflattering things about Israel and abandon belief in the New Testament."
"We’re in an era when there’s not much you can reveal about your behavior that can get you into trouble, but there’s plenty of danger in speaking your mind honestly." ~ Steve Sailer
Here are some unfortunate questions that only a hater would ask. Why were the Nazis evil for killing women and children, but the British were heroes for doing so? Why were the Nazis hanged for war crimes, but Churchill’s genocidal "bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts," in his own words, was lauded?
The central thesis of Pat Buchanan’s latest book: "The Brits kicked away their empire. Through colossal blunders, Britain twice declared war on a Germany that had not attacked her and did not want war with her, fought for 10 bloody years and lost it all… The British Empire fought, bled and died, and made Eastern and Central Europe safe for Stalinism."
The boat the Jews couldn’t sink.
Mark Steyn will be fined by the Canadian Human Rights tribunal for "hate speech," not based on standards of jurisprudence found in any other court, but based on hearsay, innuendo, and anonymous comments on blogs. It is much the same for Brigitte Bardot, who has been fined in France for voicing the belief that Muslims are destroying Europe. How very Christian of her. And to a much lesser degree, it is the same for our Kinist friends in America, who have paid a price for thinking and writing, and have even had to pay for what they have not thought and written. It is a strange turn of events when Christians will sacrifice to evangelize the most vile of sinners but will gossip and bear false witness against brothers in Christ over theological disagreements, and applaud when they are driven to financial destitution. We have seen it with our own eyes, and if not for the grace of Christ keeping our hearts and minds on him, we would have fallen from the faith long ago.
"Naturally, white people do not get offended by statements directed at white people. In fact, they don’t even have a problem making offensive statements about other white people (ask a white person about flyover states). As a rule, white people strongly prefer to get offended on behalf of other people."
"In order for white people to streamline the process of knowing everything, all human beings can be neatly filed into one of two categories: People I Agree With, and People Who are Just Like Adolf Hitler. Comparing people to Hitler is an easy way for white people to get a strong point across to the less enlightened, or the insufficiently white."
What is a species? The question is not as easy to answer as you might think. "’There is no general agreement among biologists on what species are,’ says Jonathon Marshall, a biologist at Southern Utah University. At last count, there were at least 26 published concepts in circulation." Wolves and coyotes form a genetic canine soup, kind of like Brazilians, the leadership of the NAAHYP, and Barack Obama’s pastor. And please notice, if you will, that though there is tremendous concern and big money spent to preserve animal and plant species, no matter how insignificant, there is equal zeal for obliterating the White race. Darwin considered the classification of species to be arbitrary since he believed one species evolved into another. For instance, in the words of one Darwinist, "Humans, giraffes and bats all descend from ancient mammals, and as a result they all have hair and milk." Steve Sailer is a Darwinist who defines race as a "partly inbred extended family," and insists that race is not the same thing as species. But his definition of race is matched by this definition of species from the first article: "Many researchers find that the best way to think of a species is as a population whose members breed mostly among themselves, making the group genetically distinct from other species." Thus, it is quite accurate to think of the races of humankind as species, or subspecies if you will.
To the Darwinist, "Sin is making a wrong choice," which also fits with Barack Obama’s definition of sin (see above), and "man’s fall from grace was a result of his evolutionary transition from instinct to learned behavior." This article contains some awe-inspiring balderdash, but it’s interesting that even the Darwinist can detect the story of generational separation in the book of Genesis, and that these shepherds, who gave as much care to the breed of their animals as a farmer gives to the breed of his grain, knew that they had to pass similar knowledge and customs and pure blood to future generations - and so a people was born.
Why Darwinism has nothing to do with science. And be sure to read about the completely untestable and unfalsifiable "multiverse" theory being embraced by pseudo-scientists as the latest attempt to erase the existence of God.
"The banality of evil is a fitting epitaph for Tim Russert. He calmly, with a good-natured grin, supported Satanism. In stark contrast to Tim Russert is Paul Hill. It’s been nearly five years now since he was executed for killing a state-sanctioned mass murderer. ‘You won’t kill any more babies,’ he told the executioner before killing him. There was no appeal for clemency by Pope John Paul II, who routinely begged for clemency for child molesters, when Paul Hill was tried. There were no media representatives at his funeral to talk about what a fine man he was. But there is a higher court than the U.S. Court, and in that court Paul Hill is honored and revered."
Just after Dick Cheney called West Virginian Whites inbred and Andrea Mitchell called southwest Virginian Whites rednecks, Gwen Ifill was the token Negro on the memorial tribute show for Tim Russert, and a big deal was made about how brave she was for confronting Russert on the air for not speaking out against the "racism" of Don Imus. But then Russert’s friend Imus received kind words twice before the end of the show. And speaking of Russert, on his tribute show and in almost all other media coverage of his career, he was lauded as a giant of journalism for grilling David Duke about Louisiana’s largest employers. George Bush probably still doesn’t know the country’s largest employers. What, you expected Russert to match wits with Duke on the subject of race? Go ask Wolf Blitzer how that feels.
This is so funny. Learn what a neg-red is.
Unfortunately, our posts from now on will be seldom, sparse, and probably not very interesting. Harry has been editing American Renaissance videos, and we now have similar work developing that involves Twitter and video distribution. Blogging is so 1998! Just kidding. It’s still very important, but we’re diversifying.